Have a personal or library account? Click to login
How Neoliberal are You? Development and Validation of the Neoliberal Orientation Questionnaire Cover

How Neoliberal are You? Development and Validation of the Neoliberal Orientation Questionnaire

Open Access
|Jul 2023

References

  1. Adams, G., Estrada-Villalta, S., Sullivan, D., & Markus, H. R. (2019). The psychology of neoliberalism and the neoliberalism of psychology. Journal of Social Issues, 75(1), 128. DOI: 10.1111/josi.12305
  2. Arfken, M. (2018). From resisting neoliberalism to neoliberalizing resistance. Theory & Psychology, 28(5), 684693. DOI: 10.1177/0959354318800393
  3. Azevedo, F., Jost, J. T., Rothmund, T., & Sterling, J. (2019). Neoliberal ideology and the justification of inequality in capitalist societies: Why social and economic dimensions of ideology are intertwined. Journal of Social Issues, 75(1), 140. DOI: 10.1111/josi.12310
  4. Bay-Cheng, L. Y., Fitz, C. C., Alizaga, N. M., & Zucker, A. N. (2015). Tracking homo oeconomicus: Development of the Neoliberal Beliefs Inventory. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 3(1), 7188. DOI: 10.5964/jspp.v3i1.366
  5. Becker, G. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education (3rd ed). The University of Chicago Press. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226041223.001.0001
  6. Becker, J. C., Hartwich, L., & Haslam, S. A. (2021). Neoliberalism can reduce well-being by promoting a sense of social disconnection, competition, and loneliness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(3), 947965. DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12438
  7. Bettache, K., Chiu, C., & Beattie, P. (2020). The merciless mind in a dog-eat-dog society: Neoliberalism and the indifference to social inequality. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 217222. DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.06.002
  8. Binkley, S. (2011a). Happiness, positive psychology and the program of neoliberal governmentality. Subjectivity, 4(4), 371394. DOI: 10.1057/sub.2011.16
  9. Binkley, S. (2011b). Psychological life as enterprise: Social practice and the government of neo-liberal interiority. History of the Human Sciences, 24(3), 83102. DOI: 10.1177/0952695111412877
  10. Birch, K. (2015). Neoliberalism: The whys and wherefores … and future directions. Sociology Compass, 9(7), 571584. DOI: 10.1111/soc4.12277
  11. Bongiorno, R., Ryan, M. K., Gibson, O., & Joyce, H. (2021). Exploring collective costs and individual benefits of neoliberal feminism [Manuscript submitted for publication]. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/9x6ar
  12. Bride, O. M., Dunwoody, L., Lowe-Strong, A., & Kennedy, S. M. (2008). Examining adversarial growth in illness: The factor structure of the silver lining questionnaire (SLQ-38). Psychology & Health, 23(6), 661678. DOI: 10.1080/14768320701356540
  13. Broc, G., Carlsberg, M., Cazauvieilh, C., Faury, S., & Loyal, D. (2016). Stats faciles avec R: Guide pratique [Easy Stats with R: A Practical Guide]. De Boeck supérieur.
  14. Caspar, E., Verdin, O., Rigoni, D., Cleeremans, A., & Klein, O. (2017). What do you believe in? French translation of the FAD-Plus to assess beliefs in free will and determinism and their relationship with religious practices and personality traits. Psychologica Belgica, 57(1), Article 1. DOI: 10.5334/pb.321
  15. Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 173178.
  16. Creswell, J. W. (2014). A Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods Research (1st edition). SAGE Publications, Inc.
  17. Dardot, P., & Laval, C. (2019). Never ending nightmare: How neoliberalism dismantles democracy. Verso Books.
  18. Darnon, C., Smeding, A., & Redersdorff, S. (2017). Belief in school meritocracy as an ideological barrier to the promotion of equality: School meritocracy and equality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(4), 523534. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2347
  19. De La Fabián, R., & Stecher, A. (2017). Positive psychology’s promise of happiness: A new form of human capital in contemporary neoliberal governmentality. Theory & Psychology, 27(5), 600621. DOI: 10.1177/0959354317718970
  20. Duarte, S., Dambrun, M., & Guimond, S. (2004). La dominance sociale et les “mythes légitimateurs”: Validation d’une version française de l’échelle d’orientation à la dominance sociale. [Social dominance and legitimizing myths: Validation of a French form of the Social Dominance Orientation scale.]. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 17(4), 97126.
  21. Dubois, N., & Beauvois, J.-L. (2005). Normativeness and individualism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(1), 123146. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.236
  22. Eagleton-Pierce, M. (2016). Neoliberalism: The key concepts. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203798188
  23. Ennis, L. R. (2014). Intensive mothering: The cultural contradictions of modern motherhood. Demeter Press.
  24. Everett, J. A. C. (2013). The 12 Item Social and Economic Conservatism Scale (SECS). PLOS ONE, 8(12), e82131. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082131
  25. Feldman, S., & Johnston, C. (2014). Understanding the Determinants of Political Ideology: Implications of Structural Complexity. Political Psychology, 35(3), 337358. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12055
  26. Fitz, C. C., Zucker, A. N., & Bay-Cheng, L. Y. (2012). Not all nonlabelers are created equal: Distinguishing between quasi-feminists and neoliberals. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36(3), 274285. DOI: 10.1177/0361684312451098
  27. Foster, M. D., & Matheson, K. (1995). Double relative deprivation: Combining the personal and political. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(11), 11671177. DOI: 10.1177/01461672952111005
  28. Foucault, M. (2004a). Naissance de la biopolitique: Cours au Collège de France, 1978–1979 [The brith of the biopolitique: lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979] (F. Ewald, A. Fontana, & M. Senellart, Eds.). Coedition EHESS/Gallimard/Seuil.
  29. Foucault, M. (2004b). Sécurité, territoire, population-Cours au Collège de France (1977–1978) [Security, territory, population-Courses at the Collège de France (1977–1978)] (F. Ewald, A. Fontana, & M. Senellart, Eds.). Coedition EHESS/Gallimard/Seuil.
  30. Frank, R. H. (2016). Success and Luck: Good Fortune and the Myth of Meritocracy. Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9781400880270
  31. Girerd, L., & Bonnot, V. (2020). Neoliberalism: An ideological barrier to feminist identification and collective action. Social Justice Research, 33(1), 81109. DOI: 10.1007/s11211-020-00347-8
  32. Girerd, L., Ray, F. A., Priolo, D., Codou, O., & Bonnot, V. (2020). “Free” not to engage: Neoliberal ideology and collective action. The case of the Yellow Vest movement. International Review of Social Psychology, 33(1), Article 1. DOI: 10.5334/irsp.363
  33. Girerd, L., Verniers, C., & Bonnot, V. (2021). Neoliberal ideology in France: A qualitative inquiry. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.686391
  34. Giroux, H. A. (2004). Public pedagogy and the politics of neo-liberalism: Making the political more pedagogical. Policy Futures in Education, 2(3–4), 494503. DOI: 10.2304/pfie.2004.2.3.5
  35. Grzanka, P. R., Miles, J. R., Spengler, E. S., Arnett, J. E., & Pruett, J. (2020). Measuring neoliberalism: Development and initial validation of a scale of Anti-Neoliberal Attitudes. Social Justice Research, 33(1), 4480. DOI: 10.1007/s11211-019-00339-3
  36. Gurin, P., Miller, A. H., & Gurin, G. (1980). Stratum identification and consciousness. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43(1), 30. DOI: 10.2307/3033746
  37. Hache, É. (2007). La responsabilité, une technique de gouvernementalité néolibérale? [Responsibility, a technique of neoliberal governmentality?]. Raisons politiques, 28(4), 4965. DOI: 10.3917/rai.028.0049
  38. Haga, S. M., Kraft, P., & Corby, E.-K. (2009). Emotion regulation: Antecedents and well-being outcomes of cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression in cross-cultural samples. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(3), 271291. DOI: 10.1007/s10902-007-9080-3
  39. Harrington, D. (2009). Confirmatory factor analysis. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195339888.001.0001
  40. Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.
  41. Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. Yale University Press.
  42. Iyer, R., Koleva, S., Graham, J., Ditto, P., & Haidt, J. (2012). Understanding libertarian morality: The psychological dispositions of self-identified libertarians. PLOS ONE, 7(8), e42366. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042366
  43. Jetten, J., Mols, F., & Selvanathan, H. P. (2020). How economic inequality fuels the rise and persistence of the Yellow Vest movement. International Review of Social Psychology, 33(1), Article 1. DOI: 10.5334/irsp.356
  44. Joireman, J., Shaffer, M. J., Balliet, D., & Strathman, A. (2012). Promotion orientation explains why future-oriented people exercise and eat healthy: Evidence from the two-factor consideration of future consequences-14 scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(10), 12721287. DOI: 10.1177/0146167212449362
  45. Jost, J. (2020). A theory of system justification. In A Theory of System Justification. Harvard University Press. DOI: 10.4159/9780674247192
  46. Jost, J. T. (2021). Left and Right: The Psychological Significance of a Political Distinction. Oxford University Press.
  47. Jost, J., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 307337. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600
  48. Jost, J., & Thompson, E. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(3), 209232. DOI: 10.1006/jesp.1999.1403
  49. Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2010). Social Justice: History, Theory, and Research. In S. T. Fiske, D. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. DOI: 10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002030
  50. Juhel, J., & Rouxel, G. (2005). Effets du contexte d’évaluation sur les dimensions de la désirabilité sociale [Effects of the evaluation context on the dimensions of social desirability]. Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations, 11(1), 5968. DOI: 10.1016/j.pto.2005.02.006
  51. Kay, A. C., Gaucher, D., Peach, J. M., Laurin, K., Friesen, J., Zanna, M. P., & Spencer, S. J. (2009). Inequality, discrimination, and the power of the status quo: Direct evidence for a motivation to see the way things are as the way they should be. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(3), 421434. DOI: 10.1037/a0015997
  52. Kay, A. C., & Jost, J. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of “poor but happy” and “poor but honest” stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 823837. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.823
  53. Kim, J. Y., Fitzsimons, G. M., & Kay, A. C. (2018). Lean in messages increase attributions of women’s responsibility for gender inequality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(6), 9741001. DOI: 10.1037/pspa0000129
  54. Krauth-Gruber, S., & Bonnot, V. (2020). Collective guilt, moral outrage, and support for helping the poor: A matter of system versus in-group responsibility framing. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 30(1), 5972. DOI: 10.1002/casp.2428
  55. Lang, P., Bradley, M., & Cuthbert, B. (2008). International affective picture system (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. (Technical Report A-8). University of Florida.
  56. Langer, M., Vasilopoulos, P., McAvay, H., & Jost, J. T. (2020). System justification in France: Liberté, égalité, fraternité. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 185191. DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.04.004
  57. Le Figaro. (2018, June 23). Les Français attachés aux services publics [The French attached to public services]. Le Figaro. http://www.lefigaro.fr/flash-eco/2018/06/23/97002-20180623FILWWW00109-les-francais-attaches-aux-services-publics.php
  58. Loyal, D., Sutter Dallay, A.-L., & Rascle, N. (2021). Validity of the Measure of Intensive Mothering Ideology (MIMI). L’Encéphale, 47(1), 49. DOI: 10.1016/j.encep.2020.05.019
  59. Luhtanen, R., & Crocker, J. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one’s social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(3), 302318. DOI: 10.1177/0146167292183006
  60. McDonald, M., & O’Callaghan, J. (2008). Positive psychology: A Foucauldian critique. The Humanistic Psychologist, 36(2), 127142. DOI: 10.1080/08873260802111119
  61. Milkie, M., & Warner, C. (2014). Status safeguarding: Mothering work as safety net. In L. R. Ennis (Ed.), Intensive Mothering: The Cultural Contradictions of Modern Motherhood (pp. 6685). Demeter Press.
  62. Monbiot, G. (2016). Neoliberalism – the ideology at the root of all our problems. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/apr/15/neoliberalism-ideology-problem-george-monbiot
  63. Navarro, V. (2007). Neoliberalism as a class ideology; Or, the political causes of the growth of inequalities. International Journal of Health Services, 37(1), 4762. DOI: 10.2190/AP65-X154-4513-R520
  64. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741763. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
  65. Pulfrey, C., & Butera, F. (2013). Why neoliberal values of self-enhancement lead to cheating in higher education: A motivational account. Psychological Science, 24(11), 21532162. DOI: 10.1177/0956797613487221
  66. Pyysiäinen, J., Halpin, D., & Guilfoyle, A. (2017). Neoliberal governance and ‘responsibilization’ of agents: Reassessing the mechanisms of responsibility-shift in neoliberal discursive environments. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 18(2), 215235. DOI: 10.1080/1600910X.2017.1331858
  67. Ratner, C. (2019). Neoliberal psychology. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-02982-1
  68. Robitschek, C., Ashton, M. W., Spering, C. C., Geiger, N., Byers, D., Schotts, G. C., & Thoen, M. A. (2012). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Personal Growth Initiative Scale–II. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 59(2), 274287. DOI: 10.1037/a0027310
  69. Rottenberg, C. (2018). The rise of neoliberal feminism. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190901226.001.0001
  70. Schönbrodt, F. D., & Perugini, M. (2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize? Journal of Research in Personality, 47(5), 609612. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.009
  71. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1993). Racism and support of free-market capitalism: A cross-cultural analysis. Political Psychology, 14(3), 381401. DOI: 10.2307/3791704
  72. Simon, B., & Klandermans, B. (2001). Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56(4), 319331. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.56.4.319
  73. Szymanski, D. M. (2004). Relations among dimensions of feminism and internalized heterosexism in lesbians and bisexual women. Sex Roles, 51(3/4), 145159. DOI: 10.1023/B:SERS.0000037759.33014.55
  74. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics, 5th ed (pp. xxvii, 980). Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.
  75. Teo, T. (2018). Homo neoliberalus: From personality to forms of subjectivity. Theory & Psychology, 28(5), 581599. DOI: 10.1177/0959354318794899
  76. Tournois, J., Mesnil, F., & Kop, J.-L. (2000). Autoduperie et hétéroduperie: Un instrument de mesure de la désirabilité sociale [Self-deception and other-deception: A measurement instrument of social desirability]. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée, 50, 219232.
  77. Valecha, G. K., & Ostrom, T. M. (1974). An abbreviated measure of internal-external locus of control. Journal of Personality Assessment, 38(4), 369376. DOI: 10.1080/00223891.1974.10119987
  78. van Stekelenburg, J., & Klandermans, B. (2013). The social psychology of protest. Current Sociology, 61(5–6), 886905. DOI: 10.1177/0011392113479314
  79. van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504535. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504
  80. Verniers, C., Bonnot, V., & Assilaméhou-Kunz, Y. (2022). Intensive mothering and the perpetuation of gender inequality: Evidence from a mixed methods research. Acta Psychologica, 227, 103614. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103614
  81. Weston, R., & Gore, P. A. (2006). A brief guide to structural equation modeling. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(5), 719751. DOI: 10.1177/0011000006286345
  82. Wolf, E. J., Harrington, K. M., Clark, S. L., & Miller, M. W. (2013). Sample size requirements for structural equation models: An evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76(6), 913934. DOI: 10.1177/0013164413495237
  83. Zucker, A. N., & Bay-Cheng, L. Y. (2010). Minding the gap between feminist identity and attitudes: The behavioral and ideological divide between feminists and non-labelers: Feminist identity versus attitudes. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 18951924. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00673.x
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.663 | Journal eISSN: 2397-8570
Language: English
Submitted on: Nov 25, 2021
|
Accepted on: Jun 10, 2023
|
Published on: Jul 19, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Lola Girerd, John T. Jost, Virginie Bonnot, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.