Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Early Impact of the People-centred Integrated Care on the Hypertension Management in Shenzhen Cover

The Early Impact of the People-centred Integrated Care on the Hypertension Management in Shenzhen

Open Access
|Feb 2023

Figures & Tables

ijic-23-1-6539-g1.png
Figure 1

Flow chart of the recruitment plan for hypertensive patients in routine care communities and integrated care communities.

Note: CHC: community health centre.

Table 1

Comparison of basic and clinical characteristics of participants with hypertension from the integrated care and the routine care communities.

CHARACTERISTICSROUTINE CARE COMMUNITIESINTEGRATED CARE COMMUNITIESχ2/ZP
Sociodemographic
Men, n (%)346 (59.35)746 (55.14)2.9390.087
Age, year58.5 (50–66)57.0 (49–64)2.7490.006
Education, n (%)1.4320.489
    Middle school or below245 (42.39)558 (41.27)
    High school192 (33.22)486 (35.95)
    College degree or above141 (24.39)308 (22.78)
Married/Cohabitating, n (%)528 (90.88)1251 (92.53)1.5120.219
Occupation, n (%)1.9270.588
    Worker36 (6.02)106 (7.84)
    Salaried employee144 (24.78)336 (24.85)
    Self-employed45 (7.75)111 (8.21)
    Retiree or other356 (61.27)799 (59.10)
Current drinker, n (%)154 (26.46)344 (25.44)0.2200.639
Current smoker, n (%)191 (32.76)394 (29.12)2.5620.110
Household income per capita, Ұ/month, n (%)8.3440.015
    ≤5000283 (61.79)706 (57.21)
    5001–10000133 (29.04)350 (28.36)
    >1000042 (9.17)178 (14.42)
Medical insurance, n (%)22.71<0.0001
    First grade358 (61.41)767 (56.69)
    Second grade83 (14.24)192 (14.19)
    Third grade32 (5.49)44 (3.25)
    Self-paying or other110 (18.87)350 (25.87)
The usual source of care, n (%)28.154<0.0001
    CHCs458 (79.38)1157 (85.64)
    Public hospital76 (13.17)161 (11.92)
    Private hospital or other43 (7.45)33 (2.44)
Clinical
Comorbidity status, n (%)261 (44.77)569 (42.05)1.2250.268
BMI, kg/m225.8 (23.6–27.9)25.6 (23.7–27.8)0.3640.716
WC, cm90.6 (84.4–96.5)90.0 (83.6–95.7)1.9480.051
SBP, mmHg136.0 (127.0–146.0)137.0 (127.3–147.3)–0.9700.332
DBP, mmHg82.0 (77.3–97.3)84.3 (77.3–91.0)–1.4830.138
FPG, mmol/L5.9 (5.4–6.7)5.6 (5.2–6.3)5.407<0.0001
    With diabetes7.3 (6.2–8.9)7.2 (6.4–8.2)0.9140.361
    Without diabetes5.7 (5.3–6.2)5.4 (5.1–5.9)5.735<0.0001
Scr, umol/L68.0 (57.5–80.0)67.0 (56.0–78.0)1.6180.106
UA, umol/L352 (300–419)354 (298–422)–0.2090.835
TC, mmol/L5.1 (4.4–5.9)5.0 (4.3–5.7)1.5830.114
TG, mmol/L1.4 (1.0–2.1)1.4 (1.0–2.0)1.1170.264
HDL-C, mmol/L1.2 (1.0–1.4)1.2 (1.0–1.4)0.3860.699
ALT, IU/L18.5 (13.0–26.0)20.0 (15.0–29.0)–3.7980.0001
AST, IU/L22.0 (19.0–26.0)22.0 (19.0–26.0)–0.6940.488

[i] Notes:

a) P was calculated by chi-square test (categorical variables) and Wilcoxon test (continuous variables);

b) Continuous variables are presented as medians (25th–75th percentile);

c) CHCs: community health centre; ALT: alanine transferase; AST: aspartate transferase; BMI: body mass index; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; FPG: fasting plasma glucose; HDL-C: high density lipoprotein cholesterol; SBP: systolic blood pressure; Scr: serum creatinine; TC: total cholesterol; TG: triglyceride; UA: uric acid; WC: waist circumference.

Table 2

Hypertension management and control in the integrated care and the routine care communities.

HYPERTENSION MANAGEMENT AND CONTROLROUTINE CARE COMMUNITIESINTEGRATED CARE COMMUNITIESχ2/ZP
Hypertension management
Standardized management, n (%)82 (14.07)619 (45.75)177.09<0.0001
Medication compliance, n (%)
Participants with standardized managementNon-compliance*9 (12.00)13 (2.15)23.249<0.0001
Occasional compliance2 (2.67)54 (8.94)
Complete compliance64 (85.33)537 (88.91)
Participants without standardized managementNon-compliance38 (7.98)44 (6.32)2.4610.292
Occasional compliance54 (11.34)96 (13.79)
Complete compliance384 (80.67)556 (79.89)
Mean BP level and hypertension control rate
All participantsSBP, mmHg137.3 ± 16.0138.0 ± 15.6–1.1940.232
DBP, mmHg83.8 ± 11.284.3± 10.7–1.4830.138
Age-standardized control rate, % (95% CI)52.65 (46.54–58.77)50.30 (46.49–54.10)0.6500.518
Comorbidity status
YesSBP, mmHg137.0 ± 15.5136.5 ± 15.60.2330.816
DBP, mmHg82.2 ± 10.882.3 ± 10.7–0.0430.966
Age-standardized control rate, % (95% CI)56.62 (46.30–66.94)52.76 (46.69–58.82)0.6400.521
NoSBP, mmHg137.5 ± 16.4139.1 ± 15.5–1.6410.101
DBP, mmHg84.9 ± 11.485.7 ± 10.5–1.6970.090
Age-standardized control rate, % (95% CI)50.99 (43.04–58.94)48.81 (43.85–53.76)0.4600.645
Gender
MenSBP, mmHg136.6 ± 15.6137.8 ± 14.9–1.2200.223
DBP, mmHg85.1 ± 11.486.6 ± 10.1–2.4840.013
Age-standardized control rate, % (95% CI)50.89 (43.07–58.71)47.69 (42.58–52.80)0.6800.496
WomenSBP, mmHg138.2 ± 16.5138.2 ± 16.3–0.3450.730
DBP, mmHg81.9 ± 10.881.4 ± 10.70.1400.889
Age-standardized control rate, % (95% CI)55.37 (44.61–66.13)54.36 (48.29–60.44)0.1600.873

[i] Notes:

a) SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval;

b) Variables are mean ± standard deviation unless otherwise indicated;

c) P for hypertension management was calculated by chi-square test, P for SBP/DBP and age-standardized control rate of hypertension was calculated by Wilcoxon test and z-test;

d) * P < 0.0001, Bonferroni-adjusted inspection level of α = 0.0167.

ijic-23-1-6539-g2.png
Figure 2

The monthly pharmaceutical expenditure on hypertension and its comorbidities per capita in the integrated care and the routine care communities.

P was calculated by Chi-square test, and all P < 0.05, except for *.

Table 3

The Knowledge, attitude, and practice scores towards cardiovascular diseases of participants with hypertension from the integrated care and the routine care communities.

KAP scoresRoutine care communitiesIntegrated care communitiest valuesP
All participants
    Knowledge score29.83 ± 8.9232.10 ± 6.35–5.580<0.0001
    Attitude score20.33 ± 5.5621.76 ± 4.36–5.530<0.0001
    Practice score18.73 ± 4.5319.61 ± 4.37–4.000<0.0001
    Total score68.89 ± 15.5173.48 ± 11.54–6.430<0.0001
Participants with standardized management
    Knowledge score29.32 ± 9.2532.64 ± 5.58–3.1800.002
    Attitude score20.55 ± 5.5822.24 ± 3.84–2.6600.009
    Practice score20.03 ± 3.9820.99 ± 3.58–2.0800.040
    Total score69.90 ± 15.4675.88 ± 9.52–3.4200.001
Participants without standardized management
    Knowledge score29.91 ± 8.8831.65 ± 6.90–3.6900.0002
    Attitude score20.29 ± 5.5621.36 ± 4.71–3.5200.0004
    Practice score18.51 ± 4.5818.45 ± 4.630.2300.814
    Total score68.72 ± 15.5271.47 ± 12.66–3.2800.001

[i] Notes:

a) P was calculated by T test;

b) Variables are mean ± standard deviation;

c) KAP: knowledge, attitude, and practice.

ijic-23-1-6539-g3.png
Figure 3

Patients’ satisfaction with health service delivery in the routine care (A) and the integrated care communities (B). P was calculated by χ2 test to compare the difference of 5-point satisfaction between routine care (A) and integrated care communities (B). And all P values were < 0.0001.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.6539 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Language: English
Submitted on: Mar 4, 2022
Accepted on: Jan 24, 2023
Published on: Feb 6, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2023 Feiyan Liu, Fangchao Liu, Jinchun Lin, Jian Wang, Jichun Chen, Jianxin Li, Jianfeng Huang, Dongsheng Hu, Xiangfeng Lu, Xizhuo Sun, Dongfeng Gu, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.