Have a personal or library account? Click to login
How Do People Evaluate Themselves in Terms of Assertiveness and Ability After Having Failed or Succeeded: The (Economic) Consequences Matter! Cover

How Do People Evaluate Themselves in Terms of Assertiveness and Ability After Having Failed or Succeeded: The (Economic) Consequences Matter!

Open Access
|Oct 2022

References

  1. 1Aaker, J. L., Vohs, K. D., & Mogilner, C. (2010). Nonprofits are seen as warm and for-profits as competent: Firm stereotypes matter. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 224237. DOI: 10.1086/651566
  2. 2Abele, A. E. (2003). The dynamics of masculine-agentic and feminine-communal traits: Findings from a prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(4), 768776. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.768
  3. 3Abele, A. E., & Brack, S. (2013). Preference for other persons’ traits is dependent on the kind of social relationship. Social Psychology, 44(2), 8494. DOI: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000138
  4. 4Abele, A. E., Ellemers, N., Fiske, S. T., Koch, A., & Yzerbyt, V. (2021). Navigating the social world: Toward an integrated framework for evaluating self, individuals, and groups. Psychological Review, 128(2), 290. DOI: 10.1037/rev0000262
  5. 5Abele, A. E., & Hauke, N. (2019). Comparing the facets of the big two in global evaluation of self versus other people. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 969982. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2639
  6. 6Abele, A. E., Hauke, N., Peters, K., Louvet, E., Szymkow, A., & Duan, Y. (2016). Facets of the fundamental content dimensions: Agency with competence and assertiveness-communion with warmth and morality. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 117. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01810
  7. 7Abele, A. E., Rupprecht, T., & Wojciszke, B. (2008). The influence of success and failure experiences on agency. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(3), 436448. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.454
  8. 8Abele, A. E., Uchronski, M., Suitner, C., & Wojciszke, B. (2008). Towards an operationalization of the fundamental dimensions of agency and communion: Trait content ratings in five countries considering valence and frequency of word occurrence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(7), 12021217. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.575
  9. 9Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 751. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.751
  10. 10Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2013). The Big Two in social judgment and behavior. Social Psychology, 44, 61-62. DOI: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000137
  11. 11Anderson, C., Srivastava, S., Beer, J. S., Spataro, S. E., & Chatman, J. A. (2006). Knowing your place: Self-perceptions of status in face-to-face groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(6), 10941110. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1094
  12. 12Anderson, C., Willer, R., Kilduff, G. J., & Brown, C. E. (2012). The origins of deference: When do people prefer lower status? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(5), 10771088. DOI: 10.1037/a0027409
  13. 13Barkow, J. (1980). Prestige and self-esteem: A biosocial interpretation. In D. R. Omark, F. F. Strayer, & D. G. Freedman (Eds.), Dominance relations: An ethological view of human conflict and social interaction (pp. 319332). Garland; STPM Press.
  14. 14Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and assessment, 9(1–2), 930. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2389.00160
  15. 15Baryła, W., & Wojciszke, B. (2019). Success leads to agentic cognition: Two field studies. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(3), 402408. DOI: 10.1177/1948550618765065
  16. 16Berger, J., Cohen, B. P., & Zelditch, M., Jr., (1972). Status characteristics and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 241255. DOI: 10.2307/2093465
  17. 17Bergner, S. (2020). Being smart is not enough: Personality traits and vocational interests incrementally predict intention, status and success of leaders and entrepreneurs beyond cognitive ability. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 204. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00204
  18. 18Blau, P. (1964). Power and exchange in social life. Hoboken, NJ; John Wiley & Sons.
  19. 19Carrier, A., Louvet, E., Chauvin, B., & Rohmer, O. (2014). The primacy of agency over competence in status perception. Social Psychology, 45(5), 347356. DOI: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000176
  20. 20Caruana, S., Lefeuvre, R., & Mollaret, P. (2014). Looking for performance in personality inventories: The primacy of evaluative information over descriptive traits. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(6), 622635. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2034
  21. 21Caruso, E. M., Vohs, K. D., Baxter, B., & Waytz, A. (2013). Mere exposure to money increases endorsement of free-market systems and social inequality. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 142(2), 301306. DOI: 10.1037/a0029288
  22. 22Cislak, A. (2013). Effects of power on social perception: All your boss can see is agency. Social Psychology, 44(2), 138146. DOI: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000139
  23. 23Cohen, J., Darnon, C., & Mollaret, P. (2017). Distinguishing the desire to learn from the desire to perform: The social value of achievement goals. The Journal of Social Psychology, 157(1), 3046. DOI: 10.1080/00224545.2016.1152216
  24. 24Correll, S. J., & Ridgeway, C. L. (2006). Expectation states theory. In J. Delamater (Ed.), Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 2951). DOI: 10.1007/0-387-36921-X_2
  25. 25Dubois, N. (2010). Theory of the social value of persons applied to organizations: Typologies of ‘good’ leaders and recruitment. Revue Europeenne de Psychologie Appliquee, 60(4), 255266. DOI: 10.1016/j.erap.2010.01.002
  26. 26Dubois, N., & Aubert, E. (2010). Valeur sociale des personnes: Deux informations valent-elles mieux qu’une? [The social value of the persons: Are two pieces of information better than one?] Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 23(1), 5792.
  27. 27Dubois, N., & Beauvois, J.-L. (2011). Are some rabbits more competent and warm than others? The lay epistemologist is interested in object value, not in descriptive parameters. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 70(2), 6373. DOI: 10.1024/1421-0185/a000040
  28. 28Dutton, K. A., & Brown, J. D. (1997). Global self-esteem and specific self-views as determinants of people’s reactions to success and failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 139148. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.139
  29. 29Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175191. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193146
  30. 30Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878902. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.878
  31. 31Gebauer, J., Sedikidis, C., Wagner, J., Bleidorn, W., Rentfrow, P., Potter, J., & Goslin, S. (2015). Cultural norm-fulfillment, interpersonal-belonging, or getting-ahead? A large-scale cross-cultural test of three perspectives on the function of self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 526548. DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000052
  32. 32Goudeau, S., Autin, F., & Croizet, J. C. (2017). Etudier, mesurer et manipuler la classe sociale en psychologie sociale: Approches economiques, symboliques et culturelles. International Review of Social Psychology, 30, 119. DOI: 10.5334/irsp.52
  33. 33Hauke, N., & Abele, A. E. (2020). Two faces of the self: Actor-self perspective and observer-self perspective are differentially related to agency versus communion. Self and Identity, 19(3), 346368. DOI: 10.1080/15298868.2019.1584582
  34. 34Holoien, D. S., & Fiske, S. T. (2013). Downplaying positive impressions: Compensation between warmth and competence in impression management. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(1), 3341. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.09.001
  35. 35Imhoff, R., Koch, A., & Flade, F. (2018). (Pre)occupations: A data-driven model of jobs and its consequences for categorization and evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 77, 7688. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2018.04.001
  36. 36Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 127. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
  37. 37Judd, C. M., James-Hawkins, L., Yzerbyt, V., & Kashima, Y. (2005). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 899913. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.899
  38. 38Kervyn, N., Yzerbyt, V., & Judd, C. M. (2010). Compensation between warmth and competence: Antecedents and consequences of a negative relation between the two fundamental dimensions of social perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 21(1), 155187. DOI: 10.1080/13546805.2010.517997
  39. 39Koch, A., Imhoff, R., Dotsch, R., Unkelbach, C., & Alves, H. (2016). The ABC of stereotypes about groups: Agency/socioeconomic success, conservative–progressive beliefs, and communion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(5), 675. DOI: 10.1037/pspa0000046
  40. 40Lammers, J., Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2017). Ease of retrieval moderates the effects of power: Implications for the replicability of power recall effects. Social Cognition, 35(1), 117. DOI: 10.1521/soco.2017.35.1.1
  41. 41Ledgerwood, A., Mandisodza, A. N., Jost, J. T., & Pohl, M. J. (2011). Working for the system: Motivated defense of meritocratic beliefs. Social Cognition, 29(3), 322340. DOI: 10.1521/soco.2011.29.3.322
  42. 42Louvet, E., Cambon, L., Milhabet, I., & Rohmer, O. (2019). The relationship between social status and the components of agency. The Journal of Social Psychology, 159(1), 3045. DOI: 10.1080/00224545.2018.1441795
  43. 43Mollaret, P., & Miraucourt, D. (2016). Is job performance independent from career success? A conceptual distinction between competence and agency. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 57(6), 607617. DOI: 10.1111/sjop.12329
  44. 44Rule, N. O., & Ambady, N. (2008). The face of success: Inferences from chief executive officers’ appearance predict company profits. Psychological Science, 19(2), 109111. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02054.x
  45. 45Rule, N. O., & Ambady, N. (2011). Judgments of power from college yearbook photos and later career success. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(2), 154158. DOI: 10.1177/1948550610385473
  46. 46Struthers, C. W., Weiner, B., & Allred, K. (1998). Effects of causal attributions on personnel decisions: A social motivation perspective. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 20(2), 155166. DOI: 10.1207/15324839851036778
  47. 47Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2002). Self-esteem and socioeconomic status: A meta-analytic review. Personality and social psychology review, 6(1), 5971. DOI: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0601_3
  48. 48Uchronski, M. (2008). Agency and communion in spontaneous self-descriptions: Occurrence and situational malleability. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(7), 10931102. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.563
  49. 49Van Vugt, M., Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. B. (2008). Leadership, followership, and evolution: Some lessons from the past. American Psychologist, 63(3), 182196. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.63.3.182
  50. 50Vohs, K. D. (2015). Money priming can change people’s thoughts, feelings, motivations, and behaviors: An update on 10 years of experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(4), e86e93. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000091
  51. 51Vohs, K. D., Mead, N. L., & Goode, M. R. (2006). The psychological consequences of money. Science, 314(5802), 11541156. DOI: 10.1126/science.1132491
  52. 52Vonk, R. (1999). Effects of other-profitability and self-profitability on evaluative judgements of behaviours. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(7), 833842. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199911)29:7<;833::AID-EJSP950>3.0.CO;2-Z
  53. 53Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York; Guilford.
  54. 54Wiens, S., & Nilsson, M. E. (2017). Performing contrast analysis in factorial designs: From NHST to confidence intervals and beyond. Educational and psychological measurement, 77(4), 690715. DOI: 10.1177/0013164416668950
  55. 55Wojciszke, B., Baryla, W., Parzuchowski, M., Szymkow, A., & Abele, A. E. (2011). Self-esteem is dominated by agentic over communal information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(5), 617627. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.791
  56. 56Wojciszke, B., Bazinska, R., & Jaworski, M. (1998). On the dominance of moral categories in impression formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(12), 12511263. DOI: 10.1177/01461672982412001
  57. 57Wojciszke, B., & Struzynska–Kujalowicz, A. (2007). Power influences self–esteem. Social Cognition, 25(4), 472494. DOI: 10.1521/soco.2007.25.4.472
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.692 | Journal eISSN: 2397-8570
Language: English
Submitted on: Feb 1, 2022
Accepted on: Jul 14, 2022
Published on: Oct 3, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Delphine Miraucourt, Sylvain Caruana, Patrick Mollaret, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.