Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Effect of Information Quality Evaluation on Selective Exposure in Informational Cognitive Dissonance: The Role of Information Novelty Cover

The Effect of Information Quality Evaluation on Selective Exposure in Informational Cognitive Dissonance: The Role of Information Novelty

Open Access
|Jul 2018

References

  1. 1Alcool Info Service. (2018). Le poids économique et culturel de l’alcool. Retrieved from: http://www.alcool-info-service.fr/alcool/consommation-alcool-france/culture-alcool-consommation-vin.
  2. 2Bardin, B., Perrissol, P., Facca, L., & Smeding, A. (2017a). From risk perception to information selection… and not the other way round: Selective exposure mechanisms in the field of genetically modified organisms. Food Quality and Preference, 58, 1017. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.12.015
  3. 3Bardin, B., Perrissol, S., Fos, Y., Py, J., & Dagot, L. (2017b). Exposition sélective à l’information de prévention et attitude implicite envers le tabac. Psychologie Française, 67, 114. DOI: 10.1016/j.psfr.2015.07.003
  4. 4Bardin, B., Perrissol, S., Py, J., Fos, Y., & Souchon, N. (2016). Testing of a paper-and-pencil Personalized Single Category Implicit Association Test (SC-IAT-P). International Review of Social Psychology, 29(1), 3144. DOI: 10.5334/irsp.35
  5. 5Bardin, B., Perrissol, S., Py, J., Launay, C., & Escoubès, F. (2014). The personalized SC-IAT: A possible way of reducing the influence of societal views on assessments of implicit attitude toward smoking. Psychological Reports, 115(1), 1325. DOI: 10.2466/18.07.PR0.115c10z8
  6. 6Bertrand, J. T. (1979). Selective avoidance on health topics a field test. Communication Research, 6(3), 271294. DOI: 10.1177/009365027900600302
  7. 7Brock, T. C. (1965). Commitment to exposure as a determinant of information receptivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2(1), 1019. DOI: 10.1037/h0022082
  8. 8Brock, T. C., Albert, S. M., & Becker, L. A. (1970). Familiarity, utility, and supportiveness as determinants of information receptivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14(4), 292301. DOI: 10.1037/h0028997
  9. 9Brock, T. C., & Balloun, J. L. (1967). Behavioral receptivity to dissonant information. Journal of Personality And Social Psychology, 6(4), 413428. DOI: 10.1037/h0021225
  10. 10Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In: Uleman, J. S., & Bargh, J. A. (eds.), Unintended thought, 212252. New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.
  11. 11D’Alessio, D., & Allen, M. (2007). The Selective Exposure Hypothesis and Media Choice Processes. In: Preiss, R. W., Gayle, B., Burrell, N., Allen, M., & Bryant, J. (eds.), Massmedia effects research: Advances through meta-analysis, 103118. Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  12. 12Ditto, P. H., & Lopez, D. F. (1992). Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 568584. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.568
  13. 13Ditto, P. H., Scepansky, J. A., Munro, G. D., Apanovitch, A. M., & Lockhart, L. K. (1998). Motivated sensitivity to preference-inconsistent information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 5369. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.53
  14. 14Feather, N. T. (1962). Cigarette smoking and lung cancer: A study of cognitive dissonance. Australian Journal of Psychology, 14(1), 5564. DOI: 10.1080/00049536208255449
  15. 15Feather, N. T. (1963). Cognitive dissonance, sensitivity, and evaluation. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66(2), 157163. DOI: 10.1037/h0049383
  16. 16Feather, N. T. (1969). Attitude and selective recall. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12(4), 310319. DOI: 10.1037/h0027785
  17. 17Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
  18. 18Festinger, L. (1964). Conflict, decision, and dissonance. Palo Alto, CA, US: Stanford U. Press.
  19. 19Fischer, J., Fischer, P., Englich, B., Aydin, N., & Frey, D. (2011). Empower my decisions: The effects of power gestures on confirmatory information processing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(6), 11461154. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.06.008
  20. 20Fischer, P., Fischer, J. K., Aydin, N., & Frey, D. (2010). Physically attractive social information sources lead to increased selective exposure to information. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 340347. DOI: 10.1080/01973533.2010.519208
  21. 21Fischer, P., Jonas, E., Frey, D., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2005). Selective exposure to information: The impact of information limits. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(4), 469492. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.264
  22. 22Fischer, P., Lea, S., Kastenmüller, A., Greitemeyer, T., Fischer, J., & Frey, D. (2011). The process of selective exposure: Why confirmatory information search weakens over time. Organizational Behavior And Human Decision Processes, 114(1), 3748. DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.09.001
  23. 23Fischer, P., Schulz-Hardt, S., & Frey, D. (2008). Selective exposure and information quantity: How different information quantities moderate decision makers’ preference for consistent and inconsistent information. Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology, 94(2), 231244. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.94.2.231
  24. 24Freedman, J. L. (1965). Preference for dissonant information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2(2), 287289. DOI: 10.1037/h0022415
  25. 25Freedman, J. L., & Sears, D. O. (1965). Selective exposure. In: Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 2, 5897. New York, Academic Press. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60103-3
  26. 26Frey, D. (1981). The effect of negative feedback about oneself and cost of information on preferences for information about the source of this feedback. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 4250. DOI: 10.1016/0022-1031(81)90005-6
  27. 27Frey, D. (1986). Recent research on selective exposure. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 4180. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60212-9
  28. 28Frey, D., & Rosch, M. (1984). Information seeking after decisions: The roles of novelty of information and decision reversibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10(1), 9198. DOI: 10.1177/0146167284101010
  29. 29Friese, M., Smith, C., Plischke, T., Bluemke, M., & Nosek, B. (2012). Do implicit attitudes predict actual voting behavior particularly for undecided voters? Plos One, 7(8), 114. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044130
  30. 30Galdi, S., Arcuri, L., & Gawronski, B. (2008). Automatic mental associations predict future choices of undecided decision-makers. Science, 321, 11001102. DOI: 10.1126/science.1160769
  31. 31Gaskell, G., Bauer, M. W., Durant, J., & Allum, N. C. (1999). Worlds apart? The reception of genetically modified foods in Europe and the U.S. Science, 285(5426), 384387. DOI: 10.1126/science.285.5426.384
  32. 32Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 427. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4
  33. 33Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 14641480. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
  34. 34Hart, W., Albarracín, D., Eagly, A. H., Brechan, I., Lindberg, M. J., & Merrill, L. (2009). Feeling validated versus being correct: A meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psychological Bulletin, 135(4), 555588. DOI: 10.1037/a0015701
  35. 35Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press.
  36. 36Hudson, J., Caplanova, A., & Novak, M. (2015). Public attitudes to GM foods: The balancing of risks and gains. Appetite, 92, 303313. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.05.031
  37. 37Jecker, J. D. (1964). Selective exposure to new information. In: Festinger, L. (ed.), Conflict, decision and dissonance, 6581. Stanford, CA. Stanford University Press.
  38. 38Jonas, E., Schulz-Hardt, S., Frey, D., & Thelen, N. (2001). Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions: An expansion of dissonance theoretical research on selective exposure to information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(4), 557571. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.4.557
  39. 39Krauss, S. J. (1995). Attitudes and the prediction of behavior: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(1), 5875. DOI: 10.1177/0146167295211007
  40. 40Lavoie, A. L., & Thompson, S. L. (1972). Selective exposure in a field setting. Psychological Reports, 31(2), 433434. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1972.31.2.433
  41. 41McGinnies, E., & Rosenbaum, L. L. (1965). A test of the selective-exposure hypothesis in persuasion. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 61(2), 237240. DOI: 10.1080/00223980.1965.10543409
  42. 42Mills, J., Aronson, E., & Robinson, H. (1959). Selectivity in exposure to information. The Journal of Abnormal And Social Psychology, 59(2), 250253. DOI: 10.1037/h0042162
  43. 43Nisbett, R., & Wilson, T. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231259. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231
  44. 44Noël, Y. (1999). An ordination approach to the quantification of smokers’ readiness to change. Swiss Journal Of Psychology/Schweizerische Zeitschrift Für Psychologie/Revue Suisse De Psychologie, 58(2), 123133. DOI: 10.1024//1421-0185.58.2.123
  45. 45Olson, J. M., & Zanna, M. P. (1979). A new look at selective exposure. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15(1), 115. DOI: 10.1016/0022-1031(79)90014-3
  46. 46Perrissol, S., Boscher, G., Cerclé, A., & Somat, A. (2005). Alcohol drinking, self-efficacy and selective exposure to alcohol adverts. European Review of Applied Psychology, 55(4), 235243. DOI: 10.1016/j.erap.2004.11.003
  47. 47Perrissol, S., & Somat, A. (2009). L’exposition sélective: Bilan et perspectives. L’Année Psychologique, 109(3), 551581. DOI: 10.4074/S0003503309003078
  48. 48Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1986). Toward a comprehensive model of change. In: Miller, W. E., & Heather, N. (eds.), Addictive behaviors processes of change, 327. New York, Plenum Press. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-2191-0_1
  49. 49Rosenbaum, L. L., & McGinnies, E. (1973). Selective exposure: An addendum. The Journal of Psychology, 83, 329331. DOI: 10.1080/00223980.1973.9915621
  50. 50Schulz-Hardt, S., Frey, D., Lüthgens, C., & Moscovici, S. (2000). Biased information search in group decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 655669. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.655
  51. 51Sears, D. O. (1965). Biased indoctrination and selectivity of exposure to new information. Sociometry, 28, 363373. DOI: 10.2307/2785989
  52. 52Sears, D. O., & Freedman, J. L. (1965). Effects of expected familiarity with arguments upon opinion change and selective exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2(3), 420426. DOI: 10.1037/h0022380
  53. 53Vaidis, D., & Gosling, P. (2011). Is commitment necessary for the arousal of informational dissonance? International Review of Social Psychology/Revue Internationale de psychologie Sociale, 24, 3363.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.173 | Journal eISSN: 2397-8570
Language: English
Published on: Jul 9, 2018
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2018 Brigitte Bardin, Pauline Vidal, Léo Facca, Rafaele Dumas, Stéphane Perrissol, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.