Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Conducting a Cost-Benefit Analysis of Transitional Care Programmes: The Key Challenges and Recommendations Cover

Conducting a Cost-Benefit Analysis of Transitional Care Programmes: The Key Challenges and Recommendations

International Journal of Integrated Care
Volume 20 (2020): Issue 1
By: Ke Xin Eh,  Ian Yi Han Ang,  Milawaty Nurjono and  Sue-Anne Ee Shiow Toh  
Open Access
|Feb 2020

References

  1. Coleman EA. Falling through the cracks: challenges and opportunities for improving transitional care for persons with continuous complex care needs. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2003; 51(4): 549–555. DOI: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51185.x
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Wong FK, Chau J, So C, Tam SK, McGhee S. Cost-effectiveness of a health-social partnership transitional program for post-discharge medical patients. BMC Health Service Research. 2012; 12(1): 479. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-479
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Low LL, Vasanwala FF, Ng LB, Chen C, Lee KH, Tan SY. Effectiveness of a transitional home care program in reducing acute hospital utilization: a quasi-experimental study. BMC Health Service Research. 2015; 15(1): 100. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-015-0750-2
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Shu CC, Hsu NC, Lin YF, Wang JY, Lin JW, Ko WJ. Integrated postdischarge transitional care in a hospitalist system to improve discharge outcome: an experimental study. BMC Medicine. 2011; 9(1): 96. DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-96
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Karapinar-Carkit F, Van der Knaap R, Bouhannouch F, Borgsteede SD, Janssen MJA, Siegert CEH, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a transitional pharmaceutical care program for patients discharged from the hospital. Plos One. 2017; 12(4): e0174513. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174513
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Nurjono M, Shrestha P, Lee A, Lim XY, Shiraz F, Tan S, et al. Realist evaluation of a complex integrated care programme: protocol for a mixed methods study. BMJ Open. 2018; 8(3): e017111. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017111
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Ang IYH, Tan CS, Nurjono M, Tan XQ, Koh GCH, Vrijhoef HJM, et al. A retrospective eval-uation of healthcare utilization of two post-discharge care programmes in Singapore. BMJ Open; 2019. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027220
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Ministry of Manpower. Singapore: Occupational Wages 2017, Occupational Wages by Industry; 2017. [cited 2019 Jan 17]. Available from: https://stats.mom.gov.sg/Pages/Occupational-Wages-Tables2017.aspx
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Olayiwola JN, Shih JA, Shiow S, Wee HL. Could Values and Social Structures in Singapore Facilitate Attainment of Patient-Focused, Cultural, and Linguistic Competency Standards in a Patient-Centered Medical Home Pilot? Journal Of Patient Experience. 2015; 2(2): 37–42. DOI: 10.1177/2374373515615975
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Saxena N, You AX, Zhu Z, Sun Y, George PP, Teow KL, et al. Singapore’s regional health systems-a data-driven perspective on frequent admitters and cross utilization of healthcare services in three systems. The International Journal of Health Planning And Management. 2017; 32(1): 36–49. DOI: 10.1002/hpm.2300
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Tan PN. Hospital & community resources, financial policies & funding schemes. The Singapore Family Physician. 2011; 37(3): 20–26.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Bowling A. Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. Journal of Public Health. 2005; 27(3): 281–291. DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdi031
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Nurjono M, Shrestha S, Shiraz F, Ang IYH, Yoong JS, Toh SES, et al. Implementation fidelity of a strategy to integrate service delivery: learnings from a transitional care program for individuals with complex needs in Singapore. BMC Health Service Research. 2019; 19(1): 177. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-3980-x
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Althubaiti A. Information bias in health research: definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. 2016; 9: 211–217. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S104807
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Hassan E. Recall Bias can be a Threat to Retrospective and Prospective Research Designs. The Internet Journal of Epidemiology. 2005; 3(2): 4. DOI: 10.5580/2732
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Bouwmans C, Krol M, Severens H, Koopmanschap M, Brouwer W, Hakkaart-van Roijen L. The iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire: A Standardized Instrument for Measuring and Valuing Health-Related Productivity Losses. Value In Health. 2015; 18(6): 753–758. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.05.009
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Krol M, Brouwer W, Rutten F. Productivity costs in economic evaluations: past, present, future. Pharmacoeconomics. 2013; 31(7): 537–549. DOI: 10.1007/s40273-013-0056-3
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Park M, Jit M, Wu JT. Cost-benefit analysis of vaccination: a comparative analysis of eight approaches for valuing changes to mortality and morbidity risks. BMC Medicine. 2018; 16(1): 139. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-018-1130-7
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Sng HY, Chia WM. Singapore and Asia: impact of the global financial tsunami and other economic issues. Quah, E, Chia, WM, Sng, HY (eds.). Singapore: Nanyang Technology University; 2010. DOI: 10.1142/7387
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Personal Data Protection Commission Singapore (PDPC). Guide to data sharing. Singapore: 2018 Feb [cited 2018 Nov 29]. Available from: https://www.pdpc.gov.sg/-/media/Files/PDPC/PDF-Files/Other-Guides/Guide-to-Data-Sharing-revised-26-Feb-2018.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Priisalu J, Ottis R. Personal control of privacy and data: Estonian experience. Health and Technology. 2017; 7(4): 441–451. DOI: 10.1007/s12553-017-0195-1
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Dong Y, Peng CY. Principled missing data methods for researchers. Springerplus. 2013; 2(1): 222. DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-222
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Gregory KE, Radovinsky L. Research strategies that result in optimal data collection from the patient medical record. Applied Nursing Research. 2012; 25(2): 108–116. DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2010.02.004
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Short ME, Goetzel RZ, Pei X, Tabrizi MJ, Ozminkowski RJ, Gibson TB, et al. How accurate are self-reports? Analysis of self-reported health care utilization and absence when compared with administrative data. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2009; 51(7): 786–796. DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181a86671
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Ansah EK, Powell-Jackson T. Can we trust measures of healthcare utilization from household surveys? BMC Public Health. 2013; 13(1): 853. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-853
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.4703 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 25, 2019
|
Accepted on: Jan 15, 2020
|
Published on: Feb 21, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
transitional care,
post-discharge care,
integrated care,
cost-benefit analysis,
health expenditures,
mortality

© 2020 Ke Xin Eh, Ian Yi Han Ang, Milawaty Nurjono, Sue-Anne Ee Shiow Toh, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 20 (2020): Issue 1Next article