Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Evaluating Large-Scale Integrated Care Projects: The Development of a Protocol for a Mixed Methods Realist Evaluation Study in Belgium Cover

Evaluating Large-Scale Integrated Care Projects: The Development of a Protocol for a Mixed Methods Realist Evaluation Study in Belgium

Open Access
|Sep 2020

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Overview of data sources available for each patient population under study.

Study PopulationData on sickness funds (IMA)GP dataHospital dataBELRAIPROMs & PREMsStatistical analysis
Population A: Target populationThe population for whom the developing services that will be offered by the ICP are intended and who are living in the specified geographical regionX (aggregate level)Cross-sectional time series & longitudinal cohort study
Population B: Included patientsThe part of the target population that has actually been included in the ICP and who have been offered ICP-related servicesXXXXLongitudinal cohort study
Table 2

Overview of the most relevant Quadruple Aim indicators and samples of interest.

Domain and indicatorNumeratorDenominatorData SourceSample
Population Health
MortalityNumber of deathsTotal population & population stratified by age and subgroupsIMAA/B
Occupational disabilityNumber of people who have reported a lapse in professional occupation due to health issues during the last 12 monthsActive population stratified by the criteria mentioned laterIMAA/B
Activities of daily living (ADL) & instrumental activities of daily living (IADL)Number of people with ADL > 3/IADL after 1 yearTotal number of patients stratified by subgroupsBELRAIB
Mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain & discomfort, anxiety & depressionNumber of people with no or slight problemsTotal number of patients in Sample CEQ-5D-5L**B
Quality of life on a visual analogue scaleNumber of people with a self-reported quality of life > 80Total number of patients in Sample CEQ-5D-5LB
Patient Experiences
PACIC domains (4): Patient activation; delivery system design; goal setting; problem solvingThe average percentage of patients who respond “most of the time” for each domainTotal number of people in the samplePACIC**B
Cost efficiency, care with high and low value and equity
ED visits and hospitalization through the emergency department (per 1000) during the last 12 monthsNumber of episodes during the last 12 monthsTotal population & population stratified by subgroups (Rate)IMAA/B
Number of early 30-d readmissions (per 1000) in the last 12 months due to Xi diseaseNumber of early 30-d readmissions in the last 12 monthsTotal population & population stratified by subgroups (Rate)IMAA/B
Number and indices of n° of specialized visits/GP visits***Number of outpatient specialized visits in the last 12 months in a given person’s profileTotal population & population stratified by subgroups & by SES**** (Rate)IMAA/B
Number of dental visits per year****Number of early 30-d readmissions in the last 12 monthsStratified by SES
Proportion of patients using ≥5/10 drugs (per 1000), last 12 months, due to any causeNumber of patients using ≥5/10 drugs, last 12 months, due to any causeTotal population & population stratified by subgroupsIMAA/B
Proportion of patients with ≥2 ER consultations during a 6 months period, last 12 monthsNumber of patients with ≥2 EM consultations during a 6 months period, last 12 monthsTotal population & population stratified by subgroupsIMAA/B
Professional Well Being
IndicatorNumeratorDenominator
Relational coordinationNumber of providers who indicate that they often or always collaborateTotal number of providersRC surveyC
Job satisfactionAverage number of providers who respond “Satisfied” or “Very satisfied” for select indicators of job satisfactionTotal number of providers4N4CastC
BurnoutAverage number of providers who respond “Often”, “Very often” or “Always” for select indicators of UBOSTotal number of providersUBOSC

[i] * Population A includes population B.

** Self-Reported.

**** Serving as an indicator for equity [62].

**** SES = Socio Economic Status.

Table 3

Key process indicators common to all ICPs.

ActionIndicator
Inclusion% of included patients (with informed consent)
Medication reviewRelative share of medication that was prescribed using the International Non-proprietary Name (INN)
Training sessions for professionalsNumber of training sessions organized
Number of professionals (per type) who participated
Training sessions for patientsNumber of training sessions organized
Number of patients who participated
Case managementNumber of patients in a case management trajectory
Case managementCase load: Number of patients in case management/number FTE case managers
Care pathwaysNumber of pathways
Number of patients in each pathway
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5435 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Language: English
Submitted on: Oct 10, 2019
Accepted on: Jul 29, 2020
Published on: Sep 24, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2020 Geert Goderis, Elien Colman, Lucia Alvarez Irusta, Ann Van Hecke, Benoit Petré, Dirk Devroey, Elias Van Deun, Kristof Faes, Nathan Charlier, Nick Verhaeghe, Roy Remmen, Sibyl Anthierens, Walter Sermeus, Jean Macq, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.