Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Optimisation of X-Rays Imaging Techniques for the Assessment of Joint Space Cover

Optimisation of X-Rays Imaging Techniques for the Assessment of Joint Space

By: Paolo Simoni  
Open Access
|Feb 2018

References

  1. Hellio Le Graverand, MP, Mazzuca, S, Duryea, J and Brett, A. Radiographic-based grading methods and radiographic measurement of joint space width in osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009; 47: 567579. DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2009.04.004
  2. Colebatch, AN, Edwards, CJ, Ostergaard, M, et al. EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging of the joints in the clinical management of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013; 72: 804814. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-203158
  3. Guermazi, A, Roemer, FW, Burstein, D and Hayashi, D. Why radiography should no longer be considered a surrogate outcome measure for longitudinal assessment of cartilage in knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Research & Therapy. 2011; 13. DOI: 10.1186/ar3488
  4. Aletaha, D, Neogi, T, Silman, AJ, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis classification crite-ria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 2010; 62: 25692581. DOI: 10.1002/art.27584
  5. Boyesen, P, Haavardsholm, EA, van der Heijde, D, et al. Prediction of MRI erosive pro-gression: a comparison of modern imaging modalities in early rheumatoid arthritis patients. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011; 70: 176179. DOI: 10.1136/ard.2009.126953
  6. Dohn, UM, Ejbjerg, BJ, Court-Payen, M, et al. Are bone erosions detected by magne-tic resonance imaging and ultrasonography true erosions? A comparison with computed tomography in rheumatoid arthritis metacarpophalangeal joints. Arthritis Res Ther. 2006; 8: R110. DOI: 10.1186/ar1995
  7. Hayashi, D, Xu, L, Gusenburg, J, et al. Reliability of semiquantitative assessment of osteophytes and subchondral cysts on tomosynthesis images by radiologists with different levels of expertise. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (Ankara, Turkey). 2014; 20: 353359. DOI: 10.5152/dir.2014.13283
  8. Malghem, J, Maldague, B, Lecouvet, F, Koutaïssoff, S and Vande Berg, B. [Plain radiogra-phy of the knee: the articular surfaces]. Journal de radiologie. 2008; 89: 692697, quiz 708–710.
  9. Malghem, J and Maldague, B. Patellofemoral joint: 30 degrees axial radiograph with lateral rotation of the leg. Radiology. 1989; 170: 566567. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.170.2.2911687
  10. Littleton, JT. Tomography, Physical Principles and Clinical Applications/J. T. Littleton, with contributions by ML Durizch, EH Crosby, JC Geary. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1976.
  11. Dobbins, JT, 3rd. and Godfrey, DJ. Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential. Phys Med Biol. 2003; 48: R65106. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/48/19/R01
  12. Omoumi, P, Mercier, GA, Lecouvet, F, Simoni, P and Vande Berg, BC. CT arthrography, MR arthrography, PET, and scintigraphy in osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009; 47: 595615. DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2009.04.005
  13. Gervaise, A, Osemont, B, Lecocq, S, et al. CT image quality improvement using Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction with wide-volume acquisition on 320-detector CT. Eur Radiol. 2012; 22: 295301. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2271-7
  14. Gervaise, A, Teixeira, P, Villani, N, Lecocq, S, Louis, M and Blum, A. CT dose optimisation and reduction in osteoarticular disease. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2013; 94: 371388. DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2012.05.017
  15. Altman, R, Brandt, K, Hochberg, M, et al. Design and conduct of clinical trials in patients with osteoarthritis: recommendations from a task force of the Osteoarthritis Research Society. Results from a workshop. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1996; 4: 217243. DOI: 10.1016/S1063-4584(05)80101-3
  16. Ratzlaff, C, Van Wyngaarden, C and Duryea, J. Location-specific hip joint space width for progression of hip osteoarthritis – Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 22: 14811487. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.05.017
  17. Noel, A, Ottenin, MA, Germain, C, et al. [Comparison of irradiation for tomosynthesis and CT of the wrist]. Journal de Radiologie. 2011; 92: 3239. DOI: 10.1016/j.jradio.2010.11.001
  18. Simoni, P, Jamali, S, Albert, A, Totterman, S, Schreyer, E, Tamez-Peña, JG, Zobel, BB, Miezentseva, VA and Gillet, P. Minimum joint space width (mJSW) of patellofemoral joint on standing “skyline” radiographs: test-retest reproducibility and comparison with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI). Skeletal Radiol. 2013 Nov; 42(11): 157382. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-013-1701-9
  19. Simoni, P, Gérard, L, Kaiser, MJ, Ribbens, C, Rinkin, C, Malaise, O and Malaise, M. Use of Tomosynthesis for Detection of Bone Erosions of the Foot in Patients with Established Rheumatoid Arthritis: Comparison with Radiography and CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Aug; 205(2): 36470. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.14.14120
  20. Simoni, P, Leyder, PP, Albert, A, Malchair, F, Maréchal, C, Scarciolla, L, Beomonte Zobel, B, Alvarez Miezentseva, V and Gillet, P. Optimization of computed tomography (CT) arthrography of hip for the visualization of cartilage: an in vitro study. Skeletal Radiol. 2014 Feb; 43(2): 16978. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-013-1759-4
  21. Ficat, PPJ and Bizou, H. Le défilé fémoro-patellaire. Rev Med Toulouse. 1970; 6: 241244.
  22. Gorniak, GC. Patterns of patellofemoral articular cartilage wear in cadavers. The Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy. 2009; 39: 675683. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2009.2932
  23. Van der Heijde, DM. Joint erosions and patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. British Journal of Rheumatology. 1995; 34(Suppl 2): 7478. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/XXXIV.suppl_2.74
  24. Dohn, UM, Ejbjerg, BJ, Hasselquist, M, et al. Detection of bone erosions in rheuma-toid arthritis wrist joints with magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and radiography. Arthritis Res Ther. 2008; 10(1): R25. DOI: 10.1186/ar2378
  25. Perry, D, Stewart, N, Benton, N, et al. Detection of erosions in the rheumatoid hand; a comparative study of multidetector computerized tomography versus magnetic resonance scanning. J Rheumatol. 2005; 32: 256267.
  26. Canella, C, Philippe, P, Pansini, V, Salleron, J, Flipo, RM and Cotten, A. Use of tomosynthe-sis for erosion evaluation in rheumatoid arthritic hands and wrists. Radiology. 2011; 258: 199205. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10100791
  27. Aoki, T, Fujii, M, Yamashita, Y, et al. Tomosynthesis of the wrist and hand in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with radiography and MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014; 202: 386390. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.12.10029
  28. Van der Heijde, D. How to read radiographs according to the Sharp/van der Heijde method. J Rheumatol. 2000; 27: 261263.
  29. Koevoets, R, Dirven, L, Klarenbeek, NB, et al. Insights in the relationship of joint space narrowing versus erosive joint damage and physical functioning of patients with RA. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013; 72: 870874. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-201191
  30. Van der Heijde, D. How to read radiographs according to the Sharp/van der Heijde method. J Rheumatol. 2000; 27: 261263.
  31. Llopis, E, Fernandez, E and Cerezal, L. MR and CT arthrography of the hip. Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology. 2012; 16: 4256. DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1304300
  32. Christie-Large, M, Tapp, MJF, Theivendran, K and James, SLJ. The role of multidetector CT arthrography in the investigation of suspected intra-articular hip pathology. Br J Radiol. 2010; 83: 861867. DOI: 10.1259/bjr/76751715
  33. Smith, TO, Simpson, M, Ejindu, V and Hing, CB. The diagnostic test accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance arthrography and computer tomography in the detection of chondral lesions of the hip. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2013; 23: 335344. DOI: 10.1007/s00590-012-0972-5
  34. Tamura, S, Nishii, T, Shiomi, T, et al. Three-dimensional patterns of early acetabu-lar cartilage damage in hip dysplasia; a high-resolutional CT arthrography study. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2012; 20: 646652. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.03.015
  35. Ha, Y-C, Choi, J-A, Lee, Y-K, et al. The diagnostic value of direct CT arthrography using MDCT in the evaluation of acetabular labral tear: with arthroscopic correlation. Skeletal Radiology. 2013; 42: 681688. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-012-1528-9
  36. McNitt-Gray, MF. AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: Topics in CT. Radiation dose in CT. Radiographics. 2002; 22: 15411553. DOI: 10.1148/rg.226025128
  37. Tamm, EP, Rong, XJ, Cody, DD, Ernst, RD, Fitzgerald, NE and Kundra, V. Quality initiatives: CT radiation dose reduction: how to implement change without sacrificing diagnostic quality. Radiographics. 2011; 31: 18231832. DOI: 10.1148/rg.317115027
  38. Subhas, N, Freire, M, Primak, AN, et al. CT arthrography: in vitro evaluation of single and dual energy for optimization of technique. Skeletal Radiology. 2010; 39: 10251031. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-010-0932-2
  39. Kalender, WA, Wolf, H, Suess, C, Gies, M, Greess, H and Bautz, WA. Dose reduction in CT by on-line tube current control: principles and validation on phantoms and cadavers. Eur Radiol. 1999; 9: 323328. DOI: 10.1007/s003300050674
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jbsr.1447 | Journal eISSN: 2514-8281
Language: English
Published on: Feb 7, 2018
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2018 Paolo Simoni, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.