Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Comparative Study on the Satisfaction of Healthcare Service Providers with the Synergistic Development of Rural Healthcare Systems in China: Medical Alliance Counties vs. Non-Medical Alliance Counties Cover

Comparative Study on the Satisfaction of Healthcare Service Providers with the Synergistic Development of Rural Healthcare Systems in China: Medical Alliance Counties vs. Non-Medical Alliance Counties

Open Access
|Jun 2024

Figures & Tables

ijic-24-2-7677-g1.png
Figure 1

Interests of healthcare service providers in Cross-institutional Synergistic Development.

Table 1

Satisfaction scores of Lead County Hospital Managers.

GROUPSAMPLE SIZEOVERALL SATISFACTION WITH CROSS-INSTITUTIONAL SYNERGISTIC DEVELOPMENTSATISFACTION WITH CROSS-INSTITUTIONAL SYNERGISTIC DEVELOPMENT CAPACITY ENHANCEMENTSATISFACTION WITH CROSS-INSTITUTIONAL SYNERGISTIC STRUCTURE AND RESOURCE INTEGRATION
medical alliance group48  4.85(0.77)  4.82(0.79)  4.65(1.00)
non-medical alliance group27  4.38(1.00)  4.40(1.00)  4.35(1.00)
Z value–1.224–0.902–1.321
P-value  0.221  0.367  0.186
Table 2

Satisfaction Scores of Member Institution Managers.

GROUPSAMPLE SIZEOVERALL SATISFACTION WITH CROSS-INSTITUTIONAL SYNERGISTIC DEVELOPMENTSATISFACTION WITH CROSS-INSTITUTIONAL SYNERGISTIC DEVELOPMENT CAPACITY ENHANCEMENTSATISFACTION WITH CROSS-INSTITUTIONAL SYNERGISTIC STRUCTURE AND RESOURCE INTEGRATION
medical alliance group281  4.33(1.10)  4.36(1.00)  4.02(1.23)
non-medical alliance group85  4.01(1.72)  4.00(1.67)  4.00(2.00)
Z value–2.590–2.839–2.023
P-value  0.010***  0.005***  0.043**

[i] Note: ** P < 0.05, *** P < 0.01.

Table 3

Satisfaction Scores of Medical Staff in the Lead County Hospitals.

GROUPSAMPLE SIZEOVERALL SATISFACTION WITH CROSS-INSTITUTIONAL SYNERGISTIC DEVELOPMENTSATISFACTION WITH A SUPPORTIVE ENVIRONMENT AND HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENTSATISFACTION WITH CROSS-INSTITUTIONAL SYNERGISTIC DEVELOPMENT CAPABILITY ENHANCEMENT
medical alliance group217  4.01(1.42)  4.00(1.57)  4.22(1.32)
non-medical alliance group77  3.90(1.27)  4.00(1.41)  4.00(1.19)
Z value–0.35–0.46–0.01
P-value  0.729  0.646  0.992
Table 4

Satisfaction scores of the Medical Staff in Member Institutions.

GROUPSAMPLE SIZEOVERALL SATISFACTION WITH CROSS-INSTITUTIONAL SYNERGISTIC DEVELOPMENTSATISFACTION WITH A SUPPORTIVE ENVIRONMENTSATISFACTION WITH CROSS-INSTITUTIONAL SYNERGISTIC DEVELOPMENT CAPACITY ENHANCEMENTSATISFACTION WITH HEALTHCARE SERVICE INTEGRATIONSATISFACTION WITH HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
medical alliance group764  4.00(1.28)  4.00(1.32)  4.00(1.38)  4.00(1.37)  4.00(1.70)
non-medical alliance group276  3.93(0.88)  3.92(0.77)  3.87(1.00)  3.86(1.14)  3.82(1.00)
Z value–4.90–4.81–5.14–4.84–4.13
P-value  P < 0.001***  P < 0.001***  P < 0.001***  P < 0.001***  P < 0.001***

[i] Note: *** P < 0.01.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.7677 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Language: English
Submitted on: Jun 5, 2023
Accepted on: Jun 10, 2024
Published on: Jun 20, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2024 Meng Zhang, XiaoNan Du, GeGe Jia, QingYun Xia, YanYun Xu, Jvxiao Wu, YiLin He, Jian Wu, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.