Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Hypertension Cascade Across Three Healthcare Systems and in Relation to the Level of Implementation of the Integrated Care Package Cover

Hypertension Cascade Across Three Healthcare Systems and in Relation to the Level of Implementation of the Integrated Care Package

Open Access
|Aug 2025

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Operationalization of the bars of the Cascade per country.

BARBELGIUMSLOVENIACAMBODIANOTES
Prevalencebased on survey measuring SBP ≥140 mmHg OR a DBP ≥ 90 mmHa OR self-reported use of antihypertensive medication during the past two weeks OR self-reported diagnosisno correct estimation possible of the number of people with ‘undiagnosed HTN’ and thus not of the ‘prevalence’based on a survey measuring SBP ≥ 140 mmHg OR DBP ≥ 90 mmHg OR self-reported diagnosis as having been told by healthcare professionals that they have HTNDenominator: total population aged 40–79
Testedreported that they had a BP measurement in the last 3 yearsBP measure by registered nurse in the last 3 yearsreported that they had a BP measurement in the last 3 years
1. Diagnosedreported that they have the condition ‘HTN’registered as ‘having the diagnosis HTN’reported that they were diagnosed with HTN by a healthcare professionalthe cascade will start from the ‘diagnosed’ bar, with diagnosed as ‘100%’
2. In carefollowed by a healthcare professional for HTN during the past 12 monthsHTN consult. in the past 12 monthsget treatment/care for HTN in the past 12 months
3. In treatmenteither self-reported use of medication or following a diet to treat HTN during the past 12 monthsat least one BP measure in the last 12 monthscurrently receiving treatment/advice for HTN prescribed by a doctor or other HC worker: Drugs (2w) /diet advice (reduce salt/lose weight/physical exercise.)in SL there is no information available about HTN medication or non-medical treatment; because BP measure is part of the treatment protocol of HTN, this indicator is used as a proxy of treatment
4. Adhered to treatment (medication adherence)took prescribed HTN medication last 24h (‘yes’) AND regularly (‘yes’)adherence assessment HTN: regularly (‘yes’) AND properly (‘yes’)MARS-5 adherence scale for HTN medication: high adherence (vs. no)bonly among patients who took HTN medication
5. Under controlhaving SBP <140 mmHg and DBP <90 mmHghaving SBP <140 mmHg and DBP <90 mmHghaving SBP <140 mmHg and DBP <90 mmHg

[i] Notes: aBP was measured by trained nurses during a home visit as part of the BHES fieldwork. Respondent’s SBP and DBP were determined by taking the respective averages of the last two out of three BP measurement [38]. b Participants indicate how often they engage in each of five HTN medication-adherent behaviours (e.g. “I take less than instructed”) on a 1–5 likert scale (always to never). The item scores are summed to indicate overall level of adherence. Consistent with previous research [4041], MARS scores were then dichotomised to give low adherence (LAd, MARS score ≤21) and high adherence sub-groups (HAd, MARS score N21).

ijic-25-3-8921-g1.png
Figure 1

ICP grid scores per country.

Notes: E1:Identification, E2:Treatment, E3:Health education, E4:Self-management support, E5:Structured collaboration, E6:Organization of care; the medium scores are presented; see S6.a-c for the corresponding data. The elements are based on several items and operationalized as scales ranging from 0 (no implementation) to 5 (complete implementation). FFS = fee-for-service; OD = operational district; corresponding numbers in table S4.a-c.

Table 2

The prevalence of HTN, the percentage of people tested and diagnosed with HTN among those aged 40–79 years.

AMONG INDIVIDUALS AGED 40–79
PREVALENCE (%)TESTED (%)DIAGNOSED (%)
MENWOMENMENWOMENMENWOMEN
%% ASR%% ASRSIG.b%% ASR%% ASRSIG.%% ASR%% ASRSIG.
BE44.2441.7940.9735.94n.s.93.0392.5194.2793.66n.s.24.422.9824.8721.43n.s.
SLn.a.an.a.a23.4023.0411.4911.76<0.00115.6513.999.978.07
CA31.4130.7935.1332.51n.s.48.7348.1667.2966.35<0.00113.4812.6726.423.91
AMONG INDIVIDUALS WITH HTN AGED 40–79
BE95.7396.5897.0394.62n.s.42.142.4553.0249.32n.s.
SLn.a.an.a.an.a.an.a.a
CA68.1364.5487.7685.21<0.00142.4532.575.1669.32<0.001

[i] Notes: BE = Belgium, SL = Slovenia, CA = Cambodia; ASR = age-standardized rate; n.a. = not available; n.s. = not significant; ano valid estimations of HTN prevalence available for Slovenia and thus also not for ‘being tested’ and ‘diagnosed’ among those with HTN; bThe p-value is obtained by a logistic regression model.

ijic-25-3-8921-g2.png
Figure 2

Gender stratified cascade of hypertension.

Note: The presented scores are age-standardised; see S6 for the corresponding data.

Table 3

Gender, education and financial situation regressed on the different bars of the cascade, using a logistic regression analysis (crude and adjusted odds ratios are presented).

BELGIUM
IN CARE = 1 (AMONG THE DIAGNOSED; N = 1137)IN TREATMENT = 1 (AMONG THE LINKED TO CARE; N = 1080)
CUDE ORCI-95P-VALUEAORCI-95P-VALUECRUDE ORCI-95P-VALUEAORCI-95P-VALUE
Gender (ref. men)
women1.960.944.080.0721.840.883.860.1050.910.501.640.7451.200.672.130.545
Education
(ref. high (higher secondary or higher))
low (primary school or lower)1.370.424.510.6060.790.232.650.6990.690.301.570.3750.600.251.440.255
middle (lower secondary school)1.550.524.630.4341.080.353.290.8960.910.451.860.7960.770.391.530.458
Financial situation (ref. good)
poor1.060.452.50.8911.000.412.470.9920.420.200.870.02*0.370.180.770.008**
moderate1.30.523.270.5761.010.392.600.9830.470.211.050.0670.420.200.880.022*
ADHERENT TO TREATMENT = 1 (AMONG THOSE IN TREATMENT; N = 1042)UNDER CONTROL = 1 (AMONG THOSE ADHERED TO TREATMENT)a
CRUDE ORCI-95P-VALUEADJUSTED ORCI-95P-VALUE
Gender (ref. men)
women1.380.832.280.2151.480.862.540.155
Education
(ref. high (higher secondary or higher))
low (primary school or lower)0.620.291.330.2210.370.160.830.016*
middle (lower secondary school)1.120.602.080.7150.820.421.580.552
Financial situation (ref. good)
poor1.310.752.290.3451.250.712.200.445
moderate1.210.642.270.5541.010.531.900.984
SLOVENIA
IN CARE = 1 (AMONG THE DIAGNOSED; N = 22837)bIN TREATMENT = 1 (AMONG THE LINKED TO CARE; N = 13061)b
CUDE ORCI-95P-VALUEAORCI-95P-VALUECRUDE ORCI-95P-VALUEAORCI-95P-VALUE
Gender (ref. men)
women1.091.041.150.001**1.081.021.140.005**1.360.961.920.0821.290.911.830.153
Education////////
Financial situation////////
ADHERENT TO TREATMENT = 1 (AMONG THOSE IN TREATMENT; N = 2051)UNDER CONTROL = 1 (AMONG THOSE ADHERED TO CARE; N = 1873)
CRUDE ORCI-95P-VALUEAORCI-95P-VALUECRUDE ORCI-95P-VALUEAORCI-95P-VALUE
Gender (ref. men)
women1.260.931.720.1431.250.911.740.1731.291.071.540.007**1.311.081.590.006**
Education
(ref. high (higher secondary or higher))
low (primary school or lower)1.110.741.740.6201.180.761.880.4701.120.881.450.3591.090.841.420.497
middle (lower secondary school)1.210.841.780.3221.260.871.870.2311.040.841.290.7471.070.861.340.518
Financial situation (ref. good)
poor0.470.211.260.0930.390.171.070.043*0.850.421.720.6440.820.401.680.585
moderate0.680.461.020.0540.640.430.980.034*0.880.681.140.3400.840.651.110.218
CAMBODIA
IN CARE = 1 (AMONG THE DIAGNOSED; N = 925)IN TREATMENT = 1 (AMONG THE LINKED TO CARE; N= 917)
CUDE ORCI-95P-VALUEAORCI-95P-VALUECRUDE ORCI-95P-VALUEAORCI-95P-VALUE
Gender (ref. men)
women1.621.012.610.046*1.801.033.130.036*5.421.3222.230.019*4.380.7824.570.093
Education (ref. high (higher secondary or higher))
low (primary school or lower)0.920.233.610.9061.240.354.390.7390.830.106.980.8690.360.034.180.414
middle (lower secondary school)0.750.163.400.7081.010.234.390.985////////////////
Financial situation (ref. good)
poor0.300.180.490.000***0.270.160.46<0.001***1.300.218.130.7771.420.248.720.683
moderate0.350.180.650.001***0.370.190.720.003**0.380.071.880.2400.540.093.010.487
ADHERED TO TREATMENT = 1 (AMONG THOSE IN TREATMENT; N = 522)UNDER CONTROL = 1 (AMONG THOSE ADHERED TO CARE; N = 356)
CRUDE ORCI-95P-VALUEAORCI-95P-VALUECRUDE ORCI-95P-VALUEAORCI-95P-VALUE
Gender (ref. men)
women2.231.653.000.001***2.111.572.84<0.001
Education
(ref. high (higher secondary or higher))
low (primary school or lower)1.110.472.570.8100.630.281.340.2511.040.392.770.9250.520.211.310.166
middle (lower secondary school)0.990.382.580.9930.710.281.750.4600.910.292.840.8700.620.211.820.383
Financial situation (ref. good)
poor0.710.540.920.009**0.740.560.990.045*0.700.510.950.025*0.740.521.040.088
moderate0.840.611.160.3050.890.621.270.5310.990.661.470.9721.070.691.640.745

[i] Notes: OR = odds ratio; AOR = adjusted odds ratio; adjusted for age, body mass index, current smoking status and comorbidity diabetes type 2; CI = Confidence interval; *p < 0.05 **p < 0.01 ***p < 0.001;

a the BELHES sample is only a subsample of the HIS sample and the sample size was too small for a logistic regression with outcome variable ‘under control’; b only adjusted for age; // = not able to estimate ORs because of small cells.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.8921 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Language: English
Submitted on: Jun 18, 2024
Accepted on: Aug 7, 2025
Published on: Aug 22, 2025
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Veerle Buffel, Philippe Bos, Savina Chham, Srean Chimm, Katrien Danhieux, Grace Marie Ku, Josefien Van Olmen, Crt Zavrnik, Zalika Klemenc-Ketis, Edwin Wouters, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.