Have a personal or library account? Click to login
TRUS-MR Fusion Biopsy of the Prostate: Radiological and Histological Correlation Cover

TRUS-MR Fusion Biopsy of the Prostate: Radiological and Histological Correlation

Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology
Volume 100 (2016): Issue 1
By: Michel Lavaerts,  Liesbeth De Wever,  Els Vanhoutte,  Frederik De Keyzer and  Raymond Oyen  
Open Access
|Nov 2016

References

  1. Woodrum DA Kawashima A Gorny KR Mynderse LA Targeted prostate biopsy and MR-guided therapy for prostate cancer [Epub ahead of print] Abdom Radiol (NY) 2016 Feb 24
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Loeb S Folkvaljon Y Robinson D Makarov DV Bratt O Garmo H Stattin P Immediate versus delayed prostatectomy: Nationwide population-based study Scand J Urol 2016 Apr 12 1 9 10.3109/21681805.2016.1166153
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Villers A Lemaitre L Haffner J Puech P Current status of MRI for the diagnosis, staging and prognosis of prostate cancer: Implications for focal therapy and active surveillance Curr Opin Urol 2009 19 3 274 282 10.1097/MOU.0b013e328329a2ed
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Pinto PA Chung PH Rastinehad AR Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy improves cancer detection following transrectal ultrasound biopsy and correlates with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging J Urol 2011 186 4 1281 1285 10.1016/j.juro.2011.05.078
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Rais-Bahrami S Siddiqui MM Turkbey B Utility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging suspicion levels for detecting prostate cancer J Urol 2013 190 5 1721 1727 10.1016/j.juro.2013.05.052
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Costa DN Pedrosa I Donato F Jr. Roehrborn CG Rofsky NM MR imaging-transrectal US fusion for targeted prostate biopsies: Implications for diagnosis and clinical management Radiographics 2015 35 3 696 708 10.1148/rg.2015140058
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Haider MA van der Kwast TH Tanguay J Combined T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI for localization of prostate cancer AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007 189 2 323 328 10.2214/AJR.07.2211
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Hoeks CM Barentsz JO Hambrock T Prostate cancer: Multiparametric MR imaging for detection, localization, and staging Radiology 2011 261 1 46 66 10.1148/radiol.11091822
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Engelbrecht MR Huisman HJ Laheij RJ Discrimination of prostate cancer from normal peripheral zone and central gland tissue by using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging Radiology 2003 229 1 248 254 10.1148/radiol.2291020200
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Pickles MD Gibbs P Sreenivas M Turnbull LW Diffusion-weighted imaging of normal and malignant prostate tissue at 3.0T J Magn Reson Imaging 2006 23 2 130 134 10.1002/jmri.20477
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Gibbs P Liney GP Pickles MD Zelhof B Rodrigues G Turnbull LW Correlation of ADC and T2 measurements with cell density in prostate cancer at 3.0 Tesla Invest Radiol 2009 44 9 572 576 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181b4c10e
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Woodfield CA Tung GA Grand DJ Pezzullo JA Machan JT Renzulli JF 2nd Diffusion-weighted MRI of peripheral zone prostate cancer: Comparison of tumor apparent diffusion coefficient with Gleason score and percentage of tumor on core biopsy AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010 194 4 W316 322 10.2214/AJR.09.2651
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. deSouza NM Riches SF Vanas NJ Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: A potential non-invasive marker of tumour aggressiveness in localized prostate cancer Clin Radiol 2008 63 7 774 782 10.1016/j.crad.2008.02.001
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Image of Artemis Eigen Fusion Official Eigen Website. http://www.eigen.com/products/artemis.shtml. Published 2013. Accessed April 17, 2016
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Marks L Ward A Gardi L Tracking of prostate biopsy sites using a 3D ultraound device (Artemis) J Urol 2010 183 4 e832 10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.2242
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Epstein JI Zelefsky MJ Sjoberg DD Contemporary prostate cancer grading system: A validated alternative to the Gleason score Eur Urol 2016 69 3 428 435 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.046
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Siddiqui MM Rais-Bahrami S Turkbey B Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer JAMA 2015 313 4 390 397 10.1001/jama.2014.17942
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Nakano Junqueira VC Zogbi O Cologna A Is a visible (hypoechoic) lesion at biopsy an independent predictor of prostate cancer outcome? Ultrasound Med Biol 2012 38 10 1689 1694 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.06.006
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Natarajan S Marks LS Margolis DJ Clinical application of a 3D ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy system Urol Oncol 2011 29 3 334 342 10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.02.014
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Wu J Ji A Xie B Is magnetic resonance/ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy better than systematic prostate biopsy? An updated meta- and trial sequential analysis Oncotarget 2015 6 41 43571 43580
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Wysock JS Mendhiratta N Zattoni F Predictive value of negative 3T multiparametric prostate MRI on 12 core biopsy results BJU Int 2016 118 4 515 520 10.1111/bju.13427
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Multiple authors American College of Radiology Web site http://www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/PDF/QualitySafety/Resources/PIRADS/PIRADS%20V2.pdf. Published 2015. Accessed October 15, 2016
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Delongchamps NB Rouanne M Thierry F Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the detection and localization of prostate cancer: Combination of T2-weighted, dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted imaging BJUI 2011 107 09 1411 1418
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. de Rooij M Crienen S Witjes JA Barentsz JO Rovers MM Grutters JP Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and MR-guided targeted biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in diagnosing prostate cancer: A modelling study from a health care perspective Eur Urol 2014 66 3 430 436 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.12.012
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine Web site http://casit.ucla.edu/images/Lase%20Pic%20V3.jpg. Published 2009. Accesed April 5, 2016
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jbr-btr.1199 | Journal eISSN: 2514-8281
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Published on: Nov 24, 2016
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Fusion,
Magnetic Resonance Imaging,
Prostate Biopsy,
Prostate Cancer,
Ultrasound.

© 2016 Michel Lavaerts, Liesbeth De Wever, Els Vanhoutte, Frederik De Keyzer, Raymond Oyen, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 100 (2016): Issue 1Next article