Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Reimagining Day Rehabilitation For Frailty and Neurodegenerative Conditions through the integrated Rehabilitation and EnAblement Program (iREAP) Cover

Reimagining Day Rehabilitation For Frailty and Neurodegenerative Conditions through the integrated Rehabilitation and EnAblement Program (iREAP)

Open Access
|Sep 2024

Figures & Tables

ijic-24-3-8066-g1.png
Figure 1

iREAP Model of Care.

Table 1

Reimagining Day Rehabilitation – evolution of the iREAP model of care.

TRADITIONAL DAY HOSPITALiREAP
Post-acute referral pathwaysReferral direct from primary care, specialist physicians, Aged Service Emergency Team (ASET), community allied health and self-referral
Post crisis, post illness, post-injury, post-surgical interventionAnticipatory – pre-crisis intervention for those at risk of, or experiencing frailty and/or falls; or early in course of a neurodegenerative condition
Focus on physical outcomes and ADL’sHolistic across physical, psychological and social domains
Fixed treatment protocolIndividualised care plan related to the individual’s goals of care
Didactic education approachHealth coaching, education and enablement
Single discipline leadGeriatrician and Care Coordinator lead
Multi-disciplinary case conferencing and intervention
Discharge home exercise programIndividualised enablement strategies through health coaching process
Physical outcome measuresOutcome measures across all health domains
Table 2

Baseline Characteristics of Participants.

CHARACTERISTICTOTAL GROUP (n = 99)FALLS/FRAIL GROUP (n = 47)ND GROUP (n = 52)
Age (years)
    Mean768072
    Range57–9157–9159–85
Sex, n (%)
    Female41 (41.4%)23 (48.9%)17 (32.7%)
    Male58 (58.6%)24 (51.1%)35 (67.3%)
Cognition, n (%)
    Intact38 (38.4%)24 (51.1%)14 (26.9%)
    MCI26 (26.3%)11 (23.4%)15 (28.8%)
    Dementia25 (25.2%)09 (19.1%)16 (30.8%)
    Unknown010 (10.1%)03 (06.4%)07 (13.5%)
Polypharmacy, n (%)
    Present60 (60.6%)17 (36.2%)35 (67.3%)
    Not present31 (31.3%)25 (53.2%)14 (26.9%)
    Unknown08 (08.1%)05 (10.6%)03 (5.8%)
ijic-24-3-8066-g2.png
Figure 2

Clinical Frailty Scale and Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13).

*Pre-FS – pre-program CFS; Post FS – post-program CFS.

Table 3

Physical measures.

PHYSICAL TESTMEANRANGE (min–max)P-VALUE
Timed Up and Go in 3m (s)Pre16.994.79–62.000.007
Post14.254.97–49.52
Berg Balance*Pre44.4415–560.00002
Post48.5421–56
6-minute walk test (m)Pre293.8143.5–6050.001
Post336.06133–600

[i] * The Berg Balance Scale total maximum score of 56 indicates no balance issues detected.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.8066 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Language: English
Submitted on: Nov 27, 2023
Accepted on: Sep 4, 2024
Published on: Sep 17, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2024 Genevieve Maiden, Annabel Kingsford, Audrey P. Wang, Anh R. Tran-Nam, Julia Nelson, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.