Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Understanding Ingroup Identification and Intergroup Threat Dynamics in Multiethnic Contexts Cover

Understanding Ingroup Identification and Intergroup Threat Dynamics in Multiethnic Contexts

By: Ena Uzelac and  Margareta Jelić  
Open Access
|Mar 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Structural AR-CLP model of longitudinal effects between ethnic identity and ethnonationalism (EI and EN), perception of realistic and symbolic intergroup threat (RT and ST), and perception of intergroup anxiety (IA).

Note. All paths that we tested within the framework of four nested models are depicted. M1 (dotted lines) represent the reference stability model, M2 (solid lines) represent the assumed causality model, M3 (dashed lines) represent the reverse causality model, and finally, the full reciprocal causality model (M4) is obtained by including all the paths from M1 to M3. T1 = first measurement point, T2 = second measurement point. Circles represent constructs (latent variables). Paths from two covariates at T1, sex and school type (elementary or high school), to constructs at T2 are not depicted for clarity but are included in all analyses.

Table 1

Descriptive statistics for the total sample, and separately for context and status for both time points.

MEASUREMENT POINTVARIABLECONTEXTSTATUS
TOTAL SAMPLE n = 852POST-CONFLICT n = 360NON-CONFLICT n = 492MAJORITY n = 485MINORITY n = 367
M (SD)M (SD)M (SD)M (SD)M (SD)
T1Ethnic identity4.13 (0.869)4.28 (0.835)4.02 (0.876)4.14 (0.860)4.12 (0.880)
Ethnonationalism2.43 (1.113)2.57 (1.183)2.33 (1.048)2.43 (1.113)2.43 (1.115)
Realistic threat2.50 (0.966)2.74 (1.036)2.32 (0.871)2.39 (0.914)2.64 (1.014)
Symbolic threat2.28 (1.061)2.79 (1.045)1.90 (0.904)2.14 (1.022)2.47 (1.083)
Intergroup anxiety1.80 (0.716)1.94 (0.767)1.70 (0.658)1.78 (0.693)1.82 (0.746)
T2Ethnic identity4.02 (0.939)4.26 (0.872)3.84 (0.948)4.07 (0.943)3.95 (0.930)
Ethnonationalism2.30 (1.121)2.47 (1.152)2.17 (1.082)2.31 (1.153)2.29 (1.079)
Realistic threat2.51 (1.029)2.80 (1.051)2.30 (0.961)2.43 (1.013)2.62 (1.041)
Symbolic threat2.19 (0.996)2.61 (0.968)1.88 (0.896)2.05 (0.960)2.37 (1.014)
Intergroup anxiety1.79(0.708)1.89 (0.754)1.72 (0.664)1.79 (0.702)1.79 (0.716)

[i] Note. M and SD refer to manifest variables. T1 = first measurement point; T2 = second measurement point. The range of scores on all scales is from 1 to 5.

Table 2

Intercorrelation of the research variables for both time points.

VARIABLE1.2.3.4.5.
1. Ethnic identity.40**.01.12**.07
2. Ethnonationalism.44**.17**.29**.32**
3. Realistic threat–.02.18**.41**.20**
4. Symbolic threat.07*.23**.48**.48**
5. Intergroup anxiety.001.22**.29**.48**

[i] Note. *p < .05; **p < .01. First measurement results (T1) below diagonal, second measurement results (T2) above diagonal.

Table 3

Cross-lagged model fit and comparison of alternative models.

MODELSCALED χ2dfpRMSEA [90% CI]SRMRCFICOMPARED MODELSSCALED Δχ2ΔDFΔχ2 Cr.p
017277.692818<.001
11299.762686<.0010.034
[0.031; 0.037]
0.0500.964
21281.934680<.0010.034
[0.031; 0.037]
0.0460.9641–217.83612.59.007*
31260.171680<.0010.033
[0.030; 0.036]
0.0430.9661–339.59612.59<.001*
41244.530674<.0010.033
[0.030; 0.036]
0.0400.9661–455.231221.03<.001*
2–437.40612.59<.001*
3–415.64612.59.02*

[i] Note. The final model is in italic. Models: 0 = null; 1 = autoregressive; 2 = assumed CL paths; 3 = reverse CL paths; 4 = reciprocal causation. Scaled χ2 = value with Yuan–Bentler correction, Δ = difference in parameters between two nested models, Δχ2 Cr. = boundary value above which the difference between compared models is statistically significant at a p < .05 level for corresponding degrees of freedom (Δdf).

Table 4

Stability and cross-lagged effects in reciprocal causation AR-CLP Model (N = 852).

MODELAR PATHBβCL PATHBβ
Reciprocal
causation
EIT1 → EIT20.703*0.644*EIT1 → RTT20.1070.085
ENT1 → ENT20.571*0.564*EIT1 → STT20.0120.009
RTT1 → RTT20.745*0.675*EIT1 → IAT20.0180.019
STT1 → STT20.568*0.611*ENT1 → RTT2–0.048–0.056
IAT1 → IAT20.518*0.547*ENT1STT20.092*0.105*
ENT1 → IAT20.0640.100
RTT1 → EIT2–0.051–0.053
RTT1 → ENT20.0030.002
STT1EIT20.105*0.135*
STT1 → ENT20.0900.084
IAT1 → EIT20.0060.005
IAT1ENT20.240*0.159*

[i] Note. *Statistically significant path – 95% confidence interval does not include zero to two decimals. Effects of covariates were included in all analyses as controls. AR = autoregressive path (stability coefficient), B = unstandardized regression coefficient, β = standardized regression coefficient, CL = cross-lagged path, EI = ethnic identity, EN = ethnonationalism, RT = realistic intergroup threat, ST = symbolic intergroup threat, IA = intergroup anxiety. T1 = first measurement point, T2 = second measurement point.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.983 | Journal eISSN: 2397-8570
Language: English
Submitted on: Aug 3, 2024
|
Accepted on: Jan 25, 2026
|
Published on: Mar 23, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Ena Uzelac, Margareta Jelić, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 39 (2026): Issue 1