Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Radiological Clinical Practice Guidelines Published in the Last Decade: A Bibliometric Analysis Cover

Radiological Clinical Practice Guidelines Published in the Last Decade: A Bibliometric Analysis

Open Access
|Jun 2019

References

  1. 1Cook, DJ, Greengold, NL, Ellrodt, AG and Weingarten SR. The relation between systematic reviews and practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 1997; 127: 21016. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-3-199708010-00006
  2. 2Malone, DE. Evidence-based practice in radiology: An introduction to the series. Radiology. 2007; 242: 1214. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2421060010
  3. 3Sardanelli, F, Hunink, MG, Gilbert, FJ, Di Leo, G and Krestin, GP. Evidence-based radiology: Why and how? Eur Radiol. 2010; 20: 115. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-009-1574-4
  4. 4Sardanelli, F, Bashir, H, Berzaczy, D, et al. The role of imaging specialists as authors of systematic reviews on diagnostic and interventional imaging and its impact on scientific quality: Report from the EuroAIM Evidence-based Radiology Working Group. Radiology. 2014; 272: 53340. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14131730
  5. 5Field, MJ and Lohr, KN (eds.). Institute of Medicine (US) Committee to Advise the Public Health Service on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Clinical Practice Guidelines: Directions for a New Program. Washington (DC), US: National Academies Press, 1990.
  6. 6Kliger, AS and Haley, WE. Clinical practice guidelines in end-stage renal disease: A strategy for implementation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999; 10: 87277.
  7. 7Berger, JT and Rosner, F. The ethics of practice guidelines. Arch Intern Med. 1996; 156: 205156. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.1996.00440170053006
  8. 8Ray, CE, Jr., Gupta, R and Blackwell, J. Changes in the American interventional radiology literature: Comparison over a 10-year time period. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2006; 29: 599604. DOI: 10.1007/s00270-005-0209-7
  9. 9Lim, KJ, Yoon, DY, Yun, EJ, et al. Characteristics and trends of radiology research: A survey of original articles published in AJR and Radiology between 2001 and 2010. Radiology. 2012; 264: 796802. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12111976
  10. 10Reed, DA, Cook, DA, Beckman, TJ, Levine, RB, Kern, DE and Wright, SM. Association between funding and quality of published medical education research. JAMA. 2007; 298: 10029. DOI: 10.1001/jama.298.9.1002
  11. 11Chow, DS and Itagaki, MW. Interventional oncology research in the United States: Slowing growth, limited focus, and a low level of funding. Radiology. 2010; 257: 41017. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10100070
  12. 12Eyre-Walker, A and Stoletzki, N. The assessment of science: The relative merits of post-publication review, the impact factor, and the number of citations. PLoS Biol. 2013; 11: e1001675. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001675
  13. 13Yoon, SJ, Yoon, DY, Lee, HJ, et al. Distribution of citations received by scientific papers published in the imaging literature from 2001 to 2010: Decreasing inequality and polarization. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017; 209: 24854. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.16.17769
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jbsr.1764 | Journal eISSN: 2514-8281
Language: English
Submitted on: Feb 5, 2019
Accepted on: Jun 1, 2019
Published on: Jun 28, 2019
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Su Jin Hong, Dae Young Yoon, Kyoung Ja Lim, Ji Yoon Moon, Soo Jeong Yoon, Young Lan Seo, Eun Joo Yun, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.