Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Facilitators and Barriers in Integrated Social Care for Families Facing Multiple and Complex Problems: A Scoping Review Cover

Facilitators and Barriers in Integrated Social Care for Families Facing Multiple and Complex Problems: A Scoping Review

International Journal of Integrated Care
Volume 24 (2024): Issue 3
By: Marcel van Eck,  Roelof Ettema,  Mariëlle Cloin and  Tine Van Regenmortel  
Open Access
|Aug 2024

References

  1. 1Nooteboom LA, Mulder EA, Kuiper CHZ, Colins OF, Vermeiren RRJM. Towards integrated youth care: a systematic review of facilitators and barriers for professionals. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. 2021; 48(1): 88–105. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-020-01049-8
    Back to article
  2. 2Sousa L, Ribeiro C, Rodrigues S. Are practitioners incorporating a strengths-focused approach when working with multi-problem poor families? Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. 2007 Jan; 17(1): 53–66. DOI: 10.1002/casp.875
    Back to article
  3. 3Knot-Dickscheit J, Knorth EJ. Gezinnen met meervoudige en complexe problemen: Theorie en praktijk. [Families with multiple and complex problems: theory and practice]. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Lemniscaat; 2019. [in Dutch].
    Back to article
  4. 4Verwey Jonker Instituut. Typologie voor een strategische aanpak van multiprobleemgezinnen in Rotterdam. [Typology for a strategic approach to multi-problem families in Rotterdam.]. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Verwey Jonker Instituut; 2010. [in Dutch].
    Back to article
  5. 5Ghesquière P. Multi probleem gezinnen: problematische hulpverleningssituaties in perspective. [Multi-problem families: problematic assistance situations in perspective]. Louvain, Belgium: Garant; 1993. [in Dutch].
    Back to article
  6. 6Nooteboom L, Mulder E, Kuiper C, Vermeiren R. Integraal werken? Focus op de uitvoerende hulpverleners: Complexiteit van uitvoering te vaak over het hoofd gezien. [Integral work? Focus on the executive aid workers: complexity of implementation too often overlooked. Kind & Adolescent Praktijk]. 2021; 20: 24–30. [in Dutch]. DOI: 10.1007/s12454-021-0650-z
    Back to article
  7. 7Tausendfreund T. Coaching families with multiple problems: care activities and outcomes of the flexible family support programme Ten for the Future. Groningen, the Netherlands: University of Groningen; 2015.
    Back to article
  8. 8Cleek EN, Wofsy M, Boyd-Franklin N, Mundy B, Howell TJ. The Family Empowerment Program: an interdisciplinary approach to working with multi-stressed urban families. Family Process. 2012; 51(2): 207–217. DOI: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2012.01392.x
    Back to article
  9. 9Sousa R. The collaborative professional: towards empowering vulnerable families. Journal of Social Work Practice. 2012; 26(4): 411–425. DOI: 10.1080/02650533.2012.668878
    Back to article
  10. 10Tausendfreund T, Knot-Dickscheit J, Schulze GC, Knorth EJ, Grietens H. Families in multi-problem situations: backgrounds, characteristics, and care services. Child and Youth Services. 2016; 37(1): 4–22. DOI: 10.1080/0145935X.2015.1052133
    Back to article
  11. 11Kelly LM, Knowles JM. The integrated care team: a practice model in child and family services. Journal of Family Social Work. 2015; 18(5): 382–395. DOI: 10.1080/10522158.2015.1101728
    Back to article
  12. 12Goerge W. Understanding vulnerable families in multiple service systems. Understanding vulnerable families. The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences. 2019; 5(2): 86–104. DOI: 10.7758/rsf.2019.5.2.05
    Back to article
  13. 13Sacco FC, Twemlow SW, Fonagy P. Secure attachment to family and community. Smith College Studies in Social Work. 2008; 77(4): 31–51. DOI: 10.1300/J497v77n04_03
    Back to article
  14. 14World Health Organization (WHO). Integrated care models: an overview. Working document. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2016. (PDF) Integrated care models: an overview. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2016. (researchgate.net)
    Back to article
  15. 15Bruce D, Parry B. Integrated care: a Scottish perspective. International Journal of Primary Care. 2016; 7(3): 44–48. DOI: 10.1080/17571472.2015.11494376
    Back to article
  16. 16Evers S, Paulus ATG. Health economics and integrated care: a growing and challenging relationship. International Journal of Integrated Care. 2015; 15. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.2201
    Back to article
  17. 17Lewis M. Integrated care in Wales: a summary position. London Journal of Primary Care. 2016; 7(3): 49–54. DOI: 10.1080/17571472.2015.11494377
    Back to article
  18. 18Spicer J. Integrated care in the UK: variations on a theme? London Journal of Primary Care. 2016; 7(3): 41–43. DOI: 10.1080/17571472.2015.11494375
    Back to article
  19. 19Kozlowska O, Lumb A, Tan GD, Rea R. Barriers and facilitators to integrating primary and specialist healthcare in the United Kingdom: a narrative literature review. Future healthcare journal. 2018 Feb; 5(1): 64. DOI: 10.7861/futurehosp.5-1-64
    Back to article
  20. 20Eastwood J, Barmaky S, Hansen S, Millere E, Ratcliff S, Fotheringham P, et al. Refining program theory for a place-based integrated care initiative in Sydney, Australia. International Journal of Integrated Care. 2020; 20: 13. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.5422
    Back to article
  21. 21Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA Extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2018; 169(7): 467. DOI: 10.7326/M18-0850
    Back to article
  22. 22Colquhoun HL, Levac D, O’Brien KK, Straus S, Tricco AC, Perrier L, et al. Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2014; 67(12): 1291–1294. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013
    Back to article
  23. 23Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2005; 8(1): 19–32. DOI: 10.1080/1364557032000119616
    Back to article
  24. 24Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation Science. 2010; 5: 69. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
    Back to article
  25. 25da Costa Santos CM, de Mattos Pimenta CA, Nobre MR. The PICO strategy for the research question construction and evidence search. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2007; 15: 508–11. 11. Minayo MCS, Souza. DOI: 10.1590/S0104-11692007000300023
    Back to article
  26. 26Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews. 2016; 5: 1. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
    Back to article
  27. 27Treloar C, Champness S, Simpson PL, Higginbotham N. Critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research studies. Indian Journal of Pediatrics. 2000; 67(5): 347–351. DOI: 10.1007/BF02820685
    Back to article
  28. 28Butcher NJ, Monsour A, Mew EJ, Chan AW, Moher D, Mayo-Wilson E, Terwee CB, Chee-A-Tow A, Baba A, Gavin F, Grimshaw JM, Kelly LE, Saeed L, Thabane L, Askie L, Smith M, Farid-Kapadia M, Williamson PR, Szatmari P, Tugwell P, Golub RM, Monga S, Vohra S, Marlin S, Ungar WJ, Offringa M. Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Reports: The CONSORT-Outcomes 2022 Extension. JAMA. 2022; 328(22): 2252–2264. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.21022
    Back to article
  29. 29Serbati S, Ius M, Milani P. PIPPI Programme of Intervention for Prevention of Institutionalization. Capturing the evidence of an innovative programme of family support. Revista de cercetare si interventie sociala. 2016; 52.
    Back to article
  30. 30Eastwood J, Barmaky S, Hansen S, Millere E, Ratcliff S, Fotheringham P, et al. Refining program theory for a place-based integrated care initiative in Sydney, Australia. International Journal of Integrated Care. 2020; 20: 13. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.5422
    Back to article
  31. 31Eastwood JG, Dewhurst S, Hansen S, Tennant E, Miller E, Moensted ML, et al. Care coordination for vulnerable families in the Sydney local health district: what works for whom, under what circumstances, and why? International Journal of Integrated Care. 2020; 20: 22. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.5437
    Back to article
  32. 32Tennant E, Miller E, Costantino K, De Souza D, Coupland H, Fotheringham P, et al. A critical realist evaluation of an integrated care project for vulnerable families in Sydney, Australia. BMC Health Services Research. 2020; 995. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05818-x
    Back to article
  33. 33Nooteboom LA, Kuiper CHZ, Mulder EA, Roetman PJ, Eilander J, Vermeiren RRJM. What do parents expect in the 21st century? A qualitative analysis of integrated youth care. International Journal of Integrated Care. 2020; 20(3): 1–13. DOI: 10.1186/s13034-020-00321-x
    Back to article
  34. 34Morris K. Troubled families: vulnerable families’ experiences of multiple service use. Child Family Social Work. 2013; 18(2): 198–206. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2011.00822.x
    Back to article
  35. 35Bachler E, Frühmann A, Bachler H, Aas B, Strunk G, Nickel M. Differential effects of the working alliance in family therapeutic home-based treatment of multi-problem families. Journal of Family Therapy. 2016; 38(1): 120–148. DOI: 10.1111/1467-6427.12063
    Back to article
  36. 36Onyskiw JE, Harrison MJ, Spady D, McConnan L. Formative evaluation of a collaborative community-based child abuse prevention project. Child Abuse & Neglect. 1999; 23(11): 1069–1081. DOI: 10.1016/S0145-2134(99)00080-0
    Back to article
  37. 37Sousa L. Building on personal networks when intervening with multi- problem poor families. Journal of Social Work Practice. 2005; 19(2): 163–179. DOI: 10.1080/02650530500144766
    Back to article
  38. 38Van Lawick J, Bom H. Building bridges: home visits to multi-stressed families where professional help reached a deadlock. Journal of Family Therapy. 2008; 30(4): 504–516. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6427.2008.00435.x
    Back to article
  39. 39Bachler E, Fruehmann A, Bachler H, Aas B, Nickel M, Schiepek GK. Patterns of change in collaboration are associated with baseline characteristics and predict outcome and dropout rates in treatment of multi-problem families. A validation study. Frontiers in Psychology. 2017; 8. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01221
    Back to article
  40. 40Thoburn J, Cooper N, Brandon M, Connolly S. The place of “think family“ approaches in child and family social work: messages from a process evaluation of an English pathfinder service. Children and Youth Services Review. 2013; 35(2): 228–236. DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.11.009
    Back to article
  41. 41Nooteboom LA, van den Driesschen SI, Kuiper CHZ, Vermeiren RRJM, Mulder EA. An integrated approach to meet the needs of high-vulnerable families: a qualitative study on integrated care from a professional perspective. Child Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health. 2020; 14(18). DOI: 10.1186/s13034-020-00321-x
    Back to article
  42. 42Sousa L, Rodrigues S. Linking formal and informal support in multiproblem low-income families: the role of the family manager. Journal of Community Psychology. 2009; 37(5): 649–662. DOI: 10.1002/jcop.20313
    Back to article
  43. 43Nadeau L, Jaimes A, Rousseau C, Papazian-Zohrabian G, Germain K, Broadhurst J, Battaglini A, Measham T. Partnership at the forefront of change: documenting the transformation of child and youth mental health services in Quebec. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2012; 21(2): 91–97.
    Back to article
  44. 44Tausendfreund T, Knot-Dickscheit J, Post WJ, Knorth EJ, Grietens H. Outcomes of a coaching program for families with multiple problems in the Netherlands: a prospective study. Children and Youth Services Review. 2014; 46: 203–212. DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.08.024
    Back to article
  45. 45Stabler L, O’Donnell C, Forrester D, Diaz C, Willis S, Brand S. Shared decision-making: What is good practice in delivering meetings? Involving families meaningfully in decision-making to keep children safely at home: A rapid realist review.
    Back to article
  46. 46Lonne B, Higgins D, Herrenkohl TI, Scott D. Reconstructing the workforce within public health protective systems: Improving resilience, retention, service responsiveness and outcomes. Child abuse & Neglect. 2020; 110: 104191. DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104191
    Back to article
  47. 47Bodden DHM, Deković M. Multiproblem Families Referred to Youth Mental Health: What’s in a Name? Family process. 2016; 55(1): 31–47. DOI: 10.1111/famp.12144
    Back to article
  48. 48Fernandez E. Supporting children and responding to their families: Capturing the evidence on family support. Children and youth services review. 2007; 29(10): 1368–1394. DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.05.012
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.7768 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Oct 31, 2023
Accepted on: Aug 1, 2024
Published on: Aug 7, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
families with multiple and complex problems,
multi-problem families,
integrated social care,
integrated care,
multi-agency working,
interdisciplinary collaboration,
fragmentation of care

© 2024 Marcel van Eck, Roelof Ettema, Mariëlle Cloin, Tine Van Regenmortel, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 24 (2024): Issue 3Next article