Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Giant Frontal Paranasal Mucocele: Case Report and Review of the Literature Cover

Giant Frontal Paranasal Mucocele: Case Report and Review of the Literature

Open Access
|Sep 2020

Figures & Tables

jbsr-104-1-2117-g1.jpg
Figure 1

Initial axial non-enhanced CT. A. Soft tissue and B. bone window show a slightly hyperdense mass to gray matter (arrow) located at the right frontal bone causing scalloping of the internal and external table (arrowhead). There is focal discontinuity of the external and internal table. Remnants of the expanded frontal bone (thin arrow) can be seen medially.

jbsr-104-1-2117-g2.jpg
Figure 2

MRI at first admission. A. Axial T2-WI. B. Diffusion weighted image (b1000) and C. T1-WI before and D. after gadolinium contrast administration confirm the presence of a well-defined expansile mass (arrow) at the frontal bone. The signal is homogenously hyperintense on T2 and T1-WI images in keeping with high protein content. The lesion did not demonstrate restricted diffusion. After administration of gadolinium contrast the lesion shows subtle peripheral contrast enhancement (arrowheads). The lesion exerts mass effect on the frontal lobe.

jbsr-104-1-2117-g3.jpg
Figure 3

Axial non-enhanced CT images four years later. A. Soft tissue and B. bone window demonstrate considerable growth of the lesion (arrows) and a decrease in density. There is increased osteolytic destruction of the frontal bone and progressive extra-axial extension into the brain with mass effect on the frontal horn of the lateral ventricle. C. Coronal reformatted CT image shows an intimate relationship of the lesion with the right frontal sinus (arrowhead).

jbsr-104-1-2117-g4.jpg
Figure 4

MRI scan 4 years later. A. Axial T2-WI. B. Diffusion weighted image (b1000) and C T1-WI and D. subtraction image of T1-WI before and after gadolinium contrast administration. The lesion (arrows) is slightly more hyperintense on T2-WI and slightly less intense on T1-WI compared to the previous examination due to a higher fluid content. There is no diffusion restriction and persistent subtle peripheral contrast enhancement (arrowheads).

Table 1

Predisposing factors for mucocele formation.

– Chronic sinusitis
– Craniofacial malformations
– Systemic diseases (Cystic fibrosis, Granulomatosis with polyangiitis, …)
– Obstruction by neoplasia
– Surgery
– Facial trauma
Table 2

Imaging characteristics of giant frontal sinus mucoceles described in previous case reports.

AuthorsSize (cm)General characteristicsDensity compared to grey matter on NECTEnhancement on CECTMR findings
T1-WI SI*T2-WI SI*EnhancementOther
Singh et al. (2019) Case report [5]8 × 8 × 7Expansion and thinning of the frontal boneHypodense with peripheral calcificationsN/AIntermediateHighPeripheral enhancementNo diffusion restriction.
Focal organized hemorrhage inside the lesion
Alshoabi, Gameraddin. (2018) Case report [1]10 × 9IsodensePeripheral enhancementIntermediateHighN/AN/A
Carmichael, Kang. (2015) Case report [4]4 × 6.5Intermediate densityN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Kawaguchi et al. (2002) Case report [2]N/AIsodense with peripheral calcificationsN/AIntermediate-LowHighPeripheral enhancementN/A
Saki et al. (2000) Case report [6]6.6 × 8.5Heterogenous iso- and hypodenseN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

[i] NECT: Non-enhanced CT, CECT, contrast-enhanced CT, N/A: Data not available. * Signal intensity compared to grey matter.

Table 3

Differential Diagnosis of mucoceles.

– Mucus retention cyst
– Arachnoid cyst
– (Epi)dermoid cyst
– Malignant neoplasm (both primary and metastatic)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jbsr.2117 | Journal eISSN: 2514-8281
Language: English
Submitted on: Mar 24, 2020
Accepted on: Aug 14, 2020
Published on: Sep 11, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Frederik Bosmans, Filip Vanhoenacker, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.