Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Integrating Non-Clinical Supports into Care: A Systematic Review of Social Prescribing Referral Pathways for Mental Health, Wellbeing, and Psychosocial Improvement Cover

Integrating Non-Clinical Supports into Care: A Systematic Review of Social Prescribing Referral Pathways for Mental Health, Wellbeing, and Psychosocial Improvement

International Journal of Integrated Care
Volume 25 (2025): Issue 3
By:
Open Access
|Aug 2025

References

  1. 1Herrman H, Patel V, Kieling C, et al. Time for united action on depression: A Lancet–World Psychiatric Association Commission. Lancet. 2022;399(10328):957–1022. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02141-3
    Back to article
  2. 2Kola L. Global mental health and COVID-19. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7(8):655–7. DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30235-2
    Back to article
  3. 3Dybdahl R, Lien L. Mental health is an integral part of the sustainable development goals. Prev Med Commun Health. 2017;1(1):1–3. DOI: 10.15761/PMCH.1000104
    Back to article
  4. 4World Health Organization. World mental health report: Transforming mental health for all. Gneva: WHO; 2022.
    Back to article
  5. 5Naylor C. Physical and mental health. In: Amelung VSV, Suter E, Goodwin N, Nolte E, Balicer R, editors. Handbook Integrated Care. Springer; 2017. pp. 383–98. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-56103-5_23
    Back to article
  6. 6Morse DF, Sandhu S, Mulligan K, et al. Global developments in social prescribing. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7(5):e008524. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-008524
    Back to article
  7. 7Ashe MC, Dos Santos IK, Alfares H, et al. Outcomes and instruments used in social prescribing: A modified umbrella review. HPCDP. 2024;44(6). DOI: 10.24095/hpcdp.44.6.02
    Back to article
  8. 8Zurynski Y, Vedovi A, Smith K-l. Social prescribing: A rapid literature review to inform primary care policy in Australia. Sydney: Macquarie University; 2020.
    Back to article
  9. 9Muhl C, Mulligan K, Bayoumi I, et al. Establishing internationally accepted conceptual and operational definitions of social prescribing through expert consensus: A Delphi study. BMJ Open. 2023;13(7):e070184. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070184
    Back to article
  10. 10Napierala H, Krueger K, Kuschick D, et al. Social prescribing: Systematic review of the effectiveness of psychosocial community referral interventions in primary care. IJIC. 2022;22(3). DOI: 10.5334/ijic.6472
    Back to article
  11. 11Goodwin N. Understanding integrated care. IJIC. 2016;16(4). DOI: 10.5334/ijic.2530
    Back to article
  12. 12Kurpas D, Mendive JM, Vidal-Alaball J, et al. European perspective on how social prescribing can facilitate health and social integrated care in the community. IJIC. 2023;23(2). DOI: 10.5334/ijic.7636
    Back to article
  13. 13Johansson E, Jonsson F, Rapo E, et al. Let’s try social prescribing in Sweden (SPiS)–an interventional project targeting loneliness among older adults using a model for integrated care: A research protocol. IJIC. 2021;21(2). DOI: 10.5334/ijic.5609
    Back to article
  14. 14Carroll A. Integrated care through the lens of a complex adaptive system. In: Amelung VSV, Suter E, Goodwin N, Nolte E, Balicer R, editors. Handbook Integrated Care. Springer; 2021. pp. 595–609. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-69262-9_35
    Back to article
  15. 15Morris D, Thomas P, Ridley J, et al. Community-enhanced social prescribing: Integrating community in policy and practice. Int J Community Wellbeing. 2022;5(1):179–95. DOI: 10.1007/s42413-020-00080-9
    Back to article
  16. 16Husk K, Blockley K, Lovell R, et al. What approaches to social prescribing work, for whom, and in what circumstances? A realist review. Health Soc Care Community. 2020;28(2):309–24. DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12839
    Back to article
  17. 17Bickerdike L, Booth A, Wilson PM, et al. Social prescribing: less rhetoric and more reality. A systematic review of the evidence. BMJ Open. 2017;7(4):e013384. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013384
    Back to article
  18. 18Chatterjee HJ, Camic PM, Lockyer B, et al. Non-clinical community interventions: A systematised review of social prescribing schemes. Arts Health. 2018;10(2):97–123. DOI: 10.1080/17533015.2017.1334002
    Back to article
  19. 19Pescheny JV, Pappas Y, Randhawa G. Facilitators and barriers of implementing and delivering social prescribing services: A systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:1–14. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-2893-4
    Back to article
  20. 20Lackey NQ, Tysor DA, McNay GD, et al. Mental health benefits of nature-based recreation: A systematic review. Ann Leis Res. 2021;24(3):379–93. DOI: 10.1080/11745398.2019.1655459
    Back to article
  21. 21Baker JR, Bissett M, Freak-Poli R, et al. Australian link worker social prescribing programs: An integrative review. PloS One. 2024;19(11):e0309783. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309783
    Back to article
  22. 22Pescheny JV, Randhawa G, Pappas Y. The impact of social prescribing services on service users: A systematic review of the evidence. Eur J Public Health. 2020;30(4):664–73. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz078
    Back to article
  23. 23Polley M, Whiteside J, Elnaschie S, et al. What does successful social prescribing look like? Mapping meaningful outcomes. London: University of Westminster; 2020.
    Back to article
  24. 24Sonke J, Manhas N, Belden C, et al. Social prescribing outcomes: A mapping review of the evidence from 13 countries to identify key common outcomes. Front Med. 2023;10:1266429. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1266429
    Back to article
  25. 25Menhas R, Yang L, Saqib ZA, et al. Does nature-based social prescription improve mental health outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Public Health. 2024;12:1228271. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1228271
    Back to article
  26. 26Leavell M, Leiferman J, Gascon M, et al. Nature-based social prescribing in urban settings to improve social connectedness and mental well-being: A review. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2019;6:297–308. DOI: 10.1007/s40572-019-00251-7
    Back to article
  27. 27Cooper M, Avery L, Scott J, et al. Effectiveness and active ingredients of social prescribing interventions targeting mental health: A systematic review. BMJ Open. 2022;12(7):e060214. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060214
    Back to article
  28. 28Grover S, Sandhu P, Nijjar GS, et al. Older adults and social prescribing experience, outcomes, and processes: A meta-aggregation systematic review. Public Health. 2023;218:197–207. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2023.02.016
    Back to article
  29. 29Elliott M, Davies M, Davies J, et al. Exploring how and why social prescribing evaluations work: A realist review. BMJ Open. 2022;12(4):e057009. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057009
    Back to article
  30. 30Steel Z, McDonald R, Silove D, et al. Pathways to the first contact with specialist mental health care. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2006;40(4):347–54. DOI: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01801.x
    Back to article
  31. 31Annells M, Allen J, Nunn R, et al. An evaluation of a mental health screening and referral pathway for community nursing care: Nurses’ and general practitioners’ perspectives. J Clin Nurs. 2011;20(1–2):214–26. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03275.x
    Back to article
  32. 32Spanos S, Hutchinson K, Ryder T, et al. Integrated care in epilepsy management: A scoping review of the models and components of health and social care delivery. IJIC. 2024;24(1). DOI: 10.5334/ijic.7659
    Back to article
  33. 33Jones M, Kimberlee R, Deave T, et al. The role of community centre-based arts, leisure and social activities in promoting adult well-being and healthy lifestyles. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013;10(5):1948–62. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph10051948
    Back to article
  34. 34Whitelaw S, Thirlwall C, Morrison A, et al. Developing and implementing a social prescribing initiative in primary care: Insights into the possibility of normalisation and sustainability from a UK case study. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2017;18(2):112–21. DOI: 10.1017/S1463423616000219
    Back to article
  35. 35Costa A, Sousa CJ, Seabra PRC, et al. Effectiveness of social prescribing programs in the primary health-care context: A systematic literature review. Sustainability. 2021;13(5):2731. DOI: 10.3390/su13052731
    Back to article
  36. 36Savage RD, Stall NM, Rochon PA. Looking before we leap: Building the evidence for social prescribing for lonely older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020;68(2):429–31. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.16251
    Back to article
  37. 37Rempel ES, Wilson EN, Durrant H, et al. Preparing the prescription: A review of the aim and measurement of social referral programmes. BMJ Open. 2017;7(10):e017734. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017734
    Back to article
  38. 38Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71
    Back to article
  39. 39Vidovic D, Reinhardt GY, Hammerton C. Can social prescribing foster individual and community well-being? A systematic review of the evidence. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(10):5276. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18105276
    Back to article
  40. 40Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, et al. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5:1–10. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
    Back to article
  41. 41Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A, et al. Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: A product from the ESRC methods programme Version. England: Lancaster University; 2006. Contract No.: 1. DOI: 10.13140/2.1.1018.4643
    Back to article
  42. 42Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, et al. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:1–8. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117
    Back to article
  43. 43Hong QN, Fàbregues S, Bartlett G, et al. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Educ Inf. 2018;34(4):285–91. DOI: 10.3233/EFI-180221
    Back to article
  44. 44Bergman P, Rusaw D, Bülow PH, et al. Effects of arts on prescription for persons with common mental disorders and/or musculoskeletal pain: A controlled study with 12 months follow-up. Cogent Public Health. 2023;10(1):2234631. DOI: 10.1080/27707571.2023.2234631
    Back to article
  45. 45Kolster A, Heikkinen M, Pajunen A, et al. Targeted health promotion with guided nature walks or group exercise: A controlled trial in primary care. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1208858. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1208858
    Back to article
  46. 46Makanjuola A, Lynch M, Hartfiel N, et al. Prevention of poor physical and mental health through the green social prescribing opening doors to the outdoors programme: A social return on investment analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(12):6111. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20126111
    Back to article
  47. 47Van De Venter E, Buller A. Arts on referral interventions: A mixed-methods study investigating factors associated with differential changes in mental well-being. J Public Health. 2015;37(1):143–50. DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdu028
    Back to article
  48. 48Elston J, Gradinger F, Asthana S, et al. Does a social prescribing ‘holistic’link-worker for older people with complex, multimorbidity improve well-being and frailty and reduce health and social care use and costs? A 12-month before-and-after evaluation. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2019;20:e135. DOI: 10.1017/S1463423619000598
    Back to article
  49. 49Poulos RG, Marwood S, Harkin D, et al. Arts on prescription for community-dwelling older people with a range of health and wellness needs. Health Soc Care Community. 2019;27(2):483–92. DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12669
    Back to article
  50. 50Thomson LJ, Lockyer B, Camic PM, et al. Effects of a museum-based social prescription intervention on quantitative measures of psychological wellbeing in older adults. Perspect Public Health. 2018;138(1):28–38. DOI: 10.1177/1757913917737563
    Back to article
  51. 51Vogelpoel N, Jarrold K. Social prescription and the role of participatory arts programmes for older people with sensory impairments. J Integr Care. 2014;22:39–50. DOI: 10.1108/JICA-01-2014-0002
    Back to article
  52. 52Aggar C, Thomas T, Gordon C, et al. Social prescribing for individuals living with mental illness in an Australian community setting: A pilot study. Community Ment Health J. 2021;57:189–95. DOI: 10.1007/s10597-020-00631-6
    Back to article
  53. 53Bhatti S, Rayner J, Pinto AD, et al. Using self-determination theory to understand the social prescribing process: A qualitative study. BJGP Open. 2021;5(2). DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2020.0153
    Back to article
  54. 54Duda JL, Williams GC, Ntoumanis N, et al. Effects of a standard provision versus an autonomy supportive exercise referral programme on physical activity, quality of life and well-being indicators: A cluster randomised controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014;11:1–15. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-11-10
    Back to article
  55. 55Makin S, Gask L. ‘Getting back to normal’: The added value of an art-based programme in promoting ‘recovery’for common but chronic mental health problems. Chronic Illn. 2012;8(1):64–75. DOI: 10.1177/1742395311422613
    Back to article
  56. 56Murphy SM, Edwards RT, Williams N, et al. An evaluation of the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the National Exercise Referral Scheme in Wales, UK: A randomised controlled trial of a public health policy initiative. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012;66(8):745–53. DOI: 10.1136/jech-2011-200689
    Back to article
  57. 57Payne K, Walton E, Burton C. Steps to benefit from social prescription: A qualitative interview study. BJGP. 2020;70(690):e36–e44. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp19X706865
    Back to article
  58. 58Carnes D, Sohanpal R, Frostick C, et al. The impact of a social prescribing service on patients in primary care: A mixed methods evaluation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17:1–9. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2778-y
    Back to article
  59. 59Heijnders ML, Meijs JJ. ‘Welzijn op Recept’(Social Prescribing): A helping hand in re-establishing social contacts–an explorative qualitative study. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2018;19(3):223–31. DOI: 10.1017/S1463423617000809
    Back to article
  60. 60Kellezi B, Wakefield JRH, Stevenson C, et al. The social cure of social prescribing: A mixed-methods study on the benefits of social connectedness on quality and effectiveness of care provision. BMJ Open. 2019;9(11):e033137. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033137
    Back to article
  61. 61Mercer SW, Fitzpatrick B, Grant L, et al. Effectiveness of community-links practitioners in areas of high socioeconomic deprivation. Ann Fam Med. 2019;17(6):518–25. DOI: 10.1370/afm.2429
    Back to article
  62. 62Moffatt S, Steer M, Lawson S, et al. Link worker social prescribing to improve health and well-being for people with long-term conditions: Qualitative study of service user perceptions. BMJ Open. 2017;7(7):e015203. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015203
    Back to article
  63. 63Pescheny JV, Gunn LH, Pappas Y, et al. The impact of the Luton social prescribing programme on mental well-being: A quantitative before-and-after study. J Public Health. 2021;43(1):e69–e76. DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdz155
    Back to article
  64. 64Stickley T, Hui A. Social prescribing through arts on prescription in a UK city: Participants’ perspectives (Part 1). Public Health. 2012;126(7):574–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2012.04.002
    Back to article
  65. 65Sumner RC, Crone D, Hughes S, et al. Arts on prescription: Observed changes in anxiety, depression, and well-being across referral cycles. Public Health. 2021;192:49–55. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.12.008
    Back to article
  66. 66Sumner RC, Crone DM, Baker C, et al. Factors associated with attendance, engagement and wellbeing change in an arts on prescription intervention. J Public Health. 2019;42(1):e88–e95. DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdz032
    Back to article
  67. 67Holt NJ. Tracking momentary experience in the evaluation of arts-on-prescription services: Using mood changes during art workshops to predict global wellbeing change. Perspect Public Health. 2020;140(5):270–6. DOI: 10.1177/1757913920913060
    Back to article
  68. 68Thomson LJ, Morse N, Elsden E, et al. Art, nature and mental health: Assessing the biopsychosocial effects of a ‘creative green prescription’ museum programme involving horticulture, artmaking and collections. Perspect Public Health. 2020;140(5):277–85. DOI: 10.1177/1757913920910443
    Back to article
  69. 69Stickley T, Eades M. Arts on prescription: A qualitative outcomes study. Public Health. 2013;127(8):727–34. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2013.05.001
    Back to article
  70. 70Wakefield JRH, Kellezi B, Stevenson C, et al. Social prescribing as ‘social cure’: A longitudinal study of the health benefits of social connectedness within a Social Prescribing pathway. J Health Psychol. 2022;27(2):386–96. DOI: 10.1177/1359105320944991
    Back to article
  71. 71Maund PR, Irvine KN, Reeves J, et al. Wetlands for wellbeing: Piloting a nature-based health intervention for the management of anxiety and depression. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(22):4413. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16224413
    Back to article
  72. 72Howarth M, Lawler C, da Silva A. Creating a transformative space for change: A qualitative evaluation of the RHS Wellbeing Programme for people with long term conditions. Health Place. 2021;71:102654. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102654
    Back to article
  73. 73Suter E, Oelke ND, Stiphout M. Tools and frameworks to measure health system integration. In: Amelung VSV, Suter E, Goodwin N, Nolte E, Balicer R, editors. Handbook Integrated Care. Springer; 2021. pp. 535–56. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-69262-9_32
    Back to article
  74. 74Liebmann M, Pitman A, Hsueh Y-C, et al. Do people perceive benefits in the use of social prescribing to address loneliness and/or social isolation? A qualitative meta-synthesis of the literature. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):1264. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08656-1
    Back to article
  75. 75VanderWeele TJ, Trudel-Fitzgerald C, Allin P, et al. Current recommendations on the selection of measures for well-being. Prev Med. 2020;133:106004. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106004
    Back to article
  76. 76Diener E, Chan MY. Happy people live longer: Subjective well-being contributes to health and longevity. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2011;3(1):1–43. DOI: 10.1111/j.1758-0854.2010.01045.x
    Back to article
  77. 77Allen K-A, Kern ML, Rozek CS, et al. Belonging: A review of conceptual issues, an integrative framework, and directions for future research. Aust J Psychol. 2021;73(1):87–102. DOI: 10.1080/00049530.2021.1883409
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.9127 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Jan 29, 2025
Accepted on: Aug 11, 2025
Published on: Aug 19, 2025
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
social prescribing,
person-centred care,
integrated care,
mental health,
wellbeing,
psychosocial needs

© 2025 Samantha Spanos, Shalini Wijekulasuriya, Louise A. Ellis, Maree Saba, Tanja Schroeder, Charlotte Officer, Yvonne Zurynski, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 25 (2025): Issue 3Next article