Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Legitimising Inter-Sectoral Public Health Policies: A Challenge for Professional Identities? Cover

Legitimising Inter-Sectoral Public Health Policies: A Challenge for Professional Identities?

Open Access
|Dec 2019

References

  1. 1Dahlgren, G and Whitehead, M. Policies and strategies to promote social equity in health. Institute for Future Studies:Stockholm; 1991.
  2. 2Norwegian Public Health Act. Lov-2011-06-24 nr 29: Lov om folkehelsearbeid [Public Health Act]; 2012. Available from: https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/2011-06-24-29 [in Norwegian].
  3. 3World Health Organization. The Helsinki statement on health in all policies. Helsinki: WHO; 2013.
  4. 4Freiler, A, Muntaner, C, Shankardass, K, Mah, CL, Molnar, A, Renahy, E, et al. Glossary for the implementation of Health in All Policies (HiAP). Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2013; 67: 10681072. DOI: 10.1136/jech-2013-202731
  5. 5Helgesen, MK. Styring av folkehelsepolitikk i relasjon mellom stat, fylkeskommuner og kommuner [Governance of public health policies in relations between the state, regions and municipalities]. In: Hanssen, GS, Klausen, JE, Langeland, O (eds.), Det regionale norge 1950 til 2050 [The regional Norway 1950–2050]. Oslo: Abstrakt forlag AS; 2012. 257280. [in Norwegian]
  6. 6Fosse, E, Helgesen, MK, Hagen, S, Torp, S. Addressing the social determinants of health at the local level: opportunities and challenges. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 2018; 46(20_suppl): 4752. DOI: 10.1177/1403494817743896
  7. 7Hofstad, H and Bergsli, H. Sluttevaluering av Helse og omsorg i plan. Status og ringvirkninger 2012–2016. [Evaluation of Health and care in planning. Status and repercussions 2012–2016.] NIBR-rapport 2016: 9. Oslo. [In Norwegian].
  8. 8Suchman, MC. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 1995; 20(3): 571610. DOI: 10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
  9. 9Scott, WR. Institutions and organizations: ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.) Thousand Oaks, California: Sage; 2014.
  10. 10Selznick, P. Institutionalism “Old” and “New”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1996; 41(2): 270277. DOI: 10.2307/2393719
  11. 11Van Eyk, E, Harris, E, Baum, F, Delany-Crowe, T, Lawless, A and MacDougall, C. Health in All Policies in South Australia—Did It Promote and Enact an Equity Perspective? International journal of environmental research and public health, 2017; 14: 1288. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14111288
  12. 12Holt, DH, Rod, MH, Waldorff, SB and Tjarnhaj-Thomsen, T. Elusive implementation: an ethnographic study of intersectoral policymaking for health. BMC Health Services Research, 2018; 18(1): 54. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-2864-9
  13. 13Holt, DH Waldorff, SB, Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, T and Rod, MH. Ambiguous expectations for intersectoral action for health: a document analysis of the Danish case. Critical Public Health, 2017; 28(1): 3547. DOI: 10.1080/09581596.2017.1288286
  14. 14Holt, DH, Frohlich, KL, Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, T and Clavier, C. Intersectoriality in Danish municipalities: corrupting the social determinants of health? Health Promotion International, 2016: 110. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daw020
  15. 15Synnevåg, ES, Amdam, R and Fosse, E. Public health terminology: hindrance to a Health in All Policies approach? Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 2018; 46(1): 6873. DOI: 10.1177/1403494817729921
  16. 16Amdam, R. Planning in health promotion work: An empowerment model. London, UK and New York, N.Y.: Routledge; 2010. DOI: 10.4324/9780203842522
  17. 17Buanes, A and Jentoft, S. Building bridges: institutional perspectives on interdisciplinarity. Futures, 2009; 41(7): 446454. DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2009.01.010
  18. 18Huxham, C and Vangen, S. Managing to collaborate: the theory and practice of collaborative advantage. London: Routledge; 2005.
  19. 19Holmesland, A, Seikkula, J, Nilsen, Ø, Hopfenbeck, M and Arnkil, TA. Open Dialogues in social networks: professional identity and transdisciplinary collaboration. International Journal of Integrated Care, 2010; 10: 114. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.564
  20. 20Stuart, K. Leading multi-professional teams in the children’s workforce: an action research project. International Journal of Integrated Care, 2012; 12(1): 112. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.750
  21. 21Banken, R. Strategies for institutionalizing HIA. Brussels: World Health Organization; 2001.
  22. 22Breton, E. A sophisticated architecture is indeed necessary for the implementation of health in all policies but not enough: comment on “Understanding the role of public administration in implementing action on the social determinants of health and health inequities”. (Commentary). International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 2016; 5(6): 383385. DOI: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.28
  23. 23Carey, G, Crammond, B and Keast, R. Creating change in government to address the social determinants of health: How can efforts be improved? BMC Public Health, 2014; 14(1): 1087. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1087
  24. 24Kickbusch, I, Williams, C and Lawless, A. Making the most of open windows: establishing Health in All Policies in South Australia. International Journal of Health Services, 2014; 44(1): 185194. DOI: 10.2190/HS.44.1.k
  25. 25Labonté, RN and Laverack, G. Health promotion in action: from local to global empowerment. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2008. DOI: 10.1057/9780230228375
  26. 26Yin, RK. Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.) Los Angeles: SAGE; 2014.
  27. 27Brinkmann, S and Kvale, S. InterViews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE; 2014.
  28. 28Braun, V and Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 2006; 3(2): 77101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  29. 29Offerdal, A. Iverksettingsteori – resultatene blir sjelden som planlagt, og det kan være en fordel? [Implementation theory: results are rarely as planned, and that can be an advantage?]. In: Baldersheim, H, Rose, LE (eds.), Det Kommunale laboratorium: teoretiske perspektiver på lokal politikk og organisering [The municipal laboratory: theoretical perspectives on local policy and organisation] (3rd ed.). Bergen: Fagbokforlaget; 2014. 253279 [in Norwegian].
  30. 30Fosse, E and Helgesen, MK. How can local governments level the social gradient in health among families with children? The case of Norway. International Journal of Child, Youth and Family Studies, 2015; 6(2): 328346. DOI: 10.18357/ijcyfs.62201513505
  31. 31Hofstad, H. The ambition of Health in All Policies in Norway: the role of political leadership and bureaucratic change. Health Policy, 2016; 120(5): 567575. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.03.001
  32. 32McNeil, KA, Mitchell, RJ and Parker, V. Interprofessional practice and professional identity threat. Health Sociology Review, 2013; 22(3): 291307. DOI: 10.5172/hesr.2013.22.3.291
  33. 33Shankardass, K, O’Campo, P, Muntaner, C, Bayoumi, AM and Kokkinen, L. Ideas for extending the approach to evaluating Health in All Policies in South Australia: comment on “Developing a framework for a program theory-based approach to evaluating policy processes and outcomes: Health in All Policies in South Australia.” International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 2018; 7(8): 755757. DOI: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.25
  34. 34Hagen, S, Helgesen, M, Torp, S and Fosse, E. Health in All Policies: A cross-sectional study of the public health coordinators’ role in Norwegian municipalities. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 2015; 43(6): 597605. DOI: 10.1177/1403494815585614
  35. 35Ouff, SM, Bergem, R, Aarflot, U, Hanche-Olsen, M, Vestby, G-M, Hofstad, H, et al. Partnarskap for folkehelse og Helse i plan [Partnership for public health and Health in planning]. Volda: Møreforsking; 2010. [in Norwegian]
  36. 36The Office of the Auditor General. Riksrevisjonens undersøkelse av offentlig folkehelsearbeid [The Office of the Auditor General’s investigation of public health work] Oslo; 2015. [in Norwegian].
  37. 37Guglielmin, M, Muntaner, C, O’Campo, P and Shankardass, K. A scoping review of the implementation of health in all policies at the local level. Health Policy, 2018; 122(3): 284292. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.12.005
  38. 38Van Vliet-Brown, CE, Shahram, S and Oelke, ND. Health in All Policies utilization by municipal governments: scoping review. Health Promotion International, 2017; 33(4): 110. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dax008
  39. 39Weiss, D, Lillefjell, M and Magnus, E. Facilitators for the development and implementation of health promoting policy and programs – a scoping review at the local community level. BMC Public Health, 2016; 16: 140. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-2811-9
  40. 40Khalili, H, Orchard, C, Laschinger, HKS and Farah, R. An interprofessional socialization framework for developing an interprofessional identity among health professions students. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 2013; 27(6): 448453. DOI: 10.3109/13561820.2013.804042
  41. 41Danermark, B, Ekström, M, Jakobsen, L and Karlsson, JC. Explaining society: critical realism in the social sciences. London: Routledge; 2002.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.4641 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Language: English
Submitted on: Dec 11, 2018
Accepted on: Nov 12, 2019
Published on: Dec 9, 2019
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2019 Ellen Strøm Synnevåg, Roar Amdam, Elisabeth Fosse, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.