Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Confronting Consumers’ Complicity: Do Confrontations with Causal Responsibility for Sweatshop Labor Raise Moral Obligation? Cover

Confronting Consumers’ Complicity: Do Confrontations with Causal Responsibility for Sweatshop Labor Raise Moral Obligation?

Open Access
|Feb 2024

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Summary of Studies S1–S5.

STUDYTARGETCAUSAL INVOLVEMENT [NO INVOLVEMENT]VIGNETTE
S1Self vs. OtherSelf: You [other tourists] vs.
Other: a tourist [other tourists]
buy jewelry
S2Self vs. OtherSelf: You [other tourists] vs.
Other: a tourist [other tourists]
buy jewelry
S3SelfYou [other tourists]buy jewelry
S4OtherMizarcs [Dwalkhs]buy stone furniture
S5SelfAmerican ingroup vs.
[Chinese outgroup]
buy clothing vs.
buy wooden furniture

[i] Note: All studies featured a causal involvement between subjects manipulation orthogonal to the Target manipulation (if more than one Target condition).

irsp-37-775-g1.png
Figure 1

Forest Plot of the Effect Size Estimates in the Meta-analysis of Studies S3, 2, 3, S1, S2.

Note: The forest plot is based on a random-effects model meta-analysis of the effect of causal involvement in creating and maintaining poor working conditions on the perceived moral obligation to support the suffering workers. It shows the summary effect for all comparisons included in Studies S3 to 3, S1, and S2 and the effects for the subgroups comprising other-judgments and self-judgments.

irsp-37-775-g2.png
Figure 2

Moral Obligation Judgments in Study 1.

Note: Mean moral obligation judgments (with 95% CIs) as a function of experimental group (role of target: causally involved vs. not causally involved in creating poor working conditions × 2 target: self vs. other).

irsp-37-775-g3.png
Figure 3

Moral Obligation Judgments in Study 2.

Note: Mean moral obligation judgments (with 95% CIs) as a function of experimental group (role of target: causally involved vs. not causally involved in creating poor working conditions × 2 target: close vs. distant other).

Table A1

Means and Standard Deviations (in Parentheses) of all Dependent Variables as a Function of Causal Involvement of the Target of Judgment and Self- versus Other-Judgment in Study 1.

DEPENDENT VARIABLESELFOTHER
CAUSALLY INVOLVEDNOT CAUSALLY INVOLVEDCAUSALLY INVOLVEDNOT CAUSALLY INVOLVED
Moral Obligation3.60 (1.63)3.38 (1.54)3.76 (1.60)2.92 (1.54)
Causal Responsibility3.67 (1.83)2.63 (1.81)4.67 (1.64)2.89 (1.73)

[i] Note: All dependent variables range from 1 to 7.

Table A2

Means and Standard Deviations (in Parentheses) of All Dependent Variables as a Function of Causal Involvement of the Target of Judgment and Self- versus Other-Judgment in Study 2.

DEPENDENT VARIABLECLOSE OTHERDISTANT OTHER
CAUSALLY INVOLVEDNOT CAUSALLY INVOLVEDCAUSALLY INVOLVEDNOT CAUSALLY INVOLVED
Moral Obligation3.22 (1.00)2.84 (1.06)3.30 (0.82)2.46 (1.03)
Causal Responsibility4.04 (1.61)2.99 (1.79)4.13 (1.47)2.53 (1.77)

[i] Note: Causal Responsibility ranges from 1 to 7 on a 7-point scale, Moral Obligation ranges from 1 to 5 on a 5-point scale.

Table A3

Summary of Studies in This Line of Research.

STUDYTARGETCAUSAL INVOLVEMENT [NO INVOLVEMENT]VIGNETTE
S1Self vs. OtherSelf: You [other tourists] vs. Other: a tourist [other tourists]buy jewelry
S2Self vs. OtherSelf: You [other tourists] vs. Other: a tourist [other tourists]buy jewelry
S3SelfYou [other tourists]buy jewelry
S4OtherMizarcs [Dwalkhs]buy stone furniture
S5SelfAmerican ingroup vs. [Chinese outgroup]buy clothing vs. buy wooden furniture
1Self vs. OtherAmerican ingroup vs. [Chinese outgroup]buy clothing vs. buy wooden furniture
2Close vs. Distant OtherCocoa [Azuki beans]buy cocoa products vs. Azuki bean products

[i] Note: All studies featured a causal involvement between subjects manipulation orthogonal to the Target manipulation (if more than one Target condition).

Table A4

Fixed-Effects ANOVA Results of Study 1 Using Causal Responsibility as a Criterion.

PREDICTORSUM OF SQUARESdfMEAN SQUAREFpηp2ηp2 90% CI [LL, UL]
(Intercept)9351.6419351.643036.18<.001.797[.78, .81]
Involvement385.921385.92125.29<.001.139[.10, .18]
Target78.01178.0125.33<.001.032[.01, .05]
Involvement × Target26.62126.628.64.003.011[.00, .03]
Error2383.977743.08

[i] Note: LL and UL represent the lower-limit and upper-limit of the partial ηp2 confidence interval, respectively.

Table A5

Fixed-Effects ANOVA Results of Study 1 Using Moral Obligation as a Criterion.

PREDICTORSUM OF SQUARESdfMEAN SQUAREFpηp2ηp2 90% CI [LL, UL]
(Intercept)9066.1119066.113646.37<.001.825[.81, .84]
Involvement53.92153.9221.69<.001.027[.01, .05]
Target4.2914.291.73.19.002[.00, .01]
Involvement × Target18.79118.797.56.006.010[.00, .02]
Error1924.437742.49

[i] Note: LL and UL represent the lower-limit and upper-limit of the partial ηp2 confidence interval, respectively.

Table A6

Fixed-Effects ANOVA Results of Study 2 Using Causal Responsibility as a Criterion.

PREDICTORSUM OF SQUARESdfMEAN SQUAREFpηp2ηp2 90% CI [LL, UL]
(Intercept)6046.4016046.402187.47<.001.807[.79, .82]
Involvement225.831225.8381.70<.001.135[.09, .18]
Target4.4014.401.59.21.003[.00, .02]
Involvement × Target9.4619.463.42.07.006[.00, .02]
Error1448.395242.76

[i] Note: LL and UL represent the lower-limit and upper-limit of the partial ηp2 confidence interval, respectively.

Table A7

Fixed-Effects ANOVA Results of Study 2 Using Moral Obligation as a Criterion.

PREDICTORSUM OF SQUARESdfMEAN SQUAREFpηp2ηp2 90% CI [LL, UL]
(Intercept)4509.8714509.874653.78<.001.899[.89, .91]
Involvement48.205148.2149.74<.001.087[.05, .13]
Target2.88212.882.97.09.006[.00, .02]
Involvement × Target6.60716.616.82.01.013[.00, .03]
Error507.796524.97

[i] Note: LL and UL represent the lower-limit and upper-limit of the partial ηp2 confidence interval, respectively.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.775 | Journal eISSN: 2397-8570
Language: English
Submitted on: Nov 2, 2022
Accepted on: Jan 7, 2024
Published on: Feb 27, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Felicitas Flade, Mario Messer, Roland Imhoff, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.