Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Audit on Compliance to Guidelines in CT Scanning for Urolithiasis Cover

Audit on Compliance to Guidelines in CT Scanning for Urolithiasis

Open Access
|Dec 2022

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Compliance with Urolithiasis Procedure according to Hospitals.

FIRST AUDITSECOND AUDITP VALUE
Hospital A0 criterion35.2% (44/125)23.9% (38/159)<0.001
1 criterion52.8% (66/125)38.4% (61/159)
2 criteria12% (15/125)37.7% (60/159)
At least 1 criterion64.8% (81/125)76.10% (121/159)0.037
Hospital B0 criterion53.9% (55/102)38.9% (44/113)0.013
1 criterion29.4% (30/102)27.5% (31/113)
2 criteria16.7% (17/102)33.6% (38/113)
At least 1 criterion46.08% (47/102)61.06% (69/113)0.028
Hospital C0 criterion58.33% (7/12)50% (3/6)0.501
1 criterion25% (3/12)50% (3/6)
2 criteria16.67% (2/12)0% (0/6)
At least 1 criterion41.67% (5/12)50% (3/6)0.740
Hospital A. B and C0 criterion44.35% (106/239)30.94% (86/278)<0.001
1 criterion41.42% (99/239)34.17% (95/278)
2 criteria14.23% (34/239)35.25% (98/278)
At least 1 criterion55.65% (133/239)69.42% (193/278)0.00117
jbsr-106-1-2941-g1.jpg
Figure 1

CT examination for urolithiasis in coronal section for three patients of similar diameters: (a) wrong acquisition length and protocol selection – DLP 206.1 mGy.cm (b) right protocol but wrong acquisition length – DLP 82.4 mGy.cm (c) right protocol selection using Tin Filter and right acquisition length – DLP 34.3 mGy.cm.

Table 2

Compliance with Urolithiasis Procedure according to Radiologists.

FIRST AUDITSECOND AUDIT
RAD10 criterion41.18% (7/17)34.21% (13/38)
At least 1 criterion58.82% (10/17)65.79% (25/38)
RAD20 criterion45% (9/20)24.14% (7/29)
At least 1 criterion55% (11/20)75.86% (22/29)
RAD30 criterion55.56% (10/18)33.33% (8/24)
At least 1 criterion44.44% (8/18)66.67% (16/24)
RAD40 criterion54.55% (6/11)56.25% (9/16)
At least 1 criterion45.45% (5/11)43.75% (7/16)
RAD50 criterion62.5% (10/16)28.57% (4/14)
At least 1 criterion37.5% (6/16)71.43% (10/14)
RAD60 criterion55.56% (10/18)23.08% (3/13)
At least 1 criterion44.44% (8/18)76.92% (10/13)
RAD70 criterion0% (0/7)11.11% (1/9)
At least 1 criterion100% (7/7)88.89% (8/9)
RAD80 criterion43.75% (7/16)40% (6/15)
At least 1 criterion56.25% (9/16)60% (9/15)
RAD90 criterion25.81% (8/31)16.67% (5/30)
At least 1 criterion74.19% (23/31)83.33% (25/30)
RAD100 criterion45% (9/20)14.29% (2/14)
At least 1 criterion55% (11/20)85.71% (12/14)
RAD110 criterion0% (0/3)11.11% (2/18)
At least 1 criterion100% (3/3)88.89% (16/18)
RAD120 criterion60% (6/10)100% (2/2)
At least 1 criterion40% (4/10)0% (0/2)

[i] Note: RAD = Radiologist.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jbsr.2941 | Journal eISSN: 2514-8281
Language: English
Submitted on: Sep 21, 2022
Accepted on: Nov 4, 2022
Published on: Dec 9, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Blandine Defrenne, Nigel Howarth, Denis Tack, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.