Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Impact of ‘Enhanced’ Intermediate Care Integrating Acute, Primary and Community Care and the Voluntary Sector in Torbay and South Devon, UK Cover

Impact of ‘Enhanced’ Intermediate Care Integrating Acute, Primary and Community Care and the Voluntary Sector in Torbay and South Devon, UK

Open Access
|Feb 2022

Figures & Tables

ijic-22-1-5665-g1.png
Figure 1

Data collection and time frames.

Table 1

Estimated unit costs of service use perceived to have been prevented by EIC.

INTERVENTIONS PERCEIVED TO HAVE BEEN PREVENTEDUNIT COST
Acute hospital admission [37]£ 1,590
Emergency Department attendance [37]£ 148
Pro-active hospital discharge [37]£ 313
Emergency & 999 call [37]£ 7
Out-of-hours GP visit [38]£72
GP telephone consultation [39]£14
Residential/nursing home admissionα[39]£155
Adult Social care visit (1 hour) [39]£40
Out-of-hours nursing visit [40]£31
Community hospital admission [41]£140
Intermediate careβ [37]£131

[i] Key: GP = general practitioner.

α: Based on the NHS contribution to a one-day admission, so it is a conservative estimate.

β: Estimated by summing weighted national reference costs for crisis response, home and bed-based care services.

Table 2

Summary of the population size, level of service integration and degree of implementation of the new care model across all five localities between 2016 and 2017.

DEMOGRAPHICS AND CHARACTERISTICS OF EIC BY LOCALITY20152016
COASTALMOOR TO SEANEWTON ABBOTTPAIGNTON & BRIXHAMTORQUAYCOASTALMOOR TO SEANEWTON ABBOTTPAIGNTON & BRIXHAMTORQUAY
Area descriptionTowns/ruralTowns/ruralTownsUrban/sub-urbanUrban/sub-urbanTown/ruralTowns/ruralTownsUrban/sub-urbanUrban/sub-urban
Registered GP population size ≥70 years7,2896,17911,17014,32911,1107,5896,43411,69714,97611,510
Proportion of the population ≥70 years20.4%17.1%16.6%19.6%15.4%21.1%17.7%17.1%20.3%15.9%
Joint management of HSC teamYesYesYesYesαYesαYesYesYesYesααYesα
Joint budgets for HSC teamβYesYesYesYesβYesβYesYesYesYesββYesβ
Single daily MDTYesNoNoNoNoYesYesYesYes – twoYes – two
Single referral process/point of contactγNoγNoγNoγYesYesNoγγNoγNoγYesYes
Integrated health and social care IT recordsδNoNoNoYesYesNoNoNoYesYes
Write access to GP recordsɛYesNoNoNoNoYesNoNoNoNo
Heath and social care coordinatorYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Social worker input daily into MDTYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
GP input daily into MDTYesNoNoNoNoYesYesζNoYesθNo
Pharmacy input daily into MDTYesιNoNoNoNoYesNoNoNoYes
Voluntary sector input daily into MDTYesκNoNoNoNoYesNoNoNoNo
Community MH input daily into MDTYesλNoNoYesYesYesNoNoYesYes
Other input daily into MDTNoNoNoNoNoNoYesYesηNoNo
Community hospital-bed reductions/closuresYesNoNoNoNAYesYesYesYesNA

[i] KEY: EIC = Enhanced Intermediate Care; GP = General practice/practitioner; HSC = Health and social care; MDT = Multi-disciplinary meeting; IT = Information Technology.

Note:

α Since 2002 and then formerly in 2005 with the creation of Torbay Care Trust

β Aligned budgets while building towards Section 75 agreements

γ Social services and health service have a different Single Point Of Contact (SPOC)

δ Integrated community health and social care notes recorded on PARIS

ɛ Write access but only through the attending GP (not the whole team). Other areas had read access only.

ζ Visimeet audio-visual system introduced in 2018

η Paramedic started in 2018. Community matron only twice a week.

Θ Attends MDT twice a week in the morning (2 P.A.s)

ι Attends MDT four times a week in the morning (4 P.A.s)

κ Two alternating Well-being Coordinators five times a week (5 P.A.s)

λ Community Mental Health Nurse once a week.

ijic-22-1-5665-g2.png
Figure 2

Intermediate care referral pathways, including the ‘enhanced’ pathway in Coastal locality.

Key: The enhanced elements of IC are marked in bold, brown text and new pathways shown with dotted lines. The solid lines are pathways that are present in both EIC and IC. ED is emergency department.

* South Devon localities also receive referrals from social care’s single point of contact (SPOC) service. Torbay localities have a combined health and social care SPOC.

Table 3

Population size (≥70 years), rates per ≥70 year-old population and percentage change in rates by year.

LOCALITYPOPULATION SIZEEIC REFERRAL RATES (95% CI)% CHANGE IN RATES
2015201620172015201620172015 to 20162016 to 2017
Coastal7,1047,2897,5894.3% (3.8%–4.7%)7.0% (6.4%–7.6%)11.6% (10.8%–12.4%)*64.9%65.6%
Moor to Sea8,6056,1796,4347.7% (7.1%–8.3%)12.0% (11.1%–12.8%)8.2% (7.5%–8.9%)55.2%–31.3%
Newton Abbot8,26511,17011,6976.5% (5.9%–7.0%)8.5% (8.0%–9.0%)10.3% (9.7%–10.8%)30.8%20.7%
Paignton and Brixham14,01014,32914,9766.7% (6.3%–7.2%)6.6% (6.2%–7.0%)6.6% (6.2%–7.0%)–2.2%0.7%
Torquay10,96311,11011,5106.3% (5.8%–6.8%)8.1% (7.6%–8.7%)7.8% (7.3%–8.3%)29.4%–3.9%
Total (not incl. Coastal)41,84342,78844,6176.8% (6.5%–7.0%)8.3% (8.0%–8.5%)8.1% (7.9%–8.4%)22.0%–1.8%
Total48,94750,07752,2066.4% (6.2%–6.6%)8.1% (7.8%–8.3%)8.6% (8.4%–8.9%)26.2%6.7%

[i] Key: EIC = Enhanced Intermediate Care; * = statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05), compared to other localities and Total (not incl. Coastal) within year.

Note: Moor to Sea referrals were recorded differently after 2016 bringing it into line with other areas, possibly explaining the fall in cases. The locality boundary also changed but this was adjusted for.

Table 4

Yearly mean of average monthly length of episode (LOE) (days) for intermediate care, patients placed in IC beds and home-placed patients for 2016 and 2017.

EIC CASES – AV. MONTHLY LOE (DAYS) (95% CI)% EIC CASES PLACED (95% CI)IC PLACEMENTS – AV. MONTHLY LOE (DAYS) (95% CI)IC HOME-BASED CARE – AV. MONTHLY LOE (DAYS) (95% CI)
LOCALITY20162017201620172016201720162017
Coastal7.9 (6.8–8.9)*9.0 (7.6–10.4)*9.4% (5.6%–13.2%)8.7% (7.2%–10.2%)19.1 (15.2–23.0)22.2 (17.5–26.9)6.6 (5.9–7.3)*7.8 (6.5–9.2)*
Moor to Sea13.0 (11.6–14.4)15.1 (14.0–16.1)9.5% (5.5%–13.6%)20.1% (16.3%–23.9%)26.9 (20.3–33.4)27.1 (23.1–31.1)11.5 (10.5–12.6)12.2 (10.6–13.9)
Newton Abbot42.3 (31.7–52.9)20.1 (17.7–22.5)5.5% (3.9%–7.1%)9.1% (6.0%–12.2%)63.7 (53.7–73.8)33.8 (21.3–46.2)40.9 (29.7–52.1)18.5 (16.8–20.2)
Paignton and Brixham41.2 (36.9–45.5)33.6 (28.3–38.9)29.3% (23.9%–34.7%)40.5% (33.8%–47.2%)37.3 (29.6–45.0)29.3 (24.5–34.0)41.4 (35.9–46.8)36.0 (28.6–43.4)
Torquay21.7 (19.6–23.8)20.8 (18.9–22.6)41.0% (35.6%–46.3%)47.3% (42.7%–52.0%)24.9 (22.0–27.8)25.0 (22.2–27.8)18.7 (15.6–21.9)15.7 (12.4–19.0)
Total27.9 (24.9–30.9)20.4 (18.9–21.8)19.9% (17.2%–22.6%)25.0% (23.1%–26.9%)32.2 (28.5–35.9)27.2 (24.2–30.2)26.5 (22.5–30.6)17.8 (16.1–19.6)

[i] Key: EIC = Enhanced Intermediate Care; IC = Intermediate Care; LOE = Length of episode; Av. = average; * = statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05), compared to other localities within year.

Table 5

Intermediate care home referral rates, GP referral rates to EIC and to Emergency Department (ED) for ≥70 year-olds and referral rate ratios between GP and ED for 2015 and 2017 by locality.

LOCALITYHOME-BASE CARE REFERRAL RATES (95% CI)GP REFERRAL RATES TO EIC (95% CI)GP REFERRALS RATES TO ED (95% CI)GP: ED REFERRAL RATE RATIO
201520162017201620172016201720162017
Coastal3.6% (3.1%–4.0%)6.3% (5.7%–6.9%)10.5%* (9.8%–11.2%)1.5% (1.2%–1.8%)2.9%* (2.5%–3.3%)2.9%* (2.5%–3.3%)3.1% (2.7%–3.5%)0.510.93β
Moor to Sea6.9% (6.3%–7.4%)10.8% (10.0%–11.6%)6.5% (5.9%–7.1%)2.1% (1.7%–2.4%)1.9% (1.5%–2.2%)4.2% (3.7%–4.7%)3.7% (3.3%–4.2%)0.490.50
Newton Abbotα6.1% (5.5%–6.6%)7.9% (7.4%–8.5%)9.1% (8.5%–9.6%)2.3% (2.0%–2.5%)2.0% (1.7%–2.2%)5.6% (5.1%–6.0%)5.1% (4.7%–5.5%)0.410.38
Paignton and Brixham5.0% (4.6%–5.3%)4.3% (3.9%–4.6%)3.5% (3.2%–3.8%)2.2% (1.9%–2.4%)1.7% (1.5%–1.9%)5.0% (4.7%–5.4%)4.6% (4.3%–5.0%)0.430.37
Torquay3.7% (3.3%–4.0%)4.4% (4.0%–4.8%)3.7% (3.4%–4.1%)1.9% (1.6%–2.1%)1.5% (1.3%–1.7%)6.5% (6.0%–6.9%)6.7% (6.2%–7.2%)0.290.22
Total (not Coastal)5.2% (5.0%–5.4%)6.2% (6.0%–6.4%)5.4% (5.2%–5.7%)2.1% (2.0%–2.2%)1.7% (1.6%–1.9%)5.4% (5.2%–5.6%)5.2% (4.9%–5.4%)0.390.34
Total5.0% (4.8%–5.2%)6.2% (6.0%–6.4%)6.1% (5.9%–6.4%)2.0% (1.9%–2.1%)1.9% (1.8%–2.0%)5.1% (4.9%–5.3%)4.9% (4.7%–5.0%)0.400.39

[i] Key: EIC = Enhanced Intermediate Care; GP = General practice; ED = Emergency department; GP: ED referral rate ratio = the rate of GP referrals to EIC divided by the rate of GP referrals direct to ED; * = statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05) compared to other localities and Total (not incl. Coastal) within year, using continuity correction.

Note: α Included part of Moor to Sea in 2016, although this was adjusted for.

β A high relative ratio persisted in 2018 with ratios in other localities remaining similar.

ijic-22-1-5665-g3.png
Figure 3

Trends in bed-day rates for intermediate care beds, community and acute hospital beds for ≥70 year-olds by locality between 2015 and 2017.

Key: ☆ = p ≥ 0.05 compared to other localities within year.

ijic-22-1-5665-g4.png
Figure 4

Patient experience questionnaire (P3C-EQ, N = 17), Coastal locality.

ijic-22-1-5665-g5.png
Figure 5

Perceived prevented impact of enhanced intermediate care and associated costs (annualised) in Coastal locality.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5665 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Language: English
Submitted on: Dec 8, 2020
Accepted on: Jan 28, 2022
Published on: Feb 14, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Julian Elston, Felix Gradinger, Sheena Asthana, Matthew Fox, Louise Dawson, Dawn Butler, Richard Byng, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.