Have a personal or library account? Click to login
After the Revolution: A Review of 3D Modelling as a Tool for Stone Artefact Analysis Cover

After the Revolution: A Review of 3D Modelling as a Tool for Stone Artefact Analysis

Open Access
|Nov 2022

References

  1. Abel, RL, Parfitt, S, Ashton, N, Lewis, SG, Scott, B and Stringer, C. 2011. Digital preservation and dissemination of ancient lithic technology with modern micro-CT. Computers & Graphics, 35(4): 878884. DOI: 10.1016/j.cag.2011.03.001
  2. Ahmed, N, Carter, M and Ferris, N. 2014. Sustainable archaeology through progressive assembly 3D digitization. World Archaeology, 46(1): 137154. DOI: 10.1080/00438243.2014.890911
  3. Archer, W, Djakovic, I, Brenet, M, Bourguignon, L, Presnyakova, D, Schlager, S, Soressi, M and McPherron, SP. 2021. Quantifying differences in hominin flaking technologies with 3D shape analysis. Journal of Human Evolution, 150: 102912. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2020.102912
  4. Archer, W, Gunz, P, van Niekerk, KL, Henshilwood, CS and McPherron, SP. 2015. Diachronic Change within the Still Bay at Blombos Cave, South Africa. PLOS ONE, 10(7): e0132428. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132428
  5. Archer, W, Pop, CM, Rezek, Z, Schlager, S, Lin, SC, Weiss, M, Dogandžić, T, Desta, D and McPherron, SP. 2018. A geometric morphometric relationship predicts stone flake shape and size variability. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 10(8): 19912003. DOI: 10.1007/s12520-017-0517-2
  6. Aria, M and Cuccurullo, C. 2017. bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4): 959975. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
  7. Arroyo, A and de la Torre, I. 2020. Pitted stones in the Acheulean from Olduvai Gorge Beds III and IV (Tanzania): a use-wear and 3D approach. Journal of Human Evolution, 145: 102837. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2020.102837
  8. Barone, S, Neri, P, Paoli, A and Razionale, AV. 2018. Automatic technical documentation of lithic artefacts by digital techniques. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, 11: e00087. DOI: 10.1016/j.daach.2018.e00087
  9. Benito-Calvo, A, Arroyo, A, Sánchez-Romero, L, Pante, M and de la Torre, I. 2018a. Quantifying 3D micro-surface changes on experimental stones used to break bones and their implications for the analysis of Early Stone Age pounding tools. Archaeometry, 60(3): 419436. DOI: 10.1111/arcm.12325
  10. Benito-Calvo, A, Carvalho, S, Arroyo, A, Matsuzawa, T and de la Torre, I. 2015. First GIS analysis of modern stone tools used by wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) in Bossou, Guinea, West Africa. PLOS ONE, 10(3): e0121613. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121613
  11. Benito-Calvo, A, Crittenden, AN, Livengood, SV, Sánchez-Romero, L, Martínez-Fernández, A, de la Torre, I and Pante, M. 2018b. 3D 360° surface morphometric analysis of pounding stone tools used by Hadza foragers of Tanzania: a new methodological approach for studying percussive stone artefacts. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 20: 611621. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2018.06.003
  12. Benjamin, J, McCarthy, J, Wiseman, C, Bevin, S, Kowlessar, J, Astrup, PM, Naumann, J and Hacker, J. 2019. Integrating aerial and underwater data for archaeology: digital maritime landscapes in 3D. In:. McCarthy, JK, Benjamin, J, Winton, T, and van Duivenvoorde, W (eds.). 3D Recording and Interpretation for Maritime Archaeology. Coastal Research Library. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 211231. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-03635-5_14
  13. Bisson-Larrivée, A and LeMoine, J-B. 2022. Photogrammetry and the impact of camera placement and angular intervals between images on model reconstruction. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, 26: e00224. DOI: 10.1016/j.daach.2022.e00224
  14. Bleed, P. 2001. Trees or chains, links or branches: conceptual alternatives for consideration of stone tool production and other sequential activities. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 8(1): 101127. DOI: 10.1023/A:1009526016167
  15. Boast, R and Enote, J. 2013. Virtual repatriation: it is neither virtual nor repatriation. In:. Biehl, PF and Prescott, C (eds.). Heritage in the context of globalization: Europe and the Americas. SpringerBriefs in Archaeology. New York, NY: Springer. pp. 103113. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-6077-0_13
  16. Boulanger, MT, Miller, GL and Fisher, P. 2021. A collection of early Holocene flaked-stone crescents from the northern Great Basin. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 37: 103005. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.103005
  17. Bradford, SC. 1934. Sources of information on specific subjects. Engineering, 137: 8586.
  18. Bretzke, K and Conard, NJ. 2012. Evaluating morphological variability in lithic assemblages using 3D models of stone artifacts. Journal of Archaeological Science, 39(12): 37413749. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2012.06.039
  19. Buchanan, B and Collard, M. 2010. An assessment of the impact of resharpening on Palaeoindian projectile point blade shape using geometric morphometric techniques. In:. Lycett, SJ and Chauhan, PR (eds.). New perspectives on old stones: analytical approaches to Paleolithic technologies. New York: Springer. pp. 255273. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6861-6_11
  20. Cardillo, M, Charlin, J, Arriaga, LC, Corada, JPD, Moreno, E, González-José, R and Shott, M. 2021. Functional efficiency and life history of Late Holocene lithic points from southern Patagonia: An experimental estimation using survival curves models. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 38: 103023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.103023
  21. Caricola, I, Zupancich, A, Moscone, D, Mutri, G, Falcucci, A, Duches, R, Peresani, M and Cristiani, E. 2018a. An integrated method for understanding the function of macro-lithic tools. Use wear, 3D and spatial analyses of an Early Upper Palaeolithic assemblage from North Eastern Italy. PLOS ONE, 13(12): e0207773. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207773
  22. Caricola, I, Zupancich, A, Mutri, G, Moscone, D, Peresani, M and Cristiani, E. 2018b. Un approccio funzionale e spaziale alla funzione di strumenti in pietra levigata del Paleolitico. Risultati preliminare dalla Grotta di Fumane (Italy). Sezione di Museologia Scientifica e Naturalistica, 13(0): 8486. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207773
  23. Caruana, M. 2022. Extrapolating Later Acheulian handaxe reduction sequences in South Africa: a case study from the Cave of Hearths and Amanzi Springs. Lithic Technology, 47(1): 112. DOI: 10.1080/01977261.2021.1924452
  24. Caruana, MV. 2020. South African handaxes reloaded. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 34: 102649. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102649
  25. Caruana, MV. 2021. Pilot study comparing the effects of thinning processes on the cross-sectional morphologies of Early and Late Acheulian handaxes. Archaeometry, 63(3): 481499. DOI: 10.1111/arcm.12635
  26. Caruana, MV, Carvalho, S, Braun, DR, Presnyakova, D, Haslam, M, Archer, W, Bobe, R and Harris, JWK. 2014. Quantifying traces of tool use: a novel morphometric analysis of damage patterns on percussive tools. PLOS ONE, 9(11): e113856. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113856
  27. Caruana, MV and Herries, AIR. 2021. Modelling production mishaps in later Acheulian handaxes from the Area 1 excavation at Amanzi Springs (Eastern Cape, South Africa) and their effects on reduction and morphology. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 39: 103121. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.103121
  28. Cebrià, A, Fontanals, M, Martín, P, Morales, JI, Oms, FX, Rodríguez-Hidalgo, A, Soto, M and Vergès, JM. 2014. Nuevos datos para el Neolítico antiguo en el nordeste de la Península Ibérica procedentes de la Cova del Toll (Moià, Barcelona) y de la Cova de la Font Major (L’Espluga de Francolí, Tarragona). Trabajos de Prehistoria, 71(1): 134145. DOI: 10.3989/tp.2014.12128
  29. Chacón, MG, Détroit, F, Coudenneau, A and Moncel, M-H. 2016. Morphometric assessment of convergent tool technology and function during the Early Middle Palaeolithic: the case of Payre, France. PLOS ONE, 11(5): e0155316. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155316
  30. Chistyakov, PV and Kovalev, VS. 2019. 3D моделирование археологических артефактов при помощи сканеров структурированного подсвета. Теория и практика археологических исследований, 27(3): 102112. DOI: 10.14258/tpai(2019)3(27).-07
  31. Clarkson, C. 2013. Measuring core reduction using 3D flake scar density: a test case of changing core reduction at Klasies River Mouth, South Africa. Journal of Archaeological Science, 40(12): 43484357. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2013.06.007
  32. Clarkson, C and Hiscock, P. 2011. Estimating original flake mass from 3D scans of platform area. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38: 10621068. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2010.12.001
  33. Clarkson, C, Vinicius, L and Lahr, MM. 2006. Quantifying flake scar patterning on cores using 3D recording techniques. Journal of Archaeological Science, 33(1): 132142. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2005.07.007
  34. Cobo, MJ, López-Herrera, AG, Herrera-Viedma, E and Herrera, F. 2011. An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1): 146166. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002
  35. Connah, G. 2013. Archaeological practice in Africa: a historical perspective. In: Mitchell, P and Lane, PJ (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of African Archaeology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199569885.013.0002
  36. Cook, K and Compton, ME. 2018. Canadian digital archaeology: on boundaries and futures. Canadian Journal of Archaeology/Journal Canadien d’Archéologie, 42(1): 3845.
  37. Cristiani, E, Caricola, I, Carra, M, Mutri, G, Zupancich, A and Cesaro, SN. 2018. Verso una biografia culturale dello strumentatio in pietra levigata delle societa’ di caccia-raccolta. Sezione di Museologia Scientifica e Naturalistica, 13(0): 128129. DOI: 10.15160/1824-2707/1525.
  38. Cristiani, E, Zupancich, A, Duches, R, Carra, M, Caricola, I, Fontana, A, Flor, E and Fontana, F. 2021. Non-flaked stones used in the Mesolithic Eastern Alpine Region: A functional assessment from Romagnano Loc III and Pradestel sites. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 37: 102928. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.102928
  39. Csárdi, G and Nepusz, T. 2006. The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal Complex Systems 1695.
  40. Davies, TG, Rahman, IA, Lautenschlager, S, Cunningham, JA, Asher, RJ, Barrett, PM, Bates, KT, Bengtson, S, Benson, RBJ, Boyer, DM, Braga, J, Bright, JA, Claessens, LPAM, Cox, PG, Dong, X-P, Evans, AR, Falkingham, PL, Friedman, M, Garwood, RJ, Goswami, A, Hutchinson, JR, Jeffery, NS, Johanson, Z, Lebrun, R, Martínez-Pérez, C, Marugán-Lobón, J, O’Higgins, PM, Metscher, B, Orliac, M, Rowe, TB, Rücklin, M, Sánchez-Villagra, MR, Shubin, NH, Smith, SY, Starck, JM, Stringer, C, Summers, AP, Sutton, MD, Walsh, SA, Weisbecker, V, Witmer, LM, Wroe, S, Yin, Z, Rayfield, EJ and Donoghue, PCJ. 2017. Open data and digital morphology. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 284(1852): 20170194. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2017.0194
  41. Davis, LG, Bean, DW and Nyers, AJ. 2017. Morphometric and technological attributes of Western Stemmed Tradition projectile points revealed in a second artifact cache from the Cooper’s Ferry Site, Idaho. American Antiquity, 82(3): 536557. DOI: 10.1017/aaq.2017.9
  42. Davis, LG, Bean, DW, Nyers, AJ and Brauner, DR. 2015. GLiMR: a GIS-based method for the geometric-morphometric analysis of artifacts. Lithic Technology, 40(3): 199217. DOI: 10.1179/2051618515Y.0000000007
  43. Delpiano, D, Cocilova, A, Zangrossi, F and Peresani, M. 2019. Potentialities of the virtual analysis of lithic refitting: case studies from the Middle and Upper Paleolithic. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 11(9): 44674489. DOI: 10.1007/s12520-019-00779-7
  44. Delpiano, D, Gennai, J and Peresani, M. 2021. Techno-functional implication on the production of discoid and Levallois backed implements. Lithic Technology, 46(3): 171191. DOI: 10.1080/01977261.2021.1886487
  45. Delpiano, D and Peresani, M. 2017. Exploring Neanderthal skills and lithic economy. The implication of a refitted Discoid reduction sequence reconstructed using 3D virtual analysis. Comptes Rendus Palevol, 16(8): 865877. DOI: 10.1016/j.crpv.2017.06.008
  46. Delpiano, D, Peresani, M and Pastoors, A. 2017. The contribution of 3D visual technology to the study of Palaeolithic knapped stones based on refitting: an application. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, 4: 2838. DOI: 10.1016/j.daach.2017.02.002
  47. Di Maida, G and Hageneuer, S. 2022. The DISAPALE Project: a new digital repository of lithic and bone artefacts. Lithic Technology. DOI: 10.1080/01977261.2022.2048511
  48. Dibble, HL, Holdaway, SJ, Lin, SC, Braun, DR, Douglass, MJ, Iovita, R, McPherron, SP, Olszewski, DI and Sandgathe, D. 2017. Major fallacies surrounding stone artifacts and assemblages. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 24(3): 813851. DOI: 10.1007/s10816-016-9297-8
  49. Dibble, HL, Schurmans, UA, Ioviţǎ, RP and McLaughlin, MV. 2005. The measurement and interpretation of cortex in lithic assemblages. American Antiquity, 70(3): 545560. DOI: 10.2307/40035313
  50. Dietrich, L. 2021. Südwestasien. Erstellung einer Referenzkollektion für makro- und mikroskopische Abnutzungsspuren an Reibsteinen Vorderasiens. Die Arbeiten des Jahres 2020. e-Forschungsberichte, 1: 134145. DOI: 10.34780/b28j-8605
  51. Dietrich, L and Haibt, M. 2020. Bread and porridge at Early Neolithic Göbekli Tepe: a new method to recognize products of cereal processing using quantitative functional analyses on grinding stones. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 33: 102525. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102525
  52. Discamps, E, Muth, X, Gravina, B, Lacrampe-Cuyaubère, F, Chadelle, J-P, Faivre, J-P and Maureille, B. 2016. Photogrammetry as a tool for integrating archival data in archaeological fieldwork: examples from the Middle Palaeolithic sites of Combe–Grenal, Le Moustier, and Regourdou. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 8: 268276. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.06.004
  53. Dogandžić, T, Abdolazadeh, A, Leader, G, Li, L, McPherron, SP, Tennie, C and Dibble, HL. 2020. The results of lithic experiments performed on glass cores are applicable to other raw materials. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 12(2): 44. DOI: 10.1007/s12520-019-00963-9
  54. Douglass, M, Kuhnel, D, Magnani, M, Hittner, L, Chodoronek, M and Porter, S. 2017. Community outreach, digital heritage and private collections: a case study from the North American Great Plains. World Archaeology, 49(5): 623638. DOI: 10.1080/00438243.2017.1309299
  55. Douglass, M, Lin, S and Chodoronek, M. 2015. The application of 3D photogrammetry for in-field documentation of archaeological features. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 3(2): 136152. DOI: 10.7183/2326-3768.3.2.136
  56. Dubreuil, L, Ovadia, A, Shahack-Gross, R and Grosman, L. 2019. Evidence of ritual breakage of a ground stone tool at the Late Natufian site of Hilazon Tachtit cave (12,000 years ago). PLOS ONE, 14(10): e0223370. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223370
  57. Duque Martínez, J and de Francisco Rodríguez, S. 2015. Arqueología tridimensional: las técnicas 3D aplicadas al registro paleolítico. BSAA Arqueología, (81): 953.
  58. Emmitt, J, Pillay, P, Barrett, M, Middleton, S, Mackrell, T, Floyd, B and Ladefoged, TN. 2021. A comparison of volumetric reconstruction methods of archaeological deposits using point-cloud data from Ahuahu, Aotearoa New Zealand. Remote Sensing, 13(19): 4015. DOI: 10.3390/rs13194015
  59. Emmitt, JJ, Mackrell, T and Armstrong, J. 2021. Digital modelling in museum and private collections: a case study on Early Italic armour. Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology, 4(1): 6378. DOI: 10.5334/jcaa.63
  60. Epskamp, S, Cramer, AOJ, Waldorp, LJ, Schmittmann, VD and Borsboom, D. 2012. qgraph: Network Visualizations of Relationships in Psychometric Data. Journal of Statistical Software, 048(i04). DOI: 10.18637/jss.v048.i04
  61. Evin, A, Souter, T, Hulme-Beaman, A, Ameen, C, Allen, R, Viacava, P, Larson, G, Cucchi, T and Dobney, K. 2016. The use of close-range photogrammetry in zooarchaeology: Creating accurate 3D models of wolf crania to study dog domestication. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 9: 8793. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.06.028
  62. Falcucci, A, Karakostis, FA, Göldner, D and Peresani, M. 2022. Bringing shape into focus: assessing differences between blades and bladelets and their technological significance in 3D form. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 43: 103490. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2022.103490
  63. Falcucci, A and Peresani, M. 2022. The contribution of integrated 3D model analysis to Protoaurignacian stone tool design. PLOS ONE, 17(5): e0268539. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268539
  64. Feizi, N, Vahdati Nasab, H and Wynn, T. 2020. New approach to analysis the Middle Paleolithic points of the Iranian Plateau: style vs. environment. Lithic Technology, 45(1): 1937. DOI: 10.1080/01977261.2019.1686563
  65. Felicísimo, ÁM, Polo, M-E and Peris, JA. 2013. Three-Dimensional Models of Archaeological Objects: From Laser Scanners to Interactive PDF Documents. Technical Briefs in Historical Archaeology, 7: 1318.
  66. Forestier, H, Zhou, Y, Sophady, H, Li, Y, Codeluppi, D, Auetrakulvit, P and Zeitoun, V. 2022a. The first lithic industry of mainland Southeast Asia: Evidence of the earliest hominin in a tropical context. Industries archaïques, 126(1): 102996. DOI: 10.1016/j.anthro.2022.102996
  67. Forestier, H, Zhou, Y, Viallet, C, Auetrakulvit, P, Li, Y and Sophady, H. 2022b. Reduction sequences during the Hoabinhian technocomplex in Cambodia and Thailand: a new knapping strategy in Southeast Asia from the Terminal Upper Pleistocene to mid Holocene. Lithic Technology, 47(2): 147170. DOI: 10.1080/01977261.2021.1981654
  68. Furey, L, Phillipps, R, Emmitt, J, McAlister, A and Holdaway, S. 2020. A large trolling lure shank from Ahuahu Great Mercury Island, New Zealand. The Journal of the Polynesian Society, 129(1): 85112. DOI: 10.15286/jps.129.1.85-112
  69. García-Medrano, P, Ashton, N, Moncel, M-H and Ollé, A. 2020a. The WEAP Method: a new age in the analysis of the Acheulean handaxes. Journal of Paleolithic Archaeology, 3(4): 756793. DOI: 10.1007/s41982-020-00054-5
  70. García-Medrano, P, Despriée, J and Moncel, M-H. 2022. Innovations in Acheulean biface production at la Noira (France) during Middle Pleistocene in Western Europe. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 14(4): 69. DOI: 10.1007/s12520-022-01506-5
  71. García-Medrano, P, Maldonado-Garrido, E, Ashton, N and Ollé, A. 2020b. Objectifying processes: the use of geometric morphometrics and multivariate analyses on Acheulean tools. Journal of Lithic Studies, 7(1). DOI: 10.2218/jls.4327
  72. García-Medrano, P, Ollé, A, Ashton, N and Roberts, MB. 2019. The mental template in handaxe manufacture: new insights into Acheulean lithic technological behavior at Boxgrove, Sussex, UK. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 26(1): 396422. DOI: 10.1007/s10816-018-9376-0
  73. Gill, JP, Adler, DS, Raczynski-Henk, Y, Frahm, E, Sherriff, JE, Wilkinson, KN and Gasparyan, B. 2021. The Techno-typological and 3D-GM Analysis of Hatis-1: a Late Acheulian Open-Air Site on the Hrazdan-Kotayk Plateau, Armenia. Journal of Paleolithic Archaeology, 4(4): 29. DOI: 10.1007/s41982-021-00105-5
  74. Gingerich, JAM, Sholts, SB, Wärmländer, SKTS and Stanford, D. 2014. Fluted point manufacture in eastern North America: an assessment of form and technology using traditional metrics and 3D digital morphometrics. World Archaeology, 46(1): 101122. DOI: 10.1080/00438243.2014.892437
  75. Glänzel, W and Schubert, A. 2005. Analysing Scientific Networks Through Co-Authorship. In: Moed, HF, Glänzel, W, and Schmoch, U (eds.). Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. pp. 257276. DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_12
  76. Göldner, D, Karakostis, FA and Falcucci, A. 2022. Practical and technical aspects for the 3D scanning of lithic artefacts using micro-computed tomography techniques and laser light scanners for subsequent geometric morphometric analysis. Introducing the StyroStone protocol. PLOS ONE, 17(4): e0267163. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267163
  77. Goren-Inbar, N, Belfer-Cohen, A, Grosman, L, Herzlinger, G and Agam, A. 2022. Kaizer Hill (Modi‘in), a Pre-Pottery Neolithic A quarry site – the terraced slopes. PLOS ONE, 17(3): e0265727. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265727
  78. Grosman, L. 2016. Reaching the point of no return: the computational revolution in archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 45(1): 129145. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102215-095946
  79. Grosman, L, Goldsmith, Y and Smilansky, U. 2011. Morphological analysis of Nahal Zihor handaxes: a chronological perspective. PaleoAnthropology, 2011: 203215.
  80. Grosman, L, Karasik, A, Harush, O and Smilansky, U. 2014. Archaeology in three dimensions: computer-based methods in archaeological research. Journal of Eastern Mediterranean Archaeology and Heritage Studies, 2(1): 4864. DOI: 10.5325/jeasmedarcherstu.2.1.0048
  81. Grosman, L, Muller, A, Dag, I, Goldgeier, H, Harush, O, Herzlinger, G, Nebenhaus, K, Valletta, F, Yashuv, T and Dick, N. 2022. Artifact3-D: new software for accurate, objective and efficient 3D analysis and documentation of archaeological artifacts. PLOS ONE, 17(6): e0268401. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268401
  82. Grosman, L, Shaham, D, Valletta, F, Abadi, I, Goldgeier, H, Klein, N, Dubreuil, L and Munro, ND. 2017. A human face carved on a pebble from the Late Natufian site of Nahal Ein Gev II. Antiquity, 91(358). DOI: 10.15184/aqy.2017.122
  83. Grosman, L, Sharon, G, Goldman-Neuman, T, Smikt, O and Smilansky, U. 2011. Studying post depositional damage on Acheulian bifaces using 3-D scanning. Journal of Human Evolution, 60(4): 398406. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.02.004
  84. Grosman, L, Smikt, O and Smilansky, U. 2008. On the application of 3-D scanning technology for the documentation and typology of lithic artifacts. Journal of Archaeological Science, 35: 31013110. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2008.06.011
  85. Harmand, S, Lewis, JE, Feibel, CS, Lepre, CJ, Prat, S, Lenoble, A, Boës, X, Quinn, RL, Brenet, M, Arroyo, A, Taylor, N, Clément, S, Daver, G, Brugal, J-P, Leakey, L, Mortlock, RA, Wright, JD, Lokorodi, S, Kirwa, C, Kent, DV and Roche, H. 2015. 3.3-million-year-old stone tools from Lomekwi 3, West Turkana, Kenya. Nature, 521(7552): 310315. DOI: 10.1038/nature14464
  86. Haslam, M, Gumert, MD, Biro, D, Carvalho, S and Malaivijitnond, S. 2013. Use-wear patterns on wild macaque stone tools reveal their behavioural history. PLOS ONE, 8(8): e72872. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072872
  87. Hayes, EH, Field, JH, Coster, ACF, Fullagar, R, Matheson, C, Florin, SA, Nango, M, Djandjomerr, D, Marwick, B, Wallis, LA, Smith, MA and Clarkson, C. 2021. Holocene grinding stones at Madjedbebe reveal the processing of starchy plant taxa and animal tissue. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 35: 102754. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102754
  88. Herzlinger, G and Goren-Inbar, N. 2019. Do a few tools necessarily mean a few people? A techno-morphological approach to the question of group size at Gesher Benot Ya’aqov, Israel. Journal of Human Evolution, 128: 4558. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.11.008
  89. Herzlinger, G, Goren-Inbar, N and Grosman, L. 2017. A new method for 3D geometric morphometric shape analysis: the case study of handaxe knapping skill. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 14: 163173. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.05.013
  90. Herzlinger, G and Grosman, L. 2018. AGMT3-D: a software for 3-D landmarks-based geometric morphometric shape analysis of archaeological artifacts. PloS one, 13(11): e0207890e0207890. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207890
  91. Herzlinger, G, Varanda, A, Deschamps, M, Brenet, M, Lopez-Tascon, C and Goren-Inbar, N. 2021. Reevaluation of the classification scheme of the Acheulian in the Levant – 50 years later: a morpho-technological analysis of handaxe variability. PaleoAnthropology. DOI: 10.48738/2021.iss1.70.
  92. Herzlinger, G, Wynn, T and Goren-Inbar, N. 2017. Expert cognition in the production sequence of Acheulian cleavers at Gesher Benot Ya’aqov, Israel: a lithic and cognitive analysis. PLOS ONE, 12(11): e0188337. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188337
  93. Hiscock, P. 2007. Looking the other way: a materialist/technological approach to classifying tools and implements, cores and retouched flakes. In: McPherron, SP (ed.). Tool versus cores: alternative approaches to stone tool analysis. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. pp. 198222.
  94. Hiscock, P, O’Connor, S, Balme, J and Maloney, T. 2016. World’s earliest ground-edge axe production coincides with human colonisation of Australia. Australian Archaeology, 82(1): 211. DOI: 10.1080/03122417.2016.1164379
  95. Hussain, ST. 2019. The French-Anglophone divide in lithic research: a plea for pluralism in Palaeolithic Archaeology. Leiden University.
  96. Hussain, ST. 2021. Compelling image-worlds: a pictorial perspective on the epistemology of stone artefact analysis in Palaeolithic archaeology. In: de Beaune, SA, Guidi, A, Moro Abadía, O, and Tarantini, M (eds.). New advances in the history of archaeology: Proceedings of the XVIII UISPP World Congress (4–9 June 2018, Paris, France). Oxford: Archaeopress Publishing Ltd. pp. 138170.
  97. Ioviţǎ, R. 2010. Comparing stone tool resharpening trajectories with the aid of Elliptical Fourier Analysis. In: Lycett, SJ and Chauhan, PR (eds.). New perspectives on old stones: analytical approaches to Paleolithic technologies. New York: Springer. pp. 235253. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6861-6_10
  98. Jalandoni, A and May, SK. 2020. How 3D models (photogrammetry) of rock art can improve recording veracity: a case study from Kakadu National Park, Australia. Australian Archaeology, 86(2): 137146. DOI: 10.1080/03122417.2020.1769005
  99. Jennings, C and Weisler, M. 2020. Adapting Polynesian adze technology to new raw material at Tiwai Point, Murihiku, New Zealand. Lithic Technology, 45(4): 247262. DOI: 10.1080/01977261.2020.1782591
  100. Kaňáková, L, Bátora, J and Nosek, V. 2019. Use-wear and ballistic analyses of arrowheads from the burial ground of the Nitra culture in Ludanice – Mýtna Nová Ves. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 23: 2535. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2018.09.028
  101. Kaňáková, L, Bátora, J and Nosek, V. 2020. Use-wear and ballistic analysis of arrowheads from the burial ground of Nitra culture in Holešov–Zdražilovska, Moravia. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 29: 102126. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2019.102126
  102. Kaňáková, L, Mazáčková, J, Nosek, V and Huta, P. 2022. External and terminal ballistics of early Bronze Age lithic arrowheads: experimental verification. Lithic Technology, 0(0): 116. DOI: 10.1080/01977261.2022.2040139
  103. Kaňáková, L, Šmerda, J and Nosek, V. 2016. Analýza kamenných projektilů z pohřebiště starší doby bronzové Hroznová Lhota. Traseologie a balistika. Archeologické rozhledy, (2): 163201.
  104. Kolobova, KA, Roberts, RG, Chabai, VP, Jacobs, Z, Krajcarz, MT, Shalagina, AV, Krivoshapkin, AI, Li, B, Uthmeier, T, Markin, SV, Morley, MW, O’Gorman, K, Rudaya, NA, Talamo, S, Viola, B and Derevianko, AP. 2020a. Archaeological evidence for two separate dispersals of Neanderthals into southern Siberia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(6): 28792885. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1918047117
  105. Kolobova, KA, Shalagina, AV, Chistyakov, PV, Bocharova, EN and Krivoshapkin, AI. 2020b. Возможности применения трехмерного моделирования для исследований комплексов каменного века. Сибирские исторические исследования, (4): 240260. DOI: 10.17223/2312461X/30/12
  106. Koungoulos, L. 2020. Old dogs, new tricks: 3D geometric analysis of cranial morphology supports ancient population substructure in the Australian dingo. Zoomorphology, 139(2): 263275. DOI: 10.1007/s00435-019-00475-z
  107. Lauer, T, Weiss, M, Bernhardt, W, Heinrich, S, Rappsilber, I, Stahlschmidt, MC, von Suchodoletz, H and Wansa, S. 2020. The Middle Pleistocene fluvial sequence at Uichteritz, central Germany: Chronological framework, paleoenvironmental history and early human presence during MIS 11. Geomorphology, 354: 107016. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.107016
  108. Li, H, Kuman, K, Leader, GM and Couzens, R. 2018. Handaxes in South Africa: two case studies in the early and later Acheulean. Quaternary International, 480: 2942. DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2016.08.025
  109. Li, H, Kuman, K and Li, C. 2015. Quantifying the reduction intensity of handaxes with 3D technology: a pilot study on handaxes in the Danjiangkou Reservoir Region, Central China. PLOS ONE, 10(9): e0135613. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135613
  110. Li, H, Kuman, K and Li, C. 2016. The symmetry of handaxes from the Danjiangkou Reservoir Region (central China): a methodological consideration. Quaternary International, 400: 6572. DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2015.05.033
  111. Li, H, Kuman, K, Lotter, MG, Leader, GM and Gibbon, RJ. 2017. The Victoria West: earliest prepared core technology in the Acheulean at Canteen Kopje and implications for the cognitive evolution of early hominids. Royal Society Open Science, 4(6): 170288. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.170288
  112. Li, H, Lei, L, Li, D, Lotter, MG and Kuman, K. 2021. Characterizing the shape of Large Cutting Tools from the Baise Basin (South China) using a 3D geometric morphometric approach. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 36: 102820. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.102820
  113. Lin, SC, McPherron, SP and Dibble, HL. 2015. Establishing statistical confidence in Cortex Ratios within and among lithic assemblages: a case study of the Middle Paleolithic of southwestern France. Journal of Archaeological Science, 59: 89109. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2015.04.004
  114. Lin, SC, Peng, F, Zwyns, N, Guo, J, Wang, H and Gao, X. 2019. Persistent local raw material transport at Shuidonggou Locality 2. Archaeological Research in Asia, 20: 100142. DOI: 10.1016/j.ara.2019.100142
  115. Lin, SCH, Douglass, MJ, Holdaway, SJ and Floyd, B. 2010. The application of 3D laser scanning technology to the assessment of ordinal and mechanical cortex quantification in lithic analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science, 37(4): 694702. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2009.10.030
  116. Lombao, D, Cueva-Temprana, A, Mosquera, M and Morales, JI. 2020. A new approach to measure reduction intensity on cores and tools on cobbles: the Volumetric Reconstruction Method. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 12(9): 222. DOI: 10.1007/s12520-020-01154-7
  117. Lombao, D, Cueva-Temprana, A, Rabuñal, JR, Morales, JI and Mosquera, M. 2019. The effects of blank size and knapping strategy on the estimation of core’s reduction intensity. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 11(10): 54455461. DOI: 10.1007/s12520-019-00879-4
  118. Luncz, LV, Proffitt, T, Kulik, L, Haslam, M and Wittig, RM. 2016. Distance-decay effect in stone tool transport by wild chimpanzees. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 283(1845): 20161607. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2016.1607
  119. Lycett, SJ and Chauhan, PR. 2010. Analytical Approaches to Palaeolithic Technologies: An Introduction. In: Lycett, S and Chauhan, P (eds.). New Perspectives on Old Stones: Analytical Approaches to Paleolithic Technologies. New York, NY: Springer. pp. 122. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6861-6_1
  120. Lycett, SJ, von Cramon-Taubadel, N and Foley, RA. 2006. A crossbeam co-ordinate caliper for the morphometric analysis of lithic nuclei: a description, test and empirical examples of application. Journal of Archaeological Science, 33(6): 847861. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2005.10.014
  121. Magnani, M. 2014. Three-dimensional alternatives to lithic illustration. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 2(4): 285297. DOI: 10.7183/2326-3768.2.4.285
  122. Magnani, M, Douglass, M, Schroder, W, Reeves, J and Braun, DR. 2020. The digital revolution to come: photogrammetry in archaeological practice. American Antiquity, 85(4): 737760. DOI: 10.1017/aaq.2020.59
  123. Magnani, M, Guttorm, A and Magnani, N. 2018. Three-dimensional, community-based heritage management of indigenous museum collections: archaeological ethnography, revitalization and repatriation at the Sámi Museum Siida. Journal of Cultural Heritage 31: 162169. DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2017.12.001
  124. Malinsky-Buller, A, Grosman, L and Marder, O. 2011. A case of techno-typological lithic variability & continuity in the late Lower Palaeolithic. Before Farming, 2011(1): 133. DOI: 10.3828/bfarm.2011.1.3
  125. Maloney, T and O’Connor, S. 2014. Backed points in the Kimberley: revisiting the north-south division for backed artefact production in Australia. Australian Archaeology, 79(1): 146155. DOI: 10.1080/03122417.2014.11682031
  126. Maloney, TR. 2020. Experimental and archaeological testing with 3D laser scanning reveals the limits of I/TMC as a reduction index for global scraper and point studies. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 29: 102068. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2019.102068
  127. Mapunda, B and Lane, P. 2004. Archaeology for whose interest – archaeologists or the locals? In: Merriman, N (ed.). Public archaeology. London: Routledge. pp. 225237. DOI: 10.4324/9780203646052-18
  128. Martin-Moya, D, Bisson-Larrivée, A, Riel-Salvatore, J, Negrino, F, Kolhatkar, M, Brun, C, LeMoine, J-B, Albouy, B, Ghalem, Y, Rochon, A and Ribot, I. 2020. Apports de la documentation 3D par photogrammétrie pour l’archéologie et la bioarchéologie au Québec en contextes académique et contractuel. Archéologiques, 33: 8198.
  129. Marwick, B. 2017. Computational reproducibility in archaeological research: basic principles and a case study of their implementation. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 24(2): 424450. DOI: 10.1007/s10816-015-9272-9
  130. Marwick, B, Pham, TS and Ko, MS. 2020. Over-research and ethics dumping in international archaeology. SPAFA Journal, 4. DOI: 10.26721/spafajournal.v4i0.625
  131. Matzig, DN, Hussain, ST and Riede, F. 2021. Design space constraints and the cultural taxonomy of European Final Palaeolithic large tanged points: a comparison of typological, landmark-based and whole-outline geometric morphometric approaches. Journal of Paleolithic Archaeology, 4(4): 27. DOI: 10.1007/s41982-021-00097-2
  132. McPherron, SP, Abdolahzadeh, A, Archer, W, Chan, A, Djakovic, I, Dogandžić, T, Leader, GM, Li, L, Lin, S, Magnani, M, Reeves, J, Rezek, Z and Weiss, M. 2020. Introducing platform surface interior angle (PSIA) and its role in flake formation, size and shape. PLOS ONE, 15(11): e0241714. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241714
  133. Middleton, S and Phillipps, R. In Press. Experimental improvements to the volume ratio and quantifying movement using stone artefact analysis. Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology, 117. DOI: 10.5334/jcaa.93
  134. Morales, JI, Lorenzo, C and Vergès, JM. 2015. Measuring retouch intensity in lithic tools: a new proposal using 3D scan data. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 22(2): 543558. DOI: 10.1007/s10816-013-9189-0
  135. Morales, JI and Vergès, JM. 2014. Technological behaviors in Paleolithic foragers. Testing the role of resharpening in the assemblage organization. Journal of Archaeological Science, 49: 302316. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2014.05.025
  136. Morales, JI, Vergès, JM, Fontanals, M, Ollé, A, Allué, E and Angelucci, DE. 2013. Procesos técnicos y culturales durante el Holoceno inicial en el noroeste de la Península Ibérica. Los niveles B y Bb de La Cativera (El Catllar, Tarragona). Trabajos de Prehistoria, 70(1): 5475. DOI: 10.3989/tp.2013.12102
  137. Muller, A and Clarkson, C. 2014. Estimating original flake mass on blades using 3D platform area: problems and prospects. Journal of Archaeological Science, 52: 3138. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2014.08.025
  138. Muller, A and Clarkson, C. 2016. A new method for accurately and precisely measuring flake platform area. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 8: 178186. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.06.015
  139. Muller, A, Shipton, C and Clarkson, C. 2022. Stone toolmaking difficulty and the evolution of hominin technological skills. Scientific Reports, 12(1): 5883. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-09914-2
  140. Noguchi, A. 2019. 石器の3D 計測、成果の公開・共有を目指して. 回考古学・文化財のためのデータサイエンス・サロン 1: 914.
  141. Nolan, KC, Shott, MJ and Olson, E. 2022. The Central Ohio Archaeological Digitization Survey: a demonstration of amplified public good from collaboration with private collectors. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 10(1): 8390. DOI: 10.1017/aap.2021.33
  142. Nosek, V and Kaňáková, L. 2021. Analytical potential of 3D data in the ballistic analyses of lithic projectiles. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 38: 103042. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.103042
  143. Okumura, M and Araujo, AGM. 2019. Archaeology, biology, and borrowing: a critical examination of Geometric Morphometrics in Archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Science, 101: 149158. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2017.09.015
  144. Paixão, E, Pedergnana, A, Marreiros, J, Dubreuil, L, Prévost, M, Zaidner, Y, Carver, G and Gneisinger, W. 2021. Using mechanical experiments to study ground stone tool use: exploring the formation of percussive and grinding wear traces on limestone tools. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 37: 102971. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.102971
  145. Pedergnana, A, Cristiani, E, Munro, N, Valletta, F and Sharon, G. 2021. Early line and hook fishing at the Epipaleolithic site of Jordan River Dureijat (Northern Israel). PLOS ONE, 16(10): e0257710. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257710
  146. Pérez-Balarezo, A, Navarro-Harris, X, Boëda, E and Pino, M. 2022. Beyond the mighty projectile point: techno-functional study in a Late Pleistocene artifact, Pilauco Site, Osorno, northwestern Chilean Patagonia. Lithic Technology, 47(2): 83105. DOI: 10.1080/01977261.2021.1958133
  147. Perreault, C. 2019. The quality of the archaeological record. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226631011.001.0001
  148. Perston, Y, Wallis, LA, Burke, H, McLennan, C, Hatte, E and Barker, B. 2022. Flaked Glass Artifacts from Nineteenth–Century Native Mounted Police Camps in Queensland, Australia. International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 26(3): 789822. DOI: 10.1007/s10761-021-00624-5
  149. Phillipps, RS and Holdaway, SJ. 2016. Estimating Core Number in Assemblages: Core Movement and Mobility During the Holocene of the Fayum, Egypt. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 23(2): 520540. DOI: 10.1007/s10816-015-9250-2
  150. Pop, CM. 2019. Lithics3D.
  151. Porter, ST, Roussel, M and Soressi, M. 2016. A simple photogrammetry rig for the reliable creation of 3D artifact models in the field: lithic examples from the Early Upper Paleolithic sequences of Les Cottés (France). Advances in Archaeological Practice, 4(1): 7186. DOI: 10.7183/2326-3768.4.1.71
  152. Porter, ST, Roussel, M and Soressi, M. 2019. A comparison of Châtelperronian and Protoaurignacian core technology using data derived from 3D models. Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology, 2(1): 4155. DOI: 10.5334/jcaa.17
  153. Prentiss, AM, Walsh, MJ, Barnett, KD, Murphy, M-M and Kuenstle, J. 2015. The coarse volcanic rock industry at Rio Ibáñez 6 West, Aisén Region, Patagonian Chile. Lithic Technology, 40(2): 112127. DOI: 10.1179/2051618515Y.0000000002
  154. Presnyakova, D, Braun, DR, Conard, NJ, Feibel, C, Harris, JWK, Pop, CM, Schlager, S and Archer, W. 2018. Site fragmentation, hominin mobility and LCT variability reflected in the early Acheulean record of the Okote Member, at Koobi Fora, Kenya. Journal of Human Evolution, 125: 159180. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.07.008
  155. Proffitt, T, Reeves, JS, Benito-Calvo, A, Sánchez-Romero, L, Arroyo, A, Malaijivitnond, S and Luncz, LV. 2021. Three-dimensional surface morphometry differentiates behaviour on primate percussive stone tools. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 18(184): 20210576. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2021.0576
  156. R Core Team. 2022. R: A language and environment for statistical computing.
  157. Rainie, SC, Kukutai, T, Walter, M, Figueroa-Rodríguez, Walker, J and Axelsson, P. 2019. Indigenous data sovereignty. In: Davies, T, Walker, S, Rubinstein, M, and Perini, F (eds.). The state of open data: histories and horizons. Cape Town and Ottawa: African Minds and the International Development Research Centre. pp. 300319.
  158. Ranhorn, KL, Braun, DR, Biermann Gürbüz, RE, Greiner, E, Wawrzyniak, D and Brooks, AS. 2019. Evaluating prepared core assemblages with three-dimensional methods: a case study from the Middle Paleolithic at Skhūl (Israel). Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 11(7): 32253238. DOI: 10.1007/s12520-018-0746-z
  159. Richards-Rissetto, H. 2017. What can GIS + 3D mean for landscape archaeology?. Archaeological GIS Today: Persistent Challenges, Pushing Old Boundaries, and Exploring New Horizons, 84: 1021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2017.05.005
  160. Riel-Salvatore, J, Bae, M, McCartney, P and Razdan, A. 2002. Palaeolithic archaeology and 3D visualization technology: recent developments. Antiquity, 76(294): 929930. DOI: 10.1017/S0003598X00091614
  161. Robinson, MGP, Porter, A, Figueira, W and Fletcher, R. 2019. Neolithic temples of Malta: 3D analysis points to novel roof reconstruction. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, 13: e00095. DOI: 10.1016/j.daach.2019.e00095
  162. Sánchez-Yustos, P, Diez-Martín, F, Domínguez-Rodrigo, M, Duque, J, Fraile, C, Díaz, I, Francisco, S de, Baquedano, E and Mabulla, A. 2017. The origin of the Acheulean. Techno-functional study of the FLK W lithic record (Olduvai, Tanzania). PLOS ONE, 12(8): e0179212. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179212
  163. Sano, K, Beyene, Y, Katoh, S, Koyabu, D, Endo, H, Sasaki, T, Asfaw, B and Suwa, G. 2020. A 1.4-million-year-old bone handaxe from Konso, Ethiopia, shows advanced tool technology in the early Acheulean. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(31): 1839318400. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2006370117
  164. Scerri, EML, Kühnert, D, Blinkhorn, J, Groucutt, HS, Roberts, P, Nicoll, K, Zerboni, A, Orijemie, EA, Barton, H, Candy, I, Goldstein, ST, Hawks, J, Niang, K, N’Dah, D, Petraglia, MD and Vella, NC. 2020. Field-based sciences must transform in response to COVID-19. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 4(12): 15711574. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-020-01317-8
  165. Schmid, VC, Porraz, G, Zeidi, M and Conard, NJ. 2019. Blade Technology Characterizing the MIS 5 D-A Layers of Sibudu Cave, South Africa. Lithic Technology, 44(4): 199236. DOI: 10.1080/01977261.2019.1637627
  166. Schmidt, SC and Marwick, B. 2020. Tool-Driven Revolutions in Archaeological Science. Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology, 3(1): 1832. DOI: 10.5334/jcaa.29
  167. Selden, RZ, Dockall, JE and Dubied, M. 2020. A quantitative assessment of intraspecific morphological variation in Gahagan bifaces from the southern Caddo area and central Texas. Southeastern Archaeology, 39(2): 125145. DOI: 10.1080/0734578X.2020.1744416
  168. Selden, RZ, Dockall, JE and Shafer, HJ. 2018. Lithic morphological organisation: Gahagan bifaces from the Southern Caddo Area. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, 10: e00080. DOI: 10.1016/j.daach.2018.e00080
  169. Selden, RZ, Perttula, TK and O’Brien, MJ. 2014. Advances in documentation, digital curation, virtual exhibition, and a test of 3D geometric morphometrics: a case study of the Vanderpool Vessels from the Ancestral Caddo Territory. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 2(2): 6479. DOI: 10.7183/2326-3768.2.2.64
  170. Shalagina, AV, Kolobova, KA, Chistyakov, PV and Krivoshapkin, AI. 2020. Применение трехмерного геометрико-морфометрического анализа для изучения артефактов каменного века. Stratum plus, (1): 343358.
  171. Shepherd, N. 2002. The politics of archaeology in Africa. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31: 189209. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085424
  172. Shipton, C. 2011. Taphonomy and behaviour at the Acheulean site of Kariandusi, Kenya. The African Archaeological Review, 28(2): 141155. DOI: 10.1007/s10437-011-9089-1
  173. Shipton, C. 2016. Hierarchical organization in the Acheulean to Middle Palaeolithic transition at Bhimbetka, India. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 26(4): 601618. DOI: 10.1017/S095977431600041X
  174. Shipton, C and Clarkson, C. 2015a. Flake scar density and handaxe reduction intensity. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 2: 169175. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2015.01.013
  175. Shipton, C and Clarkson, C. 2015b. Handaxe reduction and its influence on shape: An experimental test and archaeological case study. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 3: 408419. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2015.06.029
  176. Shipton, C, Clarkson, C and Cobden, R. 2019. Were Acheulean bifaces deliberately made symmetrical? Archaeological and experimental evidence. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 29(1): 6579. DOI: 10.1017/S095977431800032X
  177. Shipton, C, Clarkson, C, Pal, JN, Jones, SC, Roberts, RG, Harris, C, Gupta, MC, Ditchfield, PW and Petraglia, MD. 2013. Generativity, hierarchical action and recursion in the technology of the Acheulean to Middle Palaeolithic transition: A perspective from Patpara, the Son Valley, India. Journal of Human Evolution, 65(2): 93108. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.03.007
  178. Shipton, C and White, M. 2020. Handaxe types, colonization waves, and social norms in the British Acheulean. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 31: 102352. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102352
  179. Sholts, SB, Gingerich, JAM, Schlager, S, Stanford, DJ and Wärmländer, SKTS. 2017. Tracing social interactions in Pleistocene North America via 3D model analysis of stone tool asymmetry. PLOS ONE, 12(7): e0179933. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179933
  180. Sholts, SB, Stanford, DJ, Flores, LM and Wärmländer, SKTS. 2012. Flake scar patterns of Clovis points analyzed with a new digital morphometrics approach: evidence for direct transmission of technological knowledge across early North America. Journal of Archaeological Science, 39(9): 30183026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2012.04.049
  181. Shott, MJ. 2013. Human colonization and late Pleistocene lithic industries of the Americas. Peopling the last new worlds: the first colonisation of Sahul and the Americas, 285: 150160. DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2010.12.034
  182. Shott, MJ. 2014. Digitizing archaeology: a subtle revolution in analysis. World Archaeology, 46(1): 19. DOI: 10.1080/00438243.2013.879046
  183. Shott, MJ and Trail, BW. 2010. Exploring New Approaches to Lithic Analysis: Laser Scanning and Geometric Morphometrics. Lithic Technology, 35(2): 195220. DOI: 10.1080/01977261.2010.11721090
  184. Slizewski, A and Semal, P. 2009. Experiences with low and high cost 3D surface scanner. Quartär, 56: 131138.
  185. Soto, M, Morales, JI, Fernández-Marchena, JL, Rabuñal, JR, Saladié, P, García-Argudo, G, Lombao, D, Soares, M, Viñas, R and Vallverdú, J. 2018. La Balma de la Vall (Montblanc, Tarragona): ocupaciones de corta duración durante el Paleolítico superior final en las Montañas de Prades. Trabajos de Prehistoria, 75(2): 270286. DOI: 10.3989/tp.2018.12215
  186. Spyrou, A, Nobles, G, Hadjikoumis, A, Evin, A, Hulme-Beaman, A, Çakirlar, C, Ameen, C, Loucas, N, Nikita, E, Hanot, P, de Boer, NM, Avgousti, A, Zohar, I, May, H and Rehren, Th. 2022. Digital Zooarchaeology: State of the art, challenges, prospects and synergies. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 45: 103588. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2022.103588
  187. Stemp, WJ, Watson, AS and Evans, AA. 2015. Surface analysis of stone and bone tools. Surface Topography: Metrology and Properties, 4(1): 013001. DOI: 10.1088/2051-672X/4/1/013001
  188. Sumner, TA and Riddle, ATR. 2008. A virtual Paleolithic: assays in photogrammetric three-dimensional artifact modelling. PaleoAnthropology, 158169.
  189. Valletta, F, Dag, I and Grosman, L. 2021. Identifying Local Learning Communities During the Terminal Palaeolithic in the Southern Levant: Multi-scale 3-D Analysis of Flint Cores. Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology, 4(1): 145168. DOI: 10.5334/jcaa.74
  190. Valletta, F and Grosman, L. 2021. Local Technological Traditions in the Early and Middle Epipaleolithic of Ein Gev Area. Journal of Paleolithic Archaeology, 4(2): 10. DOI: 10.1007/s41982-021-00079-4
  191. Viallet, C. 2019. A new method of three-dimensional morphometry for analyzing the functional potentialities of bifaces. Contribution to the study of artefacts from AU P3 from the “Caune de l’Arago” (France). Comptes Rendus Palevol, 18(2): 236250. DOI: 10.1016/j.crpv.2018.11.001
  192. Way, AM, de la Peña, P, de la Peña, E and Wadley, L. 2022. Howiesons Poort backed artifacts provide evidence for social connectivity across southern Africa during the Final Pleistocene. Scientific Reports 12(1): 9227. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-12677-5
  193. Weisler, M, Collins, SL, Feng, Y, Zhao, J, Shipton, C and Wei, X. 2013. A new major adze quarry from Nānākuli, O’ahu: implications for interaction studies in Hawai’i. Journal of Pacific Archaeology, 4(2): 3557.
  194. Weiss, M. 2015. Stone tool analysis and context of a new late Middle Paleolithic site in western central Europe – Pouch-Terrassenpfeiler, Ldkr. Anhalt-Bitterfeld, Germany. Quartär, 62: 2362. DOI: 10.7485/QU62_2
  195. Weiss, M, Lauer, T, Wimmer, R and Pop, CM. 2018. The variability of the Keilmesser-Concept: a case study from central Germany. Journal of Paleolithic Archaeology, 1(3): 202246. DOI: 10.1007/s41982-018-0013-y
  196. Whitford, MF, Wyatt-Spratt, S, Gore, DB, Johnsson, MT, Power, RK, Rampe, M, Richards, C and Withford, MJ. 2020. Assessing the standardisation of Egyptian shabti manufacture via morphology and elemental analyses. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 33: 102541. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102541
  197. Wickham, H, Averick, M, Bryan, J, Chang, W, McGowan, LD, François, R, Grolemund, G, Hayes, A, Henry, L, Hester, J, Kuhn, M, Pedersen, TL, Miller, E, Bache, SM, Müller, K, Ooms, J, Robinson, D, Seidel, DP, Spinu, V, Takahashi, K, Vaughan, D, Wilke, C, Woo, K and Yutani, H. 2019. Welcome to the Tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(43): 1686. DOI: 10.21105/joss.01686
  198. Wiśniewski, A, Chłoń, M, Weiss, M, Pyżewicz, K and Migal, W. 2020. On making of Micoquian bifacial backed tools at Pietraszyn 49a, SW Poland. Journal of Paleolithic Archaeology, 3(4): 856888. DOI: 10.1007/s41982-020-00069-y
  199. Wiśniewski, A, Lauer, T, Chłoń, M, Pyżewicz, K, Weiss, M, Badura, J, Kalicki, T and Zarzecka-Szubińska, K. 2019. Looking for provisioning places of shaped tools of the late Neanderthals: A study of a Micoquian open-air site, Pietraszyn 49a (southwestern Poland). Comptes Rendus Palevol, 18(3): 367389. DOI: 10.1016/j.crpv.2019.01.003
  200. Wyatt-Spratt, S and Thoeming, A. 2019. New eyes for old objects: teaching history with photogrammetry. Journal of the History Teachers’ Association of NSW, 53(3): 2733.
  201. Yahalom-Mack, N, Herzlinger, G, Bogdanovsky, A, Tirosh, O, Garfinkel, Y, Dugaw, S, Lipschits, O and Erel, Y. 2020. Combining chemical and lead isotope analyses with 3-D geometric–morphometric shape analysis: A methodological case study of socketed bronze arrowheads from the southern Levant. Journal of Archaeological Science, 118: 105147. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2020.105147
  202. Zangrossi, F, Delpiano, D, Cocilova, A, Ferrari, F, Balzani, M and Peresani, M. 2019. 3D visual technology applied for the reconstruction of a Paleolithic workshop. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 28: 102045. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2019.102045
  203. Zhou, Z and Guan, Y. 2017. The application of three-dimensional reconstruction technology in lithic analysis. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 36(01): 38.
  204. Zupancich, A and Cristiani, E. 2020. Functional analysis of sandstone ground stone tools: arguments for a qualitative and quantitative synergetic approach. Scientific Reports, 10(1): 15740. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-72276-0
  205. Zupancich, A, Mutri, G, Caricola, I, Carra, ML, Radini, A and Cristiani, E. 2019. The application of 3D modeling and spatial analysis in the study of groundstones used in wild plants processing. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 11(9): 48014827. DOI: 10.1007/s12520-019-00824-5
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jcaa.103 | Journal eISSN: 2514-8362
Language: English
Submitted on: Sep 19, 2022
|
Accepted on: Oct 20, 2022
|
Published on: Nov 4, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Simon Wyatt-Spratt, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.