Table 1
Search strategy.
| Steps | Search terms and combinations |
|---|---|
| 1 | integrated care.mp. [mp=ti, ot, ab, nm, hw, kw, kf, px, rx, ui, an, tc, id, tm, tx, sh, ct, tn, dm, mf, dv] |
| 2 | population health.mp. [mp=ti, ot, ab, nm, hw, kw, kf, px, rx, ui, an, tc, id, tm, tx, sh, ct, tn, dm, mf, dv] |
| 3 | (integrated adj3 (organi?ation* or care or healthcare or hospital* or service* or policy or policies or system or systems)).ti,ab. |
| 4 | (intersectoral adj3 (organi?ation* or care or healthcare or hospital* or service* or policy or policies or system or systems or partnership or partnerships)).ti,ab. |
| 5 | Models, Organizational/ |
| 6 | Delivery of Health Care/ |
| 7 | Determinants of health/ |
| 8 | Equity.mp. or inequity/[mp=ti, ot, ab, nm, hw, kw, kf, px, rx, ui, an, tc, id, tm, tx, sh, ct, tn, dm, mf, dv] |
| 9 | Organizations/ |
| 10 | or/3–9 |
| 11 | 1 and 2 and 3 and 10 |
[i] Search terms used:
care
delivery
delivery of health care
determinants
determinants of health
equity
health
healthcare
hospital*
inequity
integrated
integrated care
intersectoral
models,
models, organizational
organi?ation*
organizational
organizations
partnership
partnerships
policies
policy
population
population health
service*
system
systems
Table 2
General characteristics of projects and programs (projects 1–4).
| Initiative | Embrace | Liverpool City Council’s Healthy Homes Programme | New Zealand Healthy Housing Programme (also known as Counties Manukau Health) | Hennepin Health Accountable Care Organization (ACO) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Country | The Netherlands | UK | New Zealand | USA |
| Objective |
|
|
|
|
| Intervention period | 2012 – present (pilot phase 2012–2013) | 2009 – present | 2001 – present | 2011 – present |
| Population size | 755 community-living adults in three municipalities | 40000 properties eligible; 33000 assessments and 25000 referrals done in year one | 9736 residents of 3410 homes in 2001–2007 | 9054 |
| Target population | Older adults living in community stratified into robust, frail and complex care needs risk profiles (profiles correspond to care intensity levels) | Population living in eligible housing (neighbourhoods with high level of deprivation) | Families at high risk of infectious diseases, living in neighbourhoods with high levels of deprivation and high concentrations of public and other low-income housing. | Population is stratified based on risk and high cost; Patients with high risk/cost have highest priority for intervention. |
| Sectors integrated or otherwise involved | Primary care physicians (15 practices) and local health and community organizations (welfare service, preventive and medical care) | Public health, primary care, community-level care that includes a range of services, e.g., social care agencies, specialized care (mental health), hospitals, etc. | Joint initiative between Housing New Zealand Corporation (provider of government- funded housing) and District Health Boards that includes other tiers of care (primary care, hospitals) and social service agencies via referral | Hennepin County Human Services and Public Health Department; Hennepin County Medical Center, Level I trauma center and medium-size public hospital and safety net medical system; NorthPoint Health and Well- ness Center, and Metropolitan Health Plan |
| Model of integration and/or theoretical framework | Chronic Care Model elements (self-management, delivery system design, decision support, clinical information system), Kaiser Permanent Triangle | Initiative is rooted into councils’ understanding how quality of housing affects health and wellbeing of their residents | Socio-ecological model | Shared risk model of integrated delivery of medical, behavioral, and social services for an expanded population of Medicaid beneficiaries |
| Initiative | Spokane and Clark counties Maternal and Child Health Inequities | North West London Integrated Care Pilot | Integrated Social Care and Health Districts in Hartberg | Open Care Centres for the Elderly (KAPI) |
| Country | USA | UK | Austria | Greece |
| Objective |
|
|
|
|
| Intervention period | 2008–2010 | 2013–2017 | Established in 1989, the program changed and cooperation with a district hospital was added in 2000 | Established in 1979, it changed throughout 1980s–90s and doubled in size in 2000s to support aging at home; (pilot phase 1979–1981) |
| Population size | NR | 38000 | 941 | 17000 |
| Target population | Mothers and children, pregnant women | Older adults age 75+ with diabetes | Community-dwelling older adults | Older adults age 65+, community-dwelling |
| Sectors integrated or otherwise involved | Spokane Regional Health District and Clark County Public Health led pilots and involved a great number of partners among businesses, schools, clinics. | 100 general practices, 2 acute care trusts, 5 primary care trusts, 2 mental health care trusts, 3 community health trusts, 5 local authorities, and 2 voluntary sector organizations (Age UK and Diabetes UK) | Social support, preventative and primary medical services and hospital care | Social support and preventative and primary medical services |
| Model of integration and/or theoretical framework |
| NR | NR | Innovative programmes aiming at socialisation of elderly, keeping them active, fit and healthy and creating awareness in their social environment. |
| Initiative | Zorgvoorziening Zijloever (Care friendly district) | Integrated services for frail elders (SIPA) | Torbay Integrated Care Pilot | Gesundes Kinzigtal |
| Country | The Netherlands | Canada | UK | Germany |
| Objective |
|
|
|
|
| Intervention period | Established in 1990, program undergone changes and expansion to comprehensive services in 2000s | 1999–2001 | 2005 – present | 2006 – present |
| Population size | NR | 1230 | 145000 | 69000 |
| Target population | Older adults age 65+ eligible on medical grounds for place in residential home. | Older adults age 64+, community-dwelling, with at least moderate disability | Older adults | All residents |
| Sectors integrated or otherwise involved | Long term care and wellfare services | Two community-based multidisciplinary teams with full clinical responsibility for delivering integrated care through provision of community health and social services and coordination of hospital and long term care. | Primary and secondary care (primary care trust that also took over hospital care and adult social care services, Torbay Council and Torbay Care Trust) | Physicians’ network and health care management company with background in medical sociology and integrated care management. |
| Model of integration and/or theoretical framework | Concept of ‘care-friendly districts’ supported by national policies. | Integrated Services for Frail Elderly delivering integrated social and health services, acute and long term care, community- based and institutional services. | “Bottom up” approach; departed from the creation of integrated health and social care team established in Brixham in 2004. | Triple Aim approach, chronic care model, innovative model of integration in its combination of logistical re-engineering of care processes, IT integration, public health and prevention measures. |
| Initiative | Jönköping County Council | Kaiser Permanente (Southern California) | Nuka System of Care | |
| Country | Sweden | USA | USA | |
| Objective |
|
|
| |
| Intervention period | 1997-present | 1980s-present | 1998 – present | |
| Population size | 340000 | 3.5 million | 65000 plus 10000 people from remote villages | |
| Target population | Residents in geographic area stratified as:
| Insured members, communities and KP’s own employees | All residents in geographic area, including registered patients | |
| Sectors integrated or otherwise involved |
| Ambulatory, urgent and emergency care inpatient, continuing care, and virtual (for example, phone, e-mail, and Internet) settings |
| |
| Care model and/or theoretical framework | Chronic Care Model with a strong focus on quality improvement methods | Fully integrated health maintenance organization with a strong focus on health promotion and disease prevention | Modified Patient-Centered Medical Home |
Table 3
Population health elements1 targeted by integrated population health-based care initiatives.
| Population health elements | Initiatives | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Embrace | Liverpool Healthy Homes | Healthy Housing | Hennepin Health | Maternal and Child Health | North West London ICP | Hartberg | KAPI | Zijloever | SIPA | Torbay ICP | Gesundes Kinzigtal | Nuka | Jönköping City Council | Kaiser Permanente | |
| Focusing on health and wellness, prevention rather than illness | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | |||
| Addressing multiple determinants of health | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • |
| Moving from person to populations | •2 | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | |||||
| Embracing intersectoral action and partnerships | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | |||
| Addressing equity/health disparities/health in vulnerable groups | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | |||
| Understanding needs and solutions through community outreach | • | • | • | • | • | • | |||||||||
| Adopting a long-term approach in care planning and delivery | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | ||||
Table 4
Interventions used to support population health elements and address the social determinants of health.
| Population health elements | Focusing on health and wellness, prevention rather than illness | Addressing the social/multiple determinants of health | Taking a population rather than an individual orientation | Embracing intersectoral action and partnerships | Addressing equity/health disparities/health in vulnerable groups | Understanding needs and solutions through community outreach | Adopting a long-term approach in care planning and delivery |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Determinants of health | Interventions | ||||||
| Income and Social Status |
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Social Support Networks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Education and Literacy |
|
|
|
| |||
| Employment/Working Conditions |
|
|
| ||||
| Social Environments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Physical Environments |
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Personal Health Practices and Coping Skills |
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Healthy Child Development |
|
|
| ||||
| Biology and Genetic Endowment | No interventions noted | ||||||
| Health Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Gender | No gender-specific interventions noted with the exception of interventions for marginalized expectant mothers as part of the Spokane and Clark counties Maternal and Child Health Inequities initiative | ||||||
| Culture |
|
| |||||
Table 5
Level and type of integration, contracting and partnership arrangements.
| Initiative, Country | Level of integration | Type of integration | Contracting model |
|---|---|---|---|
| Torbay, UK | Full |
| Alliance Contracting Model
|
| SIPA, Canada | Full |
| Lead provider/Prime contractor model
|
| Nuka, USA | Full |
| Alliance Contracting Model
|
| NW London ICP, UK | Coordination |
| Alliance Contracting Model
|
| Embrace, the Netherlands | Coordination |
| Alliance Contracting Model
|
| Healthy Housing, NZ | Coordination |
| Alliance Contracting Model
|
| Hennepin, USA | Coordination |
| Accountable Care Organisations
|
| Hartberg, Austria | Coordination |
| Alliance Contracting Model
|
| KAPI, Greece | Coordination |
| Alliance Contracting Model
|
| Zijloever, ND | Coordination |
| Alliance Contracting Model
|
| Gesundes Kinzigtal, Germany | Coordination |
| Outcome-based Contracting and Commissioning
|
| Jönköping County Council, Sweden | Coordination |
| Alliance Contracting Model
|
| Kaiser Permanente (Southern California) | Coordination |
| Alliance Contracting Model
|
| Maternal and Child Health, USA | Linkage |
| Alliance Contracting Model
|
| Healthy Homes, UK | Linkage |
| Alliance Contracting Model
|
