Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Orbital Solitary Fibrous Tumors: Radiological-Pathological Correlation Analysis Cover

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Orbital Solitary Fibrous Tumors: Radiological-Pathological Correlation Analysis

Open Access
|Mar 2021

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Detail classification of MRI findings.

MRI FINDINGSCLASSIFICATIONNUMBERS
ContourWell-defined6
Irregular3
LocationSuperior portion7
Inferior portion2
Inside muscle cone2
Outside muscle cone7
Signal intensity on T1WIHypo intensity0
Hypo-Iso intensity2
Iso intensity4
Iso-Hyper intensity3
Hyper intensity0
Signal intensity on T2WIHypo intensity1
Hypo-Iso intensity2
Iso intensity1
Iso-Hyper intensity4
Hyper intensity1
Linear of curvilinear hypo-intensity linePresent6
Absent3
EnhancementHomogenous6
Heterogenous2

[i] T1WI (T1-weighted image), T2WI (T2-weighted image).

jbsr-105-1-2097-g1.png
Figure 1

A 14-year-old woman with solitary fibrous tumor. (a) The tumor was located outside of the muscle cone and displayed isointensity compared with brain white mater on T1-weighted imaging. (b) The tumor displayed hyperintensity on T2-weighted imaging. (c) Hematoxylin and eosin staining of the tumor showing a prominent myxoid change.

jbsr-105-1-2097-g2.png
Figure 2

A 77-year-old woman with solitary fibrous tumor (SFT). (a) The tumor was located outside of the muscle cone and showed marked isointensity on T1-weighted imaging. (b) The tumor displayed hypointensity on T2-weighted imaging. (c) Azan staining of the tumor revealing a large amount of collagenous tissue in the lesion.

jbsr-105-1-2097-g3.png
Figure 3

A 69-year-old woman with solitary fibrous tumor (SFT). Inhomogeneous enhancement was observed on enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (a). Although the level of CD31 staining was low (b).

Table 2

Correlation between amount of collagenous tissue and the parameters of texture analysis.

AMOUNT OF COLLAGENOUS TISSUEP VALUESPEARMAN’S RANK CORRELATION COEFFICIENT
STATISTICSPARAMETERS1234Pρ
Histogramentropy0.092 ± 0.0060.116 ± 0.0160.078 ± 0.0320.095 ± 0.0290.950.03
skewness0.178 ± 1.0300.145 ± 0.5970.109 ± 0.2920.185 ± 0.3110.62–0.20
kurtosis4.518 ± 0.8663.309 ± 0.2972.619 ± 0.0222.504 ± 0.132<0.0001*–0.97
mean120721± 1832381868 ± 42632119114 ± 42736177961 ± 310710.1810.4895
median120020 ± 1522081090 ± 44357119085 ± 44357175631 ± 271370.1810.4895
0 percentile58395 ± 3799828688 ± 3011261838 ± 1821284660 ± 447170.5480.2319
25 percentiles108099 ± 1391270731 ± 46025104550 ± 38947154658 ± 290300.1810.4895
50 percentiles120020 ± 1522081090 ± 44357119085 ± 44357175631 ± 271370.1810.4895
75 percentiles131771 ± 1987492183 ± 41292133652 ± 46836200303 ± 315550.1810.4895
100 percentiles198390 ± 44906131708 ± 27227180540 ± 62027266730 ± 400290.27030.4122
Co–occurrence matrixcontrast0.100 ± 0.0090.149 ± 0.0580.102 ± 0.0950.118 ± 0.0400.965–0.0172
correlation0.951 ± 0.0100.942 ± 0.0230.910 ± 0.0400.955 ± 0.0010.4182–0.3092
energy0.975 ± 0.0020.968 ± 0.0060.984 ± 0.0170.974 ± 0.0100.9475–0.0258
homogeneity0.995 ± 0.0000.993 ± 0.0010.997 ± 0.0040.994 ± 0.0030.9475–0.0258
Run-length matrixSLE0.409 ± 0.0210.326 ± 0.0290.439 ± 0.0580.403 ± 0.0920.74120.1288
LRE65.445 ± 13.71875.242 ± 40.23768.610 ± 7.42174.700 ± 7.1160.56360.2233
GLN274.808 ± 38.795467.219 ± 38.782271.958 ± 25.069332.819 ± 192.9820.9825–0.0086
RP313.761 ± 15.303307.426 ± 56.256391.400 ± 99.577307.451 ± 6.5120.7580.1202
RLN0.259 ± 0.0080.327 ± 0.0300.246 ± 0.0470.275 ±0.0820.94750.0258
LGRE0.442 ± 0.0330.534 ± 0.0010.395 ± 0.0690.458 ±0.1020.758–0.1202
HGRE20213 ± 38315724 ± 173538253 ± 2774619984 ± 66760.9475–0.0258
SRLGLE0.009 ± 0.0020.010 ± 0.0040.008 ± 0.0050.011 ± 0.0090.8433–0.0773
SRHGLE20211 ± 38315722 ± 173538251 ± 2774619982 ± 66760.9475–0.0258
LRLGLE20211 ± 38315722 ± 173538251 ± 2774619982 ± 66760.9475–0.0258
LRHGLE20432 ± 37215932 ± 158838530 ± 2775220225 ± 67120.9475–0.0258

[i] * p < 0.05.

Four categories of the proliferation of collagenous fibers or fibrous components: (1), myxoid change (2), small amount of collagenous tissue (3), moderate amount of collagenous tissue and (4), abundant collagenous tissue.

SLE: Short-run emphasis, LRE: Long-run emphasis, GLN: Gray-level non uniformity, RP: Run percentage, RLN: Run length non-uniformity.

LGRE: Low gray-level run emphasis, HGRE: High gray-level run emphasis.

SRLGLE: Short-run low gray-level emphasis, SRHGLE: Short-run high gray-level emphasis, LRLGLE: Long-run low gray-level emphasis, LRHGLE: Long-run high gray-level emphasis.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jbsr.2097 | Journal eISSN: 2514-8281
Language: English
Submitted on: Mar 4, 2020
|
Accepted on: Jul 26, 2020
|
Published on: Mar 16, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Ryuhei Masuno, Daisuke Yunaiyama, Yukiko Shishido-Hara, Daisuke Yoshimaru, Chifumi Maruyama, Yoichi Araki, Hiroshi Goto, Toshitaka Nagao, Kazuhiro Saito, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.