Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Implementing Integrated Care in Practice – Learning from MDTs Driving the Integrated Care Programme for Older Persons in Ireland Cover

Implementing Integrated Care in Practice – Learning from MDTs Driving the Integrated Care Programme for Older Persons in Ireland

Open Access
|Mar 2021

Figures & Tables

ijic-21-1-4682-g1.png
Figure 1

10-Step Integrated Care Framework for Older Persons.

Table 1

Summary of three pioneer site descriptions.

SITE ASITE BSITE C
Catchment – GeographyUrban & large rural areaUrban & large rural areaSuburban
Catchment – Population demographicOlderSignificantly olderYoung but growing older population
Hub LocationDay hospital for older people on the grounds of a model 4 acute hospitalCommunity hospital close to a model 3 acute hospitalPrimary care centre close to a model 4 acute teaching hospital
Pioneer Site BackgroundGreen-field site (few services for older people outside of GP)Evolved from integrated care activities for older people in the acute hospitalCreation of a community geriatrician post as catalyst
Project Sponsors
C = clinician
nc = non-clinician
  1. Hospital Geriatrician (c)

  2. Older person’s services manager (nc)

  1. Acute Hospital General Manager (nc)

  2. Community Health Organisation (CHO) Head of Social Care (nc)

  1. Consultant Geriatrician (Former community geriatrician) (c)

  2. CHO Head of Social Care (nc)

The Programme funded MDT Members
  1. Senior Physiotherapist

  2. Senior OT

  3. Administrator

  4. Clinical Nurse Specialist

  5. Social worker

  1. Clinical Nurse Specialist for Dementia

  2. Senior Grade Occupational Therapist

  3. Senior Grade Physiotherapist

  4. Administrator

  1. Consultant Geriatrician (rotates every 4 months)

  2. Clinical Case Manager × 2 (one to be filled)

  3. Senior Occupational Therapist

  4. Senior Physiotherapist

  5. Senior Social Worker

  6. Administrator

ReferralsFrom GP and acute hospitalFrom acute and community hospitalFrom GP and acute hospital
Domiciliary VisitsProvided by social workerHome visits and assessment provided by physio and OTDomiciliary visits undertaken by all members of the team
GovernanceWeekly MDT meetings. Steering Committee meets quarterly; Working groups (for ambulatory care, rehabilitations and early mobilisation) meet quarterlyWeekly MDT meetings. Steering Committee meets bi-monthly; Implementation Team meets bi-monthly.Weekly MDT meetings. Steering Group meets every two months. Multidisciplinary business meetings held monthly.
Outreach ActivitiesGP educational meetings; roadshow to raise awareness among public health nurses, presentation at national Integrated Care ConferenceStakeholder planning workshop including patient advocates to map existing services and to set priorities for the yearPresentations to GPs, Nurses, at Integrated Care Conference, Attendance at Age Friendly County Alliance, Relationships built with Alzheimer’s Day Centres/services
Next StepsSecure funding for a dietitian, psychologist, pharmacist, speech and language therapist, and a community geriatrician.Increase ICPOP services, scope supports for nursing homes (esp. for dementia patients), develop end of life care, frailty and delirium education and trainingSupport long term care residents through the development of a nursing home liaison service and recruit a dietitian
Table 2

Factors influencing programme implementation progress.

Local Level Factors
  • Socio-Demographics

  • Geography (rural/urban difference)

  • Legacy health system issues

  • Existing physical structures and organisations

  • Existing relationships and links between individuals and institutions

  • Personalities

  • Community resources

  • Culture and beliefs (including language)

  • Local political and economic factors

Programme Level Factors
  • Workforce and leadership capacity

  • Power structures and hierarchy

System Level Factors
  • National political and economic factors

  • Fragmented funding structures

  • Quick turn-over of senior level decision makers

  • Lack of commitment to multiannual funding

  • Lack of clarity on regional administrative boundaries

  • Complex professional contractual negotiations

  • Slow implementation of the national eHealth strategy.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.4682 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Language: English
Submitted on: Mar 15, 2019
Accepted on: Jan 19, 2021
Published on: Mar 18, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2021 Sarah Barry, Maebh Ní Fhallúin, Stephen Thomas, PJ Harnett, Sara Burke, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.