Have a personal or library account? Click to login
In-depth Retrospective Review of Originally Negative Screening Mammograms from Women with Confirmed Breast Cancer Cover

In-depth Retrospective Review of Originally Negative Screening Mammograms from Women with Confirmed Breast Cancer

Open Access
|Nov 2022

References

  1. Perry NBM, de Wolf C, Törnberg S, Holland R, von Karsa L. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. In: European Commission DHaC, editor. 4th edn. ed. Luxemburg: European Union Publications Office; 2006. http://www.euref.org/european-guidelines.
  2. Timmermans L, Bleyen L, Bacher K, et al. Screen-detected versus interval cancers: Effect of imaging modality and breast density in the Flemish Breast Cancer Screening Programme. Eur Radiol. 2017; 27(9): 38109. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-4757-4
  3. Houssami N, Hunter K. The epidemiology, radiology and biological characteristics of interval breast cancers in population mammography screening. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2017; 3(1): 113. DOI: 10.1038/s41523-017-0014-x
  4. Evans KK, Birdwell RL, Wolfe JM. If you don’t find it often, you often don’t find it: Why some cancers are missed in breast cancer screening. PLOS ONE. 2013; 8(5): e64366. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064366
  5. Bellio G, Marion R, Giudici F, et al. Interval breast cancer versus screen-detected cancer: Comparison of clinicopathologic characteristics in a single-center analysis. Clin Breast Cancer. 2017; 17(7): 56471. DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.04.001
  6. Hoff SR, Samset JH, Abrahamsen A-L, Vigeland E, Klepp O, Hofvind S. Missed and true interval and screen-detected breast cancers in a population-based screening program. Acad radiol. 2011; 18(4): 45460. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.11.014
  7. Hovda T, Tsuruda K, Hoff SR, Sahlberg KK, Hofvind S. Radiological review of prior screening mammograms of screen-detected breast cancer. Eur Radiol. 2021; 31(4): 256879. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07130-y
  8. Hofvind S, Skaane P, Vitak B, et al. Influence of review design on percentages of missed interval breast cancers: Retrospective study of interval cancers in a population-based screening program. Radiology. 2005; 237(2): 43743. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2372041174
  9. Lekanidi K, Dilks P, Suaris T, Kennett S, Purushothaman H. Breast screening: What can the interval cancer review teach us? Are we perhaps being a bit too hard on ourselves? Eur J Radiol. 2017; 94: 135. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.07.005
  10. Prummel MV, Muradali D, Shumak R, et al. Digital compared with screen-film mammography: Measures of diagnostic accuracy among women screened in the Ontario breast screening program. Radiology. 2016; 278(2): 36573. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015150733
  11. Séradour B, Heid P, Estève J. Comparison of direct digital mammography, computed radiography, and film-screen in the French national breast cancer screening program. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014; 202(1): 22936. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.12.10419
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jbsr.2796 | Journal eISSN: 2514-8281
Language: English
Submitted on: Mar 3, 2022
|
Accepted on: Sep 12, 2022
|
Published on: Nov 11, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Lieve Vandendaele, Svetlana Jidkova, Koen Van Herck, Tom Kimpe, Veerle Verschuere, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.