Table 1
Reliability and Descriptive Statistics of Focal Variables (Study 1).
| TOTAL | UKRAINE CONDITION | INGROUP CONDITION | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| α/r1 | M (SD) | α | M (SD) | α | M (SD) | |||
| National narcissism | .89 | 3.02 (1.54) | ||||||
| National satisfaction | .93 | 5.08 (1.58) | ||||||
| Similarity | .59 | 2.81 (1.77) | ||||||
| Judgment of the attack | .89 | 1.83 (1.35) | .84 | 1.59 (1.04) | ||||
| Judgment of Putin | .88 | 2.54 (1.28) | .87 | 2.34 (1.25) | ||||
| Judgment of Russians | 42.61 (29.39) | 32.98 (31.31) | ||||||
[i] Note: 1 The Pearson’s r was used for the similarity measure, as the scale contained only two items.
Table 2
Correlations Between the Focal Variables (Study 1).
| VARIABLE | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. National narcissism | — | .55*** | .37*** | .21*** | .04 | .14* | .11* | –.09 | –.17** |
| 2. National satisfaction | — | .30*** | –.07 | –.18** | –.05 | –.07 | .04 | –.09 | |
| 3. Similarity | — | .37*** | .23*** | .46*** | .43*** | .25*** | .12* | ||
| 4. Judgment of the attack (Ukraine condition) | — | .72*** | .81*** | .77*** | .29*** | .27*** | |||
| 5. Judgment of the attack (ingroup condition) | — | .64*** | .69*** | .20*** | .24*** | ||||
| 6. Judgment of Putin (Ukraine condition) | — | .93*** | .37*** | .32*** | |||||
| 7. Judgment of Putin (ingroup condition) | — | .37*** | .37*** | ||||||
| 8. Judgment of Russians (Ukraine condition) | — | .80*** | |||||||
| 9. Judgment of Russians (ingroup condition) | — |
[i] * p < .05. ** p < .001. *** p < .001.
Figure 1
Association Between National Narcissism and Judgment of the Attack per Condition (Study 1).
Figure 2
Association Between National Narcissism and Judgment of Putin per Condition (Study 1).
Figure 3
Association Between National Narcissism and Judgment of Russians per Condition (Study 1).
Figure 4
Structural Equation Model on the Judgment of the Attack (Study 1).
Figure 5
Structural Equation Model on the Judgment of Putin (Study 1).
Table 3
Reliability and Descriptive Statistics of Focal Variables (Study 2).
| TOTAL | UKRAINE CONDITION | INGROUP CONDITION | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| α/r1 | M (SD) | α | M (SD) | α | M (SD) | |
| National narcissism | .89 | 2.43 (1.28) | ||||
| National identification | .95 | 4.39 (1.66) | ||||
| Similarity | .51 | 2.97 (1.50) | ||||
| Judgment of the attack | .88 | 1.37 (0.77) | .75 | 1.40 (0.71) | ||
| Judgment of Putin | .81 | 2.27 (0.88) | .72 | 1.40 (0.71) | ||
| Judgment of Russians | 44.18 (23.70) | 31.14 (26.16) | ||||
[i] Note: 1 The Pearson’s r was used for the similarity measure, as the scale contained only two items.
Table 4
Correlations Between the Focal Variables (Study 2).
| VARIABLE | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. National narcissism | — | .62*** | .34*** | .20*** | .16** | .21*** | .19*** | –.02 | –.08 |
| 2. National satisfaction | — | .41*** | .13** | .003 | .24*** | .26*** | .07 | .01 | |
| 3. Similarity | — | .25*** | .20*** | .38*** | .36*** | .16** | .09 | ||
| 4. Judgment of the attack (Ukraine condition) | — | .55*** | .61*** | .47*** | .13** | .15** | |||
| 5. Judgment of the attack (ingroup condition) | — | .37*** | .38*** | .03 | .12* | ||||
| 6. Judgment of Putin (Ukraine condition) | — | .78*** | .26*** | .23*** | |||||
| 7. Judgment of Putin (ingroup condition) | — | .20*** | .22*** | ||||||
| 8. Judgment of Russians (Ukraine condition) | — | .77*** | |||||||
| 9. Judgment of Russians (ingroup condition) | — |
[i] * p < .05. ** p < .001. *** p < .001.
Figure 6
Association Between National Narcissism and Judgment of the Attack per Condition (Study 2).
Figure 7
Association Between National Narcissism and Judgment of Putin per Condition (Study 2).
Figure 8
Association Between National Narcissism and Judgment of Russians per Condition (Study 2).
Figure 9
Structural Equation Model on the Judgment of the Attack (Study 2).
Figure 10
Structural Equation Model on the Judgment of Putin (Study 2).