Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Who were the « Charlie » in the Streets? A Socio-Political Approach of the January 11 Rallies   [Qui étaient Les “Charlie” dans la rue ? Approche Socio-Politique des Rassemblements du 11 Janvier] Cover

Who were the « Charlie » in the Streets? A Socio-Political Approach of the January 11 Rallies [Qui étaient Les “Charlie” dans la rue ? Approche Socio-Politique des Rassemblements du 11 Janvier]

By: Nonna Mayer and  Vincent Tiberj  
Open Access
|Aug 2016

References

  1. 1
    Ajzen I. Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior 1980 Englewood Cliffs, NJ Prentice Hall
  2. 2
    Barnes S. Kaase M. Allerbeck K. Political Action. Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies 1979 Beverly Hill (Ca) Sage Publications
  3. 3
    Brouard S. Tiberj V. As French As Everyone Else? A Survey of French Citizens of Maghrebin, African, and Turkish Origin 2011 Philadelphia Temple University Press
  4. 4
    Chong D. Druckman J. N. A Theory of Framing and Opinion Formation in Competitive Elite Environments Journal of Communication 2007 57 99 118 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00331.x
  5. 5
    Coffé H. Bolzendahl C. Same game, different rules? Differences in political participation Sex Roles 2010 62 5–6 318 333 10.1007/s11199-009-9729-y
  6. 6
    Cohu M. Maisonneuve C. Testé B. The “Charlie-Hebdo” effect: repercussions of the January 2015 terrorist attacks in France on prejudice toward immigrants and North-Africans, social dominance orientation, and attachment to the principle of laïcité International Review of Social Psychology 2016 29 1 50 58 10.5334/irsp.59
  7. 7
    Favre P. Fillieule O. Mayer N. La fin d’une étrange lacune de la sociologie des mobilisations. L’étude par sondage des manifestants: fondements théoriques et solutions techniques (The end of a strange gap in the sociology of mobilisations. The use of surveys to study demonstrators: theoretical foundations and technical solutions) Revue Française de Science Politique 1997 1 3 28
  8. 8
    Fazio R. H. Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behaviour – The mode model as an integrative framework Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 1990 23 74 109 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60318-4
  9. 9
    Festinger L. A theory of cognitive dissonance 1957 Stanford, CA Stanford University Press
  10. 10
    Fillieule O. Blanchard P. Teune (Simon) Individual Surveys in Rallies (INSURA). A new Eldorado for Comparative Social Movement Research? The Transnational Condition. Protest Dynamics in an Entangled Europe 2010 Berlin Berghahn 186 210
  11. 11
    Fillieule O. Tartakowsky D. Demonstrations 2012 Winnipeg Fernwood Publishing
  12. 12
    Fointiat V. Girandola F. Gosling P. La dissonance cognitive: Quand les actes changent les idées. (Cognitive dissonance. When acts change ideas) 2013 Paris A. Colin 10.3917/arco.gosli.2013.01
  13. 13
    Fourquet J. Marche républicaine « pour Charlie »: des disparités de mobilisation lourdes de sens. (Republican march « for Charlie ». Differences in mobilisation that matter) Ifop Focus, no 121 2015
  14. 14
    He J. Socially Desirable Responding Enhancement and Denial in 20 Countries Cross-Cultural Research 2015 49 227 249 10.1177/1069397114552781
  15. 15
    Inglehart R. The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics 1977 Princeton Princeton University Press
  16. 16
    Inglehart R. Catterberg G. Trends in Political Action: The Developmental Trend and the Post-Honeymoon Decline International Journal of Comparative Sociology 2002 43 300 316 10.1177/002071520204300305
  17. 17
    Joliveau T. Où est Charlie ? Ce que montrent réellement les cartes d’Emmanuel Todd. (Where is Charlie? What Emmanuel Todd’s maps really show) 2015 Monde géonumérique Avalable from (https://mondegeonumerique.wordpress.com/2015/05/19/ou-est-charlie-et-si-les-cartes-du-11-janvier-demmanuel-todd-montraient-tout-autre-chose/
  18. 18
    Kaminska O. Foulsham T. Understanding Sources of Social Desirability Bias in Different Modes: Evidence from Eye-tracking 2013 ISER Working Papers Series 4. Available from https://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/research/publications/working-papers/iser/2013-04.pdf
  19. 19
    Kellstedt P. M. The Mass Media and the Dynamics of American Racial Attitudes 2003 Cambridge Cambridge University Press 10.1017/CBO9780511615634
  20. 20
    Klandermans B. van Stekelenburg J. Walgrave S. Comparing street demonstrations International Sociology 2014 29 493 503 10.1177/0268580914556125
  21. 21
    Klandermans B. van Stekelenburg J. Walgrave S. Verhults J. Contextualizing contestation: framework, design and data Mobilization: An International Journal 2012 17 249 262
  22. 22
    Kraus S. J. Attitudes and the prediction of behavior: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1995 21 58 75 10.1177/0146167295211007
  23. 23
    LaPiere R. T. Attitudes versus actions Social Forces 1934 13 230 237 10.2307/2570339
  24. 24
    Mayer N. Sociologie des comportements politiques (Sociology of political behaviour) 2010 Paris A. Colin 10.3917/arco.maye.2010.01
  25. 25
    Mayer N. Michelat G. Tiberj V. Vitale T. CNCDH La stabilisation de l’indice de tolérance (The stabilisation of the Index of tolerance) Rapport sur la lutte contre le racisme, l’antisémitisme et la xénophobie 2014 (Report on the fight against racism, antisemitism and xenophobia 2014) 2015 Paris La Documentation française 211 218
  26. 26
    Mayer N. Michelat G. Tiberj V. Vitale T. CNCDH Le retour inattendu de la tolérance (The unexpected return of tolerance) Rapport sur la lutte contre le racisme, l’antisémitisme et la xénophobie 2015 (Report on the fight against racism, antisemitism and xenophobia 2015) 2016 Paris La Documentation française 285 293
  27. 27
    Mignot J.-F. Goffette C. “Non, « Charlie Hebdo » n’est pas obsédé par l’islam ». (No, « Charlie Hebdo » is not obsessed by Islam) 2015 Available from http://www.lemonde.fr/idees/article/2015/02/24/non-charlie-hebdo-n-est-pas-obsede-par-l-islam_4582419_3232.html#Uor3dmjXxbFb2BKu.99
  28. 28
    Norris P. Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government 1999 Oxford Oxford University Press 10.1093/0198295685.001.0001
  29. 29
    Norris P. Democratic Phoenix. Reinventing Political Activism 2002 Cambridge Cambridge University Press 10.1017/CBO9780511610073
  30. 30
    Nugier A. Guimond S. Je suis “Charlie”: New findings on the social and political psychology of terrorism International Review of Social Psychology 2016 29 1 45 49 10.5334/irsp.60
  31. 31
    Pelletier P. Drozda-Senkowska E. The Charlie Hebdo Terror Attack in Paris: Follow-up of French Citizens’ Terrorist Threat Perception and Its Aftermath International Review of Social Psychology 2016 29 1 85 98 10.5334/irsp.51
  32. 32
    Quaranta M. Political Protest in Western Europe. Exploring the Role of Context for Political Action 2015 Berlin Springer 10.1007/978-3-319-22162-5
  33. 33
    Robinson W. Ecological Correlations and the Behaviour of Individuals American Sociological Review 1950 15 351 357 10.2307/2087176
  34. 34
    Rouban L. Qui sont les manifestants du 11 janvier 2015 ? (Who are the January 11 demonstrators?) 2015 Paris Cevipof Available from http://www.youscribe.com/catalogue/tous/actualite-et-debat-de-societe/debats-et-polemiques/qui-sont-les-manifestants-du-11-janvier-2015-2579566
  35. 35
    Stoker G. Jennings W. The Bifurcation of Politics: The Impact of Cosmopolitan versus Shrinking Urban Dynamics Paper for the European Urban Research Association conference, Sibiu, Romania Transforming cities, transformative cities 17–20 September 2015 2015 Available from http://www.eura2015.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/StokerJenningsShrinkingCosmopolitanUrban.pdf
  36. 36
    Tiberj V. La crispation hexagonale. France fermée contre « France plurielle », 2001–2007 (Hexagonal tensions. Closed France against « France in the plural) 2008 Paris Plon
  37. 37
    Todd E. Qui est Charlie? Sociologie d’une crise religieuse (Who is Charlie? Sociology of a religious crisis) 2015 Paris Seuil
  38. 38
    Tourangeau R. Rips L. J. Rasinski K. A. The psychology of survey response 2000 Cambridge, United Kingdom Cambridge University Press
  39. 39
    Tourangeau R. Yan T. Sensitive questions in surveys Psychological Bulletin 2007 133 859 883 10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.859
  40. 40
    Truc G. Sidérations. Une sociologie des attentats (Dismay. A sociology of terror attacks) 2016 Paris PUF 10.1017/CBO9780511819322
  41. 41
    Van Aelst P. Walgrave S. Who is that (wo)man in the street? From the normalization of protest to the normalization of the protester European Journal of Political Research 2001 39 461 486 10.1111/1475-6765.00582
  42. 42
    Vasilopoulos P. Marcus G. E. Foucault M. Emotional Responses to the Charlie Hebdo Attacks: Between Ideology and Political Judgment Paper for the French Political Science Association, Aix en Provence July 2014 2015 Available from http://www.congres-afsp.fr/st/st9/st9marcusvasilopoulosfoucault.pdf
  43. 43
    Wicker A. W. Attitudes versus actions: The relationship of verbal and overt behavioral responses to attitude objects Journal of Social Issues 1969 25 41 78 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1969.tb00619.x
  44. 44
    Zaller J. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion 1992 Cambridge Cambridge University Press 10.1017/CBO9780511818691
  45. 45
    Zerhouni O. Rougier M. Muller D. “Who (really) is Charlie?” French cities with lower implicit prejudice toward Arabs demonstrated larger participation rates in Charlie Hebdo rallies International Review of Social Psychology 2016 29 1 69 76 10.5334/irsp.50
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.63 | Journal eISSN: 2397-8570
Language: English
Published on: Aug 23, 2016
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2016 Nonna Mayer, Vincent Tiberj, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.