Figure 1
Study design.
Note: RMIC-MT is short for Rainbow Model of Integrated Care-Measurement Tool.
C-RMIC-MT is short for Chinese version Rainbow Model of Integrated Care-Measurement Tool.
Table 1
Characteristics of participants.
| SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC AND HEALTH-RELATED CHARACTERISTICS | N (%) |
|---|---|
| Gender | |
| Male | 248 (64.25) |
| Female | 138 (35.75) |
| Marital status | |
| Married | 356 (92.23) |
| Others | 30 (7.77) |
| Level of education | |
| Junior technical college | 239 (61.92) |
| Senior technical college | 127 (32.90) |
| Undergraduate and graduate-university | 20 (5.18) |
| Health insurance schemes | |
| None | 338 (21.19) |
| Urban employee basic medical insurance | 159 (41.19) |
| Migrant worker basic medical insurance | 44 (11.40) |
| Urban resident basic medical insurance | 60 (15.54) |
| Health insurance of other provinces | 54 (13.99) |
| Employment | |
| Retired from paid work | 93 (24.09) |
| employed | 185 (47.93) |
| Other options | 108 (27.98) |
| Income (¥/year) | |
| <20,000 | 157 (40.67) |
| 20,000–50,000 | 141 (36.53) |
| 50,000–100,000 | 60 (15.54) |
| ≥100,000 | 28 (7.25) |
| How many years have you had diabetes? | |
| <5 years | 212 (54.92) |
| 5–10 years | 107 (27.72) |
| >10 years | 67 (17.36) |
| Do you have diabetes complication? | |
| Yes | 42 (10.88) |
| No | 344 (89.12) |
| Have you signed contract with general practitioner in community health stations? | |
| Yes | 102 (26.42) |
| No | 284 (73.58) |
| How would you describe your health today? | |
| Very good and good | 292 (75.65) |
| fair | 85 (22.02) |
| Poor and very poor | 9 (2.33) |
| How many times did you visit care providers during the last four months? | |
| <10 visits | 283 (73.32) |
| 10–19 visits | 85 (22.02) |
| ≥20 visits | 18 (4.66) |
Table 2
Eigenvalue and variance contribution rate of each factor.
| FACTOR | EXTRACTION SUMS OF SQUARED LOADINGS | ROTATION SUMS OF SQUARED LOADINGS | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOTAL | % OF VARIANCE | CUMULATIVE % | TOTAL | % OF VARIANCE | CUMULATIVE % | ||
| 1 | 7.68 | 32.00 | 32.00 | 3.67 | 15.29 | 15.29 | |
| 2 | 2.02 | 8.40 | 40.40 | 2.65 | 11.02 | 26.31 | |
| 3 | 1.42 | 5.86 | 46.26 | 2.40 | 9.98 | 36.29 | |
| 4 | 1.01 | 4.19 | 50.45 | 2.27 | 9.44 | 45.73 | |
| 5 | 0.73 | 3.06 | 53.51 | 1.87 | 7.78 | 53.51 | |
[i] Extraction method: Principle Axis Factoring.
Table 3
Factor analysis C-RMIC-MT patient version (n = 386).
| ITEM NO. | CONTENT | ROTATED FACTOR LOADINGS* | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. CLINICAL INTEGRATION | 2. PROFESSIONAL INTEGRATION | 3. TEAM-BASED COORDINATION | 4. ORGANIZATIONAL INTEGRATION | 5. PERSON-CENTEREDNESS | ||
| 1 | Explaining | .41 | ||||
| 2 | Listening | .69 | ||||
| 3 | Preference integration | .84 | ||||
| 4 | Communication | .7224 | ||||
| 5 | Questioning | .62 | ||||
| 6 | Shared decision-making | .72 | ||||
| 15 | Interdisciplinary fragmentation | .54 | ||||
| 16 | Interdisciplinary contact | .74 | ||||
| 17 | Interdisciplinary information continuity | .87 | ||||
| 18 | Interdisciplinary treatment continuity | .86 | ||||
| 7 | Care continuity in the team | .70 | ||||
| 8 | Treatment longitudinally in the team | .82 | ||||
| 14 | Interdisciplinary coordination | .63 | ||||
| 19 | Accessibility of team care | .33 | ||||
| 23 | Time management | .06 | ||||
| 12 | Interdisciplinary communication | .61 | ||||
| 13 | Interdisciplinary collaboration | .66 | ||||
| 20 | Appointments | |||||
| 21 | Results | .46 | ||||
| 22 | Multidisciplinary team | |||||
| 24 | Accessibility | .46 | ||||
| 9 | Family circumstances | .80 | ||||
| 10 | Social circumstances | .69 | ||||
| 11 | Needs assessment | .52 | ||||
[i] * Factor loadings above 0.30 are reported.
Table 4
Correlation between subscale scores C-RMIC-MT patient version (n = 386).
| VARIABLES | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Person-centeredness (item 1–2) | ||||||||
| 2. Clinical integration (item 3–7) | .46** | |||||||
| 3. Professional integration (item 8–10) | .26** | .29** | ||||||
| 4. Team-based coordination (item 11–13) | .36** | .57** | .30** | |||||
| 5. Organizational integration (item 14–15) | .17** | .40** | .23** | .38** | ||||
| 6. Overall care coordination | .20** | .23** | .30** | .18** | .35** | |||
| 7. Quality of care | .22** | .31** | .31** | .19** | .31** | .74** | ||
| 8. Treatment involvement | .04 | .37 | .13** | .15** | .12* | .01 | .06 |
[i] **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).