Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Impact of Health and Health-Related Domains on Professionals’ Perceptions of Care Complexity, Their Preferences for Integrated Care Planning and Interprofessional Collaboration Cover

Impact of Health and Health-Related Domains on Professionals’ Perceptions of Care Complexity, Their Preferences for Integrated Care Planning and Interprofessional Collaboration

International Journal of Integrated Care
Volume 25 (2025): Issue 3
By:
Open Access
|Jul 2025

References

  1. 1Naik H, Murray TM, Khan M, Daly-Grafstein D, Liu G, Kassen BO, et al. Population-Based Trends in Complexity of Hospital Inpatients. JAMA Intern Med. 2024;184(2):183–92. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.7410
    Back to article
  2. 2Plsek PE, Greenhalgh T. The challenge of complexity in health care. BMJ. 2001;323(7313):625–8. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.323.7313.625
    Back to article
  3. 3Durán A, Wright S. Understanding hospitals in changing health systems. Springer; 2020. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-28172-4
    Back to article
  4. 4Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Delivering on ‘right care, right place, right time’. How clinical care standards are improving health care in Australia: an evaluation report for the Antimicrobial Stewardship, Delirium and Hip Fracture Care Clinical Care Standards, ACSQHC; 2023.
    Back to article
  5. 5Guarinoni MG, Motta PC, Petrucci C, Lancia L. Complexity of care: a concept analysis. Ann Ig. 2014;26(3):226–36.
    Back to article
  6. 6Kuo DZ, Houtrow AJ, Council On Children With D. Recognition and Management of Medical Complexity. Pediatrics. 2016;138(6):e20163021. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2016-3021
    Back to article
  7. 7Cohen E, Kuo DZ, Agrawal R, Berry JG, Bhagat SK, Simon TD, et al. Children with medical complexity: an emerging population for clinical and research initiatives. Pediatrics. 2011;127(3):529–38. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-0910
    Back to article
  8. 8Gallan AS, McColl-Kennedy JR, Barakshina T, Figueiredo B, Jefferies JG, Gollnhofer J, et al. Transforming community well-being through patients’ lived experiences. Journal of Business Research. 2019;100:376–91. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.029
    Back to article
  9. 9Braithwaite J, Ellis LA, Churruca K, Long JC, Hibbert P, Clay-Williams R. Complexity Science as a Frame for Understanding the Management and Delivery of High Quality and Safer Care. In: Donaldson L, Ricciardi W, Sheridan S, Tartaglia R, editors. Textbook of Patient Safety and Clinical Risk Management. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021. pp. 375–91. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-59403-9_27
    Back to article
  10. 10Framework for Action on Interprofessional Education and Collaborative Practice. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
    Back to article
  11. 11Rawlinson C, Carron T, Cohidon C, Arditi C, Hong QN, Pluye P, et al. An Overview of Reviews on Interprofessional Collaboration in Primary Care: Barriers and Facilitators. Int J Integr Care. 2021;21(2):32. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.5589
    Back to article
  12. 12Wei H, Horns P, Sears SF, Huang K, Smith CM, Wei TL. A systematic meta-review of systematic reviews about interprofessional collaboration: facilitators, barriers, and outcomes. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2022;36(5):735–49. DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2021.1973975
    Back to article
  13. 13Wei H, Horsley L, Cao Y, Haddad LM, Hall KC, Robinson R, et al. The associations among nurse work engagement, job satisfaction, quality of care, and intent to leave: A national survey in the United States. International Journal of Nursing Sciences. 2023;10(4):476–84. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2023.09.010
    Back to article
  14. 14Rocks S, Berntson D, Gil-Salmerón A, Kadu M, Ehrenberg N, Stein V, et al. Cost and effects of integrated care: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Eur J Health Econ. 2020;21(8):1211–21. DOI: 10.1007/s10198-020-01217-5
    Back to article
  15. 15Valentijn PP, Boesveld IC, van der Klauw DM, Ruwaard D, Struijs JN, Molema JJ, et al. Towards a taxonomy for integrated care: a mixed-methods study. Int J Integr Care. 2015;15:e003. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.1513
    Back to article
  16. 16Goodwin N. Understanding Integrated Care. Int J Integr Care. 2016;16(4):6. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.2530
    Back to article
  17. 17Valentijn PP, Schepman SM, Opheij W, Bruijnzeels MA. Understanding integrated care: a comprehensive conceptual framework based on the integrative functions of primary care. Int J Integr Care. 2013;13:e010. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.886
    Back to article
  18. 18Occupational health and safety management systems—Requirements with guidance for use: International Organization for Standardization; 2018.
    Back to article
  19. 19Reeves S, Xyrichis A, Zwarenstein M. Teamwork, collaboration, coordination, and networking: Why we need to distinguish between different types of interprofessional practice. J Interprof Care. 2018;32(1):1–3. DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2017.1400150
    Back to article
  20. 20Kee K, Nies H, van Wieringen M, Beersma B. From Integrated Care to Integrating Care: A Conceptual Framework of Behavioural Processes Underlying Effective Collaboration in Care. Int J Integr Care. 2023;23(4):4. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.7446
    Back to article
  21. 21Glader L. Children with medical complexity: creating a framework for care based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health; 2016. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.13201
    Back to article
  22. 22ICF-CY, International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: Children & Youth version. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2007.
    Back to article
  23. 23Snyman S, Simon L, Kraus de Camargo O. The development of effective health and social care teams: ICF as the glue! In: Kraus de Camargo O, Simon L, Ronen GM, Rosenbaum PL, editors. ICF: A Hands-on Approach for Clinicians and Families: Mac Keith Press; 2019. pp. 76–94.
    Back to article
  24. 24Schot E. Working on working together. A systematic review on how healthcare professionals contribute to interprofessional collaboration; 2020. DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2019.1636007
    Back to article
  25. 25Henriksen DP, Ennis ZN, Panou V, Hangaard J, Jensen PB, Johansson SL, et al. Physician-led in-hospital multidisciplinary team conferences with multiple medical specialities present – A scoping review. J Multimorb Comorb. 2022;12:26335565221141745. DOI: 10.1177/26335565221141745
    Back to article
  26. 26Kočo L, Weekenstroo HHA, Lambregts DMJ, Sedelaar JPM, Prokop M, Fütterer JJ, et al. The Effects of Multidisciplinary Team Meetings on Clinical Practice for Colorectal, Lung, Prostate and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(16). DOI: 10.3390/cancers13164159
    Back to article
  27. 27Tran TH, de Boer J, Gyorki DE, Krishnasamy M. Optimising the quality of multidisciplinary team meetings: A narrative review. Cancer Medicine. 2022;11(9):1965–71. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4432
    Back to article
  28. 28Lewis G, Vaithianathan R, Wright L, Brice MR, Lovell P, Rankin S, et al. Integrating care for high-risk patients in England using the virtual ward model: lessons in the process of care integration from three case sites. Int J Integr Care. 2013;13:e046. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.1150
    Back to article
  29. 29Nicolaus S, Crelier B, Donzé JD, Aubert CE. Definition of patient complexity in adults: A narrative review. J Multimorb Comorb. 2022;12:26335565221081288. DOI: 10.1177/26335565221081288
    Back to article
  30. 30van Klaveren L-M, Geukers V, de Vos R. Care complexity, perceptions of complexity and preferences for interprofessional collaboration: an analysis of relationships and social networks in paediatrics. BMC Medical Education. 2024;24(1):334. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05304-6
    Back to article
  31. 31House S, Havens D. Nurses’ and Physicians’ Perceptions of Nurse-Physician Collaboration: A Systematic Review. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration. 2017;47(3). DOI: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000460
    Back to article
  32. 32Morag I, Zimerman AL. Evaluating teamwork among medical staff: How to measure and compare aspects of the team mental models of doctors and nurses. Appl Ergon. 2021;94:103418. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103418
    Back to article
  33. 33Forbes, TH 3rd., Larson K, Scott ES, Garrison HG. Getting work done: a grounded theory study of resident physician value of nursing communication. J Interprof Care. 2020;34(2):225–32. DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2019.1631764
    Back to article
  34. 34Itchhaporia D. The Evolution of the Quintuple Aim: Health Equity, Health Outcomes, and the Economy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;78(22):2262–4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.10.018
    Back to article
  35. 35Nundy S, Cooper LA, Mate KS. The Quintuple Aim for Health Care Improvement: A New Imperative to Advance Health Equity. Jama. 2022;327(6):521–2. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.25181
    Back to article
  36. 36Allenby GM, Hardt N, Rossi PE. Chapter 3 – Economic foundations of conjoint analysis. In: Dubé J-P, Rossi PE, editors. Handbook of the Economics of Marketing. 1: North-Holland; 2019. pp. 151–92. DOI: 10.1016/bs.hem.2019.04.002
    Back to article
  37. 37Ryan M, Farrar S. Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care. Bmj. 2000;320(7248):1530–3. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.320.7248.1530
    Back to article
  38. 38Al-Omari B, Farhat J, Ershaid M. Conjoint Analysis: A Research Method to Study Patients’ Preferences and Personalize Care. J Pers Med. 2022;12(2). DOI: 10.3390/jpm12020274
    Back to article
  39. 39Geyh S, Peter C, Müller R, Bickenbach JE, Kostanjsek N, Üstün BT, et al. The Personal Factors of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in the literature – a systematic review and content analysis. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2011;33(13–14):1089–102. DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2010.523104
    Back to article
  40. 40Geyh S, Schwegler U, Peter C, Müller R. Representing and organizing information to describe the lived experience of health from a personal factors perspective in the light of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF): a discussion paper. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(14):1727–38. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1445302
    Back to article
  41. 41Heerkens YF, de Weerd M, Huber M, de Brouwer CPM, van der Veen S, Perenboom RJM, et al. Reconsideration of the scheme of the international classification of functioning, disability and health: incentives from the Netherlands for a global debate. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2018;40(5):603–11. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1277404
    Back to article
  42. 42van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K. mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software. 2011;45(3):1–67. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v045.i03
    Back to article
  43. 43Bürkner P-C. brms: An R Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using Stan. Journal of Statistical Software. 2017;80(1):1–28. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v080.i01
    Back to article
  44. 44McHugh MD, Lake ET. Understanding clinical expertise: nurse education, experience, and the hospital context. Res Nurs Health. 2010;33(4):276–87. DOI: 10.1002/nur.20388
    Back to article
  45. 45Hølge-Hazelton B, Zacho Borre L, Kjerholt M, McCormack B, Rosted E. The Differences in Experiences Among Multi-Level Healthcare Leaders, Between the First and the Second Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Two Cross-Sectional Studies Compared. J Healthc Leadersh. 2021;13:209–19. DOI: 10.2147/JHL.S326019
    Back to article
  46. 46Team RC. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2023.
    Back to article
  47. 47Pordes E, Gordon J, Sanders LM, Cohen E. Models of Care Delivery for Children With Medical Complexity. Pediatrics. 2018;141(Suppl 3):S212–S23. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2017-1284F
    Back to article
  48. 48Engel M, Stoppelenburg A, van der Ark A, Bols FM, Bruggeman J, Janssens-van Vliet ECJ, et al. Development and implementation of a transmural palliative care consultation service: a multiple case study in the Netherlands. BMC Palliative Care. 2021;20(1):81. DOI: 10.1186/s12904-021-00767-6
    Back to article
  49. 49Carlile PR. A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development. Organization Science. 2002;13(4):442–55. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.13.4.442.2953
    Back to article
  50. 50Rietveld E, Kiverstein J. A Rich Landscape of Affordances. Ecological Psychology. 2014;26(4):325–52. DOI: 10.1080/10407413.2014.958035
    Back to article
  51. 51Imms C, Granlund M, Wilson PH, Steenbergen B, Rosenbaum PL, Gordon AM. Participation, both a means and an end: a conceptual analysis of processes and outcomes in childhood disability. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 2017;59(1):16–25. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.13237
    Back to article
  52. 52Moleman M, Regeer BJ, Schuitmaker-Warnaar TJ. Shared decision-making and the nuances of clinical work: Concepts, barriers and opportunities for a dynamic model. J Eval Clin Pract. 2021;27(4):926–34. DOI: 10.1111/jep.13507
    Back to article
  53. 53Jessurun CAC, Broekman MLD. True shared decision-making in neurosurgical oncology: does it really exist? Acta Neurochirurgica. 2023;165(1):11–3. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-022-05452-y
    Back to article
  54. 54Tasselli S. Social Networks and Inter-professional Knowledge Transfer: The Case of Healthcare Professionals. Organization Studies. 2015;36(7):841–72. DOI: 10.1177/0170840614556917
    Back to article
  55. 55Rollet Q, Bouvier V, Moutel G, Launay L, Bignon A-L, Bouhier-Leporrier K, et al. Multidisciplinary team meetings: are all patients presented and does it impact quality of care and survival – a registry-based study. BMC Health Services Research. 2021;21(1):1032. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-07022-x
    Back to article
  56. 56Brenner M, Kidston C, Hilliard C, Coyne I, Eustace-Cook J, Doyle C, et al. Children’s complex care needs: a systematic concept analysis of multidisciplinary language. Eur J Pediatr. 2018;177(11):1641–52. DOI: 10.1007/s00431-018-3216-9
    Back to article
  57. 57Horlait M, Baes S, De Regge M, Leys M. Understanding the Complexity, Underlying Processes, and Influencing Factors for Optimal Multidisciplinary Teamwork in Hospital-Based Cancer Teams: A Systematic Integrative Review. Cancer Nurs. 2021;44(6):E476–E92. DOI: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000923
    Back to article
  58. 58Walraven JEW, van der Meulen R, van der Hoeven JJM, Lemmens V, Verhoeven RHA, Hesselink G, et al. Preparing tomorrow’s medical specialists for participating in oncological multidisciplinary team meetings: perceived barriers, facilitators and training needs. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):502. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03570-w
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.8997 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Oct 1, 2024
Accepted on: Jun 27, 2025
Published on: Jul 9, 2025
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
ICF,
conjoint analysis

© 2025 Lisa-Maria van Klaveren, Vincent G. M. Geukers, Rien de Vos, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 25 (2025): Issue 3Next article