Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Operator Radiation Exposure in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Guidance Cover

Operator Radiation Exposure in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Guidance

Open Access
|Feb 2016

Figures & Tables

figures/Fig01_web.jpg
Figure 1

Cone-Beam CT-guidance procedure on a 59-years-old male with a suspected mass in the hilum of the right kidney. Histopathological result revealed a small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma for which this patient underwent a nephrectomy. (A) Entrypoint (EP) geometric configuration of the C-arm, looking ‘down-the-barrel’ (with arrow). (B) shows the common geometric configuration of the C-arm in the Progress view (PV). This clearly shows the close position of the operator to the radiation beam.

figures/Fig02_web.jpg
Figure 2

The disposable lead drape armor (Pb equivalent of 0.25 mm) as positioned during the model measurement with a Rando-phantom®.

figures/Fig03_web.jpg
Figure 3

The rotation (A) and angulation (B) of the C-arm used during the model measurements of scatter radiation for the operator. Dose measurement was performed in every combination of rotation projections between -120 degrees to +120 degrees at an interval of 30 degrees and in every angulation projection with an interval of 20 degrees in a range between -40 degrees to +40 degrees.

Table 1

Overview of the characteristics used for the model and during the clinical cases.

ThoraxAbdomentotal
Scatter radiation modelN4766113
Sex19 women / 19 men28 women / 47 men47 women/ 66 abdomen
Mean age (y)62.1 (range 24–85)63.9 (range 32–83)63.3 (range 24–85)
Mean target size (mm)31.0 (95% CI 24.3–37.6)25.1 (95% CI 20.1–30.1)27.8 (95% CI 23.8–31.8)
Mean BMI (kg/m2)23.9 (95% CI 23.5–24.3)23.9 (95% CI 23.5–24.3)23.9 (95% CI 23.8–24.0)
Clinical casesN172037
Sex5 women / 12 men8 women / 12 men13 women / 24 men
Mean age (y)67.3 (range 35–83)62.6 (range 35–83)64.7 (range 35–83)
Mean length size (mm)23.7 (95% CI 19.8–30.1)22.9 (95% CI 17.7–27.5)23.3 (95% CI 20.5–27.2)
Mean BMI (kg/m2)24.4 (95% CI 23.4–25.5)24.0 (95% CI 22.9–25.0)24.2 (95% CI 23.5–24.9)
Table 2

Overview of the data in entrypoint view, progress view and in total. Data is based on the clinical setting and used for the scatter radiation model.

EntrypointProgress ViewTotal
ThoraxAbdomenThoraxAbdomenThoraxAbdomen
Fluoroscopy time (s); median (95% CI)74.4 (64.6–84.3)68.3 (62.4–74.1)137.9 (124.8–150.9)111.4 (103.9–118.8)212.3 (192.7–231.9)179.7 (168.7–190.6)
kV; median (95% CI)91.9 (90.4–93.3)98.6 (97.2–100.1)103.3 (101.2–105.3)117.7 (117.0–118.4)
mAs; median (95% CI)13.5 (13.3–13.7)14.7 (14.5–14.8)14.9 (14.6–15.1)15.4 (15.3–15.6)
Field Diameter (cm) ; median (95% CI)27.7 (25.3–30.1)28.0 (26.0–30.0)27.7 (25.6–29.7)31.1 (29.5–32.8)
Angulation; median (95% CI)–3° (–8°–+2°)11° (7°–15.0°)0° (–0°–0°)0° (0°–0°)
Rotation; median (95% CI)–4° (–12°–+5°)–4.0° (–10°–+2°)–22° (–44°–1°)–25° (–45°– –6°)
Dose Hand (µSv); median (95% CI)10.7 (8.2–13.1)17.9 (13.2–22.6)23.5 (17.4–29.7)36.7 (30.9–42.6)34.2 (26.9–41.5)54.6 (46.9–62.4)
Dose Thyroid region (µSv); median (95% CI)68.6 (–3.4–140.5)42.6 (9.1–76.1)13.8 (9.2–18.4)23.6 (17.7–29.5)83.2 (11.1–155.3)66.2 (31.4–100.9)
Dose Gonads region (µSv); median (95% CI)17.8 (11.1–24.4)20.8 (17.2–24.4)16.1 (11.6–20.7)26.4 (20.9–32.0)34.3 (26.0–42.7)47.2 (39.9–54.5)
Dose Thyroid Shielding (µSv); median (95% CI)1.7 (–0.1–3.4)0.7 (0.2–1.2)0.5 (0.3–0.6)1.0 (0.7–1.3)2.2 (0.4–3.9)1.7 (1.1–2.3)
Dose Gonads Shielding (µSv); median (95% CI)1.3 (0.9–1.7)1.5 (1.2–1.8)1.3 (0.9–1.7)2.1 (1.6–2.6)2.6 (2.0–3.2)3.6 (2.9–4.2)
Dose Hand Drape (µSv); median (95% CI)3.3 (2.4–4.2)7.1 (4.1–10.0)4.6 (3.5––5.8)10.5 (6.3–14.8)7.9 (6.1–9.8)17.6 (11.9–23.4)
Dose Thyroid Drape (µSv); median (95% CI)94.7 (–22.1–211.6)76.8 (14.4–139.3)16.7 (8.7–24.7)21.8 (18.3–25.3)111.4 (–5.9–228.7)98.6 (35–161.4)
Dose Gonads Drape (µSv); median (95% CI)33.8 (19.2–48.5)34.3 (26.9–41.8)26.4 (9.3–33.5)37.8 (29.6–46.0)60.2 (43.9–76.5)72.1 (59.2–85.0)
Dose Thyroid Both (µSv); median (95% CI)0.06 (0.00–0.14)0.05 (0.03–0.08)0.02 (0.01–0.02)0.13 (0.05–0.21)0.08 (0.01–0.16)0.18 (0.08–0.28)
Dose Gonads Both (µSv); median (95% CI)0.06 (0.00–0.13)0.05 (0.02–0.08)0.18 (0.12–0.25)0.40 (0.24–0.56)0.37 (0.28–0.46)0.84 (0.55–1.13)
Table 3

Thorax group.

Couch/Ceiling ShieldingLead drape ShieldingCouch/Ceiling and Lead drape Shielding
HandEntrypointNo difference–68.9%No difference compared to lead drape shielding
Progress View–80.4%
Total–76.8%
Thyroid regionEntrypoint–97.5%+38.4%–99.8%
Progress View–96.6%+13.8%–99.5%
Total–97.4%+33.9%*–99.7%
Gonad regionEntrypoint–93.2%+90.3%–97.9%
Progress View–91.6%+59.3%–98.4%
Total–92.4%+75.3%–98.2%

Percentages of dose difference compared to the setting without any radiation shielding in the scatter radiation model. All percentages represent significant (p<0.05) changes expect the one marked with an asterix (*; p=0.31).

Table 4

Abdominal group.

Couch/Ceiling ShieldingLead drape ShieldingCouch/Ceiling and Lead drape Shielding
HandEntrypointNo difference–60.4%No difference compared to lead drape shielding
Progress View–71.3%
Total–67.8%
Thyroid regionEntrypoint–98.4%+80.5%–99.9%
Progress View–95.8%–7.7%*–99.8%
Total–97.4%+49.0%–99.8%
Gonad regionEntrypoint–92.8%+65.2%–98.9%
Progress View–92.0%+42.9%–98.7%
Total–92.4%+52.8%–98.9%

Percentages of dose difference compared to the setting without any radiation shielding in the scatter radiation model. All percentages represent significant (p<0.05) changes expect the one marked with an asterix (*; p=0.43).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jbr-btr.816 | Journal eISSN: 2514-8281
Language: English
Published on: Feb 26, 2016
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2016 SJ Braak, MJL Strijen van, E Meijer, JPM Heesewijk van, WPThM Mali, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.