
Figure 1
Timeline of NYCARES iterations and key features.
ALC: alternative level of care; FY: fiscal year; TBD: to be determined
*Nine patients from NYCARES 1.0 continued receiving services during fiscal year 2021/2022; 31 new patients were enrolled into NYCARES 2.0; total caseload for fiscal year 2022/2023 was unreached at the time of this study which took place in fiscal year 2021/2022.

Figure 2
NYCARES 2.0 process-oriented logic model.
ALC: alternative level of care; HCCSS: home and community care support services; IPT: interprofessional team; NYTHP: North York Toronto Health Partners; PCHC: patient and caregiver health council; PCP: primary care provider; PSW: personal support worker; RPM: remote patient monitoring.
Table 1
Logic model of NYCARES 1.0.
| RESOURCES/INPUTS | ACTIVITIES/STRATEGIES | OUTPUTS | OUTCOMES | IMPACT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
[i] ALC: alternative level of care; ED: emergency department; IPT: interprofessional team; LTC: long-term care; NYTHP: North York Toronto Health Partners; PCHC: patient and caregiver health council.
Table 2
Logic model of NYCARES 2.0.
| RESOURCES/INPUTS | ACTIVITIES/STRATEGIES | OUTPUTS | OUTCOMES | IMPACT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
[i] ALC: alternative level of care; ED: emergency department; NYTHP: North York Toronto Health Partners; PCP: primary care provider (physician, nurse practitioner).

Figure 3
NYCARES 2.0 implementation summary map.
ALC: alternative level of care; HCCSS: home and community care support services; IPT: interprofessional team; PSW: personal support worker; QoL: quality of life; RPM: remote patient monitoring. Thicker outlines and arrows indicate mechanisms of impact (care navigator, basket of services); circular component indicates the novel care navigator mechanism; transverse lines (≠) indicate actions that did not occur; greyed out boxes and text indicate under-implemented components; boxes with broken lines indicate outcomes that should be added.
