Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Ultrasonographic Characteristics of Thyroid Nodules with Nondiagnostic and Atypia of Undetermined Significance in Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology Cover

Ultrasonographic Characteristics of Thyroid Nodules with Nondiagnostic and Atypia of Undetermined Significance in Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology

Open Access
|May 2024

Figures & Tables

jbsr-108-1-3577-g1.jpg
Figure 1

Ultrasound images of thyroid nodules with different categorizations.

(a) This image depicts a nodule with cystic features, characterized by smooth margins and floating colloid, along with echogenic foci and debris (TI-RADS 1). The fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) results for this nodule indicated a nondiagnostic (ND) outcome.

(b) It exhibits a solid composition, an iso-hypoechoic appearance, a heterogeneous texture, central cystic regions, and a lobulated margin (TI-RADS 4). The FNAC results for this nodule indicated atypia of undetermined significance (AUS).

jbsr-108-1-3577-g2.jpg
Figure 2

Cytopathological illustrations of nodules diagnosed as ND by FNAC.

(a) A case of ND without follicular cells, where macrophages were observed in the background of bleeding (PAP, x10).

(b-c) ND cases with only colloid and inflammatory cells observed in liquid-based cytology preparations (x10).

(d) An ND case in which a single group of follicular cells was observed in addition to macrophages on the colloidal background; the thyrocyte group is highlighted in the circle (liquid-based cytology, x10).

PAP: Papanicolaou Stain, ND: Nondiagnostic, FNAC: Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology.

jbsr-108-1-3577-g3.jpg
Figure 3

Cytopathological illustrations of nodules diagnosed as AUS by FNAC.

(a) An AUS case displaying a small number of oncocytic follicular cells in non-colloidal hypocellular smears (MGG, x10).

(b) An AUS case featuring a small number of follicular cells with nuclear enlargement and membrane irregularities in the predominantly benign preparation; atypical cells are indicated with white arrows (MGG, x20).

(c-d) Atypical cyst-lining epithelial cells observed in the nodule, radiologically defined as cystic (c: PAP, magnification x10; d: liquid-based cytology, PAP, x10).

MGG: May-Grünwald Giemsa, PAP: Papanicolaou Stain, AUS: Atypia of Undetermined Significance, FNAC: Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology.

Table 1

Comparison of characteristics of nodules in Bethesda Category I (ND) and Category III (AUS) based on FNA results.

TOTAL
N = 1152
CATEGORY I (ND)
N1 = 1,110
CATEGORY III (AUS)
N2 = 142
P
(2-SIDED)
Age
(Median, IQR)
55 (46–65)55 (46–65)54 (43–63)0.284
Nodule size (mm)
(Median, IQR)
15 (12–22)15 (11–22)16 (12–24)0.321
Nodule size (mm)
(n, %)
<10 mm108 (8.6)98 (8.8%)10 (7.0%)0.475
≥10 mm1144 (91.4)1012 (91.2)132 (93.0%)
TI-RADS Score
(Median, IQR)
4 (4–5)4 (4–5)4 (4–5)0.599
Gender
(n, %)
Male319 (25.5%)289 (26.0%)30 (21.1%)0.206
Female933 (74.5%)821 (74.0%)112 (78.9%)
Composition
(n, %)
Cystic or almost completely cystic43 (3.4%)37 (3.3%)6 (4.2%)0.693
Spongiform8 (0.6%)8 (0.7%)0 (0.0%)
Mixed cystic and solid259 (20.7%)228 (20.5%)31 (21.8%)
Solid or almost completely solid942 (75.2%)837 (75.4%)105 (73.9%)
Echogenicity
(n, %)
Anechoic47 (3.8%)41 (3.7%)6 (4.2%)0.160
Hyper- or isoechoic799 (63.8%)699 (63.0%)100 (70.4%)
Hypoechoic406 (32.4%)370 (33.3%)36 (25.4%)
Shape
(n, %)
Wider-than-tall1,242 (99.2%)1,101 (99.2%)141 (99.3%)1.000
Taller-than-wide10 (0.8%)9 (0.8%)1 (0.7%)
Margin
(n, %)
Smooth—ill-defined1,147 (91.6%)1,020 (91.9%)127 (89.4%)0.585
Lobulated or irregular74 (5.9%)63 (5.7%)11 (7.7%)
Extra-thyroidal extension31 (2.5%)27 (2.4%)4 (2.8%)
Echogenic foci
(n, %)
None or large comet-tail artifacts1,006 (80.4%)894 (80.5%)112 (78.9%)0.965
Macrocalcifications133 (10.6%)117 (10.5%)16 (11.3%)
Peripheral (rim) calcifications35 (2.8%)31 (2.8%)4 (2.8%)
Punctate echogenic foci78 (6.2%)68 (6.1%)10 (7.0%)
Internal structure
(n, %)
Homogeneous586 (46.8%)517 (46.6%)69 (48.6%)0.651
Heterogeneous666 (53.2%)593 (53.4%)73 (51.4%)
TI-RADS
categories
(n, %)
TI-RADS 141 (3.3%)35 (3.2%)6 (4.2%)N/A
TI-RADS 211 (0.9%)11 (1.0%)0 (0.0%)
TI-RADS 3214 (17.1%)191 (17.2%)23 (16.2%)
TI-RADS 4822 (65.7%)727 (65.5%)95 (66.9%)
TI-RADS 5164 (13.1%)146 (13.2%)18 (12.7%)
Localization
(n, %)
Right665 (53.1%)586 (52.8%)79 (55.6%)0.804
Left537 (42.9%)479 (43.2%)58 (40.8%)
İsthmus50 (4.0%)45 (4.1%)5 (3.5%)
Number of nodules
(n, %)
Soliter1,217 (97.2%)1,078 (97.1%)139 (97.9%)0.789
Multiple35 (2.8%)32 (2.9%)3 (2.1%)
Parenchymal disease
(n, %)
Present149 (11.9%)132 (11.9%)17 (12.0%)0.978
Absent1,103 (88.1%)978 (88.1%)125 (88.0%)
jbsr-108-1-3577-g4.jpg
Figure 4

Relationship between nodule size and Bethesda Categories I (ND) and III (AUS)—distribution of nodule size in both categories. No statistically significant relationship was observed between nodule size and Bethesda categories I and III (p = 0.321).

ND: Nondiagnostic, AUS: Atypia of Undetermined Significance, TBSRTC: The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jbsr.3577 | Journal eISSN: 2514-8281
Language: English
Submitted on: Mar 14, 2024
Accepted on: Apr 25, 2024
Published on: May 7, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Ahmet Bozer, Hülya Çetin Tunçez, Tuğçe Doğa Kul, Asuman Argon, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.