References
- 1Atari, M. (2017). Assessment of long-term mate preferences in Iran. Evolutionary Psychology, 15(2). 10.1177/1474704917702459
- 2Atari, M., Barbaro, N., Shackelford, T. K., & Chegeni, R. (2017). Psychometric evaluation and cultural correlates of the mate retention inventory–short form (MRI-SF) in Iran. Evolutionary Psychology, 15(1). 10.1177/1474704917695267
- 3Atari, M., Chaudhary, N., & Al-Shawaf, L. (2020). Mate preferences in three Muslim-majority countries: Sex differences and personality correlates. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4), 533–545. 10.1177/1948550619866187
- 4Atari, M., Graham, J., & Dehghani, M. (2020). Foundations of morality in Iran. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41(5), 367–384. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2020.07.014
- 5Barber, N. (1995). The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16(5), 395–424. 10.1016/0162-3095(95)00068-2
- 6Barroso, A., Parker, K., & Bennett, J. (2020, May 27). As Millennials near 40, they’re approaching family life differently than previous generations. Pew Research Center’s Social & Demographic Trends Project.
https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2020/05/27/as-millennials-near-40-theyre-approaching-family-life-differently-than-previous-generations/ - 7Bech-Sørensen, J., & Pollet, T. V. (2016). Sex differences in mate preferences: A replication study, 20 years later. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 2(3), 171–176. 10.1007/s40806-016-0048-6
- 8Blackwell, D. L., & Lichter, D. T. (2004). Homogamy among dating, cohabiting, and married couples. The Sociological Quarterly, 45(4), 719–737. 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2004.tb02311.x
- 9Bohns, V. K., Scholer, A. A., & Rehman, U. (2015). Implicit theories of attraction. Social Cognition, 33(4), 284–307.
https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1521/soco.2015.33.4.284 - 10Brumbaugh, C. C., Baren, A., & Agishtein, P. (2014). Attraction to attachment insecurity: Flattery, appearance, and status’s role in mate preferences. Personal Relationships, 21(2), 288–308.
https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/pere.12032 - 11Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and brain sciences, 12(1), 1–14.
https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1017/S0140525X00023992 - 12Buss, D. M. (1995). Psychological sex differences: Origins through sexual selection. The American Psychologist, 50(3), 164–168. 10.1037/0003-066X.50.3.164
- 13Buss, D. M. (2019). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind. Routledge. 10.4324/9780429061417
- 14Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychol. Rev., 100, 204–232. 10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204
- 15Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (2019). Mate preferences and their behavioral manifestations. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 70, 77–110. 10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103408
- 16Cherlin, A. J. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 848–861. 10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00058.x
- 17Cherlin, A. J. (2009). The marriage-go-round: The state of marriage and the family in America today. Knopf Publishing Group.
- 18Conroy-Beam, D., & Buss, D. M. (2021). Mate preferences. Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science, 4850–4860. 10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_1
- 19Delkhamoush, M. (2009). Hierarchy of marriage values among the Iranian youth. Journal of Family Research, 5(2), 207–230.
https://www.magiran.com/p680984 - 20Dupeyrat, C., & Mariné, C. (2005). Implicit theories of intelligence, goal orientation, cognitive engagement, and achievement: A test of Dweck’s model with returning to school adults. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(1), 43–59. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.007
- 21Dweck, C. S. (1996).
Implicit theories as organizers of goals and behavior . In P. M. Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 69–90). Guilford Press. - 22Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C. Y., & Hong, Y. Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6(4), 267–285. 10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1
- 23Eastwick, P. W., & Finkel, E. J. (2008). Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: Do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner? Journal of personality and social psychology, 94(2), 245.
https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022–3514.94.2.245 - 24Erdley, C. A., & Dweck, C. S. (1993). Children’s implicit personality theories as predictors of their social judgments. Child Development, 64(3), 863–878. 10.2307/1131223
- 25Fieder, M., & Huber, S. (2022). Contemporary selection pressures in modern societies? Which factors best explain variance in human reproduction and mating? Evolution and Human Behavior, 43(1), 16–25. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2021.08.001
- 26Fleck, C., & Simpson, J. A. (2016).
Women’s mate preferences . In Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science (pp. 1–7). Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_10-1 - 27Franiuk, R., Cohen, D., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2002). Implicit theories of relationships: Implications for relationship satisfaction and longevity. Personal Relationships, 9(4), 345–367. 10.1111/1475-6811.09401
- 28Freedman, G., Powell, D. N., Le, B., & Williams, K. D. (2019). Ghosting and destiny: Implicit theories of relationships predict beliefs about ghosting. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(3), 905–924. 10.1177/0265407517748791
- 29Gonzaga, G. C., Campos, B., & Bradbury, T. (2007). Similarity, convergence, and relationship satisfaction in dating and married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(1), 34–48. 10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.34
- 30Hall, S. S. (2006). Marital meaning: Exploring young adults’ belief systems about marriage. Journal of Family Issues, 27(10), 1437–1458. 10.1177/0192513X06290036
- 31Hall, S. S. (2012a). Implicit theories of the marital institution. Marriage & Family Review, 48, 1–19.
https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/01494929.2011.619298 - 32Hall, S. S. (2012b). Implicit theories of the marital institution: Associations and moderation. Family Science Review, 17, 1–17. 10.26536/FSR.2012.17.02.01
- 33Hall, S. S., & Knox, D. (2024). Taking a test drive?: Implicit theories of sexual compatibility. Sexuality & Culture, 28, 1994–2011. 10.1007/s12119-024-10214-2
- 34Hall, S. S., & Willoughby, B. J. (2018). Opposite-sex siblings and marital beliefs among emerging adults. Journal of Adult Development, 25, 61–67. 10.1007/s10804-017-9275-8
- 35Knee, C. R. (1998). Implicit theories of relationships: Assessment and prediction of romantic relationship initiation, coping, and longevity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 360–370. 10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.360
- 36Knee, C. R., Patrick, H., & Lonsbary, C. (2003). Implicit theories of relationships: Orientations toward evaluation and cultivation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(1), 41–55. 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0701_3
- 37Li, P., Zhou, N., Zhang, Y., Xiong, Q., Nie, R., & Fang, X. (2017). Incremental theory of intelligence moderated the relationship between prior achievement and school engagement in Chinese high school students. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01703
- 38Maxwell, J. A., Muise, A., MacDonald, G., Day, L. C., Rosen, N. O., & Impett, E. A. (2017). How implicit theories of sexuality shape sexual and relationship well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(2), 238. 10.1037/pspi0000078
- 39McClendon, D. (2018). Crossing boundaries: “Some college,” schools, and educational assortative mating. Journal of Marriage and Family, 80(4), 812–825. 10.1111/jomf.12482
- 40Miles, N. J., & Servaty-Seib, H. L. (2010). Parental marital status and young adult offspring’s attitudes about marriage and divorce. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 51(4), 209–220. 10.1080/10502551003597865
- 41Muggleton, N. K., & Fincher, C. L. (2017). Unrestricted sexuality promotes distinctive short-and long-term mate preferences in women. Personal. Individ. Differ., 111, 169–173. 10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.054
- 42Ortiz-Ospina, E., & Roser, M. (2020, July 25). Marriages and divorces. Ourworldindata.org.
https://ourworldindata.org/marriages-and-divorces - 43Puts, D., Jones, B. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2012). Sexual selection on human faces and voices. Journal of Sex Research, 49, 227–243. 10.1080/00224499.2012.658924
- 44Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 2307–0919.1116. 10.9707/2307-0919.1116
- 45Schwartz, S. H., & Sagiv, L. (1995). Identifying culture-specifics in the content and structure of values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26(1), 92–116. 10.1177/0022022195261007
- 46Schwarz, S., & Hassebrauck, M. (2012). Sex and age differences in mate-selection preferences. Human Nature, 23(4), 447–466.
https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/s12110-012-9152-x - 47Shahi, H., Hall, S. S., Amraei, K., Ghasemi, A., Karami, J., & Sadeghi, S. (2023a). Do personality and attachment predict marital beliefs? Investigating young adults in Iran. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 40, 4219–4243. 10.1177/02654075231202940
- 48Shahi, H., Hall, S. S., Mogliski, J., Amraei, K., de Vries, R. E., Ghasemi, A., Azizi, Z., & Boehnke, K. (2023b). Interrelated psychological predictors of mate preferences among Iranian male and female emerging adults. Personal Relationships, 30, 1164–1184. 10.1111/pere.12519
- 49Sisk, V. F., Burgoyne, A. P., Sun, J., Butler, J. L., & Macnamara, B. N. (2018). To what extent and under which circumstances are growth mind-sets important to academic achievement? Two meta-analyses. Psychological Science, 29(4), 549–571. 10.1177/0956797617739704
- 50Tamir, M., John, O. P., Srivastava, S., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Implicit theories of emotion: Affective and social outcomes across a major life transition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(4), 731–744. 10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.731
- 51Tremayne, S. (2023). Conformity and transgression as bedfellows: Reproduction, sexuality, and religion in contemporary Iran. Women’s Studies International Forum, 99(102789). 10.1016/j.wsif.2023.102789
- 52Wang, Y., & Kassam, M. (2016). Indicators of social change in the UAE: College students’ attitudes toward love, marriage and family. Journal of Arabian Studies, 6(1), 74–94. 10.1080/21534764.2016.1192791
- 53Willoughby, B. J., & Hall, S. S. (2015). Enthusiasts, delayers and the ambiguous middle: Marital paradigms among emerging adults. Emerging Adulthood, 3, 123–135. 10.1177/2167696814548478
- 54Willoughby, B. J., Hall, S. S., & Luczak*, H. P. (2015). Marital paradigms: A conceptual framework for marital attitudes, values, and beliefs. Journal of Family Issues, 36, 188–211. 10.1177/0192513X13487677