Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Digital Workflow of the Cultural Heritage Response Unit (CHRU) Cover

The Digital Workflow of the Cultural Heritage Response Unit (CHRU)

Open Access
|Mar 2026

References

  1. Argyrou, A and Agapiou, A. 2022. ‘A review of artificial intelligence and remote sensing for archaeological research’. Remote Sensing, 14(23): 6000. DOI: 10.3390/rs14236000
  2. Anderson, MA. 2020. ‘Structure from Motion and Archaeological Excavation: Experiences of the Via Consolare Project in Pompeii’. Studies in Digital Heritage, 4(2): 78107. DOI: 10.14434/sdh.v4i2.27260
  3. Busen, T and Fritsch, B. 2021. ‘Digital Tools for the emergency response to disasters affecting cultural heritage’. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Cultural Heritage and New Technologies (Vol. 26, No. Preview). DOI: 10.11588/propylaeum.1449.c20766
  4. Domenech de Cellès, C and Rehberger, A. 5, July 2025. ‘Establishing operational readiness in a cross-sectoral team, PROCULTHER-NET Project’. Technical Bulletin N, 2133. ISSN 2975-190X.
  5. Ducke, B. 2015. ‘Free and open source software in commercial and academic archaeology: sustainable investments and reproducible research’. Open Source Archaeology: Ethics and Practice. De Gruyter Open Access, pp. 92110.
  6. Fritsch, B, Schönbuchner, T, Canalejo, J, Marzban, P and Iacono, E. 2024. Der KGR-Finder–ein QGIS-Plugin zur schnellen Identifizierung von kulturell bedeutsamen Orten. DOI: 10.34780/ft3pa984
  7. Gupta, N, Blair, S and Nicholas, R. 2020. ‘What we see, what we don’t see: data governance, archaeological spatial databases and the rights of indigenous peoples in an age of big data’. Journal of Field Archaeology, 45(sup1): S39S50. DOI: 10.1080/00934690.2020.1713969
  8. Gupta, N, Nicholas, R and Blair, S. 2022. Postcolonial and indigenous perspectives in digital archaeology. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv2mwg3mj.16
  9. Iacono, E and Fritsch, B. 2, June 2023. ‘Data acquisition and data management for the emergency rescue of cultural heritage, PROCULTHER-NET Project’. Technical Bulletin N, 3539. ISSN 2975-190X.
  10. Kadhim, I and Abed, FM. 2023. ‘A critical review of remote sensing approaches and deep learning techniques in archaeology’. Sensors, 23(6): 2918. DOI: 10.3390/s23062918
  11. Lambers, K, Verschoof-van der Vaart, WB and Bourgeois, QP. 2019. ‘Integrating remote sensing, machine learning, and citizen science in Dutch archaeological prospection’. Remote Sensing, 11(7): 794. DOI: 10.3390/rs11070794
  12. Marzban, P, Ducke, E, Iacono, E and Fritsch, B. 4, Dec 2024. ‘Remote sensing responses to hazard and damage assessment over archaeological and cultural heritage sites at risk, PROCULTHER-NET Project’. Technical Bulletin N, 7277. ISSN 2975-190X.
  13. Masini, N and Lasaponara, R. 2020. ‘Recent and past archaeological looting by satellite remote sensing: Approach and application in Syria’. In: Remote sensing for archaeology and cultural landscapes: best practices and perspectives across Europe and the Middle East. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 123137. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-10979-0_8
  14. McCoy, MD and Ladefoged, TN. 2009. ‘New developments in the use of spatial technology in archaeology’. Journal of Archaeological Research, 17: 263295. DOI: 10.1007/s10814-009-9030-1
  15. Menéndez-Marsh, FV, Al-Rawi, MA, Fonte, J, Dias, R, Gonçalves, LJ, Seco, LG, et al. 2023. ‘Geographic Information Systems in Archaeology: A Systematic Review’. Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology, 6(1): 4050. DOI: 10.5334/jcaa.104
  16. Morgan, C and Wright, H. 2018. ‘Pencils and pixels: drawing and digital media in archaeological field recording’. Journal of Field Archaeology, 43(2): 136151. DOI: 10.1080/00934690.2018.1428488
  17. Papa, S, Piacentini, V and Proietti, G. 5, July 2025. ‘Cultural heritage activities at EU MODEX Venice 2024, PROCULTHER-NET Project’. Technical Bulletin N, 1020. ISSN 2975-190X.
  18. Rayne, L, Rouhani, B and Makovics, JL. 2023. ‘Remote sensing and Disaster Risk Management for Cultural Heritage’. In: Managing Disaster Risks to Cultural Heritage. Routledge. pp. 114132. DOI: 10.4324/9781003263647-7
  19. Richards, JD, Niven, K and Jeffrey, S. 2013. ‘Preserving our digital heritage: Information systems for data management and preservation’. Visual heritage in the digital age, 311326. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-5535-5_16
  20. Smith, C and Burke, H. 2021. Global Archaeology. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199766567-0260
  21. Tapete, D and Cigna, F. 2018. ‘Appraisal of opportunities and perspectives for the systematic condition assessment of heritage sites with Copernicus Sentinel-2 high-resolution multispectral imagery’. Remote Sensing, 10(4): 561. DOI: 10.3390/rs10040561
  22. Wilkinson, MD, Dumontier, M, Aalbersberg, IJ, Appleton, G, Axton, M, Baak, A, Blomberg, N, Boiten, JW, da Silva Santos, LB, Bourne, PE and Bouwman, J. 2016. ‘The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship’. Scientific data, 3(1): 19. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jcaa.233 | Journal eISSN: 2514-8362
Language: English
Submitted on: Jul 4, 2025
|
Accepted on: Feb 11, 2026
|
Published on: Mar 27, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Pouria Marzban, Elvira Iacono, Bernhard Fritsch, Helena Brinckmann, Sibel Erhan, Benjamin Ducke, Tobias Busen, Katja Piesker, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.