Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Patients’ Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC): Validation and Evaluation of PACIC Scale among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Hungary Cover

Patients’ Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC): Validation and Evaluation of PACIC Scale among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Hungary

International Journal of Integrated Care
Volume 22 (2022): Issue 3
By: Viktória Törő,  Zsigmond Kósa,  Péter Takács,  Róbert Széll,  Sándorné Radó,  Andrea Árokszállási Szelesné,  Adrienn Siket Ujváriné and  Attila Sárváry  
Open Access
|Aug 2022

References

  1. 1World Health Organization: The European health report 2012: charting the way to well-being. WHO; 2013. http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/197113/EHR2012-Eng.pdf?ua=1 (Accessed: 2019. 09. 14.).
    Back to article
  2. 2World Health Organization: Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2014. WHO; 2014. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/148114/9789241564854_eng.pdf;jsessionid=8957D07642D3105E98D5BDDE3EC603A5?sequence=1 (Accessed: 2019. 09. 14.).
    Back to article
  3. 3International Diabetes Fedaration (IDF): IDF Diabetes Atlas. Eight edition. IDF; 2017. https://diabetesatlas.org/resources/2017-atlas.html (Accessed: 2019. 10. 14.)
    Back to article
  4. 4Nemzeti Egészségfejlesztési Intézet (NEFI) (National Health Promotion Institution): Egészségjelentés 2016 [Health Report 2016]. Budapest, NEFI; 2017. http://www.egeszseg.hu/szakmai_oldalak/assets/cikkek/17-05/egeszsegjelentes-2016.pdf (Accessed: 2019. 10. 14.)
    Back to article
  5. 5IDF Hungary – Country report 2017 and 2045. https://reports.instantatlas.com/report/view/704ee0e6475b4af885051bcec15f0e2c/HUN (Accessed: 2019. 10. 14.)
    Back to article
  6. 6Grover A, Joshi A. An overview of chronic disease models: a systematic literature review. Glob J Health Sci. 2015; 7(2): 210–227. DOI: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n2p210
    Back to article
  7. 7Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von Korff M. Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. The Milbank Quarterly. 1996; 511–544. DOI: 10.2307/3350391
    Back to article
  8. 8Bonomi AE, Wagner EH, Glasgow RE, VonKorff M. Assessment of chronic illness care (ACIC): a practical tool to measure quality improvement. Health Serv Res. 2002; 37(3): 791–820. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.00049
    Back to article
  9. 9Glasgow RE, Wagner EH, Schaefer J, et al. Development and validation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC). Med Care. 2005; 43: 436–444. DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000160375.47920.8c
    Back to article
  10. 10Glasgow RE, Whitesides H, Nelson CC, King DK. Use of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) with diabetic patients: relationship to patient characteristics, receipt of care, and self-management. Diabetes Care. 2005; 28(11): 2655–2661. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.28.11.2655
    Back to article
  11. 11Szecsenyi J, Rosemann T, Joos S, Peters-Klimm F, Miksch A. German diabetes disease management programs are appropriate for restructuring care according to the chronic care model: An evaluation with the patient assessment of chronic illness care instrument. Diabetes Care, 2008; 31: 1150–1154. DOI: 10.2337/dc07-2104
    Back to article
  12. 12Wensing M, Van Lieshout J, Jung H, Hermsen J, Rosemann T. The patient assessment chronic illness care (PACIC) questionnaire in the Netherlands: a validation study in rural general practice. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008; 8: 182. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-182
    Back to article
  13. 13Gensichen J, Serras A, Paulitsch MA, et al. The Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care questionnaire: evaluation in patients with mental disorders in primary care. Community Ment Health J. 2011; 47(4): 447–453. DOI: 10.1007/s10597-010-9340-2
    Back to article
  14. 14Cramm JM, Nieboer AP. Factorial validation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) and PACIC short version (PACIC-S) among cardiovascular disease patients in the Netherlands. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012; 10: 104. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-104
    Back to article
  15. 15Aung E, Ostini R, Dower J, et al. Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) in Type 2 Diabetes: A Longitudinal Study. Eval Health Prof. 2016; 39(2): 185–203. DOI: 10.1177/0163278714556674
    Back to article
  16. 16Iglesias K, De Geest S, Berben L, Dobbels F, Denhaerynk K, Russell LC, Helmy R, Peytremann-Bridevaux I, BRIGHT study team. Validation of the patient assessment of chronic illness care (PACIC) short form scale in heart transplant recipients: the international cross-sectional bright study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020; 20(1): 160. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-5003-3
    Back to article
  17. 17Simonsen N, Koponen AM, Suominen S. Patients’ assessment of chronic illness care: a validation study among patients with type 2 diabetes in Finland. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018; 18(1): 412. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3206-7
    Back to article
  18. 18Frei A, Senn O, Huber F, et al. Congruency of diabetes care with the Chronic Care Model in different Swiss health care organisations from the patients’ perspective: a cross sectional study. Swiss Med Wkly. 2014; 144: w13992.
    Back to article
  19. 19Kuznetsov L, Simmons RK, Sandbaek A, Maindal HT. The impact of intensive multifactorial treatment on perceptions of chronic care among individuals with screen-detected diabetes: results from the ADDITION-Denmark trial. Int J Clin Pract. 2015; 69(4): 466–73. DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.12570
    Back to article
  20. 20Drewes HW, de Jong-van Til JT, Struijs JN, et al. Measuring chronic care management experience of patients with diabetes: PACIC and PACIC+ validation. Int J Integr Care. 2012; 12: e194. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.862
    Back to article
  21. 21Arditi C, Iglesias K, Peytremann-Bridevaux I. The use of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) instrument in diabetes care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Qual Health Care. 2018; 30(10): 743–750. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy091
    Back to article
  22. 22Iglesias K, Burnand B, Peytremann-Bridevaux I. PACIC Instrument: disentangling dimensions using published validation models. Int J Qual Health Care. 2014; 26(3): 250–60. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu042
    Back to article
  23. 23Törő V, Sárváry A, Takács P, Barkaszi PA, György L, Kósa Zs. Assessment of Quality Care of Chronic Illness Patients Living in Roma Colonies and in the General Population: a Comparative Study. Central European Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2017; 23(1–2): 58–70.
    Back to article
  24. 24WHO Process of translation and adaptation of instruments https://www.coursehero.com/file/30372721/WHO-Process-of-translation-and-adaptation-of-instrumentspdf/.
    Back to article
  25. 25Andresen EM. Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000; 81(Suppl 2): S15–S20. DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2000.20619
    Back to article
  26. 26Everett B, Salamonson Y, Davidson PM. Bandura’s exercise self-efficacy scale: validation in an Australian cardiac rehabilitation setting. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009; 46: 824–829. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.01.016
    Back to article
  27. 27Terwee CB, Bot S, De Boer M, Windt D, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, De Vet H. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007; 60: 34–42. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
    Back to article
  28. 28Kim SH, Lee BG, Choe YH. Psychometric evaluation of patient assessment of chronic illness care among Korean cancer survivors. PLOS ONE. 2021; 16(8): e0256119. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256119
    Back to article
  29. 29Abdul-Razak S, Ramli AS, Badlishah-Sham SF, Haniff J, for the EMPOWER-PAR Investigators. Validity and reliability of the Patient Assessment on Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) questionnaire: the Malay version. BMC Fam Pract. 2018; 19: 1–11. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-018-0807-5
    Back to article
  30. 30Rick J, Rowe K, Hann M, et al. Psychometric properties of the Patient Assessment Of Chronic Illness Care measure: acceptability, reliability and validity in United Kingdom patients with long-term conditions. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012; 12: 293. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-293
    Back to article
  31. 31Noël PH, Parchman ML, Palmer RF, et al. Alignment of patient and primary care practice member perspectives of chronic illness care: a cross-sectional analysis. BMC Fam Pract. 2014; 15: 57. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-57
    Back to article
  32. 32Gugiu C, Coryn CL, Applegate B. Structure and measurement properties of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care instrument. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010; 16(3): 509–516. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01151.x
    Back to article
  33. 33Taggart J, Chan B, Jayasinghe UW, et al. Patients Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) in two Australian studies: structure and utility. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011; 17(2): 215–221. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01423.x
    Back to article
  34. 34Krucien N, Le Vaillant M, Pelletier-Fleury N. Adaptation and validation of the patient assessment of chronic illness care in the French context. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014; 14: 269. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-269
    Back to article
  35. 35Rosemann T, Korner T, Wensing M, Schneider A, Szecsenyi, J. Evaluation and cultural adaptation of a German version of the AIMS2-SF questionnaire (German AIMS2-SF). Rheumatology (Oxford), 2005; 44: 1190–1195. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh718
    Back to article
  36. 36Fan J, McCoy RG, Ziegenfuss JY, et al. Evaluating the structure of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) survey from the patient’s perspective. Ann Behav Med. 2015; 49(1): 104–111. DOI: 10.1007/s12160-014-9638-3
    Back to article
  37. 37Roskam AJ, Kunst AE, Van Oyen H, et al. Comparative appraisal of educational inequalities in overweight and obesity among adults in 19 European countries. Int J Epidemiol. 2010; 39: 392–404. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyp329
    Back to article
  38. 38Marmot M, Allen J, Bell R, Bloomer E, Goldblatt P. WHO European review of social determinants of health and the health divide. Lancet. 2012 15; 380(9846): 1011–29. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61228-8
    Back to article
  39. 39Patel MR. Social Determinants of Poor Management of Type 2 Diabetes Among the Insured. Curr Diab Rep. 2020; 20(11): 67. DOI: 10.1007/s11892-020-01354-4
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.6010 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Jun 28, 2021
Accepted on: Jul 27, 2022
Published on: Aug 8, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
chronic care model,
primary care,
PACIC,
patient assessment,
quality assessment of chronic illness care,
Type 2 diabetes mellitus,
validation

© 2022 Viktória Törő, Zsigmond Kósa, Péter Takács, Róbert Széll, Sándorné Radó, Andrea Árokszállási Szelesné, Adrienn Siket Ujváriné, Attila Sárváry, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 22 (2022): Issue 3Next article