
Figure 1
SHE model based on Bloem, S. & Stalpers [17].
Table 1
Structure and outputs of group discussions with healthcare professionals.
| FOCUS AREAS | OUTPUT |
|---|---|
Short explanation of the SHE model
| Descriptions of the Segments, resulting in a framework for differentiating healthcare modalities. |
Inventory of provided services
| An inventory of available services was compiled. |
Assigning support to Segments (previous descriptions were visible)
| Consensus was reached through group discussion on how to allocate support across Segments. |
Table 2
Structure and outputs of group discussions and individual interviews with patients with IMIDs.
| FOCUS AREAS | OUTPUT |
|---|---|
Top-of-Mind characteristics
| Reflection on what the condition meant for the individual in their daily life; the aspects that played a role in this. |
Health Ladder (Visual ladder with 11 Steps, brief explanation)
| Insights into behaviour, questions, and needs; what was required; what was offered. (Note: High on the ladder corresponds with Segment 1; low on the ladder corresponds with Segment 4) |
Explanation of segmentation model (short video and brief description)
Note: In TEAM interviews, words were typed and displayed on the screen; the video was not shown. | Insights into forms of support per Segment. |
Table 3
SHE Segment characteristics based on interviews and discussions with both healthcare professionals and patients (RA/SpA, IBD, PsO/HS).
| COGNITION AND BEHAVIOUR | QUESTIONS AND DILEMMAS | SPECIFIC SUPPORT NEEDS |
|---|---|---|
| Segment 1 high acceptance and high control | ||
| Attaches great importance to factual information | “What are reliable sources of information?” | “I need certainty” Desire for validation of one’s own approach |
| Keeps informed | ||
| Keeps up with developments regarding the condition | “What new developments are relevant to me?” | |
| Prepares for healthcare visits | “What diagnostic or treatment options am I unaware of?” | Shared decision-making |
| Copes easily with setbacks | “How can I manage or deal with the fluctuating course of my condition?” | Feeling heard and acknowledged by healthcare professionals |
| Segment 2 high acceptance and low control | ||
| Seeks guidance to better cope with the condition | “How can I gain control?” | “I need structure” Support to regain control over the situation Managing matters (themselves) with support from others |
| Attempts to prepare for consultations | “Am I doing the right things?” | Feeling heard and acknowledged by healthcare professionals |
| Consults multiple healthcare professionals | “What (lifestyle) adjustments will help me manage my condition?” | Comprehensive overview of disease progression, treatment and support options. |
| Open attitude towards the treatment team | “Am I doing enough?” | |
| Segment 3 low acceptance and high control | ||
| Questions why this happens to them specifically | “How can I learn to live with this?” | “I need tranquillity” |
| Wants to keep things the way they are | “How can I (re)organise my life?” | Support with coping and self-image– active role for healthcare professional |
| Tends to blame themselves | “How do I avoid social isolation?” | |
| Struggles with shame about their illness | “How can I best cope with others’ reactions?” | Support for family and friends during the disease process |
| Does not readily express emotions to healthcare professionals | “How can I discuss it with others ?” | Examples of others with the same condition |
| Primarily seeks support from family and friends | “How do I maintain an (intimate) relationship with my partner?” | Someone who listens |
| Segment 4 low acceptance and low control | ||
| Feels unable to break out of their situation | “How can I learn to live with this condition?” | “I need perspective” |
| Prefers to let everything sink in before acting | ||
| Is undecided about treatment options but does want support | “What is the next step?” | Small, concrete tasks and simple advice |
| Engages in discussions under pressure from others | “Who can be trusted?” | Feeling heard and acknowledged by healthcare professionals |
| Demands a lot of attention from healthcare professionals | “What exactly can be done?” | Step-by-step guidance and direction Active role for healthcare professionals |
| Is pessimistic and tends to blame others | “Is this never going to pass?” | |
[i] Legend: Lines are used to indicate relationships between the three characteristics.
Table 4
Tailored care framework based on discussions with both healthcare professionals and patients (RA/SpA, IBD, PsO/HS).
| CATEGORY | SUPPORTIVE INTERVENTION | SHE SEGMENT | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consult with healthcare professional | Validation and building trust | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| √ | √ | |||
| √ | ||||
| √ | ||||
| √ | √ | |||
| √ | ||||
| √ | ||||
| Attention and active listening | |||||
| √ | √ | |||
| √ | √ | |||
| √ | ||||
| √ | ||||
| √ | √ | |||
| √ | ||||
| √ | ||||
| Discussion with healthcare professional | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| √ | √ | |||
| √ | ||||
| √ | ||||
| √ | √ | |||
| √ | ||||
| √ | ||||
| √ | ||||
| √ | ||||
| √ | √ | |||
| √ | ||||
| Information (transfer) and instructions | From diagnosis to medication | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Orally | |||||
| √ | √ | |||
| √ | √ | |||
| √ | √ | |||
| Print/digital information and reliable sources | |||||
| |||||
| √ | ||||
| √ | ||||
| |||||
| √ | √ | |||
| √ | ||||
| Information sessions (meetings) | |||||
| √ | √ | |||
| √ | √ | |||
| √ | √ | √ | ||
| Channels and frequency | Contact methods and intensity | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Type of channel | |||||
| √ | ||||
| √ | ||||
| √ | ||||
| √ | ||||
| √ | √ | √ | √ | |
| Frequency of contact | |||||
| √ | √ | |||
| √ | √ | |||
| Third party support | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| Referral to another professional (e.g., general practitioner, dietician, physiotherapist, psychologist, social worker, home care, sexologist, rehabilitation doctor (not PsO), alternative medicine (mentioned by patients)) | |||||
| |||||
| √ | √ | √ | ||
| √ | ||||
| Caregiver | |||||
| √ | √ | |||
| √ | ||||
| √ | ||||
| √ | √ | |||
| √ | ||||
| √ | ||||
| Patients’ association | |||||
| √ | √ | |||
| √ | √ | |||
| Digital support (also see information transfer) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| Applications and programmes (e.g., IBDcoach (a mobile application designed to support patients at home) or lifestyle interventions such as Nederland in Beweging (a Dutch television programme that promotes physical activity). | |||||
| √ | √ | |||
| √ | √ | |||
| Podcasts | |||||
| √ | √ | |||
| √ | √ | |||
| Promoting lifestyle and therapy adherence (nutrition, movement, smoking and drinking, pregnancy, sun, vaccination) | Support mostly by nurse, referral if necessary | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| √ | ||||
| √ | ||||
| √ | √ | |||
| √ | ||||
[i] Legend: bold – mainly focused on what is offered; not bold – mainly focused on how it is offered. Numbers in the right column refer to Segments: Segment 1 – high acceptance, high control; Segment 2 – high acceptance, low control; Segment 3 – low acceptance, high control; Segment 4 – low acceptance, low control.
| HS | Hidradenitis Supperativa |
| IBD | Inflammatory Bowel Disease |
| IMIDs | Immune-mediated inflammatory disorders |
| Non-WMO | Not subject to the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act |
| PROMs | Patient Reported Outcome Measures |
| PsO | Psoriasis |
| QoL | Quality of Life |
| RA | Rheumatoid Arthritis |
| SHE | Subjective Health Experience |
| SpA | Spondylarthritis |
