Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Care Coordinator’s Tasks During the Implementation of an Integrated Care Pathway for Older Patients: A Qualitative Study Based on the French National “Health Pathway of Seniors for Preserved Autonomy” Pilot Program Cover

The Care Coordinator’s Tasks During the Implementation of an Integrated Care Pathway for Older Patients: A Qualitative Study Based on the French National “Health Pathway of Seniors for Preserved Autonomy” Pilot Program

Open Access
|Apr 2022

Figures & Tables

ijic-22-2-5977-g1.png
Figure 1

Methodology of the two complementary study phases (CC: care coordinator, GP: general practitioner; CPh: community pharmacist; HCP: healthcare professional).

Table 1

Task analysis: stakeholder involvement at each step in the integrated care pathway.

STEPPLANNED STAKEHOLDERSACTUAL STAKEHOLDERS
HHCPCCHHCPCC
1. SET-UPXXX==
2. MEDICATION REVIEWX=
3. INITIATION OF A PERSONAL DRUG PLANX(X)=
4. LOCAL CLINICAL COORDINATION TEAMX(X)=
5. ASSESSMENTSX=
6. SUMMARYX
7. IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORINGX
8. CLOSE-DOWNX

[i] X: planned intervention by the stakeholder.

(X): optional intervention by the stakeholder.

↗: unexpectedly involved in a task, or more involved in the task than planned.

↘: less involved in the task than planned.

=: involved to the extent planned.

H: hospital staff; HCP: healthcare professional; CC: care coordinator.

Table 2

A summary of the general practitioners and community pharmacists’ perceptions about the care coordinator’s task.

THE CARE COORDINATOR’S TASKSCOMMUNICATIONCOORDINATIONADMINISTRATIONOTHER TASKS
The general practitioners’
perceptions
Communication about the project: essential, needs to be reinforced

Communication between the healthcare professionals: appreciated

Communication about the patient (summary): to be reinforced
Overall coordination of actions: appreciated

Conflicts of authority, according to some general practitioners
Administrative support: essential, appreciated

Substantial time savings: much appreciated
The issue of physician-patient confidentiality was raised

The lack of an IT platform was highlighted
The community pharmacists’
perceptions
Communication about the project: essential, needs to be reinforced

Communication between the care coordinator and healthcare professionals: generally appreciated but hinders direct communication between community pharmacists and general practitioners.

Meetings attended by all the healthcare professionals were wished for

Communication about the patient (summary): to be reinforced.
Overall coordination of actions: appreciated

Meetings attended by all the healthcare professionals were wished for
Administrative support: appreciated

Substantial time savings: much appreciated
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5977 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Language: English
Submitted on: May 19, 2021
|
Accepted on: Mar 15, 2022
|
Published on: Apr 1, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 L. Douze, C. Di Martino, M. Calafiore, L. Averlant, Ch Peynot, M. Lotin, A. Delesalle, D. Dambre, M. Egot, A. Fabianek, M. M Defebvre, C. Bugny, J. Thébault, F. Puisieux, S. Pelayo, J. B. Beuscart, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.