Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Inter-Sectoral Collaboration in Municipal Health Centres: A Multi-Site Qualitative Study of Supporting Organizational Elements and Individual Drivers Cover

Inter-Sectoral Collaboration in Municipal Health Centres: A Multi-Site Qualitative Study of Supporting Organizational Elements and Individual Drivers

International Journal of Integrated Care
Volume 19 (2019): Issue 2
By: Marius Brostrøm Kousgaard,  Christian Elling Scheele and  Karsten Vrangbæk  
Open Access
|Jun 2019

References

  1. 1Valentijn, PP, Schepman, SM, Opheij, W and Bruijnzeels, MA. Understanding integrated care: a comprehensive conceptual framework based on the integrative functions of primary care. International Journal of Integrated Care, 2013; 13(1). DOI: 10.5334/ijic.886
    Back to article
  2. 2Bodenheimer, T. Coordinating Care – A Perilous Journey through the Health Care System. The New England Journal of Medicine, 2008; 358(10): 1064–1071. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMhpr0706165
    Back to article
  3. 3Colmorten, E, Clausen, T and Bengtsson, S. Providing integrated health and social care for older persons in Denmark. In: Leichsenring K, Alaszewski AM, (eds.). Providing integrated health and social care for older persons – A European review of issues at stake, 2004; p. 139–80 Vienna: European Centre and Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
    Back to article
  4. 4Steihaug, S, Paulsen, B and Melby, L. Norwegian general practitioners’ collaboration with municipal care providers – a qualitative study of structural conditions. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 2017; 35(4): 344–351. DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2017.1397264
    Back to article
  5. 5Supper, I, Catala, O, Lustman, M, Chemla, C, Bourgueil, Y and Letrilliart, L. Interprofessional collaboration in primary health care: a review of facilitators and barriers perceived by involved actors. Journal of Public Health, 2014; 37: 716–727. DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdu102
    Back to article
  6. 6Auschra, C. Barriers to the Integration of Care in Inter-Organisational Settings: A Literature Review. International Journal of Integrated Care, 2018; 18(1): 5. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.3068
    Back to article
  7. 7Suter, E, Hyman, M and Oelke, N. Measuring key integration outcomes: A case study of a large urban health center. Health Care Management Review, 2007; 32(3): 226–235. DOI: 10.1097/01.HMR.0000281624.43611.dd
    Back to article
  8. 8Praksisplanudvalget i Region Syddanmark: Praksisplan for almen praksis 2015–18 [Practice Plan for General Practice 2015–18]. Region Syddanmark 2015. [in Danish].
    Back to article
  9. 9Knoben, J and Oerlemans, LA. Proximity and inter-organizational collaboration: A literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2006; 8(2): 71–89. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2006.00121.x
    Back to article
  10. 10Gössling, T. Proximity, trust and morality in networks. European Planning Studies, 2004; 12(5): 675–689. DOI: 10.1080/0965431042000220011
    Back to article
  11. 11Monge, PR, Rothman, LW, Eisenberg, EM, Miller, KI and Kirste, KK. The dynamics of organizational proximity. Management Science, 1985; 31(9): 1129–1141. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.31.9.1129
    Back to article
  12. 12Overbeck, G and Davidsen, AS and Kousgaard MB. Enablers and barriers to implementing collaborative care for anxiety and depression: a systematic qualitative review. Implementation Science, 2016; 11: 165. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-016-0519-y
    Back to article
  13. 13Scheele, C and Vrangbæk, K. Co-location as a Driver for Cross-Sectoral Collaboration with General Practitioners as Coordinators: The Case of a Danish Municipal Health Centre. International Journal of Integrated Care, 2016; 16(4). DOI: 10.5334/ijic.2471
    Back to article
  14. 14Kaehne, A and Catherall, C. Co-located health and social care services in Wales: What are the benefits to professionals? International Journal of Health Care Management, 2012; 5(3): 164–172. DOI: 10.1179/2047971912Y.0000000014
    Back to article
  15. 15Williams, P. Collaboration in public policy and practice: Perspectives on boundary spanners. Bristol: The Policy Press; 2012. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt1t89g31
    Back to article
  16. 16Delaney, FG. Muddling through the middle ground: theoretical concerns in intersectoral collaboration and health promotion. Health Promotion International, 1994; 9(3): 217–225. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/9.3.217
    Back to article
  17. 17D’Amour, D, Goulet, L, Labadie, JF, Martín-Rodriguez, LS and Pineault, R. A model and typology of collaboration between professionals in healthcare organizations. BMC Health Services Research, 2008; 8: 188. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-188
    Back to article
  18. 18Gittell, JH, Godfrey, M and Thistlethwaite, J. Interprofessional collaborative practice and relational coordination: improving healthcare through relationships. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 2013; 27(3): 210–213. DOI: 10.3109/13561820.2012.730564
    Back to article
  19. 19Olejaz, M, Juul Nielsen, A, Rudkjøbing, A, Okkels Birk, H, Krasnik, A and Hernández-Quevedo, C. Denmark health system review. Health Systems in Transition, 2011; 14(2): i–xxii, 1–192.
    Back to article
  20. 20Rudkjøbing, A, Strandberg-Larsen, M, Vrangbæk, K, Andersen, JS and Krasnik, A. Health care agreements as a tool for coordinating health and social services. International Journal of Integrated Care, 2014; 14(4). DOI: 10.5334/ijic.1452
    Back to article
  21. 21Hsieh, HF and Shannon, SE. Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 2005; 15(9): 1277–1288. DOI: 10.1177/1049732305276687
    Back to article
  22. 22Elo, S and Kyngäs, H. The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2008; 62: 107–115. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
    Back to article
  23. 23Act on Research Ethics Review of Health Research Projects. Available from: http://www.nvk.dk/english/act-on-research [cited May 29, 2018].
    Back to article
  24. 24Brunsson, N. The Organization of Hypocrisy. Talk, Decisions and Actions in Organizations, 2nd ed. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget AS; 2006.
    Back to article
  25. 25Meyer, JW and Rowan, B. Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 1977; 83(2): 340–363. DOI: 10.1086/226550
    Back to article
  26. 26Bromley, P and Powell, WW. From Smoke and Mirrors to Walking the Talk: Decoupling in the Contemporary World. Academy of Management Annals, 2012; 6(1): 483–530. DOI: 10.1080/19416520.2012.684462
    Back to article
  27. 27Kousgaard, MB, Joensen, ASK and Thorsen, T. The challenges of boundary spanners in supporting inter-organizational collaboration in primary care – a qualitative study of general practitioners in a new role. BMC Family Practice, 2015; 16: 17. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-015-0231-z
    Back to article
  28. 28Boon, H, Verhoef, M, O’Hara, D and Findlay, B. From parallel practice to integrative health care: a conceptual framework. BMC Health Services Research, 2004; 4(1): 15. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-4-15
    Back to article
  29. 29King, N, Bravington, A, Brooks, J, Melvin, J and Wilde, D. ‘Go Make Your Face Known’: Collaborative Working through the Lens of Personal Relationships. International Journal of Integrated Care, 2017; 17(4): 3. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.2574
    Back to article
  30. 30McDonald, J, Jayasuriya, R and Harris, MF. The influence of power dynamics and trust on multidisciplinary collaboration: a qualitative case study of type 2 diabetes mellitus. BMC Health Services Research, 2012; 12: 63. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-63
    Back to article
  31. 31MacNaughton, K, Chreim, S and Bourgeault, IL. Role construction and boundaries in interprofessional primary health care teams: a qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research, 2013; 13: 486. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-486
    Back to article
  32. 32Pinborg, K. Nær sammenhæng i sundhedshus skaber mening for borgere og sundhedspersoner. [Proximity in health center makes sense for citizens and professionals]. Dagens Medicin 24.08.2017. Available from: https://kommunalsundhed.dk/naer-sammenhaeng-sundhedshus-skaber-mening-patienter-fagpersoner/ [cited March 19, 2018]. [in Danish].
    Back to article
  33. 33Shaw, SE and Rosen, R. Fragmentation: a wicked problem with an integrated solution? Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 2013; 18(1): 61–4. DOI: 10.1258/jhsrp.2012.012002
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.4196 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Jul 4, 2018
Accepted on: May 21, 2019
Published on: Jun 21, 2019
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
collaboration,
general practice,
health centres,
municipalities,
primary care

© 2019 Marius Brostrøm Kousgaard, Christian Elling Scheele, Karsten Vrangbæk, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 19 (2019): Issue 2Next article