Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Inter-Disciplinary Work in the Context of Integrated Care – a Theoretical and Methodological Framework Cover

Inter-Disciplinary Work in the Context of Integrated Care – a Theoretical and Methodological Framework

International Journal of Integrated Care
Volume 23 (2023): Issue 1
By: Niamh Lennox-Chhugani  
Open Access
|Jun 2023

References

  1. 1Singer SJ, Kerrissey M, Friedberg M, Phillips R. A Comprehensive Theory of Integration. Med Care Res Rev. 2020 Apr; 77(2): 196–207. DOI: 10.1177/1077558718767000
    Back to article
  2. 2Lennox-Chhugani N. Integrated Care – Defining for the Future through the Eye of the Beholder. International Journal of Integrated Care. 2021 Sep 20; 21(3): 13. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.6427
    Back to article
  3. 3Lalani M, Bussu S, Marshall M. Understanding integrated care at the frontline using organisational learning theory: A participatory evaluation of multi-professional teams in East London. Social Science & Medicine. 2020 Oct; 262: 113254. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113254
    Back to article
  4. 4Lewis RQ, Checkland K, Durand MA, Ling T, Mays N, Roland M, et al. Integrated Care in England – what can we Learn from a Decade of National Pilot Programmes? International Journal of Integrated Care. 2021 Oct 29; 21(4): 5. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.5631
    Back to article
  5. 5Jelphs K, Dickinson H. Working in teams. Bristol, England: Policy Press in association with Community Care. 2008; 126 p. (Better partnership working series).
    Back to article
  6. 6van der Aa MJ, van den Broeke JR, Stronks K, Busschers WB, Plochg T. Measuring renewed expertise for integrated care among health- and social-care professionals: Development and preliminary validation of the ICE-Q questionnaire. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2016 Jan 2; 30(1): 56–64. DOI: 10.3109/13561820.2015.1057271
    Back to article
  7. 7O’Donnell D, O’Donoghue G, Ní Shé É, O’Shea M, Donnelly S. Developing competence in interprofessional collaboration within integrated care teams for older people in the Republic of Ireland: A starter kit. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2023 May 4; 37(3): 480–90. DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2022.2075332
    Back to article
  8. 8Oostra DL, Fierkens C, Alewijnse MEJ, Olde Rikkert MGM, Nieuwboer MS, Perry M. Implementation of interprofessional digital communication tools in primary care for frail older adults: An interview study. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2023 May 4; 37(3): 362–70. DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2022.2086858
    Back to article
  9. 9Janse B, Huijsman R, De Kuyper RDM, Fabbricotti IN. Delivering Integrated Care to the Frail Elderly: The Impact on Professionals’ Objective Burden and Job Satisfaction. Int J Integr Care. 2016 Aug 17; 16(3): 7. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.2014
    Back to article
  10. 10Best S, Williams S. Professional identity in interprofessional teams: findings from a scoping review. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2019 Mar 4; 33(2): 170–81. DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2018.1536040
    Back to article
  11. 11Kumpunen S, Edwards N, Georghiou T, Hughes G. Why do evaluations of integrated care not produce the results we expect? International Journal of Care Coordination. 2020 Mar; 23(1): 9–13. DOI: 10.1177/2053434520909089
    Back to article
  12. 12Francetic I, Gibson J, Spooner S, Checkland K, Sutton M. Skill-mix change and outcomes in primary care: Longitudinal analysis of general practices in England 2015–2019. Social Science & Medicine. 2022 Sep; 308: 115224. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115224
    Back to article
  13. 13Hughes G, Shaw SE, Greenhalgh T. Rethinking Integrated Care: A Systematic Hermeneutic Review of the Literature on Integrated Care Strategies and Concepts. Milbank Quarterly. 2020 Jun; 98(2): 446–92. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12459
    Back to article
  14. 14Xyrichis A, Ream E. Teamwork: a concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2008 Jan; 61(2): 232–41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04496.x
    Back to article
  15. 15D’Amour D, Ferrada-Videla M, San Martin Rodriguez L, Beaulieu MD. The conceptual basis for interprofessional collaboration: Core concepts and theoretical frameworks. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2005 May; 19(sup1): 116–31. DOI: 10.1080/13561820500082529
    Back to article
  16. 16Morgan S, Pullon S, McKinlay E. Observation of interprofessional collaborative practice in primary care teams: An integrative literature review. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2015 Jul; 52(7): 1217–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.03.008
    Back to article
  17. 17Schot E, Tummers L, Noordegraaf M. Working on working together. A systematic review on how healthcare professionals contribute to interprofessional collaboration. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2020 May 3; 34(3): 332–42. DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2019.1636007
    Back to article
  18. 18Mulvale G, Embrett M, Razavi SD. ‘Gearing Up’ to improve interprofessional collaboration in primary care: a systematic review and conceptual framework. BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Dec; 17(1): 83. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-016-0492-1
    Back to article
  19. 19Reeves S, Pelone F, Harrison R, Goldman J, Zwarenstein M. Interprofessional collaboration to improve professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group, editor. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews [Internet]. 2017 Jun 22 [cited 2023 Jun 2]; 2018(8). DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000072.pub3
    Back to article
  20. 20Reeves S, Xyrichis A, Zwarenstein M. Teamwork, collaboration, coordination, and networking: Why we need to distinguish between different types of interprofessional practice. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2018 Jan 2; 32(1): 1–3. DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2017.1400150
    Back to article
  21. 21Xyrichis A, Reeves S, Zwarenstein M. Examining the nature of interprofessional practice: An initial framework validation and creation of the InterProfessional Activity Classification Tool (InterPACT). Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2018 Jul 4; 32(4): 416–25. DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2017.1408576
    Back to article
  22. 22Ries NM. Conceptualizing interprofessional working – when a lawyer joins the healthcare mix. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2021 Nov 2; 35(6): 953–62. DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2020.1856799
    Back to article
  23. 23Hofhuis J, Mensen M, ten Den LM, van den Berg AM, Koopman-Draijer M, van Tilburg MC, et al. Does functional diversity increase effectiveness of community care teams? The moderating role of shared vision, interaction frequency, and team reflexivity. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2018 Oct; 48(10): 535–48. DOI: 10.1111/jasp.12533
    Back to article
  24. 24Pomare C, Long JC, Ellis LA, Churruca K, Braithwaite J. Interprofessional collaboration in mental health settings: a social network analysis. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2019 Sep 3; 33(5): 497–503. DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2018.1544550
    Back to article
  25. 25Craig SL, Eaton AD, Belitzky M, Kates LE, Dimitropoulos G, Tobin J. Empowering the team: A social work model of interprofessional collaboration in hospitals. Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice. 2020 Jun; 19: 100327. DOI: 10.1016/j.xjep.2020.100327
    Back to article
  26. 26Pascucci D, Sassano M, Nurchis MC, Cicconi M, Acampora A, Park D, et al. Impact of interprofessional collaboration on chronic disease management: Findings from a systematic review of clinical trial and meta-analysis. Health Policy. 2021 Feb; 125(2): 191–202. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.12.006
    Back to article
  27. 27Khan AI, Barnsley J, Harris JK, Wodchis WP. Examining the extent and factors associated with interprofessional teamwork in primary care settings. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2022 Jan 2; 36(1): 52–63. DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2021.1874896
    Back to article
  28. 28Mangan C, Miller R, Ward C. Knowing me, knowing you: Inter-professional working between general practice and social care. Journal of Integrated Care. 2015 Apr 20; 23(2): 62–73. DOI: 10.1108/JICA-02-2015-0010
    Back to article
  29. 29O’Carroll V, McSwiggan L, Campbell M. Practice educators’ attitudes and perspectives of interprofessional collaboration and interprofessional practice learning for students: A mixed-methods case study. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2019 Sep 3; 33(5): 414–23. DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2018.1551865
    Back to article
  30. 30Hughes G, Shaw SE, Greenhalgh T. Why doesn’t integrated care work? Using Strong Structuration Theory to explain the limitations of an English case. Sociology Health & Illness. 2022 Jan; 44(1): 113–29. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.13398
    Back to article
  31. 31Comeau-Vallée M, Langley A. The Interplay of Inter- and Intraprofessional Boundary Work in Multidisciplinary Teams. Organization Studies. 2020 Dec; 41(12): 1649–72. DOI: 10.1177/0170840619848020
    Back to article
  32. 32Quinlan E. The ‘actualities’ of knowledge work: an institutional ethnography of multi-disciplinary primary health care teams. Sociology of Health & Illness. 2009 Jul; 31(5): 625–41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01167.x
    Back to article
  33. 33Langley A, Lindberg K, Mørk BE, Nicolini D, Raviola E, Walter L. Boundary Work among Groups, Occupations, and Organizations: From Cartography to Process. ANNALS. 2019 Jul; 13(2): 704–36. DOI: 10.5465/annals.2017.0089
    Back to article
  34. 34Tong R, Brewer M, Flavell H, Roberts LD. Professional and interprofessional identities: a scoping review. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2020 Feb 13; 1–9. DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2020.1713063
    Back to article
  35. 35Currie G, Finn R, Martin G. Role Transition and the Interaction of Relational and Social Identity: New Nursing Roles in the English NHS. Organization Studies. 2010 Jul; 31(7): 941–61. DOI: 10.1177/0170840610373199
    Back to article
  36. 36Tajfel H, Turner JC. The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behaviour. In: Psychology of Intergroup Relations. 2nd ed. Chicago: Nelson-Hall Publishers. 1986; 7–24.
    Back to article
  37. 37Albert S, Ashforth BE, Dutton JE. Organizational Identity and Identification: Charting New Waters and Building New Bridges. AMR. 2000 Jan; 25(1): 13–7. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2000.2791600
    Back to article
  38. 38Wood A, Copley J, Hill A, Cottrell N. Interprofessional identity in clinicians: A scoping review. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2022 Jul 26; 1–12. DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2022.2086222
    Back to article
  39. 39Khalili H, Orchard C. The effects of an IPS-based IPE program on interprofessional socialization and dual identity development. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2020 Feb 4; 1–11. DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2019.1709427
    Back to article
  40. 40Lusardi R, Tomelleri S. Phenomenology of health and social care integration in Italy. Current Sociology. 2018 Nov; 66(7): 1031–48. DOI: 10.1177/0011392117737821
    Back to article
  41. 41Rousseau DM. Why workers still identify with organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 1998; 19(3): 217–33. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3100169. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199805)19:3<;217::AID-JOB931>3.0.CO;2-N
    Back to article
  42. 42Clegg SR, Rhodes C, Kornberger M. Desperately Seeking Legitimacy: Organizational Identity and Emerging Industries. Organization Studies. 2007 Apr; 28(4): 495–513. DOI: 10.1177/0170840606067995
    Back to article
  43. 43Clegg S, Baumeler C. From Iron Cages to Liquid Modernity in Organization Analysis. Organization Studies. 2010 Dec; 31(12): 1713–33. DOI: 10.1177/0170840610387240
    Back to article
  44. 44Corley KG, Gioia DA. Identity Ambiguity and Change in the Wake of a Corporate Spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly. 2004 Jun; 49(2): 173–208. DOI: 10.2307/4131471
    Back to article
  45. 45Dick R, Ullrich J, Tissington PA. Working Under a Black Cloud: How to Sustain Organizational Identification after a Merger. Br J Management. 2006 Mar; 17(S1): S69–79. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00479.x
    Back to article
  46. 46Mitchell RJ, Parker V, Giles M. When do interprofessional teams succeed? Investigating the moderating roles of team and professional identity in interprofessional effectiveness. Human Relations. 2011 Oct; 64(10): 1321–43. DOI: 10.1177/0018726711416872
    Back to article
  47. 47Pratt MG, Rafaeli A. Organisational dress as a symbol of multilayered social identities. Academy of Management Journal. 1997 Aug 1; 40(4): 862–98. DOI: 10.5465/256951
    Back to article
  48. 48Alvesson M, Willmott H. Identity Regulation as Organizational Control: Producing the Appropriate Individual. J Management Studs. 2002 Jul; 39(5): 619–44. DOI: 10.1111/1467-6486.00305
    Back to article
  49. 49Dukerich JM, Golden BR, Shortell SM. Beauty is in the Eye of the Beholder: The Impact of Organizational Identification, Identity, and Image on the Cooperative Behaviors of Physicians. Administrative Science Quarterly. 2002 Sep; 47(3): 507–33. DOI: 10.2307/3094849
    Back to article
  50. 50Chreim S, Williams BE (Bernie), Hinings CR (Bob). Interlevel Influences on the Reconstruction of Professional Role Identity. AMJ. 2007 Dec; 50(6): 1515–39. DOI: 10.5465/amj.2007.28226248
    Back to article
  51. 51Moncatar TRT, Nakamura K, Siongco KLL, Seino K, Carlson R, Canila CC, et al. Interprofessional collaboration and barriers among health and social workers caring for older adults: a Philippine case study. Hum Resour Health. 2021 Dec; 19(1): 52. DOI: 10.1186/s12960-021-00568-1
    Back to article
  52. 52Øydgard GW. The influence of institutional discourses on the work of informal carers: an institutional ethnography from the perspective of informal carers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Dec; 17(1): 631. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2591-7
    Back to article
  53. 53Folkman AK, Tveit B, Sverdrup S. Leadership in interprofessional collaboration in health care. JMDH. 2019 Jan; 12: 97–107. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S189199
    Back to article
  54. 54Hindess B. Discourses of power: from Hobbes to Foucault. Oxford, UK; Cambridge, Mass., USA: Blackwell Publishers. 1996; 183 p. ISBN 978-0-631-19092-9 978-0-631-19093-6.
    Back to article
  55. 55Clegg S, Courpasson D, Phillips N. Power and Organizations. United Kingdom: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2006 [cited 2023 Jun 2]. ISBN 978-0-7619-4392-1 978-1-4462-1571-5.
    Back to article
  56. 56Alvesson M, Sköldberg K. Reflexive methodology: new vistas for qualitative research. London; Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE. 2000; 319 p. ISBN 978-0-8039-7706-8 978-0-8039-7707-5.
    Back to article
  57. 57Delbridge R, Ezzamel M. The Strength of Difference: Contemporary Conceptions of Control. Organization. 2005 Sep; 12(5): 603–18. DOI: 10.1177/1350508405055937
    Back to article
  58. 58Kärreman D, Alvesson M. Resisting resistance: Counter-resistance, consent and compliance in a consultancy firm. Human Relations. 2009 Aug; 62(8): 1115–44. DOI: 10.1177/0018726709334880
    Back to article
  59. 59Foucault M. From Discipline and Punish. 1977. In: Haugaard M (ed.). Power: a reader. Manchester, UK; New York, NY: Manchester University Press. 2002; 341 p. ISBN 978-0-7190-5728-1 978-0-7190-5729-8.
    Back to article
  60. 60Callon M. Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. The Sociological Review. 1984 May; 32(1_suppl): 196–233. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00113.x
    Back to article
  61. 61Clegg S. Frameworks of Power. United Kingdom: SAGE Publications Ltd; 1989. ISBN 978-0-8039-8161-4 978-1-4462-7926-7.
    Back to article
  62. 62Anderson M, Charlesworth A, Mossialos E. Understanding personal health budgets. BMJ. 2020 Feb 3; m324. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m324
    Back to article
  63. 63Smith DE. Institutional ethnography: a sociology for people. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press. 2005; 1 p. (The gender lens series). ISBN 978-0-7591-1481-4.
    Back to article
  64. 64Ng SL, Bisaillon L, Webster F. Blurring the boundaries: using institutional ethnography to inquire into health professions education and practice. Med Educ. 2017 Jan; 51(1): 51–60. DOI: 10.1111/medu.13050
    Back to article
  65. 65Hardy C, Phillips N, Clegg S. Reflexivity in Organization and Management Theory: A Study of the Production of the Research ‘Subject’. Human Relations. 2001 May; 54(5): 531–60. DOI: 10.1177/0018726701545001
    Back to article
  66. 66Knights D, Willmott H. Power and Identity in Theory and Practice. The Sociological Review. 1985 Feb; 33(1): 22–46. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1985.tb00786.x
    Back to article
  67. 67Rowland E, Manogaran M, Bourgeault IL. Institutional ethnography as a unique tool for improving health systems. Healthc Manage Forum. 2019 May; 32(3): 143–7. DOI: 10.1177/0840470418823220
    Back to article
  68. 68Nurjono M, Yoong J, Yap P, Wee SL, Vrijhoef HJM. Implementation of Integrated Care in Singapore: A Complex Adaptive System Perspective. International Journal of Integrated Care. 2018 Oct 16; 18(4): 4. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.4174
    Back to article
  69. 69Hughes G, Shaw SE, Greenhalgh T. Why doesn’t integrated care work? Using Strong Structuration Theory to explain the limitations of an English case. Sociology Health & Illness. 2022 Jan; 44(1): 113–29. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.13398
    Back to article
  70. 70Hughes G. Experiences of integrated care: reflections on tensions of size, scale and perspective between ethnography and evaluation. Anthropology & Medicine. 2019 Jan 2; 26(1): 33–47. DOI: 10.1080/13648470.2018.1507105
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.7544 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Dec 13, 2022
Accepted on: Jun 6, 2023
Published on: Jun 19, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
integrated care,
inter-disciplinary teams,
knowledge creation,
identity,
power relations,
social process,
institutional ethnography

© 2023 Niamh Lennox-Chhugani, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 23 (2023): Issue 1Next article