Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Process Evaluation of the North York CARES (Community Access to Resources Enabling Support) Integrated Care Program for Complex Older Adults Cover

Process Evaluation of the North York CARES (Community Access to Resources Enabling Support) Integrated Care Program for Complex Older Adults

Open Access
|Dec 2025

Figures & Tables

ijic-25-4-9824-g1.png
Figure 1

Timeline of NYCARES iterations and key features.

ALC: alternative level of care; FY: fiscal year; TBD: to be determined

*Nine patients from NYCARES 1.0 continued receiving services during fiscal year 2021/2022; 31 new patients were enrolled into NYCARES 2.0; total caseload for fiscal year 2022/2023 was unreached at the time of this study which took place in fiscal year 2021/2022.

ijic-25-4-9824-g2.png
Figure 2

NYCARES 2.0 process-oriented logic model.

ALC: alternative level of care; HCCSS: home and community care support services; IPT: interprofessional team; NYTHP: North York Toronto Health Partners; PCHC: patient and caregiver health council; PCP: primary care provider; PSW: personal support worker; RPM: remote patient monitoring.

Table 1

Logic model of NYCARES 1.0.

RESOURCES/INPUTSACTIVITIES/STRATEGIESOUTPUTSOUTCOMESIMPACT
  • Patient and caregiver engagement via the PCHC

  • Project support from NYTHP staff

  • Holistic menu of services via NYTHP organizations

  • Primary care at centre

  • Navigator model of care (single point of contact)

  • Menu of services including professional, personal support, homemaking

  • Virtual care for physician visits

  • Remote patient monitoring

  • Identify appropriate patients for referral

  • Develop needs-based care plan with patient, family, IPT

  • Provide IPT care at home, home care, overnight supports, equipment and supplies, community support

  • Provide specialist care: medical, mental health, behavioural supports

  • Meet transportation needs

  • Provide timely access to community programs

  • # staff trained on eligibility criteria

  • # individuals screened for program eligibility

  • # patients enrolled

  • # needs-based care plans developed

  • Types and # services provided

  • # ALC days saved

  • # unnecessary ED visits avoided

  • # unnecessary hospital admissions avoided

  • # LTC placements avoided or delayed

  • Reduced per-patient cost

  • Reduced family/caregiver burnout

  • # patients transitioned home post-program

  • Goal: To support patients requiring high intensity supports of home and community care, including community supports, to live safely and well at home

  • Target 1, hospital model: Hospital ALC patients with discharge destination of LTC or home care

  • Target 2, community model: Community-dwelling patients waitlisted for LTC and/or patients in the ED who are at risk of hospitalization or ALC designation

[i] ALC: alternative level of care; ED: emergency department; IPT: interprofessional team; LTC: long-term care; NYTHP: North York Toronto Health Partners; PCHC: patient and caregiver health council.

Table 2

Logic model of NYCARES 2.0.

RESOURCES/INPUTSACTIVITIES/STRATEGIESOUTPUTSOUTCOMESIMPACT
  • Funding

  • Strategic direction and guidance from leadership

  • Time and human resources from NYTHP partners across all sectors of healthcare

  • PCP participation and commitment

  • Co-design with patients and caregivers

  • Use eligibility criteria for community model with 3 streams:

    1. Acute caregiver episode

    2. Acute medical episode

    3. Stable, but indirect care needs

  • Provide NYCARES education and marketing via online and newspaper methods to referral sources

  • Integrate virtual care and digital health

  • # unnecessary ED visits avoided

  • Decreased # hospitalizations resulting in ALC designation

  • Increased # of virtual care visits, digital devices uptake, remote patient monitoring uptake

  • Client-driven collaboration within a trusted team

  • Integrated care to create continuity across agencies

  • Flexible boundaries and scope of practice

  • Compassionate and empathetic support

  • Efficient and clear information flow

  • Safe and consistent community care based on patient needs

  • Goal: Improved North York seniors’ health and in-home care to allow seniors to safely live at home for as long as possible

  • Target 1, hospital model: see description in Table 1

  • Target 2, community model: see description in Table 1

  • Target 3, rehabilitation model: rehabilitation patients needing more care before being discharged

[i] ALC: alternative level of care; ED: emergency department; NYTHP: North York Toronto Health Partners; PCP: primary care provider (physician, nurse practitioner).

ijic-25-4-9824-g3.png
Figure 3

NYCARES 2.0 implementation summary map.

ALC: alternative level of care; HCCSS: home and community care support services; IPT: interprofessional team; PSW: personal support worker; QoL: quality of life; RPM: remote patient monitoring. Thicker outlines and arrows indicate mechanisms of impact (care navigator, basket of services); circular component indicates the novel care navigator mechanism; transverse lines (≠) indicate actions that did not occur; greyed out boxes and text indicate under-implemented components; boxes with broken lines indicate outcomes that should be added.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.9824 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Language: English
Submitted on: May 7, 2025
|
Accepted on: Dec 10, 2025
|
Published on: Dec 22, 2025
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Adora Chui, Kimia Sedig, Katie N. Dainty, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.