Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Impact of Payment Reforms on the Quality and Utilisation of Healthcare for Patients With Multimorbidity: A Systematic Review Cover

The Impact of Payment Reforms on the Quality and Utilisation of Healthcare for Patients With Multimorbidity: A Systematic Review

Open Access
|Feb 2022

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Inclusion and exclusion criteria.

INCLUSION CRITERIAEXCLUSION CRITERIA
Study concerns patients with at least one of the selected chronic illnesses (COPD, diabetes, depression, CHF, chronic kidney disease, or dementia) OR explicitly focuses on patients with multimorbidityNo full text available (conference abstract, poster presentation)
The payment reform under study explicitly targets patients with multimorbidity and/or introduces a payment structure that can be beneficial for patients with multimorbidity by stimulating integrated careThe study is not about a payment reform (e.g. organisational reform only)
Peer-reviewed study, retrospective and prospective (e.g. quasi-experimental study; RCT)The payment reform does not stimulate the integrated delivery of care to the patients in that it does not comply with our definition of a targeted payment reform
Outcomes concern both the quality and utilisation of healthcareThe outcomes of the study concern only the quality or utilisation of healthcare
Published since 01/01/2000No original data
Written in English, Dutch

[i] COPD: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, CHF: Chronic heart failure.

ijic-22-1-5937-g1.png
Figure 1

PRISMA flow diagram.

Table 2

Study characteristics.

STUDY & COUNTRY [REFERENCE]TARGET POPULATIONINTERVENTIONPROGRAMME CONTENTSN (INTERVENTION, CONTROL)*1SETTINGDATA COLLECTION PERIODSTUDY TYPE (ANALYSES)OUTCOMES
Bhatt, S.P.
United States [28]
COPDBundle*2Post-acute care bundle: antibiotics, educational materials, interval follow-up, and periodic phone calls78, 109Secondary (hospital) care2012 vs. 2014Cohort study with control group (independent sample statistical tests)HR, EDV, Vis, HC, LoS
Koehler, B.E.
United States [29]
PwMBundleElderly care bundle designed as an intensive patient-centred educational programme. Includes daily visits during hospital stay, standardised phone calls for follow-up appointments and education, and medication verification post discharge22,20Secondary (hospital) care2007Randomised control trial (independent sample statistical test)HR, LoS
Morton, K.
United Kingdom [30]
COPDBundleCOPD discharge bundle: technique (inhalers), action plan, pulmonary rehabilitation, smoking cessation, and specialist follow up.4657, 4515Secondary (hospital) care2013–2017Pre-post study with control group (regression models)Mor, HR, EDV, LoS
Parekh, T.M.
United States [31]
COPDBundle*2Post-acute care bundle: expedited follow-up visits in a COPD focused clinic, home calls, medication assistance, and tobacco cessation counselling.459, 239Secondary (hospital) care2012–2014Cohort study with control group (independent sample statistical tests)Mor, HR, EDV, HC, LoS
Pawaskar, M.
United States [32]
DiabetesCapitationManaged care organisations receive a fixed amount of payment per enrolee per month3763, 4818Primary care,
secondary (hospital) care
1999–2005Cohort study with control group (regression models)ADU, Hos, EDV, Vis
Quinn, A.E.
Canada [33]
Diabetes, CKDCapitationA salary-like payment that covered clinical, research, and teaching
time
15949, 15949Secondary (hospital) care2011–2015Cohort study with matched control group (regression)DRE, Hos, EDV, Vis, HC
Joynt Maddox
United States [21]
CHF, COPD
DRG*2BPCI-model 2 bundle: Participating hospitals assume accountability for the costs of all care within 30, 60, or 90 days after hospitalisation for one or more of 48 conditions226, 407 hospitalsSecondary (hospital) care2013–2015Pre-post study with matched control group (regression models)Mor, HR, EDV, HC, LoS
Kutz, A.
Switzerland [34]
COPDDRGAll costs related to all acute inpatient hospital services19046, 30764Secondary (hospital) care2009–2015Pre-post study without control group (regression models)Mor, HR, LoS
Lichkus, J.
United States [35]
CHFDRG*2, 3One bundled payment per 90-day
episode of care initiated by an anchor admission for CHF exacerbation.
283, 316Secondary (hospital) care2013–2017Pre-post study without control group (t-tests)HR, HC
Maughhan, C.
United States [36]
DementiaDRG*2BPCI-model 2 bundle: Participating hospitals assume accountability for the costs of all care within 30, 60, or 90 days after hospitalisation for one or more of 48 conditions.45007, 45007 episodesSecondary (hospital) care2011–2012 & 2013–2016Pre-post study with matched control group (regression models)Mor, HR, EDV
Salzberg, C.A.
United States [37]
DiabetesGlobal budget*3Primary care practices receive a
monthly, risk-adjusted total payment for the comprehensive care of all patients in the practice
64471, 133345Primary care2008–2013Pre-post study with matched control group (regression models)HR, Hos, EDV, Vis, HC
Cross, D.A.
United States [38]
PwMP4PP4P-programme with incentives linked to 1) Medical Home Practice Transformation, 2) Provider-delivered Care Management, and 3) Practice Quality Assessment17501, 195344Primary care2010–2013Cohort study with control group (regression models)DRE, ADU, HR, Hos, EDV, Vis, HC
Hollander, M.J.
Canada [39]
Diabetes, CHF, COPDP4PP4P-programme with incentives linked to the provision of guidelines-based care to patients with chronic conditions176542, 209064Primary care2010–2011Cohort study with matched control group (paired samples t-test)HR, Hos, HC

[i] *1 Total number included in analyses relevant to this study – patients unless indicated otherwise.

*2 Part of Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) Initiative.

*3 Payment reform is accompanied by an organisational reform.

COPD: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, PwM: Patients with multimorbidity, CHF: Chronic health failure, CKD: Chronic kidney disease.

DRE: Disease related examination(s)/treatment(s), ADU: Appropriate drug use, Mor: Mortality, HR: Hospital readmissions, Hos: Hospitalisations, EDV: Emergency Department Visits, Vis: Visits, HC: Healthcare costs, LoS: Length of Stay.

Table 3

Effects of targeted payment reforms on the quality of care outcomes.

STUDYPAYMENT MODELDISEASE-RELATED EXAMINATION(S)/TREATMENT(S)APPROPRIATE DRUG USEMORTALITYHOSPITAL READMISSIONSRISK OF BIAS
ACDR
Bhatt, S.P.Bundlen.a.n.a.n.a.NoneNoneCritical
Koehler, B.E.Bundlen.a.n.a.n.a.Mixedn.a.Some concerns
Morton, K.Bundlen.a.n.a.NoneNoneNoneModerate
Parekh, T.M.Bundlen.a.n.a.DecreaseNonen.a.Serious
Pawaskar, M.Capitationn.a.Decreasen.a.n.a.n.a.Serious
Quinn, A.E.CapitationNonen.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.Moderate
Joynt Maddox, K.E.DRGn.a.n.a.NoneNonen.a.Serious
Kutz, A.DRGn.a.n.a.NoneNonen.a.Moderate
Lichkus, J.DRG*1n.a.n.a.n.a.Nonen.a.Critical
Maughhan, B.C.DRGn.a.n.a.NoneNonen.a.Moderate
Salzberg, C.A.Global budget *1n.a.n.a.n.a.Nonen.a.Moderate
Cross, D.A.P4PIncreaseIncreasen.a.Decreasen.a.Moderate
Hollander, M.J.P4Pn.a.n.a.n.a.Nonen.a.Serious

[i] AC: All-cause, DR: Disease-related, n.a. Not applicable.

*1 Payment reform is accompanied by an organisational reform.

Increase’ or ‘decrease’ signifies that the study found a significant (p ≤ 0.05) effect in all outcomes related to a specific outcome domain. ‘Mixed’ was used for studies with varying outcomes within one domain. ‘None’ was used for studies that found no statistically significant effect (p ≤ 0.05) for any of the outcomes related to a specific outcome domain or that studies did not report on any significance.

Table 4

Effects of targeted payment reforms on outcomes related to the utilisation of healthcare.

STUDYPAYMENT MODELHOSPITALISATIONSED VISITSVISITSHEALTHCARE COSTSLENGTH OF STAYRISK OF BIAS
ACDRACDRACDRACDR
Bhatt, S.P.Bundlen.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.Nonen.a.n.a.Critical
Koehler, B.E.Bundlen.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.NoneSome concerns
Morton, K.Bundlen.a.n.a.n.a.Nonen.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.NoneModerate
Parekh, T.M.Bundlen.a.n.a.Decreasen.a.n.a.n.a.Decreasen.a.DecreaseSerious
Pawaskar, M.CapitationIncreasen.a.Increasen.a.Decreasen.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.Serious
Quinn, A.E.CapitationNonen.a.Nonen.a.Nonen.a.Nonen.a.n.a.Moderate
Joynt Maddox, K.E.DRGn.a.n.a.Nonen.a.n.a.n.a.Nonen.a.NoneSerious
Kutz, A.DRGn.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.NoneModerate
Lichkus, J.DRG*1n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.Nonen.a.n.a.Critical
Maughhan, B.C.DRGn.a.n.a.Nonen.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.Moderate
Salzberg, C.A.Global budget *1Increasen.a.Nonen.a.Nonen.a.Nonen.a.n.a.Moderate
Cross, D.A.P4PIncreasen.a.Nonen.a.Nonen.a.Nonen.a.n.a.Moderate
Hollander, M.J.P4PNonen.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.Increasen.a.NoneSerious

[i] ED: Emergency Department, AC: All-cause, DR: Disease-related, n.a. Not applicable.

* 1 Payment reform is accompanied by an organisational reform.

Increase’ or ‘decrease’ signifies that the study found a significant (p ≤ 0.05) effect in all outcomes related to a specific outcome domain. ‘Mixed’ was used for studies with varying outcomes within one domain. ‘None’ was used for studies that found no statistically significant effect (p ≤ 0.05) for any of the outcomes related to a specific outcome domain or that studies did not report on any significance.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5937 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 3, 2021
Accepted on: Jan 28, 2022
Published on: Feb 10, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Toine E. P. Remers, Nina Nieuweweme, Simone A. van Dulmen, Marcel Olde Rikkert, Patrick P. T. Jeurissen, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.