Young Greeks’ Social Representation of Protest: Dialogical Structure and Ideological Function

Alexandros Vlazakis; Aphrodite Baka; Lia Figgou

doi:10.5334/irsp.648

Abstract

Public protest has been a controversial form of political participation which aims to intervene in the socio-political status quo by promoting or preventing social change. The political and social life in Greece has been greatly influenced by public protests which, in several cases, acted as regulators and drivers of change. The main interest of this study is to examine public protest as an object of social representation of young Greeks in the current socio-political and historical context. Obtaining data from focus groups, we use recent dialogical approaches to Social Representation Theory to examine the content, the emerging identities, as well as the structure and the ideological function of protest representation amongst young Greeks. Our findings indicate that protests’ representation is conceptualized on the basis of dialectical antitheses and contradictory identities; the idealistic perception of public protest is based on the conceptualization of the identity of active citizen and purposeful protesters, while the violent side of protests emerges from the identity of rioters and protest armies. We argue that these main elements of protest representation also determine its internal structure. In addition, they have an implicit ideological function as they express the way in which young Greeks discuss, negotiate, assimilate and redefine public protest under their set of beliefs and their worldview concerning social reality.

References

1Abric, J. C. (1993). Central system, peripheral system: their functions and roles in the dynamics of social representations. Papers on social representations, 2, 75–78.
Back to article
2Abric, J. C. (1996). Specific processes of social representations. Papers on Social Representations, 5(1), 77–80.
Back to article
3Abric, J.-C., & Tafani, É. (1995). Nature et fonctionnement du noyau central d’une représentation sociale: la représentation de l’entreprise [Nature and functioning of the central core of a social representation: the representation of the firm]. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 28, 22–31.
Back to article
4Anastasakis, O. (2009). The new politics of the new century. In S. Economides & V. Monastiriotis (Eds.), The return of street politics? Essays on the December riots in Greece (pp. 5–9). Hellenic Observatory, London School of Economics and Political Science.
Back to article
5Arampatzi, A. (2016). Constructing solidarity as resistive and creative agency in austerity Greece. Comparative European Politics, 16(1), 50–66. DOI: 10.1057/s41295-016-0071-9
Back to article
6Arbatani, T. R., Aqili, S. V., Labafi, S., & Omidi, A. (2016). Social representations of Iranian transsexual people in the media: A thematic analysis. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 6(5). DOI: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v6-i5/2142
Back to article
7Baka, A., & Garyfallou, A. (2011). Collective identity and empowerment in the December 2008 protests in Greece: A socio-psychological approach. Journal of Critical Studies in Business & Society, 2.
Back to article
8Batel, S., & Castro, P. (2014). Collective action and social change: Examining the role of representation in the communication between protesters and third-party members. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 25(3), 249–263. DOI: 10.1002/casp.2214
Back to article
9Batel, S., & Castro, P. (2018). Reopening the dialogue between the theory of social representations and discursive psychology for examining the construction and transformation of meaning in discourse and communication. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(4), 732–753. DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12259
Back to article
10Bauer, M. W., & Gaskell, G. (1999). Towards a paradigm for research on social representations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 29(2), 163–186. DOI: 10.1111/1468-5914.00096
Back to article
11Bigl, B. (2019). Stop the frack! Exploring the media’s portrayal of the social representation of an anti-fracking protest at the Baltic Sea. Environmental Communication, 14(2), 271–286. DOI: 10.1080/17524032.2019.1651367
Back to article
12Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, M. P. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association.
Back to article
13de Carvalho, E., & Skipper, Y. (2018). “We’re not just sat at home in our pyjamas!”: A thematic analysis of the social lives of home educated adolescents in the UK. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 34(3), 501–516. DOI: 10.1007/s10212-018-0398-5
Back to article
14Della Porta, D., & Diani, M. (2006). Social movements: An introduction. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
Back to article
15Devine, C. J. (2015). Ideological social identity: Psychological attachment to ideological in-groups as a political phenomenon and a behavioral influence. Political Behavior, 37(3), 509–535. DOI: 10.1007/s11109-014-9280-6
Back to article
16Di Giacomo, J. P. (1980). Intergroup alliances and rejections within a protest movement (analysis of the social representations). European Journal of Social Psychology, 10(4), 329–344. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2420100402
Back to article
17Douzinas, C. (2013). Athens rising. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20(1), 134–138. DOI: 10.1177/0969776412452089
Back to article
18Elcheroth, G., Doise, W., & Reicher, S. (2011). On the knowledge of politics and the politics of knowledge: How a social representations approach helps us rethink the subject of political psychology. Political Psychology, 32(5), 729–758. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00834.x
Back to article
19Guimelli, C. (1993). Concerning the structure of social representations. Papers on social representations, 2, 85–92.
Back to article
20Guimelli, C. (1998). Differentiation between the central core elements of social representations: Normative vs. functional elements. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 57(4), 209–224.
Back to article
21Howarth, C. (2002). Identity in whose eyes? The role of representations in identity construction. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 32(2), 145–162. DOI: 10.1111/1468-5914.00181
Back to article
22Howarth, C. (2006). A social representation is not a quiet thing: Exploring the critical potential of social representations theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45(1), 65–86. DOI: 10.1348/014466605X43777
Back to article
23Howarth, C. (2007). “It’s not their fault that they have that colour skin, is it?”: Young British children and the possibilities for contesting racializing representations. In G. Moloney & I. Walker (Eds.), Social representations and identity: Content, process, and power (pp. 131–156). New York: Palgrave McMillan. DOI: 10.1057/9780230609181_8
Back to article
24Howarth, C. (2014). Connecting social representation, identity and ideology: Reflections on a London “riot”. Papers on Social Representations, 23(1), 4–1.
Back to article
25Howarth, C., Andreouli, E., & Kessi, S. (2014). Social representations and the politics of participation. In P. Nesbitt-Larking, C. Kinnvall, T. Capelos & H. Dekker (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Global Political Psychology. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-137-29118-9_2
Back to article
26Jeffery, B., & Tufail, W. (2015). The riots were where the police were: Deconstructing the Pendelton Riot. Contention, 2(2), 37–56. DOI: 10.3167/cont.2014.020204
Back to article
27Joffe, H. (2012). Thematic analysis. In D. Harper and A. Thompson (Eds.), Qualitative methods in mental health and psychotherapy: A guide for students and practitioners (pp. 209–223). Chichester: Wiley. DOI: 10.1002/9781119973249.ch15
Back to article
28Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–337. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600
Back to article
29Jovchelovitch, S. (2007). Trust and social representations: Understanding the relations between self and other in the Brazilian public sphere. In I. Marková & A. Gillespie (Eds.), Trust and Distrust: Sociocultural Perspectives. Advances in cultural psychology: Constructing human development. Charlotte, NC, USA: Information Age Publishing.
Back to article
30Karyotis, G., & Rüdig, W. (2017). The three waves of anti-austerity protest in Greece, 2010–2015. Political Studies Review, 16(2), 158–169. DOI: 10.1177/1478929916685728
Back to article
31Leontidou, L. (2012). Athens in the Mediterranean ‘movement of the piazzas’ Spontaneity in material and virtual public spaces. City, 16(3), 299–312. DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2012.687870
Back to article
32Litton, I., & Potter, J. (1985). Social representations in the ordinary explanation of a ‘riot.’ European Journal of Social Psychology, 15(4), 371–388. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2420150402
Back to article
33Marková, I. (1982). Paradigms, thought and language. Chichester: Wiley.
Back to article
34Markova, I. (2000). Amedee or how to get rid of it: Social representations from a dialogical perspective. Culture & Psychology, 6(4), 419–460. DOI: 10.1177/1354067X0064002
Back to article
35Miglietta, A., & Acquadro Maran, D. (2017). Gender, sexism and the social representation of stalking: What makes the difference? Psychology of Violence, 7(4), 563–573. DOI: 10.1037/vio0000070
Back to article
36Moloney, G., Sutherland, M., Bowling, A., Upcroft, L., Jagdish, P. P., Walker, I., & Norton, M. (2020). Don’t forget the context when you are talking about organ donation: Social representations, shared mood and behaviour. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 30(6), 645–659. DOI: 10.1002/casp.2474
Back to article
37Moloney, G., & Walker, I. (2002). Talking about transplants: Social representations and the dialectical, dilemmatic nature of organ donation and transplantation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41(2), 299–320. DOI: 10.1348/014466602760060264
Back to article
38Morgan, D. L. (1996). Focus Groups. Annual Review of Sociology, 22(1), 129–152. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.129
Back to article
39Moscovici, S. (1963). Attitudes and opinions. Annual Review of Psychology, 14(1), 231–260. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ps.14.020163.001311
Back to article
40Moscovici, S. (1973). Preface. In C. Herzlich (Ed.), Santé et maladie. Analyse d’une représentation sociale. Paris: Mouton.
Back to article
41Moscovici, S. (1988). Notes towards a description of Social Representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(3), 211–250. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2420180303
Back to article
42Pantelidou-Maloutas, M. (2015, Dec). Youth and politics: Political attitudes of the young in Athens during the crisis. https://www.athenssocialatlas.gr/en/article/youth-and-politics-ii/
Back to article
43Pechtelidis, Y. (2011). December uprising 2008: Universality and particularity in young people’s discourse. Journal of Youth Studies, 14(4), 449–462. DOI: 10.1080/13676261.2010.543669
Back to article
44Popp, E., & Rudolph, T. J. (2011). A tale of two ideologies: Explaining public support for economic interventions. The Journal of Politics, 73(3), 808–820. DOI: 10.1017/S0022381611000478
Back to article
45Potter, J. (2018). Action and representation – A comment on Batel and Castro ‘Reopening the dialogue between the theory of social representations and discursive psychology.’ British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(2), 410–414. DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12275
Back to article
46Potter, J., & Litton, I. (1985). Some problems underlying the theory of social representations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 24(2), 81–90. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1985.tb00664.x
Back to article
47Pozzi, M., Fattori, F., Bocchiaro, P., & Alfieri, S. (2014). Do the right thing! A study on social representation of obedience and disobedience. New Ideas in Psychology, 35, 18–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2014.06.002
Back to article
48Psimitis, M. (2011). The protest cycle of spring 2010 in Greece. Social Movement Studies, 10(2), 191–197. DOI: 10.1080/14742837.2011.562365
Back to article
49Reicher, S. (1996). ‘The Battle of Westminster’: Developing the social identity model of crowd behaviour in order to explain the initiation and development of collective conflict. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26(1), 115–134. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199601)26:1<;115::AID-EJSP740>3.0.CO;2-Z
Back to article
50Reicher, S. (2004). The context of social identity: Domination, resistance, and change. Political Psychology, 25(6), 921–945. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00403.x
Back to article
51Reicher, S. D. (1987). Crowd behaviour as social action. In J. Turner, M. Hogg, P. Oakes, S. Reicher & M. Wetherell (Eds.), Rediscovering the Social Group. Oxford: Blackwell.
Back to article
52Rochon, T. R. (1998). Culture moves: Ideas, activism, and changing values. Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9780691186719
Back to article
53Rüdig, W., & Karyotis, G. (2013). Who protests in Greece? Mass opposition to austerity. British Journal of Political Science, 44(3), 487–513. DOI: 10.1017/S0007123413000112
Back to article
54Simiti, M. (2016). Rage and protest: The case of the Greek Indignant Movement. Contention, 3(2), 33–50. DOI: 10.3167/cont.2015.030204
Back to article
55Stott, C., & Reicher, S. (2011). Mad mobs and Englishmen?: Myths and realities of the 2011 riots. UK: Hachette.
Back to article
56Taylor, V., & Van Dyke, N. (2004). “Get up, stand up”: Tactical repertoires of social movements. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements (pp. 262–292). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. DOI: 10.1002/9780470999103.ch12
Back to article
57Theodossopoulos, D. (2013). Infuriated with the Infuriated? Current Anthropology, 54(2), 200–221. DOI: 10.1086/669855
Back to article
58Tsekoura, M. (2016). Spaces for youth participation and youth empowerment. YOUNG, 24(4), 326–341. DOI: 10.1177/1103308815618505
Back to article
59Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
Back to article
60Veneti, A., Lilleker, D. G., & Reilly, P. (2018). Photographing the ‘battlefield’: The role of ideology in photojournalist practices during the anti-austerity protests in Greece. Journalism, 21(6), 855–872. DOI: 10.1177/1464884918809521
Back to article
61Voelklein, C., & Howarth, C. (2005). A review of controversies about Social Representations Theory: A British debate. Culture & Psychology, 11(4), 431–454. DOI: 10.1177/1354067X05058586
Back to article
62Vogiatzoglou, M. (2017). Turbulent flow: Anti-austerity mobilization in Greece. In D. Della Porta, M. Andretta, T. Fernandes, F. O’Connor, E. Romanos & M. Vogiatzoglou (Eds.), Late neoliberalism and its discontents in the economic crisis (pp. 99–129). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-35080-6_4
Back to article
63Wagner, W. (1998). Social representations and beyond: Brute facts, symbolic coping and domesticated worlds. Culture & Psychology, 4(3), 297–329. DOI: 10.1177/1354067X9800400302
Back to article
64Wagner, W., Duveen, G., Farr, R., Jovchelovitch, S., Lorenzi-Cioldi, F., Marková, I., & Rose, D. (1999). Theory and method of social representations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 95–125. DOI: 10.1111/1467-839X.00028
Back to article
65Wagner, W., Duveen, G., Verma, J., & Themel, M. (2000). I have some faith and at the same time I don’t believe? Cognitive polyphasia and cultural change in India. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 10(4), 301–314. DOI: 10.1002/1099-1298(200007/08)10:4<;301::AID-CASP585>3.0.CO;2-V
Back to article
66Xenakis, S. (2012). A new dawn? Change and continuity in political violence in Greece. Terrorism and Political Violence, 24(3), 437–464. DOI: 10.1080/09546553.2011.633133
Back to article
67Zamperini, A., Menegatto, M., Travaglino, G. A., & Nulman, E. (2012). Social representations of protest and police after the Genoa G8 summit: A qualitative analysis of activist accounts of events. Papers on Social Representations, 21(2), 15–27.
Back to article