Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Mapping Our Heritage: Towards a Sustainable Future for Digital Spatial Information and Technologies in European Archaeological Heritage Management Cover

Mapping Our Heritage: Towards a Sustainable Future for Digital Spatial Information and Technologies in European Archaeological Heritage Management

Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology
Volume 2 (2019): Issue 1
By: Peter McKeague,  Rein van‘t Veer,  Isto Huvila,  Anne Moreau,  Philip Verhagen,  Loup Bernard,  Anwen Cooper,  Chris Green and  Niels van Manen  
Open Access
|Jun 2019

References

  1. 1 Antoniou, G and van Harmelen, F. 2004. A semantic web primer. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
    Back to article
  2. 2 ArchAIDE. 2019. Archeo revolution is coming. Available at http://www.archaide.eu/ [Last accessed 20 April 2019].
    Back to article
  3. 3 ARIADNE. 2019a. ARIADNE Portal. Available at http://www.ariadne-infrastructure.eu/Portal [Last accessed 20 April 2019].
    Back to article
  4. 4 ARIADNE. 2019b. Loir-et-Cher, Blois, 13bis rue des Ponts-Chartrains and rue de Boulogne: diagnostic report. Available at http://ariadne2.isti.cnr.it/index.php/page/25109297 [Last accessed 20 April 2019].
    Back to article
  5. 5 ArkeoGIS. 2019. ArkeoGIS: sharing & quering of spacialized data about the past. Available at http://arkeogis.org/en [Last accessed 20 April 2019].
    Back to article
  6. 6 ARKWORK. 2019. About Arkwork. Available at https://www.arkwork.eu/ [Last accessed 20 April 2019].
    Back to article
  7. 7 Berners-Lee, T, Hendler, J and Lassila, O. 2001. The Semantic Web. Scientific American 284(5): 34–43. DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican0501-34
    Back to article
  8. 8 Binding, C, Charno, M, Jeffrey, S, May, K and Tudhope, D. 2015. Template Based Semantic Integration: From Legacy Archaeological Datasets to Linked Data. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems 11(1): 1–29. DOI: 10.4018/IJSWIS.2015010101
    Back to article
  9. 9 Boasson, W and Visser, RM. 2017. SIKB0102: Synchronizing Excavation Data for Preservation and Re-Use. Studies in Digital Heritage 1(2): 206–224. DOI: 10.14434/sdh.v1i2.23262
    Back to article
  10. 10 Bowker, GC and Star, SL. 1999. Sorting Things out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Back to article
  11. 11 British Museum and Amgueddfa Cymru - National Museum Wales. 2019. Portable Antiquities Scheme. Available at https://finds.org.uk/ [Last accessed 20 April 2019].
    Back to article
  12. 12 Buckland, PI and Eriksson, EJ. 2014. Strategic Environmental Archaeology Database (SEAD). In: Smith, C (Ed) Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. New York: Springer, pp. 7076–7085. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_833
    Back to article
  13. 13 CAA. 2019. About CAA. Available at https://caa-international.org/about/ [Last accessed 20 April 2019].
    Back to article
  14. 14 Canmore. 2019. Canmore National Record of the Historic Environment Available at https://canmore.org.uk/ [Last accessed 17 May 2019].
    Back to article
  15. 15 CARARE. 2019. CARARE association. Available at http://www.carare.eu/about/ [Last accessed 20 April 2019].
    Back to article
  16. 16 ChasseoLab. 2019. ChasseoLab. Available at http://chasseolab.huma-num.fr/ [Last accessed 20 April 2019].
    Back to article
  17. 17 Conolly, J and Lake, M. 2006. Geographical Information Systems in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511807459
    Back to article
  18. 18 Cooper, A and Green, C. 2016. Embracing the Complexities of ‘Big Data’ in Archaeology: The Case of the English Landscape and Identities Project. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 23(1): 271–304. DOI: 10.1007/s10816-015-9240-4
    Back to article
  19. 19 Council of Europe. 1992. European Convention on the Protection of the Archaeological Heritage (Revised). European Treaty Series 143. Available at: https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/143 [Last accessed 31 March 2019].
    Back to article
  20. 20 CReAAH. 2019. Archaeology, Littoral and Terrestrial Heating ALERT. Available at https://alert-archeo.org/ [Last accessed 20 April 2019].
    Back to article
  21. 21 Crema, ER. 2012. Modelling Temporal Uncertainty in Archaeological Analysis. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 19(3): 440–61. DOI: 10.1007/s10816-011-9122-3
    Back to article
  22. 22 CRM-EH. 2019. CRM-EH - English Heritage extensions to CIDOC CRM for the archaeological domain. Available at http://purl.org/crmeh [Last accessed 20 April 2019].
    Back to article
  23. 23 Cuca, B, Oreni, D and Brumana, R. 2012. Digital Cartographic Heritage in Service to the Society: Landscape Analysis for Informed Decision Making. In 18th International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia, VSMM 2012, Milan, Italy, September 2–5, 2012, pp. 499–506. IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/VSMM.2012.6365964
    Back to article
  24. 24 Data FAIRport. 2019. Find Access Interoperate Re-use Data. Available at http://www.datafairport.org/ [Last accessed 20 April 2019].
    Back to article
  25. 25 Demoule, J-P. 2012. Rescue Archaeology: A European View. Annual Review of Anthropology 41: 611–626. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145854
    Back to article
  26. 26 Dhonju, HK, Xiao, W, Shakya, B, Mills, JP and Sarhosis, V. 2017. Documentation of Heritage Structures through Geo-Crowdsourcing and Web Mapping. In ISPRS Geospatial Week 2017, 18–22 September 2017, Wuhan, China. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLII-2/W7, pp. 17–21. ISPRS. DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-17-20
    Back to article
  27. 27 Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. 2015. Getting Cultural Heritage to Work for Europe: Report of the Horizon 2020 Expert Group on Cultural Heritage. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available at http://openarchive.icomos.org/1693/ [Last accessed 31 March 2019].
    Back to article
  28. 28 Doerr, M. 2003. The CIDOC Conceptual Reference Module: An Ontological Approach to Semantic Interoperability of Metadata. AI Magazine 24(3): 75–92. DOI: 10.1609/aimag.v24i3.1720
    Back to article
  29. 29 EAA. 2019. 271. Mapping our heritage. towards a sustainable future for digital spatial information and technologies in archaeological heritage management. Available at https://www.e-a-a.org/EAA/Conferences/Filmed_conference_sessions/Maastricht_2017/Session_271/EAA/Navigation_conferences/2017_videos/Session_271.aspx? [Last accessed 20 April 2019].
    Back to article
  30. 30 Eiteljorg, H, II. 1995. The Archaeological Data Archive Project. In Huggett, J and Ryan, N (Eds.) CAA94. Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology 1994. BAR International Series 600. Oxford: Tempus Reparatum, pp. 245–248.
    Back to article
  31. 31 ESRI. 2016. Spatial Data Infrastructure: A Collaborative Network. Redlands (CA): ESRI. Available at: http://www.esri.com/library/brochures/pdfs/spatial-data-infrastructure.pdf [Last accessed 31 March 2019].
    Back to article
  32. 32 Europae Archaeologia Consilium. 2015. Amersfoort Agenda – Setting the Agenda for the Future of Archaeological Heritage Management in Europe. In: Schut, PAC, Scharff, D and de Wit, L (Eds.) Setting the Agenda: Giving New Meaning to the European Archaeological Heritage. Proceedings of the International Conference Amersfoort, The Netherlands, 20–22 March 2014. EAC Occasional Paper 10. Budapest: Archaeolingua, pp. 15–23.
    Back to article
  33. 33 Europeana Foundation. 2019. Europeana Collections. Available at https://www.europeana.eu [Last accessed 20 April 2019].
    Back to article
  34. 34 European Commission. 2019. INSPIRE Knowledge Base. Infrastructure for spatial information in Europe. Available at https://inspire.ec.europa.eu/ [Last accessed 20 April 2019].
    Back to article
  35. 35 Geonovum. 2019. De verbindende kracht van standaardisatie Vindbare, toegankelijke, uitwisselbare geo-informatie. Available at https://www.geonovum.nl/ [Last accessed 20 April 2019].
    Back to article
  36. 36 Gilissen, V and Hollander, H. 2017. Archiving the Past While Keeping up with the Times. Studies in Digital Heritage 1(2): 194–205. DOI: 10.14434/sdh.v1i2.23238
    Back to article
  37. 37 González-Tennant, E. 2016. Recent Directions and Future Developments in Geographic Information Systems for Historical Archaeology. Historical Archaeology 50(3): 24–49. DOI: 10.1007/BF03377332
    Back to article
  38. 38 Goodfellow, I, Bengio, Y and Courville, A. 2016. Deep Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Back to article
  39. 39 Gov.UK. 2019. Geospatial Commission. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/geospatial-commission [Last accessed 20 April 2019].
    Back to article
  40. 40 Green, C. 2011. Winding Dali’s Clock: The Construction of a Fuzzy Temporal-GIS for Archaeology. BAR International Series 2234. Oxford: Archaeopress.
    Back to article
  41. 41 Green, C. 2012. Archaeology in Broad Strokes: Collating Data for England from 1500 BC to AD 1086. In Earl, G, Sly, T, Chrysanthi, A, Murrieta-Flores, P, Papadopoulos, C, Romanowska, I and Wheatley, D (Eds.) Archaeology in the Digital Era: Papers from the 40th Annual Conference of Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA), Southampton, 26–29 March 2012. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 307–312. DOI: 10.1515/9789048519590-033
    Back to article
  42. 42 Hiebel, G, Doerr, M and Eide, Ø. 2017. CRMgeo: A Spatiotemporal Extension of CIDOC-CRM. International Journal on Digital Libraries 18(4): 271–279. DOI: 10.1007/s00799-016-0192-4
    Back to article
  43. 43 Hörr, C, Lindinger, E and Brunnett, G. 2014. Machine Learning Based Typology Development in Archaeology. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 7(1): 2: 1–2: 23. DOI: 10.1145/2533988
    Back to article
  44. 44 Huggett, J and Ross, S. 2004. Archaeological Informatics: Beyond Technology. Internet Archaeology 15. DOI: 10.11141/ia.15.13
    Back to article
  45. 45 Huvila, I. 2016. Awkwardness of Becoming a Boundary Object: Mangle and Materialities of Reports, Documentation Data and the Archaeological Work. The Information Society 32(4): 280–297. DOI: 10.1080/01972243.2016.1177763
    Back to article
  46. 46 Huvila, I. 2017. Land Developers and Archaeological Information. Open Information Science 1(1):71–90. DOI: 10.1515/opis-2017-0006
    Back to article
  47. 47 IANUS. 2019. IANUS – Forschungsdatenzentrum Archäologie & Altertumswissenschaften. Available at https://www.ianus-fdz.de/ [Last accessed 20 April 2019].
    Back to article
  48. 48 ICOM CIDOC. 2019a. CIDOC CRM Conceptual Reference Model. Available at http://www.cidoc-crm.org/ [Last accessed 20 April 2019].
    Back to article
  49. 49 ICOM CIDOC. 2019b. CRMgeo Spatiotemporal model. Available at http://www.cidoc-crm.org/crmgeo/ [Last accessed 20 April 2019].
    Back to article
  50. 50 ICOM CIDOC. 2019c. CRMarchaeo Excavation model. Available at http://www.cidoc-crm.org/crmarchaeo/ [Last accessed 20 April 2019].
    Back to article
  51. 51 INRAP. 2019. Dolia. Catalog of documentary collections and digital library of Inrap. Available at http://dolia.inrap.fr/flora/ark:/12345/0131064 [Last accessed 20 April 2019].
    Back to article
  52. 52 Jackson, I. 2007. OneGeology – Making geological map data for the earth accessible. Episodes 30(1): 60–61.
    Back to article
  53. 53 Kintigh, K. 2006. The Promise and Challenge of Archaeological Data Integration. American Antiquity 71(3): 567–78. DOI: 10.1017/S0002731600039810
    Back to article
  54. 54 Kleijn, M, de van Manen, N, Kolen, J and Scholten, H. 2014. Towards a User-Centric SDI Framework for Historical and Heritage European Landscape Research. IJSDIR 9: 1–35. DOI: 10.2902/1725-0463.2014.09.art1
    Back to article
  55. 55 Kuna, M. 2002. The Archaeological Record of Bohemia: An Attempt at an Analytical Information System. In: García Sanjuán, L and Wheatley, DW (Eds.) Mapping the Future of the Past: Managing the Spatial Dimension of the European Archaeological Resource. Sevilla: Universidad De Sevilla, pp. 45–52.
    Back to article
  56. 56 Limp, WF. 2000. Geographic Information Systems in Historic Preservation. In: Williamson, RA and Nickens, PR (Eds.) Science and Technology in Historic Preservation. Boston: Springer, pp. 231–247. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-4145-5_10
    Back to article
  57. 57 Lock, G. 2003. Using Computers in Archaeology: Towards Virtual Pasts. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203451076
    Back to article
  58. 58 Lock, G and Stančič, Z. (Eds.). 1995. GIS and Archaeology: A European Perspective. London: Taylor and Francis.
    Back to article
  59. 59 Löwenborg, D. 2014. Recuperating GIS Data from Excavations: On the Use, or Lack of Use, of Digital Archaeological Information. In: Huvila, I (Ed.) Perspectives to Archaeological Information in the Digital Society. Uppsala: Department of ALM, Uppsala University, pp. 11–23.
    Back to article
  60. 60 Löwenborg, D. 2018. Knowledge production with data from archaeological excavations. In: Huvila, I (Ed.) Archaeology and Archaeological Information in the Digital Society. London: Routledge, pp. 37–52. DOI: 10.4324/9781315225272
    Back to article
  61. 61 Maaten, L, van der Boon, B, Lange, G, Paijmans, H and Postma, E. 2007. Computer Vision and Machine Learning for Archaeology. In: Clark, JT and Hagemeister, EM (Eds.) Digital Discovery. Exploring New Frontiers in Human Heritage. CAA2006. Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Proceedings of the 34th Conference, Fargo, United States, April 2006. Budapest: Archaeolingua, CD-ROM 476-482.
    Back to article
  62. 62 McKeague, P, Corns, A and Posluschny, A. 2017. Why the Historic Environment Needs a Spatial Data Infrastructure. Internet Archaeology 43(7). DOI: 10.11141/ia.43.7
    Back to article
  63. 63 McKeague, P, Corns, A and Shaw, R. 2012. Developing a Spatial Data Infrastructure for Archaeological and Built Heritage. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research 7: 38–65.
    Back to article
  64. 64 Meyer, É, Grussenmeyer, P, Perrin, J-P, Durand, A and Drap, P. 2007. A Web Information System for the Management and the Dissemination of Cultural Heritage Data. Journal of Cultural Heritage 8(4): 396–411. DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2007.07.003
    Back to article
  65. 65 MOLA. 2019. Citizan. Available at https://citizan.org.uk/ [Last accessed 20 April 2019].
    Back to article
  66. 66 Nazari, M. 2011. A Contextual Model of Information Literacy. Journal of Information Science 37(4): 345–359. DOI: 10.1177/0165551511403544
    Back to article
  67. 67 Nicolucci, F. 2017. Documenting Archaeological Science with CIDOC CRM. International Journal on Digital Libraries 18(3): 223–231. DOI: 10.1007/s00799-016-0199-x
    Back to article
  68. 68 Niedziółka, K. 2016. The Prospect of Digitization of Polish Archaeological Record on an Example of Materials from the Turn of Bronze and Iron Age from the Area of Pomeranian Voivodeship (Northern Poland). Sprawozdania Archeologiczne 68: 121–44. DOI: 10.23858/SA68.2016.007
    Back to article
  69. 69 Norman, P and Sohlenius, R. 2009. ASIS – More than a Register of Ancient Monuments. In: Schut, P A C (Ed.) Listing Archaeological Sites, Protecting the Historical Landscape. EAC Occasional Paper no 3. Brussels: EAC, pp. 83–86.
    Back to article
  70. 70 OGC. 2019a. Welcome to The Open Geospatial Consortium. Available at http://www.opengeospatial.org/ [Last accessed 20 April 2019].
    Back to article
  71. 71 OGC. 2019b. GeoSPARQL - A Geographic Query Language for RDF Data. Available at http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/geosparql [Last accessed 20 April 2019].
    Back to article
  72. 72 Oikarinen, T and Kortelainen, T. 2013. Challenges of Diversity, Consistency, and Globality in Indexing of Local Archeological Artifacts. Knowledge Organization 40(2): 123–135. DOI: 10.5771/0943-7444-2013-2-123
    Back to article
  73. 73 One Geology. 2019. OneGeology, what’s it all about? Available at http://www.onegeology.org/home.html [Last accessed 20 April 2019].
    Back to article
  74. 74 Oonk, S and Spijker, J. 2015. A Supervised Machine-Learning Approach towards Geochemical Predictive Modelling in Archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Science 59: 80–88. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2015.04.002
    Back to article
  75. 75 Open Data Charter. 2019. Who we are. Available at https://opendatacharter.net/ [Last accessed 20 April 2019].
    Back to article
  76. 76 PAN. 2019. Portable Antiquities of the Netherlands project. Available at https://www.portable-antiquities.nl/ [Last accessed 20 April 2019].
    Back to article
  77. 77 Pelagios commons. 2019. Pelagios commons. Available at http://commons.pelagios.org/ [Last accessed 20 April 2019].
    Back to article
  78. 78 PeriodO. A gazetteer of period definitions for linking and visualizing data. Available at http://perio.do/en/ [Last accessed 20 April 2019].
    Back to article
  79. 79 Perry, M and Herring, J. 2012. OGC GeoSPARQL – A Geographic Query Language for RDF Data. OGC 11-052r4. Open Geospatial Consortium. Available at: http://www.opengis.net/doc/IS/geosparql/1.0 [Last accessed 31 March 2019].
    Back to article
  80. 80 PLEADE. 2019. Pleade a complete, free and Open Source solution for heritage valorization. Available at http://pleade.com/ [Last accessed 20 April 2019].
    Back to article
  81. 81 Rabinowitz, A, Shaw, R, Buchanan, S, Golden, P and Kansa, E. 2016. Making Sense of the Ways We Make Sense of the Past: The PeriodO Project. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 59(2): 42–55. DOI: 10.1111/j.2041-5370.2016.12037.x
    Back to article
  82. 82 Rajala, U. 2004. Sense and Sensibility – Reflections on the Epistemology and Ontology of GIS Studies. Internet Archaeology 16. DOI: 10.11141/ia.16.2
    Back to article
  83. 83 Richards, JD. 2002. Digital Preservation and Access. European Journal of Archaeology 5(3): 343–366. DOI: 10.1177/146195702761692347
    Back to article
  84. 84 Roorda, IM and Wiemer, R. 1991. Towards a New Archaeological Information System in The Netherlands. In: Lock, G and Moffett, J (Eds.) CAA91. Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology 1991. BAR International Series S577. Oxford: Tempus Reparatum, pp. 85–88.
    Back to article
  85. 85 Scape Trust. 2019. Scotland’s Coastal Heritage at Risk. Available at http://scharp.co.uk/ [Last accessed 20 April 2019].
    Back to article
  86. 86 Schweizerische Eidgenossenschaft. 2019. Patrimoine pour tous / Kulturerbe für alle / Patrimonio per tutti. Available at https://kulturerbefueralle.ch/ [Last accessed 20 April 2019].
    Back to article
  87. 87 Seitsonen, O. 2017. Crowdsourcing Cultural Heritage: Public Participation and Conflict Legacy in Finland. Journal of Community Archaeology & Heritage 4(2): 115–30. DOI: 10.1080/20518196.2016.1252129
    Back to article
  88. 88 Shaw, R, Corns, A and McAuley, J. 2009. Archiving Archaeological Spatial Data: Standards and Metadata. In: Online Proceedings Computer Applications to Archaeology 2009 Williamsburg, Virginia, USA. March 22–26, 2009, Williamsburg (VA), pp. 1–15. Available at http://archive.caaconference.org/2009/articles/Shaw_Contribution187_c%20(1).pdf [Last accessed 31 March 2019].
    Back to article
  89. 89 Sohlenius, R. 2014. Förstudie FMIS-Processen [Prestudy of FMIS Process]. Stockholm: RAÄ.
    Back to article
  90. 90 UN-GGIM. 2018. Integrated Geospatial Information Framework. A Strategic Guide to Develop and Strengthen National Geospatial Information Management. Part 1: Overarching Strategic Framework. Available at http://ggim.un.org/meetings/GGIM-committee/8th-Session/documents/Part%201-IGIF-Overarching-Strategic-Framework-24July2018.pdf [Last accessed 31 March 2019].
    Back to article
  91. 91 Valenti, M and Nardini, A. 2004. Modello Dei Dati e Trattamento Del Dato Sul GIS Di Scavo. Archeologia e Calcolatori 15: 341–358. Available at http://www.archcalc.cnr.it/indice/PDF15/20_Valenti.pdf [Last accessed 31 March 2019].
    Back to article
  92. 92 van’t Veer, R, Bloem, P and Folmer, E. 2018. Deep Learning for Classification Tasks on Geospatial Vector Polygons. arXiv: 1806.03857. Available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.03857 [Last accessed 31 March 2019].
    Back to article
  93. 93 Verhagen, P, Vossen, I, Groenhuijzen, MR and Joyce, J. 2016. Now You See Them, Now You Don’t: Defining and Using a Flexible Chronology of Sites for Spatial Analysis of Roman Settlement in the Dutch River Area. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 10: 309–21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.10.006
    Back to article
  94. 94 Verschoof-van der Vaart, WB and Lambers, K. 2019. Learning to Look at LiDAR: The Use of R-CNN in the Automated Detection of Archaeological Objects in LiDAR Data from the Netherlands. Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology 2(1): 31–40. DOI: 10.5334/jcaa.32
    Back to article
  95. 95 Wilcke, WX, de Boer, V and van Harmelen, FAH. 2017. User-Driven Pattern Mining on Knowledge Graphs: An Archaeological Case Study. In: Duivesteijn, W, Pechenizkiy, M, Fletcher, G H L, Menkovski, V, Postma, EJ, Vanschoren, J and van der Putten, P (Eds.) Benelearn 2017: Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Benelux Conference on Machine Learning, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, 9–10 June 2017. Eindhoven: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, pp. 137–39. Available at https://pure.tue.nl/ws/files/72619856/benelearn_2017.pdf [Last accessed 31 March 2019].
    Back to article
  96. 96 Willems, WJH. 1997. Archaeological Heritage Management in the Netherlands: Past, Present and Future. In: Willems, W J H, Kars, H and Hallewas, DP (Eds.) Archaeological Heritage Management in the Netherlands – Fifty Years State Service for Archaeological Investigations. Amersfoort: ROB, pp. 3–34.
    Back to article
  97. 97 Willems, WJH. 2000. The Management of the Archaeological Heritage in the Netherlands. Archeologia Polona 38: 153–168.
    Back to article
  98. 98 Wise, A and Richards, J. 1999. Digital Preservation in Archaeology. In: Dingwall, L, Exon, S, Gaffney, V, Laflin, S and van Leusen, M (Eds.) Archaeology in the Age of the Internet. CAA97. Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Proceedings of the 25th Anniversary Conference, University of Birmingham, April 1997. BAR International Series 750. Oxford: Tempus Reparatum, pp. 137–144.
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jcaa.23 | Journal eISSN: 2514-8362
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Dec 3, 2018
Accepted on: Apr 17, 2019
Published on: Jun 7, 2019
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
spatial technology,
digital archaeological data,
heritage management,
sustainability

© 2019 Peter McKeague, Rein van‘t Veer, Isto Huvila, Anne Moreau, Philip Verhagen, Loup Bernard, Anwen Cooper, Chris Green, Niels van Manen, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 2 (2019): Issue 1Next article