Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Collapse-Related Bone Changes in Osteonecrotic Femoral Heads at Multidetector CT: Comparison between Femoral Heads with Limited and Advanced Collapse Cover

Collapse-Related Bone Changes in Osteonecrotic Femoral Heads at Multidetector CT: Comparison between Femoral Heads with Limited and Advanced Collapse

Open Access
|Jun 2022

Figures & Tables

jbsr-106-1-2735-g1.jpg
Figure 1

A 12 × 12 transparent grid was overlayed on coronal MDCT images. Image analysis was performed in every 4 × 4 mm grid box. As an example, grid boxes D2, D3, E2, F2, G2 and H2 contained collapse-related trabecular interruption.

jbsr-106-1-2735-g2.jpg
Figure 2

Coronal MDCT reformats of resected femoral head specimens of (A) a 59-year-old woman and (B) an 85-year-old woman, showing interface-related bone sclerosis (thick arrows) and collapse-related bone changes: cortical interruption (arrowheads), trabecular interruption (thin arrows) and bone resorption (asterisks in B).

jbsr-106-1-2735-g3.jpg
Figure 3

(A) and (B) Coronal MDCT reformats of a resected femoral head specimen in a 62-year-old man, showing collapse-related trabecular interruption in the superficial (thin white arrows) and deep layers (thick white arrows) of the trabecular bone. Also note cortical interruption (arrowheads) and interface-related bone sclerosis (black arrows).

Table 1

Frequency of grid boxes with cortical and trabecular bone changes on coronal MDCT reformats of 14 femoral head specimens.

R1R2
Necrosis-relatedbone changesNecrotic lesion3442/10596
(32.5%)
3666/10596
(34.6%)
Trabecular sclerosis1111/10596
(10.5%)
1362/10596
(12.9%)
Collapse-relatedbone changesCortical interruption557/2933
(19%)
413/2933
(14.1%)
Trabecular interruption796/10596
(7.5%)
665/10596
(6.3%)
Trabecular resorption331/10596
(3.1%)
595/10596
(5.6%)

[i] R1 and R2 represent two readers.

Table 2

Frequency of grid boxes with CRBC and with necrotic lesion in different thirds regions of the FH in the coronal plane on MDCT reformats.

ANTERO-POSTERIOR DIRECTIONMEDIO-LATERAL DIRECTIONCRANIO-CAUDAL DIRECTIONRADIAL DIRECTION
ANTMIDPOSTPMEDCENTLATPSUPMIDINFPSUPERFICIALDEEPP
R1NecroticLesion*782/2159
(36.2%)
1345/4354
(30.9%)
623/2419
(25.8%)
P1 < 0.001
P2 < 0.001
P3 < 0.001
681/2427
(28.1%)
1582/4345
(36.4%)
487/2160
(22.5%)
P4 < 0.001
P5 < 0.001
P6 < 0.001
1713/2273
(75.4%)
1030/4632
(22.2%)
7/2027
(0.3%)
P7 < 0.001
P8 < 0.001
P9 < 0.001
823/2232
(36.9%)
1927/6700
(28.8%)
P < 0.001
Trabecularsclerosis324/2562
(12.6%)
509/5134
(9.9%)
278/2900
(9.6%)
P1 < 0.001
P2 < 0.001
P3 = 0.664
273/2867
(9.5%)
587/5125
(11.45%)
251/2604
(9.6%)
P4 = 0.007
P5 = 0.090
P6 = 0.013
422/2671
(15.8%)
650/5447
(11.9%)
39/2478
(1.6%)
P7 < 0.001
P8 < 0.001
P9 < 0.001
203/2621
(7.7%)
908/7975
(11.4%)
P < 0.001
Corticalinterruption213/830
(25.7%)
236/1199
(19.7%)
108/904
(11.9%)
P1 = 0.001
P2 < 0.001
P3 < 0.001
131/1357
(6.7%)
252/846
(29.8%)
174/730
(23.8%)
P4 < 0.001
P5 < 0.001
P6 = 0.007
486/1388
(35%)
71/941
(7.5%)
0/604
(0%)
P7 < 0.001
P8 < 0.001
P9 < 0.001
NANA
Trabecularinterruption243/2562
(9.5%)
404/5134
(7.9%)
149/2900
(5.1%)
P1 = 0.02
P2 < 0.001
P3 < 0.001
160/2867
(5.6%)
448/5125
(8.7%)
188/2604
(7.2%)
P4 < 0.001
P5 = 0.016
P6 = 0.023
693/2671
(25.9%)
99/5447
(1.8%)
4/2478
(0.2%)
P7 < 0.001
P8 < 0.001
P9 < 0.001
448/2621
(17.1%)
348/7975
(4.4%)
P < 0.001
Trabecularresorption162/2562
(6.3%)
125/5134
(2.4%)
44/2900
(1.5%)
P1 < 0.001
P2 < 0.001
P3 = 0.007
59/2867
(2.1%)
204/5125
(4%)
68/2604
(2.6%)
P4 < 0.001
P5 = 0.221
P6 = 0.002
171/2671
(6.4%)
143/5447
(2.6%)
17/2478
(0.7%)
P7 < 0.001
P8 < 0.001
P9 < 0.001
50/2621
(1.9%)
281/7975
(3.5%)
P < 0.001
R2NecroticLesion*884/2159
(40.9%)
1323/4354
(30.4%)
607/2419
(25.1%)
P1 < 0.001
P2 < 0.001
P3 < 0.001
685/2427
(28.2%)
1585/4345
(36.5%)
544/2160
(25.2%)
P4 < 0.001
P5 = 0.022
P6 < 0.001
1766/2273
(77.7%)
1036/4632
(22.4%)
12/2027
(0.6%)
P7 < 0.001
P8 < 0.001
P9 < 0.001
897/2232
(40.2%)
1917/6700
(28.6%)
P < 0.001
Trabecularsclerosis421/2562
(16.4%)
616/5134
(12%)
325/2900
(11.2%)
P1 < 0.001
P2 < 0.001
P3 = 0.284
332/2867
(11.6%)
662/5125
(12.9%)
368/2604
(14.1%)
P4 = 0.091
P5 = 0.006
P6 = 0.014
590/2671
(22.1%)
732/5447
(13.4%)
40/2478
(1.6%)
Px < 0.001
Py < 0.001
Pz < 0.001
317/2621
(12.1%)
1045/7975
(13.1%)
P = 0.185
Corticalinterruption168/830
(20.2%)
179/1199
(14.9%)
66/904
(7.3%)
P1 = 0.002
P2 < 0.001
P3 < 0.001
112/1357
(8.3%)
186/846
(22%)
115/730
(15.75%)
P4 < 0.001
P5 < 0.001
P6 = 0.002
350/1388
(25.2%)
60/941
(6.4%)
3/604
(0.5%)
P7 < 0.001
P8 < 0.001
P9 < 0.001
NANA
Trabecularinterruption228/2562
(8.9%)
306/5134
(6%)
131/2900
(4.5%)
P1 < 0.001
P2 < 0.001
P3 = 0.004
108/2867
(3.8%)
432/5125
(8.4%)
125/2604
(4.8%)
P4 < 0.001
P5 = 0.068
P6 < 0.001
582/2671
(21.8%)
83/5447
(1.5%)
0/2478
(0%)
P7 < 0.001
P8 < 0.001
P9 < 0.001
389/2621
(14.8%)
276/7975
(3.5%)
P < 0.001
Trabecularresorption243/2562
(9.5%)
248/5134
(4.8%)
104/2900
(3.6%)
P1 < 0.001
P2 < 0.001
P3 = 0.011
116/2867
(4.1%)
334/5125
(6.5%)
145/2604
(5.6%)
P4 < 0.001
P5 = 0.01
P6 = 0.12
353/2671
(13.2%)
238/5447
(4.4%)
4/2478
(0.2%)
P7 < 0.001
P8 < 0.001
P9 < 0.001
110/2621
(4.2%)
485/7975
(6.1%)
P < 0.001

[i] *Frequency of grid boxes containing the necrotic lesion was calculated in 12 instead of 14 ONFH because the interface was only partially visible.

The denominators represent the total number of grid boxes in every region. (p1) Anterior versus Middle; (p2) Anterior versus Posterior; (p3) Middle versus posterior. (p4) = Medial versus Central; (p5) = Medial versus Lateral; (p6) = Central versus Lateral. (p7) = Superior versus Middle; (p8) = Superior versus Inferior; (p9) = Middle versus inferior.

Table 3

Comparison of frequency of grid boxes with CRBC on coronal MDCT reformats within or outside the osteonecrotic lesions*.

COLLAPSE-RELATED BONE CHANGESOUTSIDE NECROTIC LESIONWITHIN NECROTIC LESIONP VALUE
R1Cortical bone interruption42/1507 (2.8%)415/979 (42.4%)p < 0.001
Trabecular bone interruption18/6182 (0.3%)648/2750 (23.6%)p < 0.001
Trabecular bone resorption20/6182 (0.3%)246/2750 (8.9%)p < 0.001
R2Cortical bone interruption24/1507 (1.6%)315/979 (32.2%)p < 0.001
Trabecular bone interruption3/6118 (0.05%)544/2814 (19.3%)p < 0.001
Trabecular bone resorption3/6118 (0.05%)519/2814 (18.4%)p < 0.001

[i] *Frequency of grid boxes containing the necrotic lesion was calculated in 12 instead of 14 ONFH because the interface was only partially visible.

Table 4

Comparison of frequency of grid boxes with necrotic lesions and CRBC at MDCT between ONFH with limited and advanced collapse.

FREQUENCY OF GRID BOXES CONTAININGR1R2
COLLAPSE
<1.5 mm
COLLAPSE
≥1.5 mm
P VALUECOLLAPSE
<1.5 mm
COLLAPSE
≥1.5 mm
P VALUE
Necrotic lesion1481/4610(32.13%)1961/5986(32.76%)P = 0.5031460/4610(31.67%)2206/5986(36.85%)p < 0.001
Interface-relatedTrabecular sclerosis499/4610
(10.82%)
612/5986(10.22%)P = 0.318577/4610(12.51%)785/5986(13.11%)P = 0.360
Cortical bone interruption216/1269(17.02%)341/1664(20.49%)P = 0.018121/1269(9.54%)292/1664(17.55%)p < 0.001
Trabecular bone interruption369/4610(8%)427/5986
(7.13%)
P = 0.094299/4610(6.49%)366/5986(6.11%)P = 0.443
Trabecular bone resorption99/4610(2.15%)232/5986(3.88%)p < 0.001214/4610(4.64%)381/5986(6.36%)p < 0.001
ARCO:Association Research Circulation Osseous
CRBC:collapse-related bone changes
FH:femoral head
MDCT:multidetector computed tomography
ON:osteonecrosis
ONFH:osteonecrotic femoral heads
µCT:Microcomputed tomography
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jbsr.2735 | Journal eISSN: 2514-8281
Language: English
Submitted on: Dec 18, 2021
|
Accepted on: May 25, 2022
|
Published on: Jun 9, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Charbel Mourad, Souad Acid, Nicolas Michoux, Anthony Awad, Bruno Vande Berg, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.