Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Minority Influence and the Struggle for Recognition Cover

Minority Influence and the Struggle for Recognition

Open Access
|Mar 2018

References

  1. 1Alvaro, E. M., & Crano, W. D. (2017). Reflections on Gabriel Mugny’s contributions to attitude-centric theory and research on minority influence. International Review of Social Psychology, 30(1), 161171. DOI: 10.5334/irsp.25
  2. 2Bobo, L., Kluegel, J. R., & Smith, R. A. (1997). Laissez-faire racism: The crystallization of a kinder, gentler, antiblack ideology. In: Tuch, S. A., & Martin, J. K. (Eds.), Racial attitudes in the 1990s: Continuity and change, 1544. Westport, CT: Praeger.
  3. 3Butera, F., Falomir-Pichastor, J. M., Mugny, G., & Quiamzade, A. (2017). Minority influence. In: Harkins, S., Williams, K. D., & Burger, J. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Social Influence Eelaboration, 317337. New York: Oxford University Press.
  4. 4Chaumont, J. M. (1997). La concurrence des victimes: génocide, identité, reconnaissance [The competition of victims: genocides, identity and recognition]. Paris: la Découverte.
  5. 5Doise, W., & Staerklé, C. (2002). From social to political psychology: The societal approach. In: Monroe, K. (Ed.), Political Psychology, 151172. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  6. 6Dovidio, F. D., Kawakami, K., & Gaertner, S. L. (2002). Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(1), 6268. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.62
  7. 7Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1984). Cognitive theories of persuasion. Advances in in Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 267359. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60122-7
  8. 8Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The Psychology of Attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Hardcourt Hardcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  9. 9Elias, N., & Scotson, J.-L. (1994, 1965). The Established and the Outsiders. A Sociological Inquiry into Community Problems. London: Sage.
  10. 10Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. (2009). Collective action in modern times: How modern expressions of prejudice prevent collective action. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 749768. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01621.x
  11. 11Gély, R. (2006). Identités et monde commun [Identities and common world]. Bruxelles: Peter Lang.
  12. 12Gray, K., & Wegner, D. A. (2009). Moral typecasting: Divergent perceptions of moral agents and moral patients. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), 505520. DOI: 10.1037/a0013748
  13. 13Hirschman, A. (1970). Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  14. 14Honneth, A. (1996). The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  15. 15Huntington, S. P. (1996). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster. In: Monroe, K. (Ed.), Political Psychology, 151172. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  16. 16Jodelet, D. (2005). Formes et figures de l’altérité [Forms and figures of alterity]. In: Sanchez-Mazas, M., & Licata, L. (Eds.), L’Autre: Regards Psychosociaux, 2347. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
  17. 17Katz, I., & Hass, R. G. (1988). Racial ambivalence and American value conflict – correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 893905. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.55.6.893
  18. 18Kinder D. R. (1986). The continuing American dilemma: White resistance to racial change 40 years after Myrdal. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 151172. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1986.tb00230.x
  19. 19Koopmans, R., & Kriesi, H. (1997). Citoyenneté, identité nationale et mobilisation de l’extrême droite. Une comparaison entre la France, l’Allemagne, les Pays-Bas et la Suisse [Citizenship, national identity and mobilization of extreme-right. A comparison between France, Germany, the Netherlands and Swizerland]. In: Birnbaum, P. (Ed.), Sociologie des Nationalismes, 295324. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  20. 20Lamont, M. (2002). The Dignity of Working Men. Morality and the Boundaries of Race, Class, and Immigration. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
  21. 21Licata, L., Klein, O., & Gély, R. (2007). Mémoire des conflits, conflits de mémoires: Une approche psychosociale et philosophique du rôle de la mémoire collective dans les processus de réconciliation intergroupe. [Memory of the conflicts, conflicts of memories: A psychosocial and philosophical approach of the role of collective memory in the process of intergroup reconciliation]. Social Science Information, 46(4), 563589. DOI: 10.1177/0539018407082593
  22. 22Licata, L., Sanchez-Mazas, M., & Green, E. G. T. (2011). Identity, immigration, and prejudice in Europe: A recognition approach. In: Schwartz, S. J., Vignoles, V. L., & Luyckx, K. (Eds.), Handbook of Identity Theory and Research, 895916. New York: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_38
  23. 23Margalit, A. (1996). The Decent Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  24. 24Markovà, I. (2000). “Amédée or How to Get Rid of It”: Social Representations from a Dialogical Perspective. Culture & Psychology, 6(4), 419460. DOI: 10.1177/1354067X0064002
  25. 25McConahay, J. B. (1986). Modern Racism, Ambivalence, and the Modern Racism Scale. In: Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. I. (Eds.), Prejudice, Discrimination, and Racism, 91125. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  26. 26Moghaddam, F. M. (2006). From the Terrorist Point of View. Westport: Praeger Security International.
  27. 27Moscovici, S. (1972). Introduction à la psychologie sociale [Introduction to social psychology]. Paris: Librairie Larousse.
  28. 28Moscovici, S. (1976). Social Influence and Social Change. London: Academic Press.
  29. 29Moscovici, S. (1985). Innovation and minority influence. In: Moscovici, S., Mugny, G., & Van Avermaet, E. (Eds.), Perspectives on Minority Influence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511897566.003
  30. 30Moscovici, S., & Doise, W. (1992). Dissensions et Consensus. Une Théorie Générale des Décisions Collectives [Dissensions and Consensus: A General Theory of Collective Decisions]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. DOI: 10.3917/puf.mosco.1992.01
  31. 31Moscovici, S., & Faucheux, C. (1969). Social Influence, Conformity Bias and the Study of Active Minority. Tiré à part E.P.H.E. 120.
  32. 32Moscovici, S., & Markovà, I. (2000). Ideas and their development: A dialogue between Serge Moscovici and Ivana Markovà. In: Duveen, G. (Ed.), Social Representations: Explorations in Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  33. 33Moscovici, S., Mugny, G., & Van Avermaet, E. (1985). Perspectives on Minority Influence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511897566
  34. 34Moscovici, S., & Pérez, J. A. (2009). A new representation of minorities as victims. In: Butera, F., & Levine, J. M. (Eds.), Coping with Minority Status: Responses to Exclusion and Inclusion, 82103. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511804465.005
  35. 35Moscovici, S., & Ricateau, P. (1972). Conformité, minorité et influence sociale [Conformity, minority and social influence]. In: Moscovici, S. (Ed.), Introduction à la Psychologie Sociale, 1. Paris: Larousse.
  36. 36Mugny, G. (1982). The Power of Minorities. London: Academic Press.
  37. 37Mugny, G., & Pérez, J. A. (1986). Le Déni et la Raison. Psychologie de l’impact social des minorités. Fribourg: DelVal.
  38. 38Mugny, G., & Pérez, J. A. (1991). The Social Psychology of Minority Influence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  39. 39Mugny, G., Pérez, J. A., Kaiser, C., & Papastamou, S. (1984). Influence minoritaire et relations entre groupes: l’importance du contenu du message et des styles de comportement [Minority influence and intergroup relations: Importance of the content of the message and behavioral styles]. Revue Suisse de Psychologie, 43, 331351.
  40. 40Myrdal, G. (1944–1969). An American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and Modern Democracy. NewYork: Harper & Row.
  41. 41Pérez, J. A., & Molpeceres, M. A. (2018). The new moral power of minorities. International Review of Social Psychology, 31(1), 110. DOI: 10.5334/irsp.18
  42. 42Pérez, J. A., & Mugny, G. (1987). Paradoxical effects of categorization in minority influence: When being an outgroup is an advantage. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 157169. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2420170204
  43. 43Pérez, J. A., & Mugny, G. (1990). Minority influence: Manifest discrimination and latent influence. In: Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. (Eds.), Social Identity Theory: Constructive and Critical Advances, 152168. Hertfordshire: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
  44. 44Pérez, J. A., & Mugny, G. (1998). Social influence and social identity. In: Worchel, S., Morales, J. F., Paez, D., & Deschamps, J.-C. (Eds.), Social Identity: International Perspectives, 142153. London: Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781446279205.n10
  45. 45Pérez, J. A., & Mugny, G. (1999). Comment des groupes minoritaires provoquent des changements sociaux [How do minority groups lead to social changes]. In: Deschamps, J.-C., Morales, J. F., Paez, D., & Worchel, S. (Eds.), L’identité sociale, 8598. London: Sage.
  46. 46Pettigrew, T. F., & Meertens, R. W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 5775. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2420250106
  47. 47Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches. Dubuque: William C. Brown.
  48. 48Politi, E., Gale, J., & Staerklé, C. (2017). Flexible solidarity with refugees: Integrating minority influence and intergroup communication. International Review of Social Psychology, 30(1), 172183. DOI: 10.5334/irsp.24
  49. 49Pourtois, H. (2015). Délibération, participation et sens du désaccord [Deliberation, participation and the sense of disagreeing]. Éthique publique [Online], 7, nº(1), put online Nov. 13 2015, consulted Nov. 27 novembre 2017. URL: http://ethiquepublique.revues.org/1997. DOI: 10.4000/ethiquepublique.1997
  50. 50Sanchez-Mazas, M. (1996). Minority influence under value conflict: The case of human rights and xenophobia. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 169178. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1996.tb01090.x
  51. 51Sanchez-Mazas, M. (2004). Racisme et Xénophobie [Racism and xenophobia]. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
  52. 52Sanchez-Mazas, M. (2008). Violence or persuasion? Denial of recognition and opportunities for action in contemporary societies. Diogenes, 55(1), 94106. DOI: 10.1177/0392192107087920
  53. 53Sanchez-Mazas, M., Mugny, G., & Falomir, J. M. (1997). Minority influence and intergroup relations: Social comparison and validation process in the context of xenophobia in Switzerland. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 56(3), 182192.
  54. 54Sanchez-Mazas, M., & Roca, M. (2007). La dimension politique de la reconnaissance: Clés de lecture de l’action collective à partir de la théorie d’Axel Honneth [The political dimension of recognition: Keys for understanding collective action from Axel Honneth’s theory]. In: Vivre ensemble au XXIème siècle, Actes du colloque de l’Institut de Sociologie, septembre 2004, Université Libre de Bruxelles.
  55. 55Sears, D. O. (1988). Symbolic racism. In: Katz, P. A., & Taylor, D. A. (Eds.), Eliminating Racism: Profiles in Controversy. New York: Plenum. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-0818-6_4
  56. 56Tajfel, H. (1972). Experiments in a vaccum. In: Israel, J., & Tajfel, H. (Eds.), The Context of Social Psychology. London: Academic Press.
  57. 57Tajfel, H. (1975). The exit of social mobility and the voice of social change: Notes on the social psychology of intergroup relations. Social Science Information, 14(2), 101118. DOI: 10.1177/053901847501400204
  58. 58Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: Austin, W. G., & Worchel, S. (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Monterey, California: Brooks/Cole.
  59. 59Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: Worchel, S., & Austin, W. G. (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 724. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
  60. 60Taylor, D. A., & Katz, P. A. (1989). The resurgent and cyclical nature of racism. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale/International Review of Social Psychology, 2(3), 275289.
  61. 61Tocqueville, A. de. ([1935] 1998). Democracy in America. Hertfordshire: Wordsworth.
  62. 62Turner, J. C. (1991). Social Influence. Bristol: Open University Press.
  63. 63Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the Social Group. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  64. 64Turner, J. C., & Oakes, P. J. (1989). Self-categorization theory and social influence. In: Paulus, P. B. (Ed.), The Psychology of Group Influence, 2nd ed. 233275. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
  65. 65Verkuyten, M. (2006). Multicultural recognition and ethnic minority rights: A social identity perspective. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 148184. DOI: 10.1080/10463280600937418
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.41 | Journal eISSN: 2397-8570
Language: English
Published on: Mar 19, 2018
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2018 Margarita Sanchez-Mazas, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.