Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Contribution of Cross-sectional Imaging in the Work-up of Intermediate Coronary Artery Stenosis Cover

Contribution of Cross-sectional Imaging in the Work-up of Intermediate Coronary Artery Stenosis

Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology
Volume 102 (2018): Issue 1
By: Olivier Ghekiere  
Open Access
|Apr 2018

References

  1. 1Budoff, MJ, Nakazato, R, Mancini, GB, et al. CT Angiography for the Prediction of Hemodynamic Significance in Intermediate and Severe Lesions: Head-to-Head Comparison With Quantitative Coronary Angiography Using Fractional Flow Reserve as the Reference Standard. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016; 9: 559–64. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.08.021
    Back to article
  2. 2Toth, GG, Toth, B, Johnson, NP, et al. Revascularization decisions in patients with stable angina and intermediate lesions: Results of the international survey on interventional strategy. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014; 7: 751–9. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001608
    Back to article
  3. 3Kolh, P and Windecker, S. ESC/EACTS myocardial revascularization guidelines 2014. Eur Heart J. 2014; 35: 3235–6. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu366
    Back to article
  4. 4Montalescot, G, Sechtem, U, Achenbach, S, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: The Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2013; 34: 2949–3003. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht296
    Back to article
  5. 5Ghekiere, O, Dewilde, W, Bellekens, M, et al. Diagnostic performance of quantitative coronary computed tomography angiography and quantitative coronary angiography to predict hemodynamic significance of intermediate-grade stenoses. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015; 31: 1651–61. DOI: 10.1007/s10554-015-0748-1
    Back to article
  6. 6Doh, JH, Koo, BK, Nam, CW, et al. Diagnostic value of coronary CT angiography in comparison with invasive coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound in patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis: Results from the prospective multicentre FIGURE-OUT (Functional Imaging criteria for GUiding REview of invasive coronary angiOgraphy, intravascular Ultrasound, and coronary computed Tomographic angiography) study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014; 15: 870–7. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeu009
    Back to article
  7. 7Voros, S, Rinehart, S, Qian, Z, et al. Prospective validation of standardized, 3-dimensional, quantitative coronary computed tomographic plaque measurements using radiofrequency backscatter intravascular ultrasound as reference standard in intermediate coronary arterial lesions: Results from the ATLANTA (assessment of tissue characteristics, lesion morphology, and hemodynamics by angiography with fractional flow reserve, intravascular ultrasound and virtual histology, and noninvasive computed tomography in atherosclerotic plaques) I study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011; 4: 198–208. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.10.008
    Back to article
  8. 8Ghekiere, O, Salgado, R, Buls, N, et al. Image quality in coronary CT angiography: Challenges and technical solutions. Br J Radiol. 2017; 90. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160567
    Back to article
  9. 9den Harder, AM, Willemink, MJ, de Jong, PA, et al. New horizons in cardiac CT. Clin Radiol. 2016; 71: 758–67. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.01.022
    Back to article
  10. 10Takx, RA, Sucha, D, Park, J, Leiner, T and Hoffmann, U. Sublingual Nitroglycerin Administration in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: A Systematic Review. Eur Radiol. 2015; 25: 3536–42. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-3791-3
    Back to article
  11. 11Ghekiere, O, Nchimi, A, Djekic, J, et al. Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: Patient-related factors determining image quality using a second-generation 320-slice CT scanner. Int J Cardiol. 2016; 221: 970–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.07.141
    Back to article
  12. 12De Bruyne, B, Baudhuin, T, Melin, JA, et al. Coronary flow reserve calculated from pressure measurements in humans. Validation with positron emission tomography. Circulation. 1994; 89: 1013–22. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.89.3.1013
    Back to article
  13. 13Johnson, NP, Gould, KL, Di Carli, MF and Taqueti, VR. Invasive FFR and Noninvasive CFR in the Evaluation of Ischemia: What Is the Future? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 67: 2772–88. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.584
    Back to article
  14. 14Hussain, ST, Chiribiri, A, Morton, G, et al. Perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance and fractional flow reserve in patients with angiographic multi-vessel coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016; 18: 44. DOI: 10.1186/s12968-016-0263-0
    Back to article
  15. 15Stuijfzand, WJ, Uusitalo, V, Kero, T, et al. Relative flow reserve derived from quantitative perfusion imaging may not outperform stress myocardial blood flow for identification of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015; 8. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002400
    Back to article
  16. 16Lee, JM, Kim, CH, Koo, BK, et al. Integrated Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Diagnostics Improve Detection of Functionally Significant Coronary Artery Stenosis by 13N-ammonia Positron Emission Tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016; 9. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.004768
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jbsr.1537 | Journal eISSN: 2514-8281
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Mar 13, 2018
Accepted on: Apr 4, 2018
Published on: Apr 20, 2018
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Intermediate coronary artery stenosis,
quantitative coronary CT angiography,
non-invasive FFR estimates from CT (FFRCT),
stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR),
relative myocardial perfusion index,
fractional flow reserve (FFR)

© 2018 Olivier Ghekiere, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 102 (2018): Issue 1Next article