Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Multiparametric MRI of the Prostate: From Scientific Triumph to Daily Practice Cover

Multiparametric MRI of the Prostate: From Scientific Triumph to Daily Practice

Open Access
|Nov 2019

References

  1. Prostate Imaging Reporting & Data System (PI-RADS) 2019 v2.1. American College of Radiology.
  2. Woo, S, Suh, CH, Kim, SY, Cho, JY and Kim, SH. Diagnostic performance of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for detection of prostate cancer: A systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2017; 72: 177188. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.01.042
  3. Mehralivand, S, Bednarova, S, Shih, JH, et al. Prospective evaluation of PI-RADS™ Version 2 using the International Society of Urological Pathology Prostate Cancer Grade Group System. J Urol. 2017; 198: 583590. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.03.131
  4. Moldovan, PC, Van den Broeck, T, Sylvester, R, et al. What is the negative predictive value of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in excluding prostate cancer at biopsy? A systematic review and meta-analysis from the European Association of Urology Prostate Cancer Guidelines Panel. Eur Urol. 2017; 72: 250266. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.02.026
  5. Fütterer, JJ, Briganti, A, De Visschere, P, et al. Can clinically significant prostate cancer be detected with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging? A systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol. 2015; 68: 10451053. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.013
  6. Wegelin, O, van Melick, HHE, Hooft, L, et al. Comparing three different techniques for magnetic resonance imaging-targeted prostate biopsies: A systematic review of in-bore versus magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion versus cognitive registration. Is there a preferred technique? Eur Urol. 2017; 71: 517531. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.07.041
  7. Drost, FH, Osses, DF and Nieboer, D. Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 4: CD012663. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012663.pub2
  8. Boesen, L, Nørgaard, N, Løgager, V, et al. Assessment of the diagnostic accuracy of biparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men: The biparametric MRI for detection of prostate cancer (BIDOC) study. JAMA Network open. 2018; 1: e180219. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0219
  9. Garcia-Reyes, K, Passoni, NM, Palmeri, ML, et al. Detection of prostate cancer with multiparametric MRI (mpMRI): Effect of dedicated reader education on accuracy and confidence of index and anterior cancer diagnosis. Abd Imaging. 2015; 40: 134142. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-014-0197-7
  10. Hansen, NL, Koo, BC, Gallagher, FA, et al. Comparison of initial and tertiary centre second opinion reads of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate prior to repeat biopsy. Eur Radiol. 2017; 27(6): 22592266. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4635-5
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jbsr.1929 | Journal eISSN: 2514-8281
Language: English
Submitted on: Aug 30, 2019
|
Accepted on: Sep 6, 2019
|
Published on: Nov 18, 2019
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Geert Villeirs, Pieter De Visschere, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.