Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Community services' involvement in the discharge of older adults from hospital into the community Cover

Community services' involvement in the discharge of older adults from hospital into the community

Open Access
|Sep 2013

Figures & Tables

figures/ijic2013-2013032-001.jpg
Figure 1.

Flow chart of included and excluded studies.

figures/ijic2013-2013032-002.jpg
Figure 2.

Diagram of Virtual Interface Model.

figures/ijic2013-2013032-003.jpg
Figure 3.

Diagram of In-reach Interface Model.

figures/ijic2013-2013032-004.jpg
Figure 4.

Diagram of Out-reach Interface Model.

figures/ijic2013-2013032-005.jpg
Figure 5.

Diagram of Independent Interface Model.

Table 1.

Full-search strategy used to identify studies for the review

figures/ijic2013-2013032-006.jpg
Table 2.

Abridged search strategy used to identify studies for this review

figures/ijic2013-2013032-007.jpg
Table 3.

Characteristics of studies included in this review

figures/ijic2013-2013032-008.jpg

RCT, randomised controlled trial; CHF, congestive heart failure.

Key: Community service provision

1. Those that provide interventions to maintain or optimise functional capacity and independence.

2. Services that provide slow stream rehabilitation.

3. Services that provide case management role situated in the community.

4. Those that provide planned, supported transfer of patients from hospital to community.

Table 4.

Quality scores of retrieved articles

figures/ijic2013-2013032-009.jpg

Key to scoring the McMasters quantitative critical appraisal tool: All domains, except three, were scored. 1 for yes, 0 for no or not addressed, and the item was deducted from the overall score for not applicable.

1. Was the purpose stated clearly?

2. Was the relevant background literature reviewed?

3. Design (not scored)

4. Sample

 4a. Was the sample described in detail?

 4b. Was the sample size justified?

5. Outcomes

 5a. Were the outcome measures reliable?

 5b. Were the outcome measures valid?

6. Intervention

 6a. Intervention was described in detail?

 6b. Contamination was avoided?

 6c. Cointervention was avoided?

7. Results

 7a. Results were reported in terms of statistical significance?

 7b. Were the analysis method(s) appropriate?

 7c. Clinical importance was reported?

 7d. Drop-outs were reported?

8. Conclusion was appropriate, given the study methods and results.

Table 5.

Summary of studies within the Virtual Interface Model

figures/ijic2013-2013032-010.jpg

Key

Significantly positive +ve.

No significant difference≈.

Significantly negative −ve

Decreased but not analysed statistically ↓.

Table 6.

Summary of studies within the In-reach Interface Model

figures/ijic2013-2013032-011.jpg

Key

Significantly positive +ve.

No significant difference≈.

Significantly negative −ve.

Decreased but not analysed statistically ↓.

Table 7.

Summary of study in the Out-reach Interface Model

figures/ijic2013-2013032-012.jpg

Key

Significantly positive +ve.

No significant difference≈.

Significantly negative −ve.

Table 8.

Summary of studies on Independent Interface Model

figures/ijic2013-2013032-013.jpg

Key

Significantly positive +ve.

No significant difference≈.

Significantly negative −ve.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.917 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Language: English
Submitted on: Jul 23, 2012
Accepted on: Jul 26, 2013
Published on: Sep 18, 2013
Published by: Igitur publishing
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2013 Michelle Guerin, Karen Grimmer, Saravana Kumar, published by Igitur publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.