Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Case Management for People with Acquired Brain Injury with Complex Problems (Part 2): Process Evaluation of a One-Group Trial Cover

Case Management for People with Acquired Brain Injury with Complex Problems (Part 2): Process Evaluation of a One-Group Trial

Open Access
|Jul 2025

References

  1. 1Allanson F, Pestell C, Gignac GE, Yeo YX, Weinborn M. Neuropsychological Predictors of Outcome Following Traumatic Brain Injury in Adults: a Meta-Analysis. Neuropsychol Rev. 2017;27(3):187201. DOI: 10.1007/s11065-017-9353-5
  2. 2De Wit L, Theuns P, Dejaeger E, Devos S, Gantenbein AR, Kerckhofs E, et al. Long-term impact of stroke on patients’ health-related quality of life. Disabil Rehabil [Internet]. 2017 Jul 3;39(14):143540. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09638288.2016.1200676
  3. 3Bieńkiewicz MMN, Brandi ML, Hughes C, Voitl A, Hermsdörfer J. The complexity of the relationship between neuropsychological deficits and impairment in everyday tasks after stroke. Brain Behav. 2015;5(10):114. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.371
  4. 4Norrving B, Barrick J, Davalos A, Dichgans M, Cordonnier C, Guekht A, et al. Action Plan for Stroke in Europe 2018–2030. Eur Stroke J. 2018;3(4):30936. DOI: 10.1177/2396987318808719
  5. 5Sacco RL, Sandercock P, Endres M, Feigin V, Pandian J, Shinohara Y, et al. Review and prioritization of stroke research recommendations to address the mission of the World Stroke Organization: a call to action from the WSO Research Committee. Int J Stroke [Internet]. 2015 Oct 26;10(SA100):49. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/ijs.12625
  6. 6Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation. Clinical Practice Guideline for the Rehabilitation of Adults with Moderate to Severe TBI [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2020 Jan 17]. Available from: https://braininjuryguidelines.org/modtosevere/fileadmin/Guidelines_components/Rec/Section_1_REC_complete_ENG_final.pdf
  7. 7Braaf S, Ameratunga S, Christie N, Teague W, Ponsford J, Cameron PA, et al. Care coordination experiences of people with traumatic brain injury and their family members in the 4-years after injury: a qualitative analysis. Brain Inj [Internet]. 2019;00(00):110. DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2019.1566835
  8. 8Claiborne N. Effectiveness of a Care Coordination Model for Stroke Survivors: A Randomized Study. Health Soc Work [Internet]. 2006 May 1 [cited 2022 Jun 24];31(2):8796. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/hsw/article/31/2/87/625312
  9. 9Forster A. Validation of the Longer-term Unmet Needs after Stroke (LUNS) monitoring tool: A multicentre study. Clin Rehabil [Internet]. 2013 Nov 20;27(11):10208. DOI: 10.1177/0269215513487082
  10. 10Voogdt-Pruis HR, Zonneveld N, Bergsma M, Van Wijk E, Kerkhoff H, Van der Dussen L, et al. Optimising Integrated Stroke Care in Regional Networks: A Nationwide Self-Assessment Study in 2012, 2015 and 2019. Int J Integr Care [Internet]. 2021 Sep 20;21(3):12. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.5611
  11. 11Stiekema A, Resch C, Donkervoort M, Jansen N, Jurrius KHM, Zadoks JM, et al. Case management after acquired brain injury compared to care as usual: study protocol for a 2-year pragmatic randomized controlled superiority trial with two parallel groups. Trials [Internet]. 2020 Dec 17;21(1):928. Available from: https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13063-020-04804-2
  12. 12Saunders RP, Evans MH, Joshi P. Developing a Process-Evaluation Plan for Assessing Health Promotion Program Implementation: A How-To Guide. Health Promot Pract. 2005;6(2):13447. DOI: 10.1177/1524839904273387
  13. 13Stiekema APM, Winkens B, Bierlaagh D, Donkervoort M, Jansen N, Jurrius KHM, et al. Case management for people with acquired brain injury with complex problems (part 1): outcomes of a one-group trial. under Revis.
  14. 14Kaushik V, Walsh CA. Pragmatism as a research paradigm and its implications for Social Work research. Soc Sci. 2019 Sep 1;8(9). DOI: 10.3390/socsci8090255
  15. 15Onwuegbuzie AJ, Dickinson WB, Leech NL, Zoran AG. Toward more rigor in focus group research: A new framework for collecting and analyzing focus group data. Int J Qual Methods [Internet]. 2009;8(3):121. Available from: http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/IJQM/article/view/4554
  16. 16Lukersmith S, Fernandez A, Millington M, Salvador-Carulla L. The brain injury case management taxonomy (BICM-T); a classification of community-based case management interventions for a common language. Disabil Health J [Internet]. 2016 Apr;9(2):27280. DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2015.09.006
  17. 17Lukersmith S, Taylor J, Salvador-Carulla L. Vagueness and Ambiguity in Communication of Case Management: A Content Analysis in the Australian National Disability Insurance Scheme. Int J Integr Care [Internet]. 2021 Mar 19;21(1):17. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.5590
  18. 18Pindus DM, Mullis R, Lim L, Wellwood I, RundellA V, Aziz NAA, et al. Stroke survivors’ and informal caregivers’ experiences of primary care and community healthcare services – A systematic review and meta-ethnography. PLoS One [Internet]. 2018;13(2):123. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85042383263&doi=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0192533&partnerID=40&md5=6cb81a7bb9672eba39e64e448181555a
  19. 19Stiekema A, Winkens I, Ponds R, De Vugt ME, Van Heugten CM. Finding a new balance in life: a qualitative study on perceived long-term needs of people with acquired brain injury and partners. Brain Inj [Internet]. 2020;00(00):19. DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2020.1725125
  20. 20McMordie WR, Rogers KF, Barker SL. Consumer satisfaction with services provided to head-injured patients and their families. Brain Inj [Internet]. 1991 Jan 3;5(1):4351. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/02699059108998510
  21. 21Green T, Bonner A, Teleni L, Bradford N, Purtell L, Douglas C, et al. Use and reporting of experience-based codesign studies in the healthcare setting: a systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf [Internet]. 2020 Jan;29(1):6476. Available from: https://qualitysafety.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009570
  22. 22Wang Y, Wong EL-Y, Nilsen P, Chung VC, Tian Y, Yeoh E-K. A scoping review of implementation science theories, models, and frameworks — an appraisal of purpose, characteristics, usability, applicability, and testability. Implement Sci [Internet]. 2023 Sep 19;18(1):43. Available from: https://implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13012-023-01296-x
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.8650 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 23, 2024
Accepted on: Jun 18, 2025
Published on: Jul 7, 2025
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Annemarie P. M. Stiekema, Desiree Bierlaagh, Mireille Donkervoort, Natska Jansen, Kitty H. M. Jurrius, Judith Zadoks, Caroline M. van Heugten, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.