Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Cross-Validation of Representational Structures Using the Attribute-Challenge Technique and the Test of Context Independence: The Social Representation of Health Cover

Cross-Validation of Representational Structures Using the Attribute-Challenge Technique and the Test of Context Independence: The Social Representation of Health

Open Access
|Oct 2018

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Characteristics of the central and peripheral systems of a representation.

Central systemPeripheral system
Functions(a) Meaning-generating function(a) Making the central core concrete
(b) Meaning-organising function(b) Regulating the central core
(c) Protecting the central core
Properties(a) Stable(a) Flexible
(b) Consistent and rigid(b) Bears contradiction
(c) Rather insensitive to immediate context changes(c) Sensitive to the immediate context
(d) Consensual (defines the homogeneity of the group)(d) Supporting the heterogeneity of the group
Table 2

Results obtained by the two techniques for representations of health.

ItemsACTTCITest statistic
Healthy lifestyle46.7%97.5%aχ2(1; N = 223) = 73.7, p < .001, Cramer’s V = .57
Food43.8%94.1%aχ2(1; N = 223) = 67.4, p < .001, Cramer’s V = .55
Essentiality27.6%92.4%aχ2(1; N = 223) = 98.9, p < .001, Cramer’s V = .67
Prevention50.5%91.5%aχ2(1; N = 223) = 46.6, p < .001, Cramer’s V = .46
Equilibrium49.5%88.1%aχ2(1; N = 223) = 39.4, p < .001, Cramer’s V = .42
Well-being43.8%87.3%χ2(1; N = 223) = 47.4, p < .001, Cramer’s V = .46
Public authorities32.4%82.2%χ2(1; N = 223) = 56.9, p < .001, Cramer’s V = .50
Sport28.6%78.8%χ2(1; N = 223) = 56.7, p < .001, Cramer’s V = .50
Work30.5%78.0%χ2(1; N = 223) = 50.8, p < .001, Cramer’s V = .48
Absence of illness29.5%50.8%χ2(1; N = 223) = 10.5, p < .001, Cramer’s V = .22
Avoiding medication21.0%38.1%χ2(1; N = 223) = 7.8, p = .005, Cramer’s V = .19
Avoiding hospital22.9%33.9%χ2(1; N = 223) = 3.3, p > .05, Cramer’s V = .12
Doctor23.8%33.9%χ2(1; N = 223) = 2.7, p > .05, Cramer’s V = .11
Medication15.2%6.8%χ2(1; N = 223) = 4.1, p = .04, Cramer’s V = .14
Hospital13.3%5.9%χ2(1; N = 223) = 3.6, p > .05, Cramer’s V = .13

[i] Note. The ACT stands for the attribute-challenge technique; TCI stands for the test of context independence.

a Elements determined as central on the basis of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test with a centrality threshold of 87.5% for the TCI (N = 118) and of 86.7% for the ACT (N = 105).

χ2 Chi-square test between the rates of replies of each condition.

Table 3

Principal Component Analyses (PCA, Varimax rotation) of the ACT and the TCI questionnaires.

ACTTCI
Factors1234123456
Eigen value4.891.771.371.063.012.061.471.111.081.00
% Variance explained32.6311.919.107.0920.0413.719.817.427.226.67
Food a.79.78
Equilibriuma.78.58
Healthy lifestylea.75.52.48
Sport.56.75
Essentialitya.47.46.54
Avoiding hospital.90.75
Work.60.70
Avoiding medication.58.79
Well-being.52.55.67
Hospital.87.79
Medication.72.82
Absence of illness.53.77
Doctor.51.79
Public authorities.81.86
Preventiona.45.46.51.4749

[i] Notes. ACT stands for the attribute-challenge technique; TCI stands for the test of context independence. Only saturations above .30 are presented.

a Elements determined as central on the basis of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test with a centrality threshold of 87.5% for the TCI (N = 118).

Table 4

Results obtained by the two techniques for representations of health.

ItemsACTTCITest statistic
Healthy lifestyle40.4%97.2%aχ2(1; N = 120) = 49.8, p < .001, Cramer’s V = .64
Food34.6%91.5%aχ2(1; N = 122) = 43.2, p < .001, Cramer’s V = .59
Equilibrium40.4%87.3%aχ2(1; N = 117) = 32.2, p < .001, Cramer’s V = .52
Prevention34.6%81.7%χ2(1; N = 121) = 26.2, p < .001, Cramer’s V = .47
Well-being46.2%78.9%χ2(1; N = 119) = 14.47, p < .001, Cramer’s V = .35
Essentiality36.5%74.6%χ2(1; N = 116) = 19.55, p < .001, Cramer’s V = .41
Public authorities21.2%66.2%χ2(1; N = 116) = 20.7, p < .001, Cramer’s V = .42
Sport23.1%59.2%χ2(1; N = 121) = 14.7, p < .001, Cramer’s V = .35
Work11.5%53.5%χ2(1; N = 117) = 21.9, p < .001, Cramer’s V = .43
Absence of illness19.2%43.7%χ2(1; N = 117) = 6.5, p = .01, Cramer’s V = .24
Avoiding hospital15.4%33.8%χ2(1; N = 117) = 5.7, p = .01, Cramer’s V = .22
Doctor26.9%26.8%χ2(1; N = 122) = 0.0, p > .05, Cramer’s V = .00
Avoiding medication15.4%23.9%χ2(1; N = 121) = 1.3, p > .05, Cramer’s V = .10
Medication15.4%5.6%χ2(1; N = 122) = 3.38, p > .05, Cramer’s V = .17
Hospital13.5%2.8%χ2(1; N = 121) = 5.33, p = .02, Cramer’s V = .21

[i] Note. ACT stands for the attribute-challenge technique; TCI stands for the test of context independence.

a Elements determined as central on the basis of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test with a centrality threshold of: 83.38% (N = 67), 83.50% (N = 68), 83.62% (N = 69), 83.74% (N = 70), and 83.86% (N = 71) on the basis of the number of responses retained per items for the TCI, and of 79.95% (N = 46), 80.16% (N = 47), 80.37% (N = 48), 80.57% (N = 49), 80.77% (N = 50), 80.96% (N = 51) on the basis of the number of responses retained per items for the ACT.

χ2 Chi-square test between the rates of replies of each condition.

Table 5

Principal Component Analyses (PCA, Varimax rotation) of the ACT and TCI questionnaires.

ACTTCI
Factors123412345
Proper value6.152.061.371.303.881.851.611.251.05
% Variance explained41.0313.779.138.6725.8912.3010.768.337.02
Avoiding hospital.91.68
Well-being.70.53
Doctor.70.75
Absence of illness.69.42
Essentiality.65.73
Fooda..91.68.43
Healthy lifestylea.90.74
Equilibriuma.78.72
Sport.69.60
Prevention.78.83
Work.72.42.46
Medication.84.79
Public authorities.72.91
Hospital.56.68
Avoiding medication.45.55.85

[i] Notes. ACT stands for the attribute-challenge technique; TCI stands for the test of context independence. Only saturations above .30 are presented.

a Elements determined as central on the basis of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test with a centrality threshold of: 83.38% (N = 67), 83.50% (N = 68), 83.62% (N = 69), 83.74% (N = 70), and 83.86% (N = 71) on the basis of the number of responses retained per item for the TCI.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.87 | Journal eISSN: 2397-8570
Language: English
Published on: Oct 9, 2018
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2018 Marie-Anastasie Aim, Thibaut Decarsin, Inna Bovina, Lionel Dany, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.