Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Collaboration for Impact: Co-creating a Workforce Development Toolkit Using an Arts-based Approach Cover

Collaboration for Impact: Co-creating a Workforce Development Toolkit Using an Arts-based Approach

Open Access
|Jun 2020

References

  1. Singh P, Chokshi DA. Community health workers—a local solution to a global problem. New England Journal of Medicine, 2013; 369(10): 894896. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1305636
  2. Witmer A, et al., Community health workers: integral members of the health care work force. American journal of public health, 1995; 85(8_Pt_1): 10551058. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.85.8_Pt_1.1055
  3. Long JC, Cunningham FC, Braithwaite J. Bridges, brokers and boundary spanners in collaborative networks: a systematic review. BMC health services research, 2013; 13(1): 158. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-158
  4. Williams P. The life and times of the boundary spanner. Journal of Integrated Care, 2011. DOI: 10.1108/14769011111148140
  5. Gale N, et al., Street-level diplomacy? Communicative and adaptive work at the front line of implementing public health policies in primary care. Social Science & Medicine, 2017; 177: 918. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.046
  6. Gale NK, et al., Synthetic social support: Theorizing lay health worker interventions. Social Science & Medicine, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.11.012
  7. Gale NK, Sidhu MS. Risk work or resilience work? A qualitative study with community health workers negotiating the tensions between biomedical and community-based forms of health promotion in the United Kingdom. PloS one, 2019; 14(7). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220109
  8. Brown P, Gale N. Developing a sociology of risk work in client-facing contexts: an editorial. Health, risk & society, 2018; 20(1-2): 112. DOI: 10.1080/13698575.2018.1445072
  9. Ozanne JL, et al., Assessing the societal impact of research: The relational engagement approach. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 2017; 36(1): 114. DOI: 10.1509/jppm.14.121
  10. Kuruvilla S, et al., Describing the impact of health research: a Research Impact Framework. BMC health services research, 2006; 6(1): 134. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-134
  11. Realpe A, Wallace L. What is co-production? London: The Health Foundation, 2016. 2017.
  12. Stuttaford M, et al., Use of applied theatre in health research dissemination and data validation: A pilot study from South Africa. Health, 2006; 10(1): 3145. DOI: 10.1177/1363459306058985
  13. Wright P. A qualitative study of Lay and Professional perceptions on Breast Health and the use of theatre as an effective method of health education in this field. 1995, Dudley Priority Healthcare: Unpublished report.
  14. Beck U. Risk society: Towards a new modernity. 1992, London: Sage.
  15. Petersen A, Lupton D. The new public health: Health and self in the age of risk. 1996, Sage Publications, Inc.
  16. Horlick-Jones T. On ‘risk work’: professional discourse, accountability, and everyday action. Health, risk & society, 2005; 7(3): 293307. DOI: 10.1080/13698570500229820
  17. Gale NK, et al., Towards a sociology of risk work: a systematic narrative review and synthesis. Sociology Compass; 2016. DOI: 10.1111/soc4.12416
  18. Dorling G, et al., The evidence for integrated care. 2015, London: McKinsey and Company.
  19. Brown P, Gale N. Theorising risk work: Analysing professionals’ lifeworlds and practices. Professions and Professionalism, 2018; 8(1): 1988. DOI: 10.7577/pp.1988
  20. Ham C, Walsh N. Making integrated care happen at scale and pace. 2013, London: The King’s Fund.
  21. Puhl RM, Heuer CA. Obesity stigma: important considerations for public health. American journal of public health, 2010; 100(6): 10191028. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.159491
  22. Warner J. Inquiry reports as active texts and their function in relation to professional practice in mental health. Health, risk & society, 2006; 8(3): 223237. DOI: 10.1080/13698570600871661
  23. Veltkamp G, Brown P. The everyday risk work of Dutch child-healthcare professionals: Inferring ‘safe’ and ‘good’ parenting through trust, as mediated by a lens of gender and class. Sociology of Health & Illness, 2017; n/a-n/a. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.12582
  24. Gale N, Brown P, Sidhu M. Co-production in the epidemiological clinic: A decentred analysis of the tensions in community-based, client-facing risk work. Social Policy & Administration, 2019; 53(2): 203218. DOI: 10.1111/spol.12465
  25. Olaniran A, et al., Who is a community health worker?–a systematic review of definitions. Global Health Action, 2017; 10(1): 1272223. DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2017.1272223
  26. Carr SM, et al., An evidence synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research on component intervention techniques, effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, equity and acceptability of different versions of health-related lifestyle advisor role in improving health. Health Technol Assess, 2011; 15(9): iiiv, 1–284. DOI: 10.3310/hta15090
  27. Najafizada SAM. Community health workers in Canada and other high-income countries: a scoping review and research gaps. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 2015; 106(3): E157. DOI: 10.17269/CJPH.106.4747
  28. Abdel-All M, et al., Effectiveness of community health worker training programmes for cardiovascular disease management in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMJ open, 2017; 7(11): e015529. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015529
  29. DH. Choosing health: Making healthy choices easier. 2004, London: Department of Health.
  30. Procter S, et al., Success and failure in integrated models of nursing for long term conditions: multiple case studies of whole systems. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 2013; 50(5): 632643. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.10.007
  31. Mathers J, Taylor R, Parry J. Measuring the impact of Health Trainers Services on health and health inequalities: does the service’s data collection and reporting system provide reliable information? Journal of Public Health, 2016. DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdv214
  32. Mathers J, Parry J. A REVIEW OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATIONAL HEALTH TRAINER SERVICE INITIATIVE (Final Report to Policy Research Programme, NIHR). 2013, Birmingham: School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham.
  33. Ham C, Smith J, Eastmure E. Commissioning integrated care in a liberated NHS. 2011, London: Nuffield Trust.
  34. Addicott R. Commissioning and contracting for integrated care. 2014, London: King’s Fund.
  35. Shneerson CL, Gale NK. Using mixed methods to identify and answer clinically relevant research questions. Qualitative health research, 2015; 25(6): 845856. DOI: 10.1177/1049732315580107
  36. Iversen C, Broström A, Ulander M. Traffic risk work with sleepy patients: from rationality to practice. Health, Risk & Society, 2018; 20(1–2): 2342. DOI: 10.1080/13698575.2017.1399986
  37. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic Inquiry. 1985, Beverly Hills, C.A.: Sage. DOI: 10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
  38. Wright P, Broadwood J, Connolly J. Women and Theatre, Birmingham: The Early Years (1984–1994), in The Palgrave Handbook of the History of Women on Stage. 2019, Springer. pp. 531555. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-23828-5_24
  39. Kandemir A, Budd R. Using vignettes to explore reality and values with young people. In Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 2018.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5377 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Language: English
Submitted on: Aug 7, 2019
|
Accepted on: May 13, 2020
|
Published on: Jun 9, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2020 Juliet Rayment, Manbinder Sidhu, Polly Wright, Patrick Brown, Sheila Greenfield, Stephen Jeffreys, Nicola Gale, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.